Comparison of the Quality of Chitin and Chitosan from Shrimp, Crab and Squilla Waste

Chitin and Chitosan obtained from the crustaceans are having more biological value such as physiological compatibility, non-toxicity, bio digestibility, adsorption and chelating capacity. These biological values of chitosan depend on the quality parameters which are directly related to the source of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current world environment 2017-12, Vol.12 (3), p.670-677
Hauptverfasser: Parthiban, F., Balasundari, S., Gopalakannan, A., Rathnakumar, K., Felix, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 677
container_issue 3
container_start_page 670
container_title Current world environment
container_volume 12
creator Parthiban, F.
Balasundari, S.
Gopalakannan, A.
Rathnakumar, K.
Felix, S.
description Chitin and Chitosan obtained from the crustaceans are having more biological value such as physiological compatibility, non-toxicity, bio digestibility, adsorption and chelating capacity. These biological values of chitosan depend on the quality parameters which are directly related to the source of the raw material. In this study, three commercially available crustacean shell waste such as shrimp, crab and squilla were used for the extraction of chitin and chitosan. The chemical treatment of demineralization, deproteinization and deacetylation were used for the production of chitosan. The viscosity quality parameter of the shrimp chitosan (5300cPs) was better than the crab and squilla chitosan. It is due the high solubility (97.65%) of the shrimp chitosan in 1% acetic acid. The degree of deacetylation of the shrimp chitosan (81.24%) directly relates the solubility of the chitosan. The chitosan with these quality parameters considered to be the excellent biological value. The yield of shrimp chitosan (15.4%) was also more when compare to crab and squilla chitosan. These result showed that utilisation of shrimp shell waste for the production of chitin and chitosan will give more economical and biological value along with reduction of environmental pollution.
doi_str_mv 10.12944/CWE.12.3.18
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2119941321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2119941321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1468-4bc3c7bf3bb78304fa7f44202f201962611bc2ccd15dc5d90d757706fddbd5a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNrQ8g6DVOtZJsWcdi0h8IlJKUHIUsWcTBsRzJPuTtq6bdy37LDjvLIPQIZAVUcv5c7deJVmwF5Q2aUUZJVhIGt2hGpGAZl1Teo0WMR5JKcpJLOkO7yp8GHdroe-wdHg8N_pp0146X37E6tGPbY93bK_qoe-yCP-HtIbSnYYmroOvrenue2q7TeK_j2DygO6e72Cz--xx9v6531Xu2-Xz7qF42mQFelBmvDTOidqyuRckId1o4zimhjhKQBS0AakONsZBbk1tJrMiFIIWztra55myOnv7uDsGfpyaO6uin0CdLRQGk5MAoJNXyT2WCjzE0Tg3peR0uCoi6RqdSdIkUU1CyH3IjX5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2119941321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Quality of Chitin and Chitosan from Shrimp, Crab and Squilla Waste</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Parthiban, F. ; Balasundari, S. ; Gopalakannan, A. ; Rathnakumar, K. ; Felix, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parthiban, F. ; Balasundari, S. ; Gopalakannan, A. ; Rathnakumar, K. ; Felix, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Chitin and Chitosan obtained from the crustaceans are having more biological value such as physiological compatibility, non-toxicity, bio digestibility, adsorption and chelating capacity. These biological values of chitosan depend on the quality parameters which are directly related to the source of the raw material. In this study, three commercially available crustacean shell waste such as shrimp, crab and squilla were used for the extraction of chitin and chitosan. The chemical treatment of demineralization, deproteinization and deacetylation were used for the production of chitosan. The viscosity quality parameter of the shrimp chitosan (5300cPs) was better than the crab and squilla chitosan. It is due the high solubility (97.65%) of the shrimp chitosan in 1% acetic acid. The degree of deacetylation of the shrimp chitosan (81.24%) directly relates the solubility of the chitosan. The chitosan with these quality parameters considered to be the excellent biological value. The yield of shrimp chitosan (15.4%) was also more when compare to crab and squilla chitosan. These result showed that utilisation of shrimp shell waste for the production of chitin and chitosan will give more economical and biological value along with reduction of environmental pollution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-4929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2320-8031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12944/CWE.12.3.18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bhopal: Enviro Research Publishers</publisher><subject>Acetic acid ; Biocompatibility ; Chelation ; Chemical treatment ; Chitin ; Chitosan ; Crabs ; Crustaceans ; Deacetylation ; Demineralization ; Demineralizing ; Deproteinization ; Digestibility ; Organic chemistry ; Parameters ; Pollution control ; Solubility ; Toxicity ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>Current world environment, 2017-12, Vol.12 (3), p.670-677</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is licensed underhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/(“License). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1468-4bc3c7bf3bb78304fa7f44202f201962611bc2ccd15dc5d90d757706fddbd5a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1468-4bc3c7bf3bb78304fa7f44202f201962611bc2ccd15dc5d90d757706fddbd5a43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9079-2085</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parthiban, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasundari, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopalakannan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathnakumar, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felix, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Quality of Chitin and Chitosan from Shrimp, Crab and Squilla Waste</title><title>Current world environment</title><description>Chitin and Chitosan obtained from the crustaceans are having more biological value such as physiological compatibility, non-toxicity, bio digestibility, adsorption and chelating capacity. These biological values of chitosan depend on the quality parameters which are directly related to the source of the raw material. In this study, three commercially available crustacean shell waste such as shrimp, crab and squilla were used for the extraction of chitin and chitosan. The chemical treatment of demineralization, deproteinization and deacetylation were used for the production of chitosan. The viscosity quality parameter of the shrimp chitosan (5300cPs) was better than the crab and squilla chitosan. It is due the high solubility (97.65%) of the shrimp chitosan in 1% acetic acid. The degree of deacetylation of the shrimp chitosan (81.24%) directly relates the solubility of the chitosan. The chitosan with these quality parameters considered to be the excellent biological value. The yield of shrimp chitosan (15.4%) was also more when compare to crab and squilla chitosan. These result showed that utilisation of shrimp shell waste for the production of chitin and chitosan will give more economical and biological value along with reduction of environmental pollution.</description><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Chelation</subject><subject>Chemical treatment</subject><subject>Chitin</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Crabs</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Deacetylation</subject><subject>Demineralization</subject><subject>Demineralizing</subject><subject>Deproteinization</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Solubility</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>0973-4929</issn><issn>2320-8031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotkM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNrQ8g6DVOtZJsWcdi0h8IlJKUHIUsWcTBsRzJPuTtq6bdy37LDjvLIPQIZAVUcv5c7deJVmwF5Q2aUUZJVhIGt2hGpGAZl1Teo0WMR5JKcpJLOkO7yp8GHdroe-wdHg8N_pp0146X37E6tGPbY93bK_qoe-yCP-HtIbSnYYmroOvrenue2q7TeK_j2DygO6e72Cz--xx9v6531Xu2-Xz7qF42mQFelBmvDTOidqyuRckId1o4zimhjhKQBS0AakONsZBbk1tJrMiFIIWztra55myOnv7uDsGfpyaO6uin0CdLRQGk5MAoJNXyT2WCjzE0Tg3peR0uCoi6RqdSdIkUU1CyH3IjX5I</recordid><startdate>20171227</startdate><enddate>20171227</enddate><creator>Parthiban, F.</creator><creator>Balasundari, S.</creator><creator>Gopalakannan, A.</creator><creator>Rathnakumar, K.</creator><creator>Felix, S.</creator><general>Enviro Research Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9079-2085</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171227</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Quality of Chitin and Chitosan from Shrimp, Crab and Squilla Waste</title><author>Parthiban, F. ; Balasundari, S. ; Gopalakannan, A. ; Rathnakumar, K. ; Felix, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1468-4bc3c7bf3bb78304fa7f44202f201962611bc2ccd15dc5d90d757706fddbd5a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Chelation</topic><topic>Chemical treatment</topic><topic>Chitin</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Crabs</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Deacetylation</topic><topic>Demineralization</topic><topic>Demineralizing</topic><topic>Deproteinization</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Solubility</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parthiban, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasundari, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopalakannan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathnakumar, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felix, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Current world environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parthiban, F.</au><au>Balasundari, S.</au><au>Gopalakannan, A.</au><au>Rathnakumar, K.</au><au>Felix, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Quality of Chitin and Chitosan from Shrimp, Crab and Squilla Waste</atitle><jtitle>Current world environment</jtitle><date>2017-12-27</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>670-677</pages><issn>0973-4929</issn><eissn>2320-8031</eissn><abstract>Chitin and Chitosan obtained from the crustaceans are having more biological value such as physiological compatibility, non-toxicity, bio digestibility, adsorption and chelating capacity. These biological values of chitosan depend on the quality parameters which are directly related to the source of the raw material. In this study, three commercially available crustacean shell waste such as shrimp, crab and squilla were used for the extraction of chitin and chitosan. The chemical treatment of demineralization, deproteinization and deacetylation were used for the production of chitosan. The viscosity quality parameter of the shrimp chitosan (5300cPs) was better than the crab and squilla chitosan. It is due the high solubility (97.65%) of the shrimp chitosan in 1% acetic acid. The degree of deacetylation of the shrimp chitosan (81.24%) directly relates the solubility of the chitosan. The chitosan with these quality parameters considered to be the excellent biological value. The yield of shrimp chitosan (15.4%) was also more when compare to crab and squilla chitosan. These result showed that utilisation of shrimp shell waste for the production of chitin and chitosan will give more economical and biological value along with reduction of environmental pollution.</abstract><cop>Bhopal</cop><pub>Enviro Research Publishers</pub><doi>10.12944/CWE.12.3.18</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9079-2085</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0973-4929
ispartof Current world environment, 2017-12, Vol.12 (3), p.670-677
issn 0973-4929
2320-8031
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2119941321
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Acetic acid
Biocompatibility
Chelation
Chemical treatment
Chitin
Chitosan
Crabs
Crustaceans
Deacetylation
Demineralization
Demineralizing
Deproteinization
Digestibility
Organic chemistry
Parameters
Pollution control
Solubility
Toxicity
Viscosity
title Comparison of the Quality of Chitin and Chitosan from Shrimp, Crab and Squilla Waste
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T03%3A44%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Quality%20of%20Chitin%20and%20Chitosan%20from%20Shrimp,%20Crab%20and%20Squilla%20Waste&rft.jtitle=Current%20world%20environment&rft.au=Parthiban,%20F.&rft.date=2017-12-27&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=670-677&rft.issn=0973-4929&rft.eissn=2320-8031&rft_id=info:doi/10.12944/CWE.12.3.18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2119941321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2119941321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true