Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper

While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not desc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wind energy (Chichester, England) England), 2018-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1232-1238
Hauptverfasser: Oh, Sho, Ishihara, Takeshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1238
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1232
container_title Wind energy (Chichester, England)
container_volume 21
creator Oh, Sho
Ishihara, Takeshi
description While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not described. In order to evaluate the damping ratios for both first and second modes of MW‐size wind turbines, a series of excitation tests using an active mass damper were performed in this study on a 2.4 MW offshore wind turbine. First, the sinusoidal test, which gives accurate and reliable results for linear systems, is performed, and results show that the damping ratio for the fore‐aft first mode is 0.2% and the fore‐aft second mode is 2.4% for the target wind turbine. Next the free decay test, which is applicable to systems with the effect from the aerodynamic damping, is performed, and results show that the damping ratios obtained for the fore‐aft first and second mode are similar to those from the sinusoidal test. The damping ratio is 1.2% for the side‐side first mode and 3.2% for the side‐side second mode. Finally, an empirical formula for the damping ratios of first mode is proposed for wind turbines with steel towers using the results from the previous researches and the excitation tests in this study.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/we.2214
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2118288267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2118288267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-cc9da8b6cc5ec856abc634e2bf0237bd4e2cecae6d85a688b7c8a6c0f4b2db353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqUg_oIlDhxQiu04qXNEVXlIRRwA9Wj5sUGumge2Q9p_T9pw5bRz-GZ3ZxC6pmRGCWH3PcwYo_wETSgpioQKxk-POks44_wcXYSwIYQSSsUEde_RdyZ2Xm1xq7yqIILHzkIdXemMiq6pcVNihdmM49c11k2MTYVLtwOLe1dbPJi1qwHrPYadcXH0RAgRd8HVX1iZ6H4AVyoEbFXVgr9EZ6XaBrj6m1P0-bj8WDwnq7enl8XDKjFMFDwxprBK6NyYDIzIcqVNnnJguiQsnWs7SANGQW5FpnIh9NwIlRtScs2sTrN0im7Gva1vvrvhI7lpOl8PJyUb4jMhWD4fqNuRMr4JwUMpW-8q5feSEnnoVPYgD50O5N1I9m4L-_8wuV4e6V-8pHkN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118288267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Oh, Sho ; Ishihara, Takeshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Oh, Sho ; Ishihara, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><description>While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not described. In order to evaluate the damping ratios for both first and second modes of MW‐size wind turbines, a series of excitation tests using an active mass damper were performed in this study on a 2.4 MW offshore wind turbine. First, the sinusoidal test, which gives accurate and reliable results for linear systems, is performed, and results show that the damping ratio for the fore‐aft first mode is 0.2% and the fore‐aft second mode is 2.4% for the target wind turbine. Next the free decay test, which is applicable to systems with the effect from the aerodynamic damping, is performed, and results show that the damping ratios obtained for the fore‐aft first and second mode are similar to those from the sinusoidal test. The damping ratio is 1.2% for the side‐side first mode and 3.2% for the side‐side second mode. Finally, an empirical formula for the damping ratios of first mode is proposed for wind turbines with steel towers using the results from the previous researches and the excitation tests in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-4244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/we.2214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Active damping ; active mass damper ; Building codes ; Damping ratio ; Design ; Earthquake dampers ; Earthquake resistance ; Excitation ; excitation test ; Linear systems ; Offshore operations ; Parameter identification ; Seismic design ; seismic resistant design ; Steel ; Turbines ; Wind power ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2018-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1232-1238</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-cc9da8b6cc5ec856abc634e2bf0237bd4e2cecae6d85a688b7c8a6c0f4b2db353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-cc9da8b6cc5ec856abc634e2bf0237bd4e2cecae6d85a688b7c8a6c0f4b2db353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3050-5793</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwe.2214$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwe.2214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oh, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><title>Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper</title><title>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</title><description>While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not described. In order to evaluate the damping ratios for both first and second modes of MW‐size wind turbines, a series of excitation tests using an active mass damper were performed in this study on a 2.4 MW offshore wind turbine. First, the sinusoidal test, which gives accurate and reliable results for linear systems, is performed, and results show that the damping ratio for the fore‐aft first mode is 0.2% and the fore‐aft second mode is 2.4% for the target wind turbine. Next the free decay test, which is applicable to systems with the effect from the aerodynamic damping, is performed, and results show that the damping ratios obtained for the fore‐aft first and second mode are similar to those from the sinusoidal test. The damping ratio is 1.2% for the side‐side first mode and 3.2% for the side‐side second mode. Finally, an empirical formula for the damping ratios of first mode is proposed for wind turbines with steel towers using the results from the previous researches and the excitation tests in this study.</description><subject>Active damping</subject><subject>active mass damper</subject><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Damping ratio</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Earthquake dampers</subject><subject>Earthquake resistance</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>excitation test</subject><subject>Linear systems</subject><subject>Offshore operations</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>seismic resistant design</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>1095-4244</issn><issn>1099-1824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqUg_oIlDhxQiu04qXNEVXlIRRwA9Wj5sUGumge2Q9p_T9pw5bRz-GZ3ZxC6pmRGCWH3PcwYo_wETSgpioQKxk-POks44_wcXYSwIYQSSsUEde_RdyZ2Xm1xq7yqIILHzkIdXemMiq6pcVNihdmM49c11k2MTYVLtwOLe1dbPJi1qwHrPYadcXH0RAgRd8HVX1iZ6H4AVyoEbFXVgr9EZ6XaBrj6m1P0-bj8WDwnq7enl8XDKjFMFDwxprBK6NyYDIzIcqVNnnJguiQsnWs7SANGQW5FpnIh9NwIlRtScs2sTrN0im7Gva1vvrvhI7lpOl8PJyUb4jMhWD4fqNuRMr4JwUMpW-8q5feSEnnoVPYgD50O5N1I9m4L-_8wuV4e6V-8pHkN</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Oh, Sho</creator><creator>Ishihara, Takeshi</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3050-5793</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper</title><author>Oh, Sho ; Ishihara, Takeshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-cc9da8b6cc5ec856abc634e2bf0237bd4e2cecae6d85a688b7c8a6c0f4b2db353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Active damping</topic><topic>active mass damper</topic><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Damping ratio</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Earthquake dampers</topic><topic>Earthquake resistance</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>excitation test</topic><topic>Linear systems</topic><topic>Offshore operations</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>seismic resistant design</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oh, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oh, Sho</au><au>Ishihara, Takeshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper</atitle><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1232</spage><epage>1238</epage><pages>1232-1238</pages><issn>1095-4244</issn><eissn>1099-1824</eissn><abstract>While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not described. In order to evaluate the damping ratios for both first and second modes of MW‐size wind turbines, a series of excitation tests using an active mass damper were performed in this study on a 2.4 MW offshore wind turbine. First, the sinusoidal test, which gives accurate and reliable results for linear systems, is performed, and results show that the damping ratio for the fore‐aft first mode is 0.2% and the fore‐aft second mode is 2.4% for the target wind turbine. Next the free decay test, which is applicable to systems with the effect from the aerodynamic damping, is performed, and results show that the damping ratios obtained for the fore‐aft first and second mode are similar to those from the sinusoidal test. The damping ratio is 1.2% for the side‐side first mode and 3.2% for the side‐side second mode. Finally, an empirical formula for the damping ratios of first mode is proposed for wind turbines with steel towers using the results from the previous researches and the excitation tests in this study.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/we.2214</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3050-5793</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1095-4244
ispartof Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2018-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1232-1238
issn 1095-4244
1099-1824
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2118288267
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Active damping
active mass damper
Building codes
Damping ratio
Design
Earthquake dampers
Earthquake resistance
Excitation
excitation test
Linear systems
Offshore operations
Parameter identification
Seismic design
seismic resistant design
Steel
Turbines
Wind power
Wind turbines
title Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T15%3A41%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20parameter%20identification%20of%20a%202.4%20MW%20bottom%20fixed%20wind%20turbine%20by%20excitation%20test%20using%20active%20mass%20damper&rft.jtitle=Wind%20energy%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Oh,%20Sho&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1232&rft.epage=1238&rft.pages=1232-1238&rft.issn=1095-4244&rft.eissn=1099-1824&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/we.2214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2118288267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118288267&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true