Horizontal policy coherence starts with problem definition: Unpacking the EU integrated energy‐climate approach
The existing policy coherence literature usually takes problem definition for granted. Building on the case of the Energy Policy for Europe we argue that a focus on shifting problem definitions adds depth to the analysis of policy coherence as it allows us to problematize the standard on which the j...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental policy and governance 2018-09, Vol.28 (5), p.329-338 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 338 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 329 |
container_title | Environmental policy and governance |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Kurze, Kristina Lenschow, Andrea |
description | The existing policy coherence literature usually takes problem definition for granted. Building on the case of the Energy Policy for Europe we argue that a focus on shifting problem definitions adds depth to the analysis of policy coherence as it allows us to problematize the standard on which the judgment of coherence is based. We further argue that problem definition is instrumental in enabling certain horizontal policy options. Empirically, the European Union's (EU's) support of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies illustrates that policy coherence between EU energy and environmental policies is increasingly conceptualized as an integrated approach headed for climate change mitigation and a low‐carbon economy. We show that by shifting the focus of policy integration and coherence from environment to climate policy, CCS moved from the margins to the center of available policy options. Arguably, this comes at the expense of coherence if viewed from a broader sustainable development perspective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eet.1819 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2118247411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2118247411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-3d70c5ae5a0d10d574abad60255b6693e86772752154cfb7e410cb95621b2f9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFKwzAUhosoOKfgIwS88aYzSZum9U5GdcLAmw28C2l6umZ2aZdkjHrlI_iMPomdE--8OofDx_8fviC4JnhCMKZ3AH5CUpKdBCPCWRJmUZSe_u309Ty4cG6NcRLTGI-C7ay1-r01XjaoaxuteqTaGiwYBch5ab1De-1r1Nm2aGCDSqi00V635h4tTSfVmzYr5GtA-RJp42FlpYcSgQG76r8-PlWjN8MFyW6IkKq-DM4q2Ti4-p3jYPmYL6azcP7y9Dx9mIeKZlEWRiXHiklgEpcEl4zHspBlgiljRZJkEaQJ55QzSlisqoJDTLAqMpZQUtAqK6JxcHPMHWq3O3BerNudNUOloISkNOYxIQN1e6SUbZ2zUInODv_aXhAsDkLFIFQchA5oeET3uoH-X07k-eKH_wbh03lL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118247411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Horizontal policy coherence starts with problem definition: Unpacking the EU integrated energy‐climate approach</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kurze, Kristina ; Lenschow, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurze, Kristina ; Lenschow, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>The existing policy coherence literature usually takes problem definition for granted. Building on the case of the Energy Policy for Europe we argue that a focus on shifting problem definitions adds depth to the analysis of policy coherence as it allows us to problematize the standard on which the judgment of coherence is based. We further argue that problem definition is instrumental in enabling certain horizontal policy options. Empirically, the European Union's (EU's) support of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies illustrates that policy coherence between EU energy and environmental policies is increasingly conceptualized as an integrated approach headed for climate change mitigation and a low‐carbon economy. We show that by shifting the focus of policy integration and coherence from environment to climate policy, CCS moved from the margins to the center of available policy options. Arguably, this comes at the expense of coherence if viewed from a broader sustainable development perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-932X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eet.1819</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shipley: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>carbon capture and storage ; Carbon sequestration ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate policy ; Coherence ; discourse ; Energy ; Energy policy ; Energy storage ; Environmental policy ; Integrated approach ; Integrative approach ; low‐carbon economy ; Mitigation ; policy coherence ; problem definition ; Storage ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Environmental policy and governance, 2018-09, Vol.28 (5), p.329-338</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-3d70c5ae5a0d10d574abad60255b6693e86772752154cfb7e410cb95621b2f9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-3d70c5ae5a0d10d574abad60255b6693e86772752154cfb7e410cb95621b2f9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feet.1819$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feet.1819$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurze, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenschow, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Horizontal policy coherence starts with problem definition: Unpacking the EU integrated energy‐climate approach</title><title>Environmental policy and governance</title><description>The existing policy coherence literature usually takes problem definition for granted. Building on the case of the Energy Policy for Europe we argue that a focus on shifting problem definitions adds depth to the analysis of policy coherence as it allows us to problematize the standard on which the judgment of coherence is based. We further argue that problem definition is instrumental in enabling certain horizontal policy options. Empirically, the European Union's (EU's) support of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies illustrates that policy coherence between EU energy and environmental policies is increasingly conceptualized as an integrated approach headed for climate change mitigation and a low‐carbon economy. We show that by shifting the focus of policy integration and coherence from environment to climate policy, CCS moved from the margins to the center of available policy options. Arguably, this comes at the expense of coherence if viewed from a broader sustainable development perspective.</description><subject>carbon capture and storage</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>discourse</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Integrated approach</subject><subject>Integrative approach</subject><subject>low‐carbon economy</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>policy coherence</subject><subject>problem definition</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>1756-932X</issn><issn>1756-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFKwzAUhosoOKfgIwS88aYzSZum9U5GdcLAmw28C2l6umZ2aZdkjHrlI_iMPomdE--8OofDx_8fviC4JnhCMKZ3AH5CUpKdBCPCWRJmUZSe_u309Ty4cG6NcRLTGI-C7ay1-r01XjaoaxuteqTaGiwYBch5ab1De-1r1Nm2aGCDSqi00V635h4tTSfVmzYr5GtA-RJp42FlpYcSgQG76r8-PlWjN8MFyW6IkKq-DM4q2Ti4-p3jYPmYL6azcP7y9Dx9mIeKZlEWRiXHiklgEpcEl4zHspBlgiljRZJkEaQJ55QzSlisqoJDTLAqMpZQUtAqK6JxcHPMHWq3O3BerNudNUOloISkNOYxIQN1e6SUbZ2zUInODv_aXhAsDkLFIFQchA5oeET3uoH-X07k-eKH_wbh03lL</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Kurze, Kristina</creator><creator>Lenschow, Andrea</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Horizontal policy coherence starts with problem definition: Unpacking the EU integrated energy‐climate approach</title><author>Kurze, Kristina ; Lenschow, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-3d70c5ae5a0d10d574abad60255b6693e86772752154cfb7e410cb95621b2f9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>carbon capture and storage</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>discourse</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Integrated approach</topic><topic>Integrative approach</topic><topic>low‐carbon economy</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>policy coherence</topic><topic>problem definition</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurze, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenschow, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental policy and governance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurze, Kristina</au><au>Lenschow, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Horizontal policy coherence starts with problem definition: Unpacking the EU integrated energy‐climate approach</atitle><jtitle>Environmental policy and governance</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>329-338</pages><issn>1756-932X</issn><eissn>1756-9338</eissn><abstract>The existing policy coherence literature usually takes problem definition for granted. Building on the case of the Energy Policy for Europe we argue that a focus on shifting problem definitions adds depth to the analysis of policy coherence as it allows us to problematize the standard on which the judgment of coherence is based. We further argue that problem definition is instrumental in enabling certain horizontal policy options. Empirically, the European Union's (EU's) support of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies illustrates that policy coherence between EU energy and environmental policies is increasingly conceptualized as an integrated approach headed for climate change mitigation and a low‐carbon economy. We show that by shifting the focus of policy integration and coherence from environment to climate policy, CCS moved from the margins to the center of available policy options. Arguably, this comes at the expense of coherence if viewed from a broader sustainable development perspective.</abstract><cop>Shipley</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/eet.1819</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-932X |
ispartof | Environmental policy and governance, 2018-09, Vol.28 (5), p.329-338 |
issn | 1756-932X 1756-9338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2118247411 |
source | PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | carbon capture and storage Carbon sequestration Climate Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Coherence discourse Energy Energy policy Energy storage Environmental policy Integrated approach Integrative approach low‐carbon economy Mitigation policy coherence problem definition Storage Sustainable development |
title | Horizontal policy coherence starts with problem definition: Unpacking the EU integrated energy‐climate approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A02%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Horizontal%20policy%20coherence%20starts%20with%20problem%20definition:%20Unpacking%20the%20EU%20integrated%20energy%E2%80%90climate%20approach&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20policy%20and%20governance&rft.au=Kurze,%20Kristina&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=329-338&rft.issn=1756-932X&rft.eissn=1756-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eet.1819&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2118247411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118247411&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |