Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions
This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college stu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical education 2007-01, Vol.84 (1), p.175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | Journal of chemical education |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Tien, Lydia T Teichert, Melonie A Rickey, Dawn |
description | This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college students) to revise their molecular-level ideas regarding chemical compounds dissolved in water. The MORE Thinking Frame guides students' thinking, making them aware of their ideas and prompting them to revise their ideas in light of experimental evidence. We examined the students' molecular-level ideas about aqueous sodium chloride and sucrose solutions before and after participating in the MORE laboratory module to determine the extent to which the students' refined ideas: (1) were consistent with experimental evidence they collected throughout the laboratory module; (2) were scientifically accurate; and (3) had progressed toward more scientifically accurate ideas compared with their initial ideas. The results indicate that the module was particularly effective for encouraging students to revise their ideas about aqueous salt solutions such that their ideas were consistent with experimental data and scientifically correct. Participation in the laboratory module also prompted students to make significant productive revisions to their ideas about aqueous sugar solutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/ed084p175 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211936781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ755048</ericid><sourcerecordid>1205732331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-be15b524c184b7c74dcf2621f66d850fb9590c41b7b1c876fa0a3949b44a13383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkMFLwzAchYMoOKcH7x6C4MFDNWmTNj3KqDrpmGzzXNL0F-3ompqkg_33dkzmwdM7vI_vwUPompIHSkL6CBURrKMJP0EjmkYioFEoTtGIDGWQcsHO0YVza0JoyFMxQn2mNShfb6EF57DRWOLZfJHhXJbGSm_sDs9M1TeA6xa_W7PpfN1-4qXvK2i9wyuDF7CtHeDVF9R2gBtQfSNtkMMWGjytQDo8yHqPl6bpfW1ad4nOtGwcXP3mGH08Z6vJa5DPX6aTpzyQEUl8UALlJQ-ZooKViUpYpXQYh1THcSU40WXKU6IYLZOSKpHEWhIZpSwtGZM0ikQ0RrcHb2fNdw_OF2vT23aYLEI63BMngg7Q_QFS1jhnQRedrTfS7gpKiv2pxfHUgb05sGBrdeSyt4RzwvZ7d4daKvc39V_zA4YKfuY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211936781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Tien, Lydia T ; Teichert, Melonie A ; Rickey, Dawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Tien, Lydia T ; Teichert, Melonie A ; Rickey, Dawn</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college students) to revise their molecular-level ideas regarding chemical compounds dissolved in water. The MORE Thinking Frame guides students' thinking, making them aware of their ideas and prompting them to revise their ideas in light of experimental evidence. We examined the students' molecular-level ideas about aqueous sodium chloride and sucrose solutions before and after participating in the MORE laboratory module to determine the extent to which the students' refined ideas: (1) were consistent with experimental evidence they collected throughout the laboratory module; (2) were scientifically accurate; and (3) had progressed toward more scientifically accurate ideas compared with their initial ideas. The results indicate that the module was particularly effective for encouraging students to revise their ideas about aqueous salt solutions such that their ideas were consistent with experimental data and scientifically correct. Participation in the laboratory module also prompted students to make significant productive revisions to their ideas about aqueous sugar solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ed084p175</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEDA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: Division of Chemical Education</publisher><subject>Chemical compounds ; Chemistry ; College students ; Colleges & universities ; Critical thinking ; Experiments ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Laboratories ; Modules ; Organic chemistry ; Prompting ; Research facilities ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Solution chemistry ; Students ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2007-01, Vol.84 (1), p.175</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-be15b524c184b7c74dcf2621f66d850fb9590c41b7b1c876fa0a3949b44a13383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed084p175$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed084p175$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ755048$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tien, Lydia T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichert, Melonie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickey, Dawn</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college students) to revise their molecular-level ideas regarding chemical compounds dissolved in water. The MORE Thinking Frame guides students' thinking, making them aware of their ideas and prompting them to revise their ideas in light of experimental evidence. We examined the students' molecular-level ideas about aqueous sodium chloride and sucrose solutions before and after participating in the MORE laboratory module to determine the extent to which the students' refined ideas: (1) were consistent with experimental evidence they collected throughout the laboratory module; (2) were scientifically accurate; and (3) had progressed toward more scientifically accurate ideas compared with their initial ideas. The results indicate that the module was particularly effective for encouraging students to revise their ideas about aqueous salt solutions such that their ideas were consistent with experimental data and scientifically correct. Participation in the laboratory module also prompted students to make significant productive revisions to their ideas about aqueous sugar solutions.</description><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Prompting</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Solution chemistry</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkMFLwzAchYMoOKcH7x6C4MFDNWmTNj3KqDrpmGzzXNL0F-3ompqkg_33dkzmwdM7vI_vwUPompIHSkL6CBURrKMJP0EjmkYioFEoTtGIDGWQcsHO0YVza0JoyFMxQn2mNShfb6EF57DRWOLZfJHhXJbGSm_sDs9M1TeA6xa_W7PpfN1-4qXvK2i9wyuDF7CtHeDVF9R2gBtQfSNtkMMWGjytQDo8yHqPl6bpfW1ad4nOtGwcXP3mGH08Z6vJa5DPX6aTpzyQEUl8UALlJQ-ZooKViUpYpXQYh1THcSU40WXKU6IYLZOSKpHEWhIZpSwtGZM0ikQ0RrcHb2fNdw_OF2vT23aYLEI63BMngg7Q_QFS1jhnQRedrTfS7gpKiv2pxfHUgb05sGBrdeSyt4RzwvZ7d4daKvc39V_zA4YKfuY</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Tien, Lydia T</creator><creator>Teichert, Melonie A</creator><creator>Rickey, Dawn</creator><general>Division of Chemical Education</general><general>Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions</title><author>Tien, Lydia T ; Teichert, Melonie A ; Rickey, Dawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-be15b524c184b7c74dcf2621f66d850fb9590c41b7b1c876fa0a3949b44a13383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Prompting</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Solution chemistry</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tien, Lydia T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichert, Melonie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickey, Dawn</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tien, Lydia T</au><au>Teichert, Melonie A</au><au>Rickey, Dawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ755048</ericid><atitle>Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>175</spage><pages>175-</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><coden>JCEDA8</coden><abstract>This study investigates the effectiveness of a Model–Observe–Reflect–Explain (MORE) laboratory module in prompting three different populations of general chemistry students (honors students at a research university, chemistry majors at a primarily undergraduate institution, and community college students) to revise their molecular-level ideas regarding chemical compounds dissolved in water. The MORE Thinking Frame guides students' thinking, making them aware of their ideas and prompting them to revise their ideas in light of experimental evidence. We examined the students' molecular-level ideas about aqueous sodium chloride and sucrose solutions before and after participating in the MORE laboratory module to determine the extent to which the students' refined ideas: (1) were consistent with experimental evidence they collected throughout the laboratory module; (2) were scientifically accurate; and (3) had progressed toward more scientifically accurate ideas compared with their initial ideas. The results indicate that the module was particularly effective for encouraging students to revise their ideas about aqueous salt solutions such that their ideas were consistent with experimental data and scientifically correct. Participation in the laboratory module also prompted students to make significant productive revisions to their ideas about aqueous sugar solutions.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>Division of Chemical Education</pub><doi>10.1021/ed084p175</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9584 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical education, 2007-01, Vol.84 (1), p.175 |
issn | 0021-9584 1938-1328 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_211936781 |
source | American Chemical Society Journals |
subjects | Chemical compounds Chemistry College students Colleges & universities Critical thinking Experiments Instructional Effectiveness Laboratories Modules Organic chemistry Prompting Research facilities Science education Science Instruction Solution chemistry Students Teaching Methods |
title | Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A25%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20a%20MORE%20Laboratory%20Module%20in%20Prompting%20Students%20To%20Revise%20Their%20Molecular-Level%20Ideas%20about%20Solutions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Tien,%20Lydia%20T&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=175&rft.pages=175-&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft.coden=JCEDA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ed084p175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1205732331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211936781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ755048&rfr_iscdi=true |