Performance based design in geotechnical earthquake engineering
The key elements of performance-based design will be illustrated and discussed in the context of designing cost effective remedial measures for embankment dams with liquefiable materials in the foundation. This situation is considered one of the more challenging areas of performance based design. So...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2018-11, Vol.114, p.326-332 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 332 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 326 |
container_title | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Finn, W.D. Liam |
description | The key elements of performance-based design will be illustrated and discussed in the context of designing cost effective remedial measures for embankment dams with liquefiable materials in the foundation. This situation is considered one of the more challenging areas of performance based design. Some of the key elements that will be considered will be the selection of performance criteria, selection of an appropriately validated analysis program and calibrating the constitutive model to represent material properties in the field. Major elements of performance based seismic design will be explored using typical case histories from practice such as Sardis Dam in Mississippi, Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam in California, and Flood Protection Dikes in Hokkaido, Japan. A primary source of concern about performance based design based on the results of finite element or finite difference methods of analysis is the reliability of the analyses. Reliability is enhanced by due diligence in the selection of a well-validated program and an appropriately calibrated constituted constitutive model. These issues are discussed in the paper, but there remains a residual concern because there is no field response data on large dams by which our real capability can be assessed.
•Four examples of performance based design.•Demonstration of variety of performance criteria including displacement and pore pressure levels.•Use of large displacement deformation analysis for embankments.•Probabilistic analysis of specified slope displacements.•Reliability of non-linear effective dynamic stress analysis for practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2119939422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726117309612</els_id><sourcerecordid>2119939422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-d770c425bc8fe96d9f4c7cab2fe4a9d76c19e1dd4f40282d9915af3ca8c24073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEURYMoWKufIAy4njEvk04mqyJFq1DQRRfuQpq8TDO2mTaZCv17p7R7V29z7r28Q8gj0AIoVM9tkTq_scdQMAp1QUVBQVyREdRC5iWH72syoqwSuWAV3JK7lFo6EFBXIzL9wui6uNXBYLbSCW1mMfkmZD5kDXY9mnXwRm8y1LFf7w_6BzMMjQ-I0Yfmntw4vUn4cLljsnx7Xc7e88Xn_GP2ssh1WdE-t0JQw9lkZWqHsrLScSOMXjGHXEsrKgMSwVruOGU1s1LCRLvS6NowTkU5Jk_n2l3s9gdMvWq7QwzDomIAUpaSMzZQkzNlYpdSRKd20W91PCqg6qRKteqiSp1UKSrUIGLITc85HD749RhVMh4HI9ZHNL2ynf-n4Q-BjXXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2119939422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance based design in geotechnical earthquake engineering</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Finn, W.D. Liam</creator><creatorcontrib>Finn, W.D. Liam</creatorcontrib><description>The key elements of performance-based design will be illustrated and discussed in the context of designing cost effective remedial measures for embankment dams with liquefiable materials in the foundation. This situation is considered one of the more challenging areas of performance based design. Some of the key elements that will be considered will be the selection of performance criteria, selection of an appropriately validated analysis program and calibrating the constitutive model to represent material properties in the field. Major elements of performance based seismic design will be explored using typical case histories from practice such as Sardis Dam in Mississippi, Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam in California, and Flood Protection Dikes in Hokkaido, Japan. A primary source of concern about performance based design based on the results of finite element or finite difference methods of analysis is the reliability of the analyses. Reliability is enhanced by due diligence in the selection of a well-validated program and an appropriately calibrated constituted constitutive model. These issues are discussed in the paper, but there remains a residual concern because there is no field response data on large dams by which our real capability can be assessed.
•Four examples of performance based design.•Demonstration of variety of performance criteria including displacement and pore pressure levels.•Use of large displacement deformation analysis for embankments.•Probabilistic analysis of specified slope displacements.•Reliability of non-linear effective dynamic stress analysis for practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Case histories ; Constitutive models ; Dam design ; Dam engineering ; Dam foundations ; Dams ; Design ; Design engineering ; Dikes ; Due diligence ; Earthquake engineering ; Earthquakes ; Embankment dams ; Finite difference method ; Finite element method ; Flood management ; Flood protection ; Large strain analysis ; Liquefaction ; Material properties ; Mathematical models ; Performance based design ; Performance criteria ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Reliability of analysis ; Screening or mitigation ; Seismic activity ; Seismic design ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic response</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2018-11, Vol.114, p.326-332</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Nov 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-d770c425bc8fe96d9f4c7cab2fe4a9d76c19e1dd4f40282d9915af3ca8c24073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-d770c425bc8fe96d9f4c7cab2fe4a9d76c19e1dd4f40282d9915af3ca8c24073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finn, W.D. Liam</creatorcontrib><title>Performance based design in geotechnical earthquake engineering</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>The key elements of performance-based design will be illustrated and discussed in the context of designing cost effective remedial measures for embankment dams with liquefiable materials in the foundation. This situation is considered one of the more challenging areas of performance based design. Some of the key elements that will be considered will be the selection of performance criteria, selection of an appropriately validated analysis program and calibrating the constitutive model to represent material properties in the field. Major elements of performance based seismic design will be explored using typical case histories from practice such as Sardis Dam in Mississippi, Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam in California, and Flood Protection Dikes in Hokkaido, Japan. A primary source of concern about performance based design based on the results of finite element or finite difference methods of analysis is the reliability of the analyses. Reliability is enhanced by due diligence in the selection of a well-validated program and an appropriately calibrated constituted constitutive model. These issues are discussed in the paper, but there remains a residual concern because there is no field response data on large dams by which our real capability can be assessed.
•Four examples of performance based design.•Demonstration of variety of performance criteria including displacement and pore pressure levels.•Use of large displacement deformation analysis for embankments.•Probabilistic analysis of specified slope displacements.•Reliability of non-linear effective dynamic stress analysis for practice.</description><subject>Case histories</subject><subject>Constitutive models</subject><subject>Dam design</subject><subject>Dam engineering</subject><subject>Dam foundations</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Dikes</subject><subject>Due diligence</subject><subject>Earthquake engineering</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Embankment dams</subject><subject>Finite difference method</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Flood protection</subject><subject>Large strain analysis</subject><subject>Liquefaction</subject><subject>Material properties</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Performance based design</subject><subject>Performance criteria</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reliability of analysis</subject><subject>Screening or mitigation</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEURYMoWKufIAy4njEvk04mqyJFq1DQRRfuQpq8TDO2mTaZCv17p7R7V29z7r28Q8gj0AIoVM9tkTq_scdQMAp1QUVBQVyREdRC5iWH72syoqwSuWAV3JK7lFo6EFBXIzL9wui6uNXBYLbSCW1mMfkmZD5kDXY9mnXwRm8y1LFf7w_6BzMMjQ-I0Yfmntw4vUn4cLljsnx7Xc7e88Xn_GP2ssh1WdE-t0JQw9lkZWqHsrLScSOMXjGHXEsrKgMSwVruOGU1s1LCRLvS6NowTkU5Jk_n2l3s9gdMvWq7QwzDomIAUpaSMzZQkzNlYpdSRKd20W91PCqg6qRKteqiSp1UKSrUIGLITc85HD749RhVMh4HI9ZHNL2ynf-n4Q-BjXXo</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Finn, W.D. Liam</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Performance based design in geotechnical earthquake engineering</title><author>Finn, W.D. Liam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-d770c425bc8fe96d9f4c7cab2fe4a9d76c19e1dd4f40282d9915af3ca8c24073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case histories</topic><topic>Constitutive models</topic><topic>Dam design</topic><topic>Dam engineering</topic><topic>Dam foundations</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Dikes</topic><topic>Due diligence</topic><topic>Earthquake engineering</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Embankment dams</topic><topic>Finite difference method</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Flood protection</topic><topic>Large strain analysis</topic><topic>Liquefaction</topic><topic>Material properties</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Performance based design</topic><topic>Performance criteria</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reliability of analysis</topic><topic>Screening or mitigation</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finn, W.D. Liam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finn, W.D. Liam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance based design in geotechnical earthquake engineering</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>114</volume><spage>326</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>326-332</pages><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><abstract>The key elements of performance-based design will be illustrated and discussed in the context of designing cost effective remedial measures for embankment dams with liquefiable materials in the foundation. This situation is considered one of the more challenging areas of performance based design. Some of the key elements that will be considered will be the selection of performance criteria, selection of an appropriately validated analysis program and calibrating the constitutive model to represent material properties in the field. Major elements of performance based seismic design will be explored using typical case histories from practice such as Sardis Dam in Mississippi, Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam in California, and Flood Protection Dikes in Hokkaido, Japan. A primary source of concern about performance based design based on the results of finite element or finite difference methods of analysis is the reliability of the analyses. Reliability is enhanced by due diligence in the selection of a well-validated program and an appropriately calibrated constituted constitutive model. These issues are discussed in the paper, but there remains a residual concern because there is no field response data on large dams by which our real capability can be assessed.
•Four examples of performance based design.•Demonstration of variety of performance criteria including displacement and pore pressure levels.•Use of large displacement deformation analysis for embankments.•Probabilistic analysis of specified slope displacements.•Reliability of non-linear effective dynamic stress analysis for practice.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.017</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0267-7261 |
ispartof | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2018-11, Vol.114, p.326-332 |
issn | 0267-7261 1879-341X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2119939422 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Case histories Constitutive models Dam design Dam engineering Dam foundations Dams Design Design engineering Dikes Due diligence Earthquake engineering Earthquakes Embankment dams Finite difference method Finite element method Flood management Flood protection Large strain analysis Liquefaction Material properties Mathematical models Performance based design Performance criteria Reliability Reliability analysis Reliability of analysis Screening or mitigation Seismic activity Seismic design Seismic engineering Seismic response |
title | Performance based design in geotechnical earthquake engineering |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A10%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20based%20design%20in%20geotechnical%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Finn,%20W.D.%20Liam&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=114&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=326-332&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2119939422%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2119939422&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726117309612&rfr_iscdi=true |