Neither Boon nor Bane: The Economic Effects of a Landscape-Scale National Monument
The designation of landscape-scale national monuments has generated intense debate as to whether their regional economic effects are positive or negative. National monuments can restrict land uses, thus favoring economic development based on the low-wage tourism industry relative to higher-wage extr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Land economics 2018-08, Vol.94 (3), p.323-339 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 339 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 323 |
| container_title | Land economics |
| container_volume | 94 |
| creator | Jakus, Paul M. Akhundjanov, Sherzod B. |
| description | The designation of landscape-scale national monuments has generated intense debate as to whether their regional economic effects are positive or negative. National monuments can restrict land uses, thus favoring economic development based on the low-wage tourism industry relative to higher-wage extractive industries. Utah’s Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument has been managed for landscape-scale conservation while protecting existing valid uses. We assess postdesignation trends in the ranching, mining, and tourism industries, after which pre- and postdesignation paths of per capita income are examined using difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods. We conclude that monument designation had no effect on regional per capita income. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3368/le.94.3.323 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2120184944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26538691</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26538691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-345d7904d75c277cadb5fc1f9e3aaeaaa3f369b07199c54a42b5ef96103cbb903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUMtKAzEUDaJgra7EpVBwKTMmuXndpRZfUHShgruQSTPYoZ3UZLrw702p1Ls5d3EenEPIOaM1gDI3y1CjqKEGDgdkxKSAygCXh2REKYdKK8BjcpJzR8tppUfk4iUshq-QJncx9pM-lsf14ZQctW6Zw9kfjsnHw_379KmavT4-T29nlQeEoQIh5xqpmGvpudbezRvZetZiAOeCcw5aUNhQzRC9FE7wRoYWFaPgmwYpjMnVzned4vcm5MF2cZP6Emk545QZgUIU1vWO5VPMOYXWrtNi5dKPZdRue9tlsCgs2NK7sMXeswt-WG1y-LdVaJRh9m27zXYaZqBMwT6L7HIn6_IQ0z6BKwlGIYNfYE5iOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2120184944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neither Boon nor Bane: The Economic Effects of a Landscape-Scale National Monument</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Jakus, Paul M. ; Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jakus, Paul M. ; Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.</creatorcontrib><description>The designation of landscape-scale national monuments has generated intense debate as to whether their regional economic effects are positive or negative. National monuments can restrict land uses, thus favoring economic development based on the low-wage tourism industry relative to higher-wage extractive industries. Utah’s Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument has been managed for landscape-scale conservation while protecting existing valid uses. We assess postdesignation trends in the ranching, mining, and tourism industries, after which pre- and postdesignation paths of per capita income are examined using difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods. We conclude that monument designation had no effect on regional per capita income.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-7639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-8325</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3368/le.94.3.323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: University of Wisconsin Press</publisher><subject>Conservation ; Control methods ; Economic development ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Income ; Land use ; Landscape ; Landscaping ; Memorials & monuments ; Mining ; Monuments ; National monuments ; Regional development ; Regions ; Tourism</subject><ispartof>Land economics, 2018-08, Vol.94 (3), p.323-339</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System</rights><rights>Copyright by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Wisconsin Press Aug 1, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-345d7904d75c277cadb5fc1f9e3aaeaaa3f369b07199c54a42b5ef96103cbb903</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26538691$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26538691$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27843,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jakus, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.</creatorcontrib><title>Neither Boon nor Bane: The Economic Effects of a Landscape-Scale National Monument</title><title>Land economics</title><description>The designation of landscape-scale national monuments has generated intense debate as to whether their regional economic effects are positive or negative. National monuments can restrict land uses, thus favoring economic development based on the low-wage tourism industry relative to higher-wage extractive industries. Utah’s Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument has been managed for landscape-scale conservation while protecting existing valid uses. We assess postdesignation trends in the ranching, mining, and tourism industries, after which pre- and postdesignation paths of per capita income are examined using difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods. We conclude that monument designation had no effect on regional per capita income.</description><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscaping</subject><subject>Memorials & monuments</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Monuments</subject><subject>National monuments</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><issn>0023-7639</issn><issn>1543-8325</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUMtKAzEUDaJgra7EpVBwKTMmuXndpRZfUHShgruQSTPYoZ3UZLrw702p1Ls5d3EenEPIOaM1gDI3y1CjqKEGDgdkxKSAygCXh2REKYdKK8BjcpJzR8tppUfk4iUshq-QJncx9pM-lsf14ZQctW6Zw9kfjsnHw_379KmavT4-T29nlQeEoQIh5xqpmGvpudbezRvZetZiAOeCcw5aUNhQzRC9FE7wRoYWFaPgmwYpjMnVzned4vcm5MF2cZP6Emk545QZgUIU1vWO5VPMOYXWrtNi5dKPZdRue9tlsCgs2NK7sMXeswt-WG1y-LdVaJRh9m27zXYaZqBMwT6L7HIn6_IQ0z6BKwlGIYNfYE5iOA</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Jakus, Paul M.</creator><creator>Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.</creator><general>University of Wisconsin Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Neither Boon nor Bane</title><author>Jakus, Paul M. ; Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-345d7904d75c277cadb5fc1f9e3aaeaaa3f369b07199c54a42b5ef96103cbb903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscaping</topic><topic>Memorials & monuments</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Monuments</topic><topic>National monuments</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jakus, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Land economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jakus, Paul M.</au><au>Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neither Boon nor Bane: The Economic Effects of a Landscape-Scale National Monument</atitle><jtitle>Land economics</jtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>323-339</pages><issn>0023-7639</issn><eissn>1543-8325</eissn><abstract>The designation of landscape-scale national monuments has generated intense debate as to whether their regional economic effects are positive or negative. National monuments can restrict land uses, thus favoring economic development based on the low-wage tourism industry relative to higher-wage extractive industries. Utah’s Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument has been managed for landscape-scale conservation while protecting existing valid uses. We assess postdesignation trends in the ranching, mining, and tourism industries, after which pre- and postdesignation paths of per capita income are examined using difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods. We conclude that monument designation had no effect on regional per capita income.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>University of Wisconsin Press</pub><doi>10.3368/le.94.3.323</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-7639 |
| ispartof | Land economics, 2018-08, Vol.94 (3), p.323-339 |
| issn | 0023-7639 1543-8325 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2120184944 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Conservation Control methods Economic development Economic impact Economics Income Land use Landscape Landscaping Memorials & monuments Mining Monuments National monuments Regional development Regions Tourism |
| title | Neither Boon nor Bane: The Economic Effects of a Landscape-Scale National Monument |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neither%20Boon%20nor%20Bane:%20The%20Economic%20Effects%20of%20a%20Landscape-Scale%20National%20Monument&rft.jtitle=Land%20economics&rft.au=Jakus,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=323-339&rft.issn=0023-7639&rft.eissn=1543-8325&rft_id=info:doi/10.3368/le.94.3.323&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26538691%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2120184944&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26538691&rfr_iscdi=true |