THE HIERARCHY OF COURT ADMINISTRATION

THE HIERARCHY OF COURT ADMINISTRATION

Government often struggles with priorities when budgets must be cut. Often, both courts and officials in the two other branches search statutes and rules for "mandates" for what courts must do and, indirectly, what is not essential. Neither statutes nor court rules embrace all that courts...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of organization theory and behavior 2008-10, Vol.11 (3), p.381
1. Verfasser: Aikman, Alexander B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Courts
Hierarchies
Priorities
Public administration
Studies
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 381
container_title International journal of organization theory and behavior
container_volume 11
creator Aikman, Alexander B
description Government often struggles with priorities when budgets must be cut. Often, both courts and officials in the two other branches search statutes and rules for "mandates" for what courts must do and, indirectly, what is not essential. Neither statutes nor court rules embrace all that courts must do to fulfill their adjudicatory mission plus be a viable branch of government. Nor do they suggest priorities when cuts are needed. The Hierarchy of Court Administration establishes priorities by drawing parallels between Maslows hierarchy of needs for humans and the institutional needs of courts. Most critically, it defines courts' mission critical needs as a parallel to Maslow's physiological needs of humans, but then also suggests priorities after those needs are met.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212017813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1536919911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2120178133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDU20jUxMjdmAbINLI11TUyNzTkYuIqLswwMDIyNLM04GVRDPFwVPDxdgxyDnD0iFfzdFJz9Q4NCFBxdfD39PINDghxDPP39eBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRHlAq3sjQyMDQ3MLQ2JgoRQDXEiwB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212017813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE HIERARCHY OF COURT ADMINISTRATION</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Aikman, Alexander B</creator><creatorcontrib>Aikman, Alexander B</creatorcontrib><description>Government often struggles with priorities when budgets must be cut. Often, both courts and officials in the two other branches search statutes and rules for "mandates" for what courts must do and, indirectly, what is not essential. Neither statutes nor court rules embrace all that courts must do to fulfill their adjudicatory mission plus be a viable branch of government. Nor do they suggest priorities when cuts are needed. The Hierarchy of Court Administration establishes priorities by drawing parallels between Maslows hierarchy of needs for humans and the institutional needs of courts. Most critically, it defines courts' mission critical needs as a parallel to Maslow's physiological needs of humans, but then also suggests priorities after those needs are met.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-4537</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boca Raton: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Courts ; Hierarchies ; Priorities ; Public administration ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of organization theory and behavior, 2008-10, Vol.11 (3), p.381</ispartof><rights>Copyright PrAcademics Press, Florida Atlantic University Fall 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aikman, Alexander B</creatorcontrib><title>THE HIERARCHY OF COURT ADMINISTRATION</title><title>International journal of organization theory and behavior</title><description>Government often struggles with priorities when budgets must be cut. Often, both courts and officials in the two other branches search statutes and rules for "mandates" for what courts must do and, indirectly, what is not essential. Neither statutes nor court rules embrace all that courts must do to fulfill their adjudicatory mission plus be a viable branch of government. Nor do they suggest priorities when cuts are needed. The Hierarchy of Court Administration establishes priorities by drawing parallels between Maslows hierarchy of needs for humans and the institutional needs of courts. Most critically, it defines courts' mission critical needs as a parallel to Maslow's physiological needs of humans, but then also suggests priorities after those needs are met.</description><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1093-4537</issn><issn>1532-4273</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDU20jUxMjdmAbINLI11TUyNzTkYuIqLswwMDIyNLM04GVRDPFwVPDxdgxyDnD0iFfzdFJz9Q4NCFBxdfD39PINDghxDPP39eBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRHlAq3sjQyMDQ3MLQ2JgoRQDXEiwB</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Aikman, Alexander B</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>THE HIERARCHY OF COURT ADMINISTRATION</title><author>Aikman, Alexander B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2120178133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aikman, Alexander B</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of organization theory and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aikman, Alexander B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE HIERARCHY OF COURT ADMINISTRATION</atitle><jtitle>International journal of organization theory and behavior</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>381</spage><pages>381-</pages><issn>1093-4537</issn><eissn>1532-4273</eissn><abstract>Government often struggles with priorities when budgets must be cut. Often, both courts and officials in the two other branches search statutes and rules for "mandates" for what courts must do and, indirectly, what is not essential. Neither statutes nor court rules embrace all that courts must do to fulfill their adjudicatory mission plus be a viable branch of government. Nor do they suggest priorities when cuts are needed. The Hierarchy of Court Administration establishes priorities by drawing parallels between Maslows hierarchy of needs for humans and the institutional needs of courts. Most critically, it defines courts' mission critical needs as a parallel to Maslow's physiological needs of humans, but then also suggests priorities after those needs are met.</abstract><cop>Boca Raton</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-4537
ispartof International journal of organization theory and behavior, 2008-10, Vol.11 (3), p.381
issn 1093-4537
1532-4273
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_212017813
source Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Courts
Hierarchies
Priorities
Public administration
Studies
title THE HIERARCHY OF COURT ADMINISTRATION
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A30%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20HIERARCHY%20OF%20COURT%20ADMINISTRATION&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20organization%20theory%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Aikman,%20Alexander%20B&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=381&rft.pages=381-&rft.issn=1093-4537&rft.eissn=1532-4273&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1536919911%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212017813&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true