Service oriented architecture maturity models: A systematic literature review
In recent years, the maturity model research has gained wide acceptance in the area of information systems and many Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) maturity models have been proposed. However, there are limited empirical studies on in-depth analysis and validation of SOA Maturity Models (SOAMMs)...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Computer standards and interfaces 2019-01, Vol.61, p.65-76 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 76 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 65 |
| container_title | Computer standards and interfaces |
| container_volume | 61 |
| creator | Pulparambil, Supriya Baghdadi, Youcef |
| description | In recent years, the maturity model research has gained wide acceptance in the area of information systems and many Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) maturity models have been proposed. However, there are limited empirical studies on in-depth analysis and validation of SOA Maturity Models (SOAMMs).
The objective is to present a comprehensive comparison of existing SOAMMs to identify the areas of improvement and the research opportunities.
A systematic literature review is conducted to explore the SOA adoption maturity studies.
A total of 20 unique SOAMMs are identified and analyzed in detail. A comparison framework is defined based on SOAMM design and usage support. The results provide guidance for SOA practitioners who are involved in selection, design, and implementation of SOAMMs.
Although all SOAMMs propose a measurement framework, only a few SOAMMs provide guidance for selecting and prioritizing improvement measures. The current state of research shows that a gap exists in both prescriptive and descriptive purpose of SOAMM usage and it indicates the need for further research. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.csi.2018.05.001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2119943860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092054891730418X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2119943860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e836eaf6044e30f48026325d715dad87c92e24966edcd820b3bab1ef42856af53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscU5Y24njwKmq-JOKOABny7U3wlHbFNsF9e1xKGdOK41mdnc-Qi4ZlAyYvO5LG33JgakS6hKAHZEJUw0vmiwdkwm0HIq6Uu0pOYuxBwAuRTMhz68YvrxFOgSPm4SOmmA_fEKbdgHp2uTh056uB4ereENnNO5jwqx7S1fZF8yvMeCXx-9zctKZVcSLvzkl7_d3b_PHYvHy8DSfLQorpEoFKiHRdBKqCgV0lRqf4bVrWO2MU41tOfKqlRKddYrDUizNkmFXcVVL09ViSq4Oe7dh-NxhTLofdmGTT2rOWNtWQknILnZw2TDEGLDT2-DXJuw1Az1S073O1PRITUOtM7WcuT1kctuxUtDRZjAWnQ-ZiXaD_yf9A5QCdao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2119943860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Service oriented architecture maturity models: A systematic literature review</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pulparambil, Supriya ; Baghdadi, Youcef</creator><creatorcontrib>Pulparambil, Supriya ; Baghdadi, Youcef</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the maturity model research has gained wide acceptance in the area of information systems and many Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) maturity models have been proposed. However, there are limited empirical studies on in-depth analysis and validation of SOA Maturity Models (SOAMMs).
The objective is to present a comprehensive comparison of existing SOAMMs to identify the areas of improvement and the research opportunities.
A systematic literature review is conducted to explore the SOA adoption maturity studies.
A total of 20 unique SOAMMs are identified and analyzed in detail. A comparison framework is defined based on SOAMM design and usage support. The results provide guidance for SOA practitioners who are involved in selection, design, and implementation of SOAMMs.
Although all SOAMMs propose a measurement framework, only a few SOAMMs provide guidance for selecting and prioritizing improvement measures. The current state of research shows that a gap exists in both prescriptive and descriptive purpose of SOAMM usage and it indicates the need for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-5489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7018</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2018.05.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Descriptive purpose ; Empirical analysis ; Identification methods ; Literature review ; Literature reviews ; Prescriptive purpose ; Service oriented architecture ; SOA Maturity Model ; SOAMM ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>Computer standards and interfaces, 2019-01, Vol.61, p.65-76</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e836eaf6044e30f48026325d715dad87c92e24966edcd820b3bab1ef42856af53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e836eaf6044e30f48026325d715dad87c92e24966edcd820b3bab1ef42856af53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5728-5551</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.05.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pulparambil, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baghdadi, Youcef</creatorcontrib><title>Service oriented architecture maturity models: A systematic literature review</title><title>Computer standards and interfaces</title><description>In recent years, the maturity model research has gained wide acceptance in the area of information systems and many Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) maturity models have been proposed. However, there are limited empirical studies on in-depth analysis and validation of SOA Maturity Models (SOAMMs).
The objective is to present a comprehensive comparison of existing SOAMMs to identify the areas of improvement and the research opportunities.
A systematic literature review is conducted to explore the SOA adoption maturity studies.
A total of 20 unique SOAMMs are identified and analyzed in detail. A comparison framework is defined based on SOAMM design and usage support. The results provide guidance for SOA practitioners who are involved in selection, design, and implementation of SOAMMs.
Although all SOAMMs propose a measurement framework, only a few SOAMMs provide guidance for selecting and prioritizing improvement measures. The current state of research shows that a gap exists in both prescriptive and descriptive purpose of SOAMM usage and it indicates the need for further research.</description><subject>Descriptive purpose</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Literature review</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Prescriptive purpose</subject><subject>Service oriented architecture</subject><subject>SOA Maturity Model</subject><subject>SOAMM</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0920-5489</issn><issn>1872-7018</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscU5Y24njwKmq-JOKOABny7U3wlHbFNsF9e1xKGdOK41mdnc-Qi4ZlAyYvO5LG33JgakS6hKAHZEJUw0vmiwdkwm0HIq6Uu0pOYuxBwAuRTMhz68YvrxFOgSPm4SOmmA_fEKbdgHp2uTh056uB4ereENnNO5jwqx7S1fZF8yvMeCXx-9zctKZVcSLvzkl7_d3b_PHYvHy8DSfLQorpEoFKiHRdBKqCgV0lRqf4bVrWO2MU41tOfKqlRKddYrDUizNkmFXcVVL09ViSq4Oe7dh-NxhTLofdmGTT2rOWNtWQknILnZw2TDEGLDT2-DXJuw1Az1S073O1PRITUOtM7WcuT1kctuxUtDRZjAWnQ-ZiXaD_yf9A5QCdao</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Pulparambil, Supriya</creator><creator>Baghdadi, Youcef</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-5551</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Service oriented architecture maturity models: A systematic literature review</title><author>Pulparambil, Supriya ; Baghdadi, Youcef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e836eaf6044e30f48026325d715dad87c92e24966edcd820b3bab1ef42856af53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Descriptive purpose</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Literature review</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Prescriptive purpose</topic><topic>Service oriented architecture</topic><topic>SOA Maturity Model</topic><topic>SOAMM</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pulparambil, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baghdadi, Youcef</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computer standards and interfaces</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pulparambil, Supriya</au><au>Baghdadi, Youcef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Service oriented architecture maturity models: A systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Computer standards and interfaces</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>61</volume><spage>65</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>65-76</pages><issn>0920-5489</issn><eissn>1872-7018</eissn><abstract>In recent years, the maturity model research has gained wide acceptance in the area of information systems and many Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) maturity models have been proposed. However, there are limited empirical studies on in-depth analysis and validation of SOA Maturity Models (SOAMMs).
The objective is to present a comprehensive comparison of existing SOAMMs to identify the areas of improvement and the research opportunities.
A systematic literature review is conducted to explore the SOA adoption maturity studies.
A total of 20 unique SOAMMs are identified and analyzed in detail. A comparison framework is defined based on SOAMM design and usage support. The results provide guidance for SOA practitioners who are involved in selection, design, and implementation of SOAMMs.
Although all SOAMMs propose a measurement framework, only a few SOAMMs provide guidance for selecting and prioritizing improvement measures. The current state of research shows that a gap exists in both prescriptive and descriptive purpose of SOAMM usage and it indicates the need for further research.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.csi.2018.05.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-5551</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0920-5489 |
| ispartof | Computer standards and interfaces, 2019-01, Vol.61, p.65-76 |
| issn | 0920-5489 1872-7018 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2119943860 |
| source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Descriptive purpose Empirical analysis Identification methods Literature review Literature reviews Prescriptive purpose Service oriented architecture SOA Maturity Model SOAMM Validation studies |
| title | Service oriented architecture maturity models: A systematic literature review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T15%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Service%20oriented%20architecture%20maturity%20models:%20A%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Computer%20standards%20and%20interfaces&rft.au=Pulparambil,%20Supriya&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=61&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=65-76&rft.issn=0920-5489&rft.eissn=1872-7018&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.csi.2018.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2119943860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2119943860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S092054891730418X&rfr_iscdi=true |