Effects of Nitrogen Availability and Cheatgrass Competition on the Establishment of Vavilov Siberian Wheatgrass
Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) is the most widespread invasive weed in sagebrush ecosystems of North America. Restoration of perennial vegetation is difficult and land managers have often used introduced bunchgrasses to restore degraded sagebrush communities. Our objective was to evaluate the poten...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rangeland ecology & management 2008-09, Vol.61 (5), p.475-484 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 484 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 475 |
container_title | Rangeland ecology & management |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Mazzola, Monica B. Allcock, Kimberly G. Chambers, Jeanne C. Blank, Robert R. Schupp, Eugene W. Doescher, Paul S. Nowak, Robert S. |
description | Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) is the most widespread invasive weed in sagebrush ecosystems of North America. Restoration of perennial vegetation is difficult and land managers have often used introduced bunchgrasses to restore degraded sagebrush communities. Our objective was to evaluate the potential of ‘Vavilov’ Siberian wheatgrass (Agropyron fragile [Roth] P. Candargy) to establish on cheatgrass-dominated sites. We examined Vavilov establishment in response to different levels of soil nitrogen availability by adding sucrose to the soil to promote nitrogen (N) immobilization and examined cheatgrass competition by seeding different levels of cheatgrass. We used a blocked split-split plot design with two sucrose levels (0 and 360 g · m−2), two levels of Vavilov (0 and 300 seeds · m−2), and five levels of cheatgrass (0, 150, 300, 600, and 1 200 seeds · m−2). Seeding was conducted in fall 2003 and 2004, and measurements were taken in June 2004, 2005, and 2006. Sucrose addition decreased availability of soil nitrate but not orthophosphate. In the first year after seeding, sucrose reduced cheatgrass density by 35% and decreased both cheatgrass biomass per square meter and seed production per square meter by 67%. These effects were temporary, and by the second year after seeding, there was a sevenfold increase in cheatgrass density. As a result, the effects of sucrose addition were no longer significant. Sucrose affected Vavilov growth, but not density, during the first year after seeding. Vavilov density decreased as cheatgrass seeding density increased. Short-term reductions in N or cheatgrass seed supply did not have long-term effects on cheatgrass and did not increase Vavilov establishment. Longer-term reductions in soil N, higher seeding densities, or more competitive plant materials are necessary to revegetate areas dominated by cheatgrass. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2111/07-133.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211989547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25146812</jstor_id><els_id>S1550742408500625</els_id><sourcerecordid>25146812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b408t-cf4af76286f036e2eee7e4044412b9913832f115fcbcb6eac839016e6da10f983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rGzEQhkVpIakbyB8oFT2EXjbRaLVfR2PcNhCSQ76OQrse2WPWK1dSDP73kbPBpwY0aGCemXlnhrFzEJcSAK5ElUGeX8IndgpFAVkhZP35zRdZpaQ6YV9DWAuRlwDVKXNza7GLgTvLbyl6t8SBT3eGetNST3HPzbDgsxWauPQmBD5zmy1GiuQGnl5cIZ-HaNqewmqDQzwUejI76t2O31OLnszAn4_539gXa_qAZ-__hD3-nj_M_mY3d3-uZ9ObrFWijllnlbFVKevSJqUoEbFCJZRSINumgbzOpQUobNd2bYmmq_NGQInlwoCwTZ1P2M-x7ta7fy8Yol67Fz-kljqtqambQlUJ-jVCnXcheLR662lj_F6DOGCgRaXTNpNN2PcRXYfo_JGTBaiyBpniP8a4NU6bpaegH--lgDypgkaoJhFyJDCNvSP0OnSEQ4cL8ukCeuHof20vxqSWnBvwY32vXe6XOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211989547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Nitrogen Availability and Cheatgrass Competition on the Establishment of Vavilov Siberian Wheatgrass</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mazzola, Monica B. ; Allcock, Kimberly G. ; Chambers, Jeanne C. ; Blank, Robert R. ; Schupp, Eugene W. ; Doescher, Paul S. ; Nowak, Robert S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, Monica B. ; Allcock, Kimberly G. ; Chambers, Jeanne C. ; Blank, Robert R. ; Schupp, Eugene W. ; Doescher, Paul S. ; Nowak, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><description>Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) is the most widespread invasive weed in sagebrush ecosystems of North America. Restoration of perennial vegetation is difficult and land managers have often used introduced bunchgrasses to restore degraded sagebrush communities. Our objective was to evaluate the potential of ‘Vavilov’ Siberian wheatgrass (Agropyron fragile [Roth] P. Candargy) to establish on cheatgrass-dominated sites. We examined Vavilov establishment in response to different levels of soil nitrogen availability by adding sucrose to the soil to promote nitrogen (N) immobilization and examined cheatgrass competition by seeding different levels of cheatgrass. We used a blocked split-split plot design with two sucrose levels (0 and 360 g · m−2), two levels of Vavilov (0 and 300 seeds · m−2), and five levels of cheatgrass (0, 150, 300, 600, and 1 200 seeds · m−2). Seeding was conducted in fall 2003 and 2004, and measurements were taken in June 2004, 2005, and 2006. Sucrose addition decreased availability of soil nitrate but not orthophosphate. In the first year after seeding, sucrose reduced cheatgrass density by 35% and decreased both cheatgrass biomass per square meter and seed production per square meter by 67%. These effects were temporary, and by the second year after seeding, there was a sevenfold increase in cheatgrass density. As a result, the effects of sucrose addition were no longer significant. Sucrose affected Vavilov growth, but not density, during the first year after seeding. Vavilov density decreased as cheatgrass seeding density increased. Short-term reductions in N or cheatgrass seed supply did not have long-term effects on cheatgrass and did not increase Vavilov establishment. Longer-term reductions in soil N, higher seeding densities, or more competitive plant materials are necessary to revegetate areas dominated by cheatgrass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7424</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2111/07-133.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rangeland Ecology & Management, P.O. Box 7065, Lawrence, KS 66044: Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>Agropyron fragile ; Biomass production ; Bromus tectorum ; Cultivars ; Drought ; Ecological competition ; forage crops ; forage grasses ; Forest & brush fires ; grass weeds ; Grasses ; immobilization in soil ; invasion ; invasive species ; land restoration ; nitrate ; nitrate nitrogen ; Nitrogen ; nutrient availability ; orthophosphates ; plant communities ; plant competition ; plant density ; plant establishment ; Plant growth ; Plants ; Range management ; rangeland restoration ; Rangeland soils ; rangelands ; Research Papers ; sagebrush steppe ; seed productivity ; Seeding ; Seedlings ; Seeds ; Soil ecology ; soil fertility ; sucrose ; sucrose addition ; temporal variation ; Tillers ; weed control</subject><ispartof>Rangeland ecology & management, 2008-09, Vol.61 (5), p.475-484</ispartof><rights>Society for Range Management</rights><rights>2008 Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 The Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Sep 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b408t-cf4af76286f036e2eee7e4044412b9913832f115fcbcb6eac839016e6da10f983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b408t-cf4af76286f036e2eee7e4044412b9913832f115fcbcb6eac839016e6da10f983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2111/07-133.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,26978,27924,27925,52363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, Monica B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allcock, Kimberly G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Jeanne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blank, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schupp, Eugene W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doescher, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Nitrogen Availability and Cheatgrass Competition on the Establishment of Vavilov Siberian Wheatgrass</title><title>Rangeland ecology & management</title><description>Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) is the most widespread invasive weed in sagebrush ecosystems of North America. Restoration of perennial vegetation is difficult and land managers have often used introduced bunchgrasses to restore degraded sagebrush communities. Our objective was to evaluate the potential of ‘Vavilov’ Siberian wheatgrass (Agropyron fragile [Roth] P. Candargy) to establish on cheatgrass-dominated sites. We examined Vavilov establishment in response to different levels of soil nitrogen availability by adding sucrose to the soil to promote nitrogen (N) immobilization and examined cheatgrass competition by seeding different levels of cheatgrass. We used a blocked split-split plot design with two sucrose levels (0 and 360 g · m−2), two levels of Vavilov (0 and 300 seeds · m−2), and five levels of cheatgrass (0, 150, 300, 600, and 1 200 seeds · m−2). Seeding was conducted in fall 2003 and 2004, and measurements were taken in June 2004, 2005, and 2006. Sucrose addition decreased availability of soil nitrate but not orthophosphate. In the first year after seeding, sucrose reduced cheatgrass density by 35% and decreased both cheatgrass biomass per square meter and seed production per square meter by 67%. These effects were temporary, and by the second year after seeding, there was a sevenfold increase in cheatgrass density. As a result, the effects of sucrose addition were no longer significant. Sucrose affected Vavilov growth, but not density, during the first year after seeding. Vavilov density decreased as cheatgrass seeding density increased. Short-term reductions in N or cheatgrass seed supply did not have long-term effects on cheatgrass and did not increase Vavilov establishment. Longer-term reductions in soil N, higher seeding densities, or more competitive plant materials are necessary to revegetate areas dominated by cheatgrass.</description><subject>Agropyron fragile</subject><subject>Biomass production</subject><subject>Bromus tectorum</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>forage crops</subject><subject>forage grasses</subject><subject>Forest & brush fires</subject><subject>grass weeds</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>immobilization in soil</subject><subject>invasion</subject><subject>invasive species</subject><subject>land restoration</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>nitrate nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nutrient availability</subject><subject>orthophosphates</subject><subject>plant communities</subject><subject>plant competition</subject><subject>plant density</subject><subject>plant establishment</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Range management</subject><subject>rangeland restoration</subject><subject>Rangeland soils</subject><subject>rangelands</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>sagebrush steppe</subject><subject>seed productivity</subject><subject>Seeding</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soil ecology</subject><subject>soil fertility</subject><subject>sucrose</subject><subject>sucrose addition</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>Tillers</subject><subject>weed control</subject><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1rGzEQhkVpIakbyB8oFT2EXjbRaLVfR2PcNhCSQ76OQrse2WPWK1dSDP73kbPBpwY0aGCemXlnhrFzEJcSAK5ElUGeX8IndgpFAVkhZP35zRdZpaQ6YV9DWAuRlwDVKXNza7GLgTvLbyl6t8SBT3eGetNST3HPzbDgsxWauPQmBD5zmy1GiuQGnl5cIZ-HaNqewmqDQzwUejI76t2O31OLnszAn4_539gXa_qAZ-__hD3-nj_M_mY3d3-uZ9ObrFWijllnlbFVKevSJqUoEbFCJZRSINumgbzOpQUobNd2bYmmq_NGQInlwoCwTZ1P2M-x7ta7fy8Yol67Fz-kljqtqambQlUJ-jVCnXcheLR662lj_F6DOGCgRaXTNpNN2PcRXYfo_JGTBaiyBpniP8a4NU6bpaegH--lgDypgkaoJhFyJDCNvSP0OnSEQ4cL8ukCeuHof20vxqSWnBvwY32vXe6XOQ</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Mazzola, Monica B.</creator><creator>Allcock, Kimberly G.</creator><creator>Chambers, Jeanne C.</creator><creator>Blank, Robert R.</creator><creator>Schupp, Eugene W.</creator><creator>Doescher, Paul S.</creator><creator>Nowak, Robert S.</creator><general>Society for Range Management</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Allen Pres Publishing Services</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Effects of Nitrogen Availability and Cheatgrass Competition on the Establishment of Vavilov Siberian Wheatgrass</title><author>Mazzola, Monica B. ; Allcock, Kimberly G. ; Chambers, Jeanne C. ; Blank, Robert R. ; Schupp, Eugene W. ; Doescher, Paul S. ; Nowak, Robert S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b408t-cf4af76286f036e2eee7e4044412b9913832f115fcbcb6eac839016e6da10f983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agropyron fragile</topic><topic>Biomass production</topic><topic>Bromus tectorum</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>forage crops</topic><topic>forage grasses</topic><topic>Forest & brush fires</topic><topic>grass weeds</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>immobilization in soil</topic><topic>invasion</topic><topic>invasive species</topic><topic>land restoration</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>nitrate nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nutrient availability</topic><topic>orthophosphates</topic><topic>plant communities</topic><topic>plant competition</topic><topic>plant density</topic><topic>plant establishment</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Range management</topic><topic>rangeland restoration</topic><topic>Rangeland soils</topic><topic>rangelands</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>sagebrush steppe</topic><topic>seed productivity</topic><topic>Seeding</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soil ecology</topic><topic>soil fertility</topic><topic>sucrose</topic><topic>sucrose addition</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>Tillers</topic><topic>weed control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, Monica B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allcock, Kimberly G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Jeanne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blank, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schupp, Eugene W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doescher, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazzola, Monica B.</au><au>Allcock, Kimberly G.</au><au>Chambers, Jeanne C.</au><au>Blank, Robert R.</au><au>Schupp, Eugene W.</au><au>Doescher, Paul S.</au><au>Nowak, Robert S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Nitrogen Availability and Cheatgrass Competition on the Establishment of Vavilov Siberian Wheatgrass</atitle><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>475</spage><epage>484</epage><pages>475-484</pages><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><eissn>1551-5028</eissn><abstract>Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) is the most widespread invasive weed in sagebrush ecosystems of North America. Restoration of perennial vegetation is difficult and land managers have often used introduced bunchgrasses to restore degraded sagebrush communities. Our objective was to evaluate the potential of ‘Vavilov’ Siberian wheatgrass (Agropyron fragile [Roth] P. Candargy) to establish on cheatgrass-dominated sites. We examined Vavilov establishment in response to different levels of soil nitrogen availability by adding sucrose to the soil to promote nitrogen (N) immobilization and examined cheatgrass competition by seeding different levels of cheatgrass. We used a blocked split-split plot design with two sucrose levels (0 and 360 g · m−2), two levels of Vavilov (0 and 300 seeds · m−2), and five levels of cheatgrass (0, 150, 300, 600, and 1 200 seeds · m−2). Seeding was conducted in fall 2003 and 2004, and measurements were taken in June 2004, 2005, and 2006. Sucrose addition decreased availability of soil nitrate but not orthophosphate. In the first year after seeding, sucrose reduced cheatgrass density by 35% and decreased both cheatgrass biomass per square meter and seed production per square meter by 67%. These effects were temporary, and by the second year after seeding, there was a sevenfold increase in cheatgrass density. As a result, the effects of sucrose addition were no longer significant. Sucrose affected Vavilov growth, but not density, during the first year after seeding. Vavilov density decreased as cheatgrass seeding density increased. Short-term reductions in N or cheatgrass seed supply did not have long-term effects on cheatgrass and did not increase Vavilov establishment. Longer-term reductions in soil N, higher seeding densities, or more competitive plant materials are necessary to revegetate areas dominated by cheatgrass.</abstract><cop>Rangeland Ecology & Management, P.O. Box 7065, Lawrence, KS 66044</cop><pub>Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.2111/07-133.1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-7424 |
ispartof | Rangeland ecology & management, 2008-09, Vol.61 (5), p.475-484 |
issn | 1550-7424 1551-5028 1551-5028 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_211989547 |
source | BioOne Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agropyron fragile Biomass production Bromus tectorum Cultivars Drought Ecological competition forage crops forage grasses Forest & brush fires grass weeds Grasses immobilization in soil invasion invasive species land restoration nitrate nitrate nitrogen Nitrogen nutrient availability orthophosphates plant communities plant competition plant density plant establishment Plant growth Plants Range management rangeland restoration Rangeland soils rangelands Research Papers sagebrush steppe seed productivity Seeding Seedlings Seeds Soil ecology soil fertility sucrose sucrose addition temporal variation Tillers weed control |
title | Effects of Nitrogen Availability and Cheatgrass Competition on the Establishment of Vavilov Siberian Wheatgrass |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A38%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Nitrogen%20Availability%20and%20Cheatgrass%20Competition%20on%20the%20Establishment%20of%20Vavilov%20Siberian%20Wheatgrass&rft.jtitle=Rangeland%20ecology%20&%20management&rft.au=Mazzola,%20Monica%20B.&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=475&rft.epage=484&rft.pages=475-484&rft.issn=1550-7424&rft.eissn=1551-5028&rft_id=info:doi/10.2111/07-133.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25146812%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211989547&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25146812&rft_els_id=S1550742408500625&rfr_iscdi=true |