Inaccurate Doses of Rh Immune Globulin After Rh-Incompatible Fetomaternal Hemorrhage: Survey of Laboratory Practice

* Context.--Rh(D)-negative women with a large fetomaternal hemmorrahage (FMH) from an Rh(D)-positive fetus are at risk for anti-D alloimmunization if they do not receive adequate Rh immune glbulin (RhIG). Determination of the adequate RhIG dose for these women is a critical laboratory procedure for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2009-03, Vol.133 (3), p.465-469
1. Verfasser: Ramsey, Glenn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 469
container_issue 3
container_start_page 465
container_title Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)
container_volume 133
creator Ramsey, Glenn
description * Context.--Rh(D)-negative women with a large fetomaternal hemmorrahage (FMH) from an Rh(D)-positive fetus are at risk for anti-D alloimmunization if they do not receive adequate Rh immune glbulin (RhIG). Determination of the adequate RhIG dose for these women is a critical laboratory procedure for protecting their future Rh(D)-positive children. Objective.--To determine how often laboratories recommended an inaccurate dose of RhIG for excess FMH. Design.--Nearly 1600 laboratories using the College of American Pathologists' proficiency testing for fetal red blood cell detection were surveyed to determine (1) their calculation method and (2) the number of RhIG doses recommended for a survey specimen, based on their measured percentage of fetal red blood cells. We surveyed nearly 1450 laboratories for their accuracy in determining RhIG dose, using 2 common calculation methods we provided. Results.--The AABB Technical Manual method was used by 67% of responding laboratories. However, 20.7% of laboratories using this method would have recommended an inaccurate dose of RhIG--11.5% too much and 9.2% too little--for the level of FMH reported in the survey specimen. If all laboratories had used the common recommendation of 300 [micro]g/30 mL of fetal blood present, 2% would have recommended RhIG doses too low for the volume of FMH they measured. In 3 of the 4 calculation exercises we provided, 20% to 30% of laboratories underestimated the necessary dose of RhIG. Conclusions.--Based on our surveys, some mothers with excess FMH may be receiving inaccurate doses of RhIG. Laboratories performing quantification of FMH should review their procedures and training for calculating RhIG dosage. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:465-469)
doi_str_mv 10.5858/133.3.465
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211961199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A230151984</galeid><sourcerecordid>A230151984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-9c37554e40a596044b0843f5f5a7f0a6dfa5f40a66802801701c98ae93eb34473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU9rGzEQxUVpoa7bQ7-B6KHQwzrSSlqvejNJkxgMLf1zFrPKyN6glVxJW_C3r4x7aCCIQWjm954GHiHvOVupXvVXXIiVWMlOvSALrqRoWt6pl2TBGBON1r16Td7k_Fifum35guRtAGvnBAXpTcyYaXT0-4Fup2kOSO98HGY_BrpxBVMdNNtg43SEMg4e6S2WOFVpCuDpPU4xpQPs8TP9Mac_eDp77WCI1T2mE_2WwJbR4lvyyoHP-O7fvSS_br_8vL5vdl_vttebXWNFJ0ujrVgrJVEyULpjUg6sl8Ipp2DtGHQPDpSrw67rWdszvmbc6h5QCxyElGuxJB8uvscUf8-Yi3mM83nVbFrOdVdLV6i5QHvwaMbgYqlr7jFgAh8DurG2N61gXHFd_1-S1TN8PQ84jfZZwcf_BAcEXw45-rmMMeSn4KcLaFPMOaEzxzROkE6GM3MO19RwjTA1XPEX8mSURQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211961199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inaccurate Doses of Rh Immune Globulin After Rh-Incompatible Fetomaternal Hemorrhage: Survey of Laboratory Practice</title><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ramsey, Glenn</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Glenn</creatorcontrib><description>* Context.--Rh(D)-negative women with a large fetomaternal hemmorrahage (FMH) from an Rh(D)-positive fetus are at risk for anti-D alloimmunization if they do not receive adequate Rh immune glbulin (RhIG). Determination of the adequate RhIG dose for these women is a critical laboratory procedure for protecting their future Rh(D)-positive children. Objective.--To determine how often laboratories recommended an inaccurate dose of RhIG for excess FMH. Design.--Nearly 1600 laboratories using the College of American Pathologists' proficiency testing for fetal red blood cell detection were surveyed to determine (1) their calculation method and (2) the number of RhIG doses recommended for a survey specimen, based on their measured percentage of fetal red blood cells. We surveyed nearly 1450 laboratories for their accuracy in determining RhIG dose, using 2 common calculation methods we provided. Results.--The AABB Technical Manual method was used by 67% of responding laboratories. However, 20.7% of laboratories using this method would have recommended an inaccurate dose of RhIG--11.5% too much and 9.2% too little--for the level of FMH reported in the survey specimen. If all laboratories had used the common recommendation of 300 [micro]g/30 mL of fetal blood present, 2% would have recommended RhIG doses too low for the volume of FMH they measured. In 3 of the 4 calculation exercises we provided, 20% to 30% of laboratories underestimated the necessary dose of RhIG. Conclusions.--Based on our surveys, some mothers with excess FMH may be receiving inaccurate doses of RhIG. Laboratories performing quantification of FMH should review their procedures and training for calculating RhIG dosage. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:465-469)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5858/133.3.465</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APLMAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Northfield: College of American Pathologists</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Antigens ; Blood ; Care and treatment ; Disease prevention ; Dosage and administration ; Flow cytometry ; Hemorrhage ; Immune response ; Laboratories ; Obstetrics ; Pathology ; Physiological aspects ; Practice ; Pregnancy ; Rho(D) immune globulin ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976), 2009-03, Vol.133 (3), p.465-469</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 College of American Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright College of American Pathologists Mar 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-9c37554e40a596044b0843f5f5a7f0a6dfa5f40a66802801701c98ae93eb34473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-9c37554e40a596044b0843f5f5a7f0a6dfa5f40a66802801701c98ae93eb34473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Glenn</creatorcontrib><title>Inaccurate Doses of Rh Immune Globulin After Rh-Incompatible Fetomaternal Hemorrhage: Survey of Laboratory Practice</title><title>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</title><description>* Context.--Rh(D)-negative women with a large fetomaternal hemmorrahage (FMH) from an Rh(D)-positive fetus are at risk for anti-D alloimmunization if they do not receive adequate Rh immune glbulin (RhIG). Determination of the adequate RhIG dose for these women is a critical laboratory procedure for protecting their future Rh(D)-positive children. Objective.--To determine how often laboratories recommended an inaccurate dose of RhIG for excess FMH. Design.--Nearly 1600 laboratories using the College of American Pathologists' proficiency testing for fetal red blood cell detection were surveyed to determine (1) their calculation method and (2) the number of RhIG doses recommended for a survey specimen, based on their measured percentage of fetal red blood cells. We surveyed nearly 1450 laboratories for their accuracy in determining RhIG dose, using 2 common calculation methods we provided. Results.--The AABB Technical Manual method was used by 67% of responding laboratories. However, 20.7% of laboratories using this method would have recommended an inaccurate dose of RhIG--11.5% too much and 9.2% too little--for the level of FMH reported in the survey specimen. If all laboratories had used the common recommendation of 300 [micro]g/30 mL of fetal blood present, 2% would have recommended RhIG doses too low for the volume of FMH they measured. In 3 of the 4 calculation exercises we provided, 20% to 30% of laboratories underestimated the necessary dose of RhIG. Conclusions.--Based on our surveys, some mothers with excess FMH may be receiving inaccurate doses of RhIG. Laboratories performing quantification of FMH should review their procedures and training for calculating RhIG dosage. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:465-469)</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Rho(D) immune globulin</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU9rGzEQxUVpoa7bQ7-B6KHQwzrSSlqvejNJkxgMLf1zFrPKyN6glVxJW_C3r4x7aCCIQWjm954GHiHvOVupXvVXXIiVWMlOvSALrqRoWt6pl2TBGBON1r16Td7k_Fifum35guRtAGvnBAXpTcyYaXT0-4Fup2kOSO98HGY_BrpxBVMdNNtg43SEMg4e6S2WOFVpCuDpPU4xpQPs8TP9Mac_eDp77WCI1T2mE_2WwJbR4lvyyoHP-O7fvSS_br_8vL5vdl_vttebXWNFJ0ujrVgrJVEyULpjUg6sl8Ipp2DtGHQPDpSrw67rWdszvmbc6h5QCxyElGuxJB8uvscUf8-Yi3mM83nVbFrOdVdLV6i5QHvwaMbgYqlr7jFgAh8DurG2N61gXHFd_1-S1TN8PQ84jfZZwcf_BAcEXw45-rmMMeSn4KcLaFPMOaEzxzROkE6GM3MO19RwjTA1XPEX8mSURQ</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Ramsey, Glenn</creator><general>College of American Pathologists</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Inaccurate Doses of Rh Immune Globulin After Rh-Incompatible Fetomaternal Hemorrhage: Survey of Laboratory Practice</title><author>Ramsey, Glenn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-9c37554e40a596044b0843f5f5a7f0a6dfa5f40a66802801701c98ae93eb34473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Rho(D) immune globulin</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Glenn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramsey, Glenn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inaccurate Doses of Rh Immune Globulin After Rh-Incompatible Fetomaternal Hemorrhage: Survey of Laboratory Practice</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>465</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>465-469</pages><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><coden>APLMAS</coden><abstract>* Context.--Rh(D)-negative women with a large fetomaternal hemmorrahage (FMH) from an Rh(D)-positive fetus are at risk for anti-D alloimmunization if they do not receive adequate Rh immune glbulin (RhIG). Determination of the adequate RhIG dose for these women is a critical laboratory procedure for protecting their future Rh(D)-positive children. Objective.--To determine how often laboratories recommended an inaccurate dose of RhIG for excess FMH. Design.--Nearly 1600 laboratories using the College of American Pathologists' proficiency testing for fetal red blood cell detection were surveyed to determine (1) their calculation method and (2) the number of RhIG doses recommended for a survey specimen, based on their measured percentage of fetal red blood cells. We surveyed nearly 1450 laboratories for their accuracy in determining RhIG dose, using 2 common calculation methods we provided. Results.--The AABB Technical Manual method was used by 67% of responding laboratories. However, 20.7% of laboratories using this method would have recommended an inaccurate dose of RhIG--11.5% too much and 9.2% too little--for the level of FMH reported in the survey specimen. If all laboratories had used the common recommendation of 300 [micro]g/30 mL of fetal blood present, 2% would have recommended RhIG doses too low for the volume of FMH they measured. In 3 of the 4 calculation exercises we provided, 20% to 30% of laboratories underestimated the necessary dose of RhIG. Conclusions.--Based on our surveys, some mothers with excess FMH may be receiving inaccurate doses of RhIG. Laboratories performing quantification of FMH should review their procedures and training for calculating RhIG dosage. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:465-469)</abstract><cop>Northfield</cop><pub>College of American Pathologists</pub><doi>10.5858/133.3.465</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9985
ispartof Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2009-03, Vol.133 (3), p.465-469
issn 0003-9985
1543-2165
1543-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_211961199
source Allen Press Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Accuracy
Antigens
Blood
Care and treatment
Disease prevention
Dosage and administration
Flow cytometry
Hemorrhage
Immune response
Laboratories
Obstetrics
Pathology
Physiological aspects
Practice
Pregnancy
Rho(D) immune globulin
Surveys
title Inaccurate Doses of Rh Immune Globulin After Rh-Incompatible Fetomaternal Hemorrhage: Survey of Laboratory Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A43%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inaccurate%20Doses%20of%20Rh%20Immune%20Globulin%20After%20Rh-Incompatible%20Fetomaternal%20Hemorrhage:%20Survey%20of%20Laboratory%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Ramsey,%20Glenn&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=465&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=465-469&rft.issn=0003-9985&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft.coden=APLMAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.5858/133.3.465&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA230151984%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211961199&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A230151984&rfr_iscdi=true