Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions

This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical education 2007-01, Vol.84 (1), p.175
Hauptverfasser: Tien, Lydia T, Teichert, Melonie A, Rickey, Dawn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 175
container_title Journal of chemical education
container_volume 84
creator Tien, Lydia T
Teichert, Melonie A
Rickey, Dawn
description This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college students) to revise their molecular-level ideas regarding chemical compounds dissolved in water. The MORE Thinking Frame guides students' thinking, making them aware of their ideas and prompting them to revise their ideas in light of experimental evidence. We examined the students' molecular-level ideas about aqueous sodium chloride and sucrose solutions before and after participating in the MORE laboratory module to determine the extent to which the students' refined ideas: (1) were consistent with experimental evidence they collected throughout the laboratory module; (2) were scientifically accurate; and (3) had progressed toward more scientifically accurate ideas compared with their initial ideas. The results indicate that the module was particularly effective for encouraging students to revise their ideas about aqueous salt solutions such that their ideas were consistent with experimental data and scientifically correct. Participation in the laboratory module also prompted students to make significant productive revisions to their ideas about aqueous sugar solutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ed084p175
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211936781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ755048</ericid><sourcerecordid>1205732331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-be15b524c184b7c74dcf2621f66d850fb9590c41b7b1c876fa0a3949b44a13383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkMFLwzAchYMoOKcH7x6C4MFDNWmTNj3KqDrpmGzzXNL0F-3ompqkg_33dkzmwdM7vI_vwUPompIHSkL6CBURrKMJP0EjmkYioFEoTtGIDGWQcsHO0YVza0JoyFMxQn2mNShfb6EF57DRWOLZfJHhXJbGSm_sDs9M1TeA6xa_W7PpfN1-4qXvK2i9wyuDF7CtHeDVF9R2gBtQfSNtkMMWGjytQDo8yHqPl6bpfW1ad4nOtGwcXP3mGH08Z6vJa5DPX6aTpzyQEUl8UALlJQ-ZooKViUpYpXQYh1THcSU40WXKU6IYLZOSKpHEWhIZpSwtGZM0ikQ0RrcHb2fNdw_OF2vT23aYLEI63BMngg7Q_QFS1jhnQRedrTfS7gpKiv2pxfHUgb05sGBrdeSyt4RzwvZ7d4daKvc39V_zA4YKfuY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211936781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Tien, Lydia T ; Teichert, Melonie A ; Rickey, Dawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Tien, Lydia T ; Teichert, Melonie A ; Rickey, Dawn</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college students) to revise their molecular-level ideas regarding chemical compounds dissolved in water. The MORE Thinking Frame guides students' thinking, making them aware of their ideas and prompting them to revise their ideas in light of experimental evidence. We examined the students' molecular-level ideas about aqueous sodium chloride and sucrose solutions before and after participating in the MORE laboratory module to determine the extent to which the students' refined ideas: (1) were consistent with experimental evidence they collected throughout the laboratory module; (2) were scientifically accurate; and (3) had progressed toward more scientifically accurate ideas compared with their initial ideas. The results indicate that the module was particularly effective for encouraging students to revise their ideas about aqueous salt solutions such that their ideas were consistent with experimental data and scientifically correct. Participation in the laboratory module also prompted students to make significant productive revisions to their ideas about aqueous sugar solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ed084p175</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEDA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: Division of Chemical Education</publisher><subject>Chemical compounds ; Chemistry ; College students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Critical thinking ; Experiments ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Laboratories ; Modules ; Organic chemistry ; Prompting ; Research facilities ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Solution chemistry ; Students ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2007-01, Vol.84 (1), p.175</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-be15b524c184b7c74dcf2621f66d850fb9590c41b7b1c876fa0a3949b44a13383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed084p175$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed084p175$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ755048$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tien, Lydia T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichert, Melonie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickey, Dawn</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college students) to revise their molecular-level ideas regarding chemical compounds dissolved in water. The MORE Thinking Frame guides students' thinking, making them aware of their ideas and prompting them to revise their ideas in light of experimental evidence. We examined the students' molecular-level ideas about aqueous sodium chloride and sucrose solutions before and after participating in the MORE laboratory module to determine the extent to which the students' refined ideas: (1) were consistent with experimental evidence they collected throughout the laboratory module; (2) were scientifically accurate; and (3) had progressed toward more scientifically accurate ideas compared with their initial ideas. The results indicate that the module was particularly effective for encouraging students to revise their ideas about aqueous salt solutions such that their ideas were consistent with experimental data and scientifically correct. Participation in the laboratory module also prompted students to make significant productive revisions to their ideas about aqueous sugar solutions.</description><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Prompting</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Solution chemistry</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkMFLwzAchYMoOKcH7x6C4MFDNWmTNj3KqDrpmGzzXNL0F-3ompqkg_33dkzmwdM7vI_vwUPompIHSkL6CBURrKMJP0EjmkYioFEoTtGIDGWQcsHO0YVza0JoyFMxQn2mNShfb6EF57DRWOLZfJHhXJbGSm_sDs9M1TeA6xa_W7PpfN1-4qXvK2i9wyuDF7CtHeDVF9R2gBtQfSNtkMMWGjytQDo8yHqPl6bpfW1ad4nOtGwcXP3mGH08Z6vJa5DPX6aTpzyQEUl8UALlJQ-ZooKViUpYpXQYh1THcSU40WXKU6IYLZOSKpHEWhIZpSwtGZM0ikQ0RrcHb2fNdw_OF2vT23aYLEI63BMngg7Q_QFS1jhnQRedrTfS7gpKiv2pxfHUgb05sGBrdeSyt4RzwvZ7d4daKvc39V_zA4YKfuY</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Tien, Lydia T</creator><creator>Teichert, Melonie A</creator><creator>Rickey, Dawn</creator><general>Division of Chemical Education</general><general>Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions</title><author>Tien, Lydia T ; Teichert, Melonie A ; Rickey, Dawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-be15b524c184b7c74dcf2621f66d850fb9590c41b7b1c876fa0a3949b44a13383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Prompting</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Solution chemistry</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tien, Lydia T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichert, Melonie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickey, Dawn</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tien, Lydia T</au><au>Teichert, Melonie A</au><au>Rickey, Dawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ755048</ericid><atitle>Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>175</spage><pages>175-</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><coden>JCEDA8</coden><abstract>This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college students) to revise their molecular-level ideas regarding chemical compounds dissolved in water. The MORE Thinking Frame guides students' thinking, making them aware of their ideas and prompting them to revise their ideas in light of experimental evidence. We examined the students' molecular-level ideas about aqueous sodium chloride and sucrose solutions before and after participating in the MORE laboratory module to determine the extent to which the students' refined ideas: (1) were consistent with experimental evidence they collected throughout the laboratory module; (2) were scientifically accurate; and (3) had progressed toward more scientifically accurate ideas compared with their initial ideas. The results indicate that the module was particularly effective for encouraging students to revise their ideas about aqueous salt solutions such that their ideas were consistent with experimental data and scientifically correct. Participation in the laboratory module also prompted students to make significant productive revisions to their ideas about aqueous sugar solutions.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>Division of Chemical Education</pub><doi>10.1021/ed084p175</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9584
ispartof Journal of chemical education, 2007-01, Vol.84 (1), p.175
issn 0021-9584
1938-1328
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_211936781
source American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Chemical compounds
Chemistry
College students
Colleges & universities
Critical thinking
Experiments
Instructional Effectiveness
Laboratories
Modules
Organic chemistry
Prompting
Research facilities
Science education
Science Instruction
Solution chemistry
Students
Teaching Methods
title Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A25%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20a%20MORE%20Laboratory%20Module%20in%20Prompting%20Students%20To%20Revise%20Their%20Molecular-Level%20Ideas%20about%20Solutions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Tien,%20Lydia%20T&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=175&rft.pages=175-&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft.coden=JCEDA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ed084p175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1205732331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211936781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ755048&rfr_iscdi=true