Evolving Relative Importance of the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic in Anthropogenic Ocean Heat Uptake
Ocean uptake of anthropogenic heat over the past 15 years has mostly occurred in the Southern Ocean, based on Argo float observations. This agrees with historical simulations from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), where the Southern Ocean (south of 30°S) accounts for 72%...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of climate 2018-09, Vol.31 (18), p.7459-7479 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7479 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 7459 |
container_title | Journal of climate |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Shi, Jia-Rui Xie, Shang-Ping Talley, Lynne D. |
description | Ocean uptake of anthropogenic heat over the past 15 years has mostly occurred in the Southern Ocean, based on Argo float observations. This agrees with historical simulations from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), where the Southern Ocean (south of 30°S) accounts for 72% ± 28% of global heat uptake, while the contribution from the North Atlantic north of 30°N is only 6%. Aerosols preferentially cool the Northern Hemisphere, and the effect on surface heat flux over the subpolar North Atlantic opposes the greenhouse gas (GHG) effect in nearly equal magnitude. This heat uptake compensation is associated with weakening (strengthening) of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) in response to GHG (aerosol) radiative forcing. Aerosols are projected to decline in the near future, reinforcing the greenhouse effect on the North Atlantic heat uptake. As a result, the Southern Ocean, which will continue to take up anthropogenic heat largely through the mean upwelling of water from depth, will be joined by increased relative contribution from the North Atlantic because of substantial AMOC slowdown in the twenty-first century. In the RCP8.5 scenario, the percentage contribution to global uptake is projected to decrease to 48% ± 8% in the Southern Ocean and increase to 26% ± 6% in the northern North Atlantic. Despite the large uncertainty in the magnitude of projected aerosol forcing, our results suggest that anthropogenic aerosols, given their geographic distributions and temporal trajectories, strongly influence the high-latitude ocean heat uptake and interhemispheric asymmetry through AMOC change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/jcli-d-18-0170.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2117986742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26496675</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26496675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-419c1cf135748edca8a38d0b84ee417d9a7fafdb2221a1e1d12201857f0fa92a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKfvvggBn6O5adqkj2NONxkO1D2HLE3Xzi6paTbw39tR8enA4Tv3wofQLdAHAJE-7kxTk4KAJBRE352hEaSMEso5O0cjKnNOpEjTS3TVdTtKgWWUjlA1O_rmWLstfreNjvXR4sW-9SFqZyz2JY6VxR_-0EdweGWsdli7Ar_1SIUnsdEu1gbXDk9crIJv_da6vhjIudURr9uov-w1uih109mbvxyj9fPsczony9XLYjpZEpOkeSQccgOmhCQVXNrCaKkTWdCN5NZyEEWuRanLYsMYAw0WCmCMgkxFSUudM52M0f1wtw3--2C7qHb-EFz_UrFeVC4zwVlP0YEywXddsKVqQ73X4UcBVSef6nW6XKgnBVKdfCroJ3fDZNdFH_55lvE8y0Sa_AL1gXNa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117986742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolving Relative Importance of the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic in Anthropogenic Ocean Heat Uptake</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Shi, Jia-Rui ; Xie, Shang-Ping ; Talley, Lynne D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jia-Rui ; Xie, Shang-Ping ; Talley, Lynne D.</creatorcontrib><description>Ocean uptake of anthropogenic heat over the past 15 years has mostly occurred in the Southern Ocean, based on Argo float observations. This agrees with historical simulations from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), where the Southern Ocean (south of 30°S) accounts for 72% ± 28% of global heat uptake, while the contribution from the North Atlantic north of 30°N is only 6%. Aerosols preferentially cool the Northern Hemisphere, and the effect on surface heat flux over the subpolar North Atlantic opposes the greenhouse gas (GHG) effect in nearly equal magnitude. This heat uptake compensation is associated with weakening (strengthening) of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) in response to GHG (aerosol) radiative forcing. Aerosols are projected to decline in the near future, reinforcing the greenhouse effect on the North Atlantic heat uptake. As a result, the Southern Ocean, which will continue to take up anthropogenic heat largely through the mean upwelling of water from depth, will be joined by increased relative contribution from the North Atlantic because of substantial AMOC slowdown in the twenty-first century. In the RCP8.5 scenario, the percentage contribution to global uptake is projected to decrease to 48% ± 8% in the Southern Ocean and increase to 26% ± 6% in the northern North Atlantic. Despite the large uncertainty in the magnitude of projected aerosol forcing, our results suggest that anthropogenic aerosols, given their geographic distributions and temporal trajectories, strongly influence the high-latitude ocean heat uptake and interhemispheric asymmetry through AMOC change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-18-0170.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Air pollution ; Anthropogenic factors ; Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) ; Atmosphere ; Cerebral hemispheres ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Computer simulation ; Geographical distribution ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Heat ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer ; Hemispheric laterality ; Human influences ; Intercomparison ; Northern Hemisphere ; Ocean circulation ; Oceanography ; Oceans ; Radiative forcing ; Uptake ; Upwelling ; Water depth ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 2018-09, Vol.31 (18), p.7459-7479</ispartof><rights>2018 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-419c1cf135748edca8a38d0b84ee417d9a7fafdb2221a1e1d12201857f0fa92a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-419c1cf135748edca8a38d0b84ee417d9a7fafdb2221a1e1d12201857f0fa92a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26496675$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26496675$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3668,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jia-Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Shang-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talley, Lynne D.</creatorcontrib><title>Evolving Relative Importance of the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic in Anthropogenic Ocean Heat Uptake</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>Ocean uptake of anthropogenic heat over the past 15 years has mostly occurred in the Southern Ocean, based on Argo float observations. This agrees with historical simulations from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), where the Southern Ocean (south of 30°S) accounts for 72% ± 28% of global heat uptake, while the contribution from the North Atlantic north of 30°N is only 6%. Aerosols preferentially cool the Northern Hemisphere, and the effect on surface heat flux over the subpolar North Atlantic opposes the greenhouse gas (GHG) effect in nearly equal magnitude. This heat uptake compensation is associated with weakening (strengthening) of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) in response to GHG (aerosol) radiative forcing. Aerosols are projected to decline in the near future, reinforcing the greenhouse effect on the North Atlantic heat uptake. As a result, the Southern Ocean, which will continue to take up anthropogenic heat largely through the mean upwelling of water from depth, will be joined by increased relative contribution from the North Atlantic because of substantial AMOC slowdown in the twenty-first century. In the RCP8.5 scenario, the percentage contribution to global uptake is projected to decrease to 48% ± 8% in the Southern Ocean and increase to 26% ± 6% in the northern North Atlantic. Despite the large uncertainty in the magnitude of projected aerosol forcing, our results suggest that anthropogenic aerosols, given their geographic distributions and temporal trajectories, strongly influence the high-latitude ocean heat uptake and interhemispheric asymmetry through AMOC change.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Cerebral hemispheres</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Hemispheric laterality</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Intercomparison</subject><subject>Northern Hemisphere</subject><subject>Ocean circulation</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Radiative forcing</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Upwelling</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKfvvggBn6O5adqkj2NONxkO1D2HLE3Xzi6paTbw39tR8enA4Tv3wofQLdAHAJE-7kxTk4KAJBRE352hEaSMEso5O0cjKnNOpEjTS3TVdTtKgWWUjlA1O_rmWLstfreNjvXR4sW-9SFqZyz2JY6VxR_-0EdweGWsdli7Ar_1SIUnsdEu1gbXDk9crIJv_da6vhjIudURr9uov-w1uih109mbvxyj9fPsczony9XLYjpZEpOkeSQccgOmhCQVXNrCaKkTWdCN5NZyEEWuRanLYsMYAw0WCmCMgkxFSUudM52M0f1wtw3--2C7qHb-EFz_UrFeVC4zwVlP0YEywXddsKVqQ73X4UcBVSef6nW6XKgnBVKdfCroJ3fDZNdFH_55lvE8y0Sa_AL1gXNa</recordid><startdate>20180915</startdate><enddate>20180915</enddate><creator>Shi, Jia-Rui</creator><creator>Xie, Shang-Ping</creator><creator>Talley, Lynne D.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180915</creationdate><title>Evolving Relative Importance of the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic in Anthropogenic Ocean Heat Uptake</title><author>Shi, Jia-Rui ; Xie, Shang-Ping ; Talley, Lynne D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-419c1cf135748edca8a38d0b84ee417d9a7fafdb2221a1e1d12201857f0fa92a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Cerebral hemispheres</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Hemispheric laterality</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Intercomparison</topic><topic>Northern Hemisphere</topic><topic>Ocean circulation</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Radiative forcing</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Upwelling</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jia-Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Shang-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talley, Lynne D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Jia-Rui</au><au>Xie, Shang-Ping</au><au>Talley, Lynne D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolving Relative Importance of the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic in Anthropogenic Ocean Heat Uptake</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>2018-09-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>7459</spage><epage>7479</epage><pages>7459-7479</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>Ocean uptake of anthropogenic heat over the past 15 years has mostly occurred in the Southern Ocean, based on Argo float observations. This agrees with historical simulations from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), where the Southern Ocean (south of 30°S) accounts for 72% ± 28% of global heat uptake, while the contribution from the North Atlantic north of 30°N is only 6%. Aerosols preferentially cool the Northern Hemisphere, and the effect on surface heat flux over the subpolar North Atlantic opposes the greenhouse gas (GHG) effect in nearly equal magnitude. This heat uptake compensation is associated with weakening (strengthening) of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) in response to GHG (aerosol) radiative forcing. Aerosols are projected to decline in the near future, reinforcing the greenhouse effect on the North Atlantic heat uptake. As a result, the Southern Ocean, which will continue to take up anthropogenic heat largely through the mean upwelling of water from depth, will be joined by increased relative contribution from the North Atlantic because of substantial AMOC slowdown in the twenty-first century. In the RCP8.5 scenario, the percentage contribution to global uptake is projected to decrease to 48% ± 8% in the Southern Ocean and increase to 26% ± 6% in the northern North Atlantic. Despite the large uncertainty in the magnitude of projected aerosol forcing, our results suggest that anthropogenic aerosols, given their geographic distributions and temporal trajectories, strongly influence the high-latitude ocean heat uptake and interhemispheric asymmetry through AMOC change.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/jcli-d-18-0170.1</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-8755 |
ispartof | Journal of climate, 2018-09, Vol.31 (18), p.7459-7479 |
issn | 0894-8755 1520-0442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2117986742 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aerosols Air pollution Anthropogenic factors Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) Atmosphere Cerebral hemispheres Climate change Climate models Computer simulation Geographical distribution Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Heat Heat flux Heat transfer Hemispheric laterality Human influences Intercomparison Northern Hemisphere Ocean circulation Oceanography Oceans Radiative forcing Uptake Upwelling Water depth Wind |
title | Evolving Relative Importance of the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic in Anthropogenic Ocean Heat Uptake |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T13%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolving%20Relative%20Importance%20of%20the%20Southern%20Ocean%20and%20North%20Atlantic%20in%20Anthropogenic%20Ocean%20Heat%20Uptake&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=Shi,%20Jia-Rui&rft.date=2018-09-15&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=7459&rft.epage=7479&rft.pages=7459-7479&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/jcli-d-18-0170.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26496675%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117986742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26496675&rfr_iscdi=true |