Wendt's Violation of the Constructivist Project: Agency and Why a World State is Not Inevitable/Agency, Teleology and the World State: A Reply to Shannon
The logic of anarchy and the struggle for recognition push humanity inexorably toward a single global state with a monopoly on legitimate force. Alexander Wendt's teleology goes through five stage -- from a Hobbesian 'system of states'; to a Lockean 'society of states'; to a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of international relations 2005-12, Vol.11 (4), p.581 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 581 |
container_title | European journal of international relations |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Shannon, Vaughn P Wendt, Alexander |
description | The logic of anarchy and the struggle for recognition push humanity inexorably toward a single global state with a monopoly on legitimate force. Alexander Wendt's teleology goes through five stage -- from a Hobbesian 'system of states'; to a Lockean 'society of states'; to a 'world society'; to a 'collective security' system of one for all and all for one; and to a world state -- whereby the authority to use force and recognize peoples resides with a world government alone. Vaughn Shannon thinks that teleology 'conceptually denies' agency and undermines it in practice. Teleological thinking brings three things to the understanding of world politics -- an awareness of how the agency of each of the people , every day, contributes (or not) to the eventual end-state of the system; a hope that world state will one day be a reality; and the belief that like individuals, collectives too can decide their own fate. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211998209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>961001941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2119982093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNT01Lw0AQXcSCVfsfBi9eDO42bWy8SVH0ImKLOZZtMm02LDN1d1LoT_HfulIPHj29B--Ld6KGZlLoLL8z-Wni-XSS6aIwZ-o8xk5rPTOmHKqvCqmR6wgfjr0VxwS8AWkR5kxRQl-L27so8Ba4w1ru4WGLVB_AUgNVmxAqDr6BhVhBcBFeWeCFcO_Erj3eHu03sESP7Hl7TP4M_MmlVnjHnT-AMCxaS8R0qQYb6yOOfvFCXT09LufP2S7wZ49RVh33gZK0Gqcr5Wysy_xfpm-5oVju</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211998209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wendt's Violation of the Constructivist Project: Agency and Why a World State is Not Inevitable/Agency, Teleology and the World State: A Reply to Shannon</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Shannon, Vaughn P ; Wendt, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Shannon, Vaughn P ; Wendt, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>The logic of anarchy and the struggle for recognition push humanity inexorably toward a single global state with a monopoly on legitimate force. Alexander Wendt's teleology goes through five stage -- from a Hobbesian 'system of states'; to a Lockean 'society of states'; to a 'world society'; to a 'collective security' system of one for all and all for one; and to a world state -- whereby the authority to use force and recognize peoples resides with a world government alone. Vaughn Shannon thinks that teleology 'conceptually denies' agency and undermines it in practice. Teleological thinking brings three things to the understanding of world politics -- an awareness of how the agency of each of the people , every day, contributes (or not) to the eventual end-state of the system; a hope that world state will one day be a reality; and the belief that like individuals, collectives too can decide their own fate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-0661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Sage Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Free will ; International relations ; Logic ; Political science ; Political theory ; Society ; Sovereignty ; Teleology</subject><ispartof>European journal of international relations, 2005-12, Vol.11 (4), p.581</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Dec 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shannon, Vaughn P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Wendt's Violation of the Constructivist Project: Agency and Why a World State is Not Inevitable/Agency, Teleology and the World State: A Reply to Shannon</title><title>European journal of international relations</title><description>The logic of anarchy and the struggle for recognition push humanity inexorably toward a single global state with a monopoly on legitimate force. Alexander Wendt's teleology goes through five stage -- from a Hobbesian 'system of states'; to a Lockean 'society of states'; to a 'world society'; to a 'collective security' system of one for all and all for one; and to a world state -- whereby the authority to use force and recognize peoples resides with a world government alone. Vaughn Shannon thinks that teleology 'conceptually denies' agency and undermines it in practice. Teleological thinking brings three things to the understanding of world politics -- an awareness of how the agency of each of the people , every day, contributes (or not) to the eventual end-state of the system; a hope that world state will one day be a reality; and the belief that like individuals, collectives too can decide their own fate.</description><subject>Free will</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Teleology</subject><issn>1354-0661</issn><issn>1460-3713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNT01Lw0AQXcSCVfsfBi9eDO42bWy8SVH0ImKLOZZtMm02LDN1d1LoT_HfulIPHj29B--Ld6KGZlLoLL8z-Wni-XSS6aIwZ-o8xk5rPTOmHKqvCqmR6wgfjr0VxwS8AWkR5kxRQl-L27so8Ba4w1ru4WGLVB_AUgNVmxAqDr6BhVhBcBFeWeCFcO_Erj3eHu03sESP7Hl7TP4M_MmlVnjHnT-AMCxaS8R0qQYb6yOOfvFCXT09LufP2S7wZ49RVh33gZK0Gqcr5Wysy_xfpm-5oVju</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Shannon, Vaughn P</creator><creator>Wendt, Alexander</creator><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Wendt's Violation of the Constructivist Project: Agency and Why a World State is Not Inevitable/Agency, Teleology and the World State: A Reply to Shannon</title><author>Shannon, Vaughn P ; Wendt, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2119982093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Free will</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Teleology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shannon, Vaughn P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of international relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shannon, Vaughn P</au><au>Wendt, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wendt's Violation of the Constructivist Project: Agency and Why a World State is Not Inevitable/Agency, Teleology and the World State: A Reply to Shannon</atitle><jtitle>European journal of international relations</jtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>581</spage><pages>581-</pages><issn>1354-0661</issn><eissn>1460-3713</eissn><abstract>The logic of anarchy and the struggle for recognition push humanity inexorably toward a single global state with a monopoly on legitimate force. Alexander Wendt's teleology goes through five stage -- from a Hobbesian 'system of states'; to a Lockean 'society of states'; to a 'world society'; to a 'collective security' system of one for all and all for one; and to a world state -- whereby the authority to use force and recognize peoples resides with a world government alone. Vaughn Shannon thinks that teleology 'conceptually denies' agency and undermines it in practice. Teleological thinking brings three things to the understanding of world politics -- an awareness of how the agency of each of the people , every day, contributes (or not) to the eventual end-state of the system; a hope that world state will one day be a reality; and the belief that like individuals, collectives too can decide their own fate.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Sage Publications Ltd</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-0661 |
ispartof | European journal of international relations, 2005-12, Vol.11 (4), p.581 |
issn | 1354-0661 1460-3713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_211998209 |
source | Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Free will International relations Logic Political science Political theory Society Sovereignty Teleology |
title | Wendt's Violation of the Constructivist Project: Agency and Why a World State is Not Inevitable/Agency, Teleology and the World State: A Reply to Shannon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A19%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wendt's%20Violation%20of%20the%20Constructivist%20Project:%20Agency%20and%20Why%20a%20World%20State%20is%20Not%20Inevitable/Agency,%20Teleology%20and%20the%20World%20State:%20A%20Reply%20to%20Shannon&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20international%20relations&rft.au=Shannon,%20Vaughn%20P&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=581&rft.pages=581-&rft.issn=1354-0661&rft.eissn=1460-3713&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E961001941%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211998209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |