Competing for Foreign Direct Investment
This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence suppo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public finance review 2018-11, Vol.46 (6), p.1044-1068 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1068 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1044 |
container_title | Public finance review |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Wu, Chen Burge, Gregory S |
description | This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness has proven elusive. Using data from Chinese provinces covering 1999 to 2012, we explore this relationship using a dynamic system generalized method of moments approach. We find some evidence that trade zones enhance FDI-related employment but find none to support the idea that industrial development zones and spending to promote foreign affairs increase employment. Conversely, regional spillovers are consistently found to increase FDI-related employment in our main results and all robustness checks. We argue this highlights the importance of crowd-out effects and agglomeration spillovers, and that coordinating FDI promotion policy across regions may compare favorably to the current approach, which mainly encourages local competition over a largely fixed pool of aggregate FDI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1091142117698015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2117655788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2117655788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758-6ca0059eba77bac4719f70001cb6f07c51320173f1b25c5b24c3070523eb66343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LAzEURYNYsLbuXQ64cBV9L5mXN1nKaLVQcNN9mYRMmWKTmpn6-40fq3vgwj1cIW4RHhCZHxEsYq0KG9sA0oWYI5GSTBouC5da_vRX4nocDwCgiO1c3LfpeArTEPdVn3K1SjkM-1g9Dzn4qVrHrzBOxxCnpZj13ccYbv5zIbarl237Jjfvr-v2aSM9UyON7wDIBtcxu87XjLbn4kLvTA_sCbUCZN2jU-TJqdprYCClgzNG13oh7v5mTzl9not7d0jnHItx93uNiJtGfwMBtEBI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117655788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competing for Foreign Direct Investment</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wu, Chen ; Burge, Gregory S</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chen ; Burge, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness has proven elusive. Using data from Chinese provinces covering 1999 to 2012, we explore this relationship using a dynamic system generalized method of moments approach. We find some evidence that trade zones enhance FDI-related employment but find none to support the idea that industrial development zones and spending to promote foreign affairs increase employment. Conversely, regional spillovers are consistently found to increase FDI-related employment in our main results and all robustness checks. We argue this highlights the importance of crowd-out effects and agglomeration spillovers, and that coordinating FDI promotion policy across regions may compare favorably to the current approach, which mainly encourages local competition over a largely fixed pool of aggregate FDI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-1421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1091142117698015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Competition ; Economic development ; Economic models ; Effectiveness ; Employment ; Foreign investment ; Generalized method of moments ; Government spending ; Industrial development ; International relations ; International trade ; Provinces ; Robustness ; Spillover effect</subject><ispartof>Public finance review, 2018-11, Vol.46 (6), p.1044-1068</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758-6ca0059eba77bac4719f70001cb6f07c51320173f1b25c5b24c3070523eb66343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burge, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><title>Competing for Foreign Direct Investment</title><title>Public finance review</title><description>This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness has proven elusive. Using data from Chinese provinces covering 1999 to 2012, we explore this relationship using a dynamic system generalized method of moments approach. We find some evidence that trade zones enhance FDI-related employment but find none to support the idea that industrial development zones and spending to promote foreign affairs increase employment. Conversely, regional spillovers are consistently found to increase FDI-related employment in our main results and all robustness checks. We argue this highlights the importance of crowd-out effects and agglomeration spillovers, and that coordinating FDI promotion policy across regions may compare favorably to the current approach, which mainly encourages local competition over a largely fixed pool of aggregate FDI.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>Generalized method of moments</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Spillover effect</subject><issn>1091-1421</issn><issn>1552-7530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LAzEURYNYsLbuXQ64cBV9L5mXN1nKaLVQcNN9mYRMmWKTmpn6-40fq3vgwj1cIW4RHhCZHxEsYq0KG9sA0oWYI5GSTBouC5da_vRX4nocDwCgiO1c3LfpeArTEPdVn3K1SjkM-1g9Dzn4qVrHrzBOxxCnpZj13ccYbv5zIbarl237Jjfvr-v2aSM9UyON7wDIBtcxu87XjLbn4kLvTA_sCbUCZN2jU-TJqdprYCClgzNG13oh7v5mTzl9not7d0jnHItx93uNiJtGfwMBtEBI</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Wu, Chen</creator><creator>Burge, Gregory S</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Competing for Foreign Direct Investment</title><author>Wu, Chen ; Burge, Gregory S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758-6ca0059eba77bac4719f70001cb6f07c51320173f1b25c5b24c3070523eb66343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>Generalized method of moments</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Spillover effect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burge, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Public finance review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Chen</au><au>Burge, Gregory S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competing for Foreign Direct Investment</atitle><jtitle>Public finance review</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1044</spage><epage>1068</epage><pages>1044-1068</pages><issn>1091-1421</issn><eissn>1552-7530</eissn><abstract>This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness has proven elusive. Using data from Chinese provinces covering 1999 to 2012, we explore this relationship using a dynamic system generalized method of moments approach. We find some evidence that trade zones enhance FDI-related employment but find none to support the idea that industrial development zones and spending to promote foreign affairs increase employment. Conversely, regional spillovers are consistently found to increase FDI-related employment in our main results and all robustness checks. We argue this highlights the importance of crowd-out effects and agglomeration spillovers, and that coordinating FDI promotion policy across regions may compare favorably to the current approach, which mainly encourages local competition over a largely fixed pool of aggregate FDI.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><doi>10.1177/1091142117698015</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1091-1421 |
ispartof | Public finance review, 2018-11, Vol.46 (6), p.1044-1068 |
issn | 1091-1421 1552-7530 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2117655788 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Competition Economic development Economic models Effectiveness Employment Foreign investment Generalized method of moments Government spending Industrial development International relations International trade Provinces Robustness Spillover effect |
title | Competing for Foreign Direct Investment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A21%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competing%20for%20Foreign%20Direct%20Investment&rft.jtitle=Public%20finance%20review&rft.au=Wu,%20Chen&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1044&rft.epage=1068&rft.pages=1044-1068&rft.issn=1091-1421&rft.eissn=1552-7530&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1091142117698015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2117655788%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117655788&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |