No buck for the bang: revisiting the military-growth nexus

This paper investigates the empirical relationship between military spending and economic growth in a large panel of advanced and developing countries over the period 1984–2014, with a particular focus on whether the growth impact of military expenditures varies with the type and level of security t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Empirica 2018-11, Vol.45 (4), p.639-653
Hauptverfasser: Cevik, Serhan, Ricco, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 653
container_issue 4
container_start_page 639
container_title Empirica
container_volume 45
creator Cevik, Serhan
Ricco, John
description This paper investigates the empirical relationship between military spending and economic growth in a large panel of advanced and developing countries over the period 1984–2014, with a particular focus on whether the growth impact of military expenditures varies with the type and level of security threats. Although there is extensive literature on the military-growth nexus, there is still no consensus on the nature and magnitude of this relationship. Using an expansive dataset and controlling for country-specific effects and potential endogeneity, we revisit this issue and reach two firm conclusions. First, military spending has no statistically significant direct (positive) effect on growth. Second, the nature and level of security threats do not alter the relationship between military spending and growth. Overall, the empirical results documented in the study suggest that military spending is simply not important or large enough in most countries to have a meaningful impact on growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10663-017-9380-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2120688190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2120688190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-4fb5327a12e9bce5091eca5a497939ef337731ff95a04a1ffb7eb1ed8dd1fb583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewisTbMxElsd4cqXlIFG1hbTjpOU9qk2AmPv8clSKxYzUP33hkdxs4RLhFAXgWEohAcUHItFHB1wCaYS8ELjXjIJiCyuJRZdsxOQlgDgI7DhM0eu6QcqtfEdT7pV5SUtq1niaf3JjR909Y_y22zaXrrv3jtu49-lbT0OYRTduTsJtDZb52yl9ub5_k9XzzdPcyvF7wSCnueuTIXqbSYki4rykEjVTa3mZZaaHJCSCnQOZ1byGxsSkkl0lItlxitSkzZxZi7893bQKE3627wbTxpUkyhUAo1RBWOqsp3IXhyZuebbfzZIJg9IjMiMhGR2SMy--R09ISobWvyf8n_m74B8LZozA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2120688190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No buck for the bang: revisiting the military-growth nexus</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cevik, Serhan ; Ricco, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Cevik, Serhan ; Ricco, John</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the empirical relationship between military spending and economic growth in a large panel of advanced and developing countries over the period 1984–2014, with a particular focus on whether the growth impact of military expenditures varies with the type and level of security threats. Although there is extensive literature on the military-growth nexus, there is still no consensus on the nature and magnitude of this relationship. Using an expansive dataset and controlling for country-specific effects and potential endogeneity, we revisit this issue and reach two firm conclusions. First, military spending has no statistically significant direct (positive) effect on growth. Second, the nature and level of security threats do not alter the relationship between military spending and growth. Overall, the empirical results documented in the study suggest that military spending is simply not important or large enough in most countries to have a meaningful impact on growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-8744</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6911</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10663-017-9380-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Defense spending ; Developing countries ; Econometrics ; Economic growth ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; European Integration ; Industrial Organization ; International Economics ; LDCs ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; Original Paper ; Public Finance</subject><ispartof>Empirica, 2018-11, Vol.45 (4), p.639-653</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017</rights><rights>Empirica is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-4fb5327a12e9bce5091eca5a497939ef337731ff95a04a1ffb7eb1ed8dd1fb583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-4fb5327a12e9bce5091eca5a497939ef337731ff95a04a1ffb7eb1ed8dd1fb583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2373-2023</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10663-017-9380-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10663-017-9380-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cevik, Serhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricco, John</creatorcontrib><title>No buck for the bang: revisiting the military-growth nexus</title><title>Empirica</title><addtitle>Empirica</addtitle><description>This paper investigates the empirical relationship between military spending and economic growth in a large panel of advanced and developing countries over the period 1984–2014, with a particular focus on whether the growth impact of military expenditures varies with the type and level of security threats. Although there is extensive literature on the military-growth nexus, there is still no consensus on the nature and magnitude of this relationship. Using an expansive dataset and controlling for country-specific effects and potential endogeneity, we revisit this issue and reach two firm conclusions. First, military spending has no statistically significant direct (positive) effect on growth. Second, the nature and level of security threats do not alter the relationship between military spending and growth. Overall, the empirical results documented in the study suggest that military spending is simply not important or large enough in most countries to have a meaningful impact on growth.</description><subject>Defense spending</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>European Integration</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>International Economics</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><issn>0340-8744</issn><issn>1573-6911</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewisTbMxElsd4cqXlIFG1hbTjpOU9qk2AmPv8clSKxYzUP33hkdxs4RLhFAXgWEohAcUHItFHB1wCaYS8ELjXjIJiCyuJRZdsxOQlgDgI7DhM0eu6QcqtfEdT7pV5SUtq1niaf3JjR909Y_y22zaXrrv3jtu49-lbT0OYRTduTsJtDZb52yl9ub5_k9XzzdPcyvF7wSCnueuTIXqbSYki4rykEjVTa3mZZaaHJCSCnQOZ1byGxsSkkl0lItlxitSkzZxZi7893bQKE3627wbTxpUkyhUAo1RBWOqsp3IXhyZuebbfzZIJg9IjMiMhGR2SMy--R09ISobWvyf8n_m74B8LZozA</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Cevik, Serhan</creator><creator>Ricco, John</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-2023</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>No buck for the bang: revisiting the military-growth nexus</title><author>Cevik, Serhan ; Ricco, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-4fb5327a12e9bce5091eca5a497939ef337731ff95a04a1ffb7eb1ed8dd1fb583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Defense spending</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>European Integration</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>International Economics</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cevik, Serhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricco, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Empirica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cevik, Serhan</au><au>Ricco, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No buck for the bang: revisiting the military-growth nexus</atitle><jtitle>Empirica</jtitle><stitle>Empirica</stitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>639</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>639-653</pages><issn>0340-8744</issn><eissn>1573-6911</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates the empirical relationship between military spending and economic growth in a large panel of advanced and developing countries over the period 1984–2014, with a particular focus on whether the growth impact of military expenditures varies with the type and level of security threats. Although there is extensive literature on the military-growth nexus, there is still no consensus on the nature and magnitude of this relationship. Using an expansive dataset and controlling for country-specific effects and potential endogeneity, we revisit this issue and reach two firm conclusions. First, military spending has no statistically significant direct (positive) effect on growth. Second, the nature and level of security threats do not alter the relationship between military spending and growth. Overall, the empirical results documented in the study suggest that military spending is simply not important or large enough in most countries to have a meaningful impact on growth.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10663-017-9380-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-2023</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-8744
ispartof Empirica, 2018-11, Vol.45 (4), p.639-653
issn 0340-8744
1573-6911
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2120688190
source PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Defense spending
Developing countries
Econometrics
Economic growth
Economics
Economics and Finance
European Integration
Industrial Organization
International Economics
LDCs
Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics
Original Paper
Public Finance
title No buck for the bang: revisiting the military-growth nexus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T17%3A53%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20buck%20for%20the%20bang:%20revisiting%20the%20military-growth%20nexus&rft.jtitle=Empirica&rft.au=Cevik,%20Serhan&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=639&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=639-653&rft.issn=0340-8744&rft.eissn=1573-6911&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10663-017-9380-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2120688190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2120688190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true