Competing for Foreign Direct Investment

This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence suppo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public finance review 2018-11, Vol.46 (6), p.1044-1068
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Chen, Burge, Gregory S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1068
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1044
container_title Public finance review
container_volume 46
creator Wu, Chen
Burge, Gregory S
description This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness has proven elusive. Using data from Chinese provinces covering 1999 to 2012, we explore this relationship using a dynamic system generalized method of moments approach. We find some evidence that trade zones enhance FDI-related employment but find none to support the idea that industrial development zones and spending to promote foreign affairs increase employment. Conversely, regional spillovers are consistently found to increase FDI-related employment in our main results and all robustness checks. We argue this highlights the importance of crowd-out effects and agglomeration spillovers, and that coordinating FDI promotion policy across regions may compare favorably to the current approach, which mainly encourages local competition over a largely fixed pool of aggregate FDI.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1091142117698015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2117655788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2117655788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758-6ca0059eba77bac4719f70001cb6f07c51320173f1b25c5b24c3070523eb66343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LAzEURYNYsLbuXQ64cBV9L5mXN1nKaLVQcNN9mYRMmWKTmpn6-40fq3vgwj1cIW4RHhCZHxEsYq0KG9sA0oWYI5GSTBouC5da_vRX4nocDwCgiO1c3LfpeArTEPdVn3K1SjkM-1g9Dzn4qVrHrzBOxxCnpZj13ccYbv5zIbarl237Jjfvr-v2aSM9UyON7wDIBtcxu87XjLbn4kLvTA_sCbUCZN2jU-TJqdprYCClgzNG13oh7v5mTzl9not7d0jnHItx93uNiJtGfwMBtEBI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117655788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competing for Foreign Direct Investment</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wu, Chen ; Burge, Gregory S</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chen ; Burge, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness has proven elusive. Using data from Chinese provinces covering 1999 to 2012, we explore this relationship using a dynamic system generalized method of moments approach. We find some evidence that trade zones enhance FDI-related employment but find none to support the idea that industrial development zones and spending to promote foreign affairs increase employment. Conversely, regional spillovers are consistently found to increase FDI-related employment in our main results and all robustness checks. We argue this highlights the importance of crowd-out effects and agglomeration spillovers, and that coordinating FDI promotion policy across regions may compare favorably to the current approach, which mainly encourages local competition over a largely fixed pool of aggregate FDI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-1421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1091142117698015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Competition ; Economic development ; Economic models ; Effectiveness ; Employment ; Foreign investment ; Generalized method of moments ; Government spending ; Industrial development ; International relations ; International trade ; Provinces ; Robustness ; Spillover effect</subject><ispartof>Public finance review, 2018-11, Vol.46 (6), p.1044-1068</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758-6ca0059eba77bac4719f70001cb6f07c51320173f1b25c5b24c3070523eb66343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burge, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><title>Competing for Foreign Direct Investment</title><title>Public finance review</title><description>This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness has proven elusive. Using data from Chinese provinces covering 1999 to 2012, we explore this relationship using a dynamic system generalized method of moments approach. We find some evidence that trade zones enhance FDI-related employment but find none to support the idea that industrial development zones and spending to promote foreign affairs increase employment. Conversely, regional spillovers are consistently found to increase FDI-related employment in our main results and all robustness checks. We argue this highlights the importance of crowd-out effects and agglomeration spillovers, and that coordinating FDI promotion policy across regions may compare favorably to the current approach, which mainly encourages local competition over a largely fixed pool of aggregate FDI.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>Generalized method of moments</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Spillover effect</subject><issn>1091-1421</issn><issn>1552-7530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LAzEURYNYsLbuXQ64cBV9L5mXN1nKaLVQcNN9mYRMmWKTmpn6-40fq3vgwj1cIW4RHhCZHxEsYq0KG9sA0oWYI5GSTBouC5da_vRX4nocDwCgiO1c3LfpeArTEPdVn3K1SjkM-1g9Dzn4qVrHrzBOxxCnpZj13ccYbv5zIbarl237Jjfvr-v2aSM9UyON7wDIBtcxu87XjLbn4kLvTA_sCbUCZN2jU-TJqdprYCClgzNG13oh7v5mTzl9not7d0jnHItx93uNiJtGfwMBtEBI</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Wu, Chen</creator><creator>Burge, Gregory S</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Competing for Foreign Direct Investment</title><author>Wu, Chen ; Burge, Gregory S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758-6ca0059eba77bac4719f70001cb6f07c51320173f1b25c5b24c3070523eb66343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>Generalized method of moments</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Spillover effect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burge, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Public finance review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Chen</au><au>Burge, Gregory S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competing for Foreign Direct Investment</atitle><jtitle>Public finance review</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1044</spage><epage>1068</epage><pages>1044-1068</pages><issn>1091-1421</issn><eissn>1552-7530</eissn><abstract>This article explores the effects of locally adopted economic development zones and government spending promoting foreign affairs on foreign direct investment (FDI)–related employment in Chinese provinces. While these policies are motivated by a desire for employment growth, empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness has proven elusive. Using data from Chinese provinces covering 1999 to 2012, we explore this relationship using a dynamic system generalized method of moments approach. We find some evidence that trade zones enhance FDI-related employment but find none to support the idea that industrial development zones and spending to promote foreign affairs increase employment. Conversely, regional spillovers are consistently found to increase FDI-related employment in our main results and all robustness checks. We argue this highlights the importance of crowd-out effects and agglomeration spillovers, and that coordinating FDI promotion policy across regions may compare favorably to the current approach, which mainly encourages local competition over a largely fixed pool of aggregate FDI.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><doi>10.1177/1091142117698015</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-1421
ispartof Public finance review, 2018-11, Vol.46 (6), p.1044-1068
issn 1091-1421
1552-7530
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2117655788
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Competition
Economic development
Economic models
Effectiveness
Employment
Foreign investment
Generalized method of moments
Government spending
Industrial development
International relations
International trade
Provinces
Robustness
Spillover effect
title Competing for Foreign Direct Investment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A21%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competing%20for%20Foreign%20Direct%20Investment&rft.jtitle=Public%20finance%20review&rft.au=Wu,%20Chen&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1044&rft.epage=1068&rft.pages=1044-1068&rft.issn=1091-1421&rft.eissn=1552-7530&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1091142117698015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2117655788%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117655788&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true