Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper
While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not desc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wind energy (Chichester, England) England), 2018-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1232-1238 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1238 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1232 |
container_title | Wind energy (Chichester, England) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Oh, Sho Ishihara, Takeshi |
description | While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not described. In order to evaluate the damping ratios for both first and second modes of MW‐size wind turbines, a series of excitation tests using an active mass damper were performed in this study on a 2.4 MW offshore wind turbine. First, the sinusoidal test, which gives accurate and reliable results for linear systems, is performed, and results show that the damping ratio for the fore‐aft first mode is 0.2% and the fore‐aft second mode is 2.4% for the target wind turbine. Next the free decay test, which is applicable to systems with the effect from the aerodynamic damping, is performed, and results show that the damping ratios obtained for the fore‐aft first and second mode are similar to those from the sinusoidal test. The damping ratio is 1.2% for the side‐side first mode and 3.2% for the side‐side second mode. Finally, an empirical formula for the damping ratios of first mode is proposed for wind turbines with steel towers using the results from the previous researches and the excitation tests in this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/we.2214 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2118288267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2118288267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-cc9da8b6cc5ec856abc634e2bf0237bd4e2cecae6d85a688b7c8a6c0f4b2db353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqUg_oIlDhxQiu04qXNEVXlIRRwA9Wj5sUGumge2Q9p_T9pw5bRz-GZ3ZxC6pmRGCWH3PcwYo_wETSgpioQKxk-POks44_wcXYSwIYQSSsUEde_RdyZ2Xm1xq7yqIILHzkIdXemMiq6pcVNihdmM49c11k2MTYVLtwOLe1dbPJi1qwHrPYadcXH0RAgRd8HVX1iZ6H4AVyoEbFXVgr9EZ6XaBrj6m1P0-bj8WDwnq7enl8XDKjFMFDwxprBK6NyYDIzIcqVNnnJguiQsnWs7SANGQW5FpnIh9NwIlRtScs2sTrN0im7Gva1vvrvhI7lpOl8PJyUb4jMhWD4fqNuRMr4JwUMpW-8q5feSEnnoVPYgD50O5N1I9m4L-_8wuV4e6V-8pHkN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118288267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Oh, Sho ; Ishihara, Takeshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Oh, Sho ; Ishihara, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><description>While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not described. In order to evaluate the damping ratios for both first and second modes of MW‐size wind turbines, a series of excitation tests using an active mass damper were performed in this study on a 2.4 MW offshore wind turbine. First, the sinusoidal test, which gives accurate and reliable results for linear systems, is performed, and results show that the damping ratio for the fore‐aft first mode is 0.2% and the fore‐aft second mode is 2.4% for the target wind turbine. Next the free decay test, which is applicable to systems with the effect from the aerodynamic damping, is performed, and results show that the damping ratios obtained for the fore‐aft first and second mode are similar to those from the sinusoidal test. The damping ratio is 1.2% for the side‐side first mode and 3.2% for the side‐side second mode. Finally, an empirical formula for the damping ratios of first mode is proposed for wind turbines with steel towers using the results from the previous researches and the excitation tests in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-4244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/we.2214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Active damping ; active mass damper ; Building codes ; Damping ratio ; Design ; Earthquake dampers ; Earthquake resistance ; Excitation ; excitation test ; Linear systems ; Offshore operations ; Parameter identification ; Seismic design ; seismic resistant design ; Steel ; Turbines ; Wind power ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2018-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1232-1238</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-cc9da8b6cc5ec856abc634e2bf0237bd4e2cecae6d85a688b7c8a6c0f4b2db353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-cc9da8b6cc5ec856abc634e2bf0237bd4e2cecae6d85a688b7c8a6c0f4b2db353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3050-5793</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwe.2214$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwe.2214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oh, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><title>Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper</title><title>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</title><description>While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not described. In order to evaluate the damping ratios for both first and second modes of MW‐size wind turbines, a series of excitation tests using an active mass damper were performed in this study on a 2.4 MW offshore wind turbine. First, the sinusoidal test, which gives accurate and reliable results for linear systems, is performed, and results show that the damping ratio for the fore‐aft first mode is 0.2% and the fore‐aft second mode is 2.4% for the target wind turbine. Next the free decay test, which is applicable to systems with the effect from the aerodynamic damping, is performed, and results show that the damping ratios obtained for the fore‐aft first and second mode are similar to those from the sinusoidal test. The damping ratio is 1.2% for the side‐side first mode and 3.2% for the side‐side second mode. Finally, an empirical formula for the damping ratios of first mode is proposed for wind turbines with steel towers using the results from the previous researches and the excitation tests in this study.</description><subject>Active damping</subject><subject>active mass damper</subject><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Damping ratio</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Earthquake dampers</subject><subject>Earthquake resistance</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>excitation test</subject><subject>Linear systems</subject><subject>Offshore operations</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>seismic resistant design</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>1095-4244</issn><issn>1099-1824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqUg_oIlDhxQiu04qXNEVXlIRRwA9Wj5sUGumge2Q9p_T9pw5bRz-GZ3ZxC6pmRGCWH3PcwYo_wETSgpioQKxk-POks44_wcXYSwIYQSSsUEde_RdyZ2Xm1xq7yqIILHzkIdXemMiq6pcVNihdmM49c11k2MTYVLtwOLe1dbPJi1qwHrPYadcXH0RAgRd8HVX1iZ6H4AVyoEbFXVgr9EZ6XaBrj6m1P0-bj8WDwnq7enl8XDKjFMFDwxprBK6NyYDIzIcqVNnnJguiQsnWs7SANGQW5FpnIh9NwIlRtScs2sTrN0im7Gva1vvrvhI7lpOl8PJyUb4jMhWD4fqNuRMr4JwUMpW-8q5feSEnnoVPYgD50O5N1I9m4L-_8wuV4e6V-8pHkN</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Oh, Sho</creator><creator>Ishihara, Takeshi</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3050-5793</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper</title><author>Oh, Sho ; Ishihara, Takeshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-cc9da8b6cc5ec856abc634e2bf0237bd4e2cecae6d85a688b7c8a6c0f4b2db353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Active damping</topic><topic>active mass damper</topic><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Damping ratio</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Earthquake dampers</topic><topic>Earthquake resistance</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>excitation test</topic><topic>Linear systems</topic><topic>Offshore operations</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>seismic resistant design</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oh, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oh, Sho</au><au>Ishihara, Takeshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper</atitle><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1232</spage><epage>1238</epage><pages>1232-1238</pages><issn>1095-4244</issn><eissn>1099-1824</eissn><abstract>While the structural damping is an important parameter in the seismic resistant design, several problems exist in the current design codes such as that the recommended values vary largely between design codes, and that the second mode damping ratio which is required in the design is usually not described. In order to evaluate the damping ratios for both first and second modes of MW‐size wind turbines, a series of excitation tests using an active mass damper were performed in this study on a 2.4 MW offshore wind turbine. First, the sinusoidal test, which gives accurate and reliable results for linear systems, is performed, and results show that the damping ratio for the fore‐aft first mode is 0.2% and the fore‐aft second mode is 2.4% for the target wind turbine. Next the free decay test, which is applicable to systems with the effect from the aerodynamic damping, is performed, and results show that the damping ratios obtained for the fore‐aft first and second mode are similar to those from the sinusoidal test. The damping ratio is 1.2% for the side‐side first mode and 3.2% for the side‐side second mode. Finally, an empirical formula for the damping ratios of first mode is proposed for wind turbines with steel towers using the results from the previous researches and the excitation tests in this study.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/we.2214</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3050-5793</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1095-4244 |
ispartof | Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2018-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1232-1238 |
issn | 1095-4244 1099-1824 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2118288267 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals |
subjects | Active damping active mass damper Building codes Damping ratio Design Earthquake dampers Earthquake resistance Excitation excitation test Linear systems Offshore operations Parameter identification Seismic design seismic resistant design Steel Turbines Wind power Wind turbines |
title | Structural parameter identification of a 2.4 MW bottom fixed wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T15%3A41%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20parameter%20identification%20of%20a%202.4%20MW%20bottom%20fixed%20wind%20turbine%20by%20excitation%20test%20using%20active%20mass%20damper&rft.jtitle=Wind%20energy%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Oh,%20Sho&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1232&rft.epage=1238&rft.pages=1232-1238&rft.issn=1095-4244&rft.eissn=1099-1824&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/we.2214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2118288267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118288267&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |