A Comparative Study of Microscale and Standard Burets
This paper describes a comparative study of the performance of microscale titrations using 2-mL microscale burets with those using Beral pipets and normal 50- and 10-mL burets. The usefulness of a microburet in general and analytical chemistry is demonstrated by presenting results from acid-base, ox...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical education 2000-05, Vol.77 (5), p.625 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 625 |
| container_title | Journal of chemical education |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | Singh, Mono M McGowan, Cynthia B Szafran, Zvi Pike, Ronald M |
| description | This paper describes a comparative study of the performance of microscale titrations using 2-mL microscale burets with those using Beral pipets and normal 50- and 10-mL burets. The usefulness of a microburet in general and analytical chemistry is demonstrated by presenting results from acid-base, oxidation-reduction, precipitation, complexometric, and pH titrations. Several versatile features of using a microscale buret such as cost effectiveness, time savings, and accessibility for the physically challenged has been emphasized. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1021/ed077p625 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211975830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>52852021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a284t-8bd12042d63cdf8ac937c48892706bbc042f68925b88bd8ba7aeffac55b8d9d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LxDAQhoMoWFcP_oMgePBQzUfTJse1rB-w4kE9h2k-oMvutiatsP_elIoevMww7_vwzjAIXVJySwmjd86SqupLJo5QRhWXOeVMHqOMJDNXQhan6CzGDSGUCSUzJJa47nY9BBjaL4ffhtEecOfxS2tCFw1sHYa9TXqqECy-H4Mb4jk68bCN7uKnL9DHw-q9fsrXr4_P9XKdA5PFkMvGUkYKZkturJdgFK9MIaViFSmbxiTLl2kSjUyobKAC5z0YkQSrLOELdDXn9qH7HF0c9KYbwz6t1IxSVQnJJ-hmhqaLY3Be96HdQThoSvT0FP37lMRezyyY-Jf1n_sG2sxfJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211975830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Study of Microscale and Standard Burets</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Singh, Mono M ; McGowan, Cynthia B ; Szafran, Zvi ; Pike, Ronald M</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Mono M ; McGowan, Cynthia B ; Szafran, Zvi ; Pike, Ronald M</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes a comparative study of the performance of microscale titrations using 2-mL microscale burets with those using Beral pipets and normal 50- and 10-mL burets. The usefulness of a microburet in general and analytical chemistry is demonstrated by presenting results from acid-base, oxidation-reduction, precipitation, complexometric, and pH titrations. Several versatile features of using a microscale buret such as cost effectiveness, time savings, and accessibility for the physically challenged has been emphasized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ed077p625</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEDA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: Division of Chemical Education</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Chemical reactions ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Cost effectiveness ; Instruments ; Organic chemistry ; Oxidation ; Oxidation-reduction potential</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2000-05, Vol.77 (5), p.625</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society May 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a284t-8bd12042d63cdf8ac937c48892706bbc042f68925b88bd8ba7aeffac55b8d9d03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed077p625$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed077p625$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2752,27057,27905,27906,56719,56769</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Mono M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Cynthia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szafran, Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, Ronald M</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Study of Microscale and Standard Burets</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>This paper describes a comparative study of the performance of microscale titrations using 2-mL microscale burets with those using Beral pipets and normal 50- and 10-mL burets. The usefulness of a microburet in general and analytical chemistry is demonstrated by presenting results from acid-base, oxidation-reduction, precipitation, complexometric, and pH titrations. Several versatile features of using a microscale buret such as cost effectiveness, time savings, and accessibility for the physically challenged has been emphasized.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidation-reduction potential</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LxDAQhoMoWFcP_oMgePBQzUfTJse1rB-w4kE9h2k-oMvutiatsP_elIoevMww7_vwzjAIXVJySwmjd86SqupLJo5QRhWXOeVMHqOMJDNXQhan6CzGDSGUCSUzJJa47nY9BBjaL4ffhtEecOfxS2tCFw1sHYa9TXqqECy-H4Mb4jk68bCN7uKnL9DHw-q9fsrXr4_P9XKdA5PFkMvGUkYKZkturJdgFK9MIaViFSmbxiTLl2kSjUyobKAC5z0YkQSrLOELdDXn9qH7HF0c9KYbwz6t1IxSVQnJJ-hmhqaLY3Be96HdQThoSvT0FP37lMRezyyY-Jf1n_sG2sxfJA</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Singh, Mono M</creator><creator>McGowan, Cynthia B</creator><creator>Szafran, Zvi</creator><creator>Pike, Ronald M</creator><general>Division of Chemical Education</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>A Comparative Study of Microscale and Standard Burets</title><author>Singh, Mono M ; McGowan, Cynthia B ; Szafran, Zvi ; Pike, Ronald M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a284t-8bd12042d63cdf8ac937c48892706bbc042f68925b88bd8ba7aeffac55b8d9d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidation-reduction potential</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Mono M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Cynthia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szafran, Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, Ronald M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Mono M</au><au>McGowan, Cynthia B</au><au>Szafran, Zvi</au><au>Pike, Ronald M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Study of Microscale and Standard Burets</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>625</spage><pages>625-</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><coden>JCEDA8</coden><abstract>This paper describes a comparative study of the performance of microscale titrations using 2-mL microscale burets with those using Beral pipets and normal 50- and 10-mL burets. The usefulness of a microburet in general and analytical chemistry is demonstrated by presenting results from acid-base, oxidation-reduction, precipitation, complexometric, and pH titrations. Several versatile features of using a microscale buret such as cost effectiveness, time savings, and accessibility for the physically challenged has been emphasized.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>Division of Chemical Education</pub><doi>10.1021/ed077p625</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9584 |
| ispartof | Journal of chemical education, 2000-05, Vol.77 (5), p.625 |
| issn | 0021-9584 1938-1328 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_211975830 |
| source | ACS Publications |
| subjects | Analytical chemistry Chemical reactions Comparative analysis Comparative studies Cost effectiveness Instruments Organic chemistry Oxidation Oxidation-reduction potential |
| title | A Comparative Study of Microscale and Standard Burets |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A54%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20Microscale%20and%20Standard%20Burets&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Singh,%20Mono%20M&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=625&rft.pages=625-&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft.coden=JCEDA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ed077p625&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E52852021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211975830&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |