Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics

Modern economists do not subscribe to a homogeneous definition of their subject. Surveying definitions of economics from contemporary principles of economics textbooks, we find that economics is the study of the economy, the study of the coordination process, the study of the effects of scarcity, th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of economic perspectives 2009-01, Vol.23 (1), p.221-234
Hauptverfasser: Backhouse, Roger E., Medema, Steven G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 234
container_issue 1
container_start_page 221
container_title The Journal of economic perspectives
container_volume 23
creator Backhouse, Roger E.
Medema, Steven G.
description Modern economists do not subscribe to a homogeneous definition of their subject. Surveying definitions of economics from contemporary principles of economics textbooks, we find that economics is the study of the economy, the study of the coordination process, the study of the effects of scarcity, the science of choice, and the study of human behavior. At a time when economists are tackling subjects as diverse as growth, auctions, crime, and religion with a methodological toolkit that includes real analysis, econometrics, laboratory experiments, and historical case studies, and when they are debating the explanatory roles of rationality and behavioral norms, any concise definition of economics is likely to be inadequate. This lack of agreement on a definition does not necessarily pose a problem for the subject. Economists are generally guided by pragmatic considerations of what works or by methodological views emanating from various sources, not by formal definitions: to repeat the comment attributed to Jacob Viner, economics is what economists do. However, the way the definition of economics has evolved is more than a historical curiosity. At times, definitions are used to justify what economists are doing. Definitions can also reflect the direction in which their authors want to see the subject move and can even influence practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1257/jep.23.1.221
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212073762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27648302</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27648302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b649d30500405970a59abc8ccd179093ff839ed79004b576736d3ae175da4e0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7evArFs62TTD4ab7KuH7CwIHoO3TTFFrepSVbw35tlxbnMHB7m5X0IuaRQUSbU7eCmimFFK8boEZlRzXmptBTHZAa1FiUi6FNyFuMA-5FiRqpXl4KPk7Op_3bxrliPRfpwxYPr-rFPvR8L3xVL60e_7W08Jydd8xndxd-ek_fH5dviuVytn14W96vSYg2p3EiuWwQBwEFoBY3QzcbW1rZUadDYdTVq1-Yb-EYoqVC22DiqRNtwBy3OyfXh7xT8187FZAa_C2OONIwyUKgky9DNAbK5QQyuM1Pot034MRTMXojJQgxDQ00WkvGrAz7E5MM_y5TkNQLDX4KwW0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212073762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>American Economic Association</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Backhouse, Roger E. ; Medema, Steven G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Backhouse, Roger E. ; Medema, Steven G.</creatorcontrib><description>Modern economists do not subscribe to a homogeneous definition of their subject. Surveying definitions of economics from contemporary principles of economics textbooks, we find that economics is the study of the economy, the study of the coordination process, the study of the effects of scarcity, the science of choice, and the study of human behavior. At a time when economists are tackling subjects as diverse as growth, auctions, crime, and religion with a methodological toolkit that includes real analysis, econometrics, laboratory experiments, and historical case studies, and when they are debating the explanatory roles of rationality and behavioral norms, any concise definition of economics is likely to be inadequate. This lack of agreement on a definition does not necessarily pose a problem for the subject. Economists are generally guided by pragmatic considerations of what works or by methodological views emanating from various sources, not by formal definitions: to repeat the comment attributed to Jacob Viner, economics is what economists do. However, the way the definition of economics has evolved is more than a historical curiosity. At times, definitions are used to justify what economists are doing. Definitions can also reflect the direction in which their authors want to see the subject move and can even influence practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-3309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/jep.23.1.221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>19th century ; Behavioral economics ; Definitions ; Economic analysis ; Economic research ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economists ; Features ; Microeconomics ; Morality ; Philosophy ; Political economy ; Rational choice theory ; Scarcity ; Science ; Society ; Studies ; Textbooks ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>The Journal of economic perspectives, 2009-01, Vol.23 (1), p.221-234</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association Winter 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b649d30500405970a59abc8ccd179093ff839ed79004b576736d3ae175da4e0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b649d30500405970a59abc8ccd179093ff839ed79004b576736d3ae175da4e0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27648302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27648302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3735,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Backhouse, Roger E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medema, Steven G.</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics</title><title>The Journal of economic perspectives</title><description>Modern economists do not subscribe to a homogeneous definition of their subject. Surveying definitions of economics from contemporary principles of economics textbooks, we find that economics is the study of the economy, the study of the coordination process, the study of the effects of scarcity, the science of choice, and the study of human behavior. At a time when economists are tackling subjects as diverse as growth, auctions, crime, and religion with a methodological toolkit that includes real analysis, econometrics, laboratory experiments, and historical case studies, and when they are debating the explanatory roles of rationality and behavioral norms, any concise definition of economics is likely to be inadequate. This lack of agreement on a definition does not necessarily pose a problem for the subject. Economists are generally guided by pragmatic considerations of what works or by methodological views emanating from various sources, not by formal definitions: to repeat the comment attributed to Jacob Viner, economics is what economists do. However, the way the definition of economics has evolved is more than a historical curiosity. At times, definitions are used to justify what economists are doing. Definitions can also reflect the direction in which their authors want to see the subject move and can even influence practice.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Behavioral economics</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Features</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Rational choice theory</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0895-3309</issn><issn>1944-7965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7evArFs62TTD4ab7KuH7CwIHoO3TTFFrepSVbw35tlxbnMHB7m5X0IuaRQUSbU7eCmimFFK8boEZlRzXmptBTHZAa1FiUi6FNyFuMA-5FiRqpXl4KPk7Op_3bxrliPRfpwxYPr-rFPvR8L3xVL60e_7W08Jydd8xndxd-ek_fH5dviuVytn14W96vSYg2p3EiuWwQBwEFoBY3QzcbW1rZUadDYdTVq1-Yb-EYoqVC22DiqRNtwBy3OyfXh7xT8187FZAa_C2OONIwyUKgky9DNAbK5QQyuM1Pot034MRTMXojJQgxDQ00WkvGrAz7E5MM_y5TkNQLDX4KwW0Q</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Backhouse, Roger E.</creator><creator>Medema, Steven G.</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>JFNAL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics</title><author>Backhouse, Roger E. ; Medema, Steven G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b649d30500405970a59abc8ccd179093ff839ed79004b576736d3ae175da4e0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Behavioral economics</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Features</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Rational choice theory</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Backhouse, Roger E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medema, Steven G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Jstor Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of economic perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Backhouse, Roger E.</au><au>Medema, Steven G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of economic perspectives</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>221-234</pages><issn>0895-3309</issn><eissn>1944-7965</eissn><abstract>Modern economists do not subscribe to a homogeneous definition of their subject. Surveying definitions of economics from contemporary principles of economics textbooks, we find that economics is the study of the economy, the study of the coordination process, the study of the effects of scarcity, the science of choice, and the study of human behavior. At a time when economists are tackling subjects as diverse as growth, auctions, crime, and religion with a methodological toolkit that includes real analysis, econometrics, laboratory experiments, and historical case studies, and when they are debating the explanatory roles of rationality and behavioral norms, any concise definition of economics is likely to be inadequate. This lack of agreement on a definition does not necessarily pose a problem for the subject. Economists are generally guided by pragmatic considerations of what works or by methodological views emanating from various sources, not by formal definitions: to repeat the comment attributed to Jacob Viner, economics is what economists do. However, the way the definition of economics has evolved is more than a historical curiosity. At times, definitions are used to justify what economists are doing. Definitions can also reflect the direction in which their authors want to see the subject move and can even influence practice.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/jep.23.1.221</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-3309
ispartof The Journal of economic perspectives, 2009-01, Vol.23 (1), p.221-234
issn 0895-3309
1944-7965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_212073762
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3); American Economic Association; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects 19th century
Behavioral economics
Definitions
Economic analysis
Economic research
Economic theory
Economics
Economists
Features
Microeconomics
Morality
Philosophy
Political economy
Rational choice theory
Scarcity
Science
Society
Studies
Textbooks
Wealth
title Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A32%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospectives:%20On%20the%20Definition%20of%20Economics&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20economic%20perspectives&rft.au=Backhouse,%20Roger%20E.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=221-234&rft.issn=0895-3309&rft.eissn=1944-7965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/jep.23.1.221&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27648302%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212073762&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27648302&rfr_iscdi=true