Shear Resistance Characteristics of Soil–Geomembrane Interfaces

The shear resistance at soil–geomembrane interfaces is critically important for the proper design of geomembrane-lined side slopes of landfills, reservoirs, and canals. The dependable design and construction of such applications is enhanced by the experimental documentation of the interaction behavi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of geosynthetics and ground engineering 2018-12, Vol.4 (4), p.1-16, Article 29
Hauptverfasser: Markou, I. N., Evangelou, E. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title International journal of geosynthetics and ground engineering
container_volume 4
creator Markou, I. N.
Evangelou, E. D.
description The shear resistance at soil–geomembrane interfaces is critically important for the proper design of geomembrane-lined side slopes of landfills, reservoirs, and canals. The dependable design and construction of such applications is enhanced by the experimental documentation of the interaction behavior between different soils and various geomembrane types. Toward this end, direct shear tests were conducted on 29 soil–geomembrane interfaces using a conventional (100 mm) shear box. Two dry and dense uniform sands, one with rounded and one with sub-angular grains of the same size, and one compacted cohesive soil of low plasticity were tested in contact with seven geomembranes of different types with smooth or rough surfaces. The direct shear tests yielded linear failure envelopes with no adhesion for the sand–geomembrane interfaces and polynomial failure envelopes for the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces, possibly indicating a transition from drained to undrained conditions at the interface with increasing normal stress. Sub-angular sand grains, soft geomembranes, and rough geomembrane surfaces were found to mobilize interface shear resistance more effectively. The shear resistance parameters are functions of the shearing displacement at the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces and their values at failure reveal a transition from “friction-like” behavior to “adhesion-like” behavior as normal stress increases. The ratio between the friction coefficient values for the sand–geomembrane interfaces tested ranges from approximately 1 to 2. For the geomembrane types tested, differences in failure shear stress at the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces are generally limited to ± 20%.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40891-018-0146-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2117176710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2117176710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8ca9cee7fa04b18d1cef16d6fb3e5d95a32ad957fcaebd4f448ae3b8b5b6ba493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWGofwNuC59XMbppsjqVoLRQEq-cwyU7slna3JtuDN9_BN_RJjKzoycPwD8P__wMfY5fAr4FzdRMFrzTkHKo0QubyhI0K0DrXhdKnv7vk52wS45ZzXoBQvJAjNltvCEP2SLGJPbaOsvkGA7qeQjo0Lmadz9Zds_t8_1hQt6e9DdhStmyTw6OjeMHOPO4iTX50zJ7vbp_m9_nqYbGcz1a5K0H2eeVQOyLlkQsLVQ2OPMhaelvStNZTLAtMorxDsrXwQlRIpa3s1EqLQpdjdjX0HkL3eqTYm213DG16aQoABUoq4MkFg8uFLsZA3hxCs8fwZoCbb1hmgGUSLPMNy8iUKYZMTN72hcJf8_-hL6MkbmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117176710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shear Resistance Characteristics of Soil–Geomembrane Interfaces</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Markou, I. N. ; Evangelou, E. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Markou, I. N. ; Evangelou, E. D.</creatorcontrib><description>The shear resistance at soil–geomembrane interfaces is critically important for the proper design of geomembrane-lined side slopes of landfills, reservoirs, and canals. The dependable design and construction of such applications is enhanced by the experimental documentation of the interaction behavior between different soils and various geomembrane types. Toward this end, direct shear tests were conducted on 29 soil–geomembrane interfaces using a conventional (100 mm) shear box. Two dry and dense uniform sands, one with rounded and one with sub-angular grains of the same size, and one compacted cohesive soil of low plasticity were tested in contact with seven geomembranes of different types with smooth or rough surfaces. The direct shear tests yielded linear failure envelopes with no adhesion for the sand–geomembrane interfaces and polynomial failure envelopes for the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces, possibly indicating a transition from drained to undrained conditions at the interface with increasing normal stress. Sub-angular sand grains, soft geomembranes, and rough geomembrane surfaces were found to mobilize interface shear resistance more effectively. The shear resistance parameters are functions of the shearing displacement at the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces and their values at failure reveal a transition from “friction-like” behavior to “adhesion-like” behavior as normal stress increases. The ratio between the friction coefficient values for the sand–geomembrane interfaces tested ranges from approximately 1 to 2. For the geomembrane types tested, differences in failure shear stress at the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces are generally limited to ± 20%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-9260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-9279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40891-018-0146-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adhesion tests ; Building Materials ; Canals ; Coefficient of friction ; Cohesion ; Compacted soils ; Engineering ; Envelopes ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Failure ; Foundations ; Geoengineering ; Grains ; Hydraulics ; Landfill construction ; Mathematical analysis ; Original Paper ; Sand ; Shear strength ; Shear stress ; Shear tests ; Shearing ; Soil compaction ; Soil resistance ; Soil stresses ; Ultrasonic testing</subject><ispartof>International journal of geosynthetics and ground engineering, 2018-12, Vol.4 (4), p.1-16, Article 29</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2018</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8ca9cee7fa04b18d1cef16d6fb3e5d95a32ad957fcaebd4f448ae3b8b5b6ba493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8ca9cee7fa04b18d1cef16d6fb3e5d95a32ad957fcaebd4f448ae3b8b5b6ba493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2363-7632</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40891-018-0146-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40891-018-0146-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Markou, I. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evangelou, E. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Shear Resistance Characteristics of Soil–Geomembrane Interfaces</title><title>International journal of geosynthetics and ground engineering</title><addtitle>Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng</addtitle><description>The shear resistance at soil–geomembrane interfaces is critically important for the proper design of geomembrane-lined side slopes of landfills, reservoirs, and canals. The dependable design and construction of such applications is enhanced by the experimental documentation of the interaction behavior between different soils and various geomembrane types. Toward this end, direct shear tests were conducted on 29 soil–geomembrane interfaces using a conventional (100 mm) shear box. Two dry and dense uniform sands, one with rounded and one with sub-angular grains of the same size, and one compacted cohesive soil of low plasticity were tested in contact with seven geomembranes of different types with smooth or rough surfaces. The direct shear tests yielded linear failure envelopes with no adhesion for the sand–geomembrane interfaces and polynomial failure envelopes for the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces, possibly indicating a transition from drained to undrained conditions at the interface with increasing normal stress. Sub-angular sand grains, soft geomembranes, and rough geomembrane surfaces were found to mobilize interface shear resistance more effectively. The shear resistance parameters are functions of the shearing displacement at the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces and their values at failure reveal a transition from “friction-like” behavior to “adhesion-like” behavior as normal stress increases. The ratio between the friction coefficient values for the sand–geomembrane interfaces tested ranges from approximately 1 to 2. For the geomembrane types tested, differences in failure shear stress at the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces are generally limited to ± 20%.</description><subject>Adhesion tests</subject><subject>Building Materials</subject><subject>Canals</subject><subject>Coefficient of friction</subject><subject>Cohesion</subject><subject>Compacted soils</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Envelopes</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Grains</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Landfill construction</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Shear tests</subject><subject>Shearing</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil resistance</subject><subject>Soil stresses</subject><subject>Ultrasonic testing</subject><issn>2199-9260</issn><issn>2199-9279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWGofwNuC59XMbppsjqVoLRQEq-cwyU7slna3JtuDN9_BN_RJjKzoycPwD8P__wMfY5fAr4FzdRMFrzTkHKo0QubyhI0K0DrXhdKnv7vk52wS45ZzXoBQvJAjNltvCEP2SLGJPbaOsvkGA7qeQjo0Lmadz9Zds_t8_1hQt6e9DdhStmyTw6OjeMHOPO4iTX50zJ7vbp_m9_nqYbGcz1a5K0H2eeVQOyLlkQsLVQ2OPMhaelvStNZTLAtMorxDsrXwQlRIpa3s1EqLQpdjdjX0HkL3eqTYm213DG16aQoABUoq4MkFg8uFLsZA3hxCs8fwZoCbb1hmgGUSLPMNy8iUKYZMTN72hcJf8_-hL6MkbmQ</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Markou, I. N.</creator><creator>Evangelou, E. D.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-7632</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Shear Resistance Characteristics of Soil–Geomembrane Interfaces</title><author>Markou, I. N. ; Evangelou, E. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8ca9cee7fa04b18d1cef16d6fb3e5d95a32ad957fcaebd4f448ae3b8b5b6ba493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adhesion tests</topic><topic>Building Materials</topic><topic>Canals</topic><topic>Coefficient of friction</topic><topic>Cohesion</topic><topic>Compacted soils</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Envelopes</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Grains</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Landfill construction</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Shear tests</topic><topic>Shearing</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil resistance</topic><topic>Soil stresses</topic><topic>Ultrasonic testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Markou, I. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evangelou, E. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of geosynthetics and ground engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Markou, I. N.</au><au>Evangelou, E. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shear Resistance Characteristics of Soil–Geomembrane Interfaces</atitle><jtitle>International journal of geosynthetics and ground engineering</jtitle><stitle>Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><artnum>29</artnum><issn>2199-9260</issn><eissn>2199-9279</eissn><abstract>The shear resistance at soil–geomembrane interfaces is critically important for the proper design of geomembrane-lined side slopes of landfills, reservoirs, and canals. The dependable design and construction of such applications is enhanced by the experimental documentation of the interaction behavior between different soils and various geomembrane types. Toward this end, direct shear tests were conducted on 29 soil–geomembrane interfaces using a conventional (100 mm) shear box. Two dry and dense uniform sands, one with rounded and one with sub-angular grains of the same size, and one compacted cohesive soil of low plasticity were tested in contact with seven geomembranes of different types with smooth or rough surfaces. The direct shear tests yielded linear failure envelopes with no adhesion for the sand–geomembrane interfaces and polynomial failure envelopes for the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces, possibly indicating a transition from drained to undrained conditions at the interface with increasing normal stress. Sub-angular sand grains, soft geomembranes, and rough geomembrane surfaces were found to mobilize interface shear resistance more effectively. The shear resistance parameters are functions of the shearing displacement at the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces and their values at failure reveal a transition from “friction-like” behavior to “adhesion-like” behavior as normal stress increases. The ratio between the friction coefficient values for the sand–geomembrane interfaces tested ranges from approximately 1 to 2. For the geomembrane types tested, differences in failure shear stress at the cohesive soil–geomembrane interfaces are generally limited to ± 20%.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40891-018-0146-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-7632</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2199-9260
ispartof International journal of geosynthetics and ground engineering, 2018-12, Vol.4 (4), p.1-16, Article 29
issn 2199-9260
2199-9279
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2117176710
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adhesion tests
Building Materials
Canals
Coefficient of friction
Cohesion
Compacted soils
Engineering
Envelopes
Environmental Science and Engineering
Failure
Foundations
Geoengineering
Grains
Hydraulics
Landfill construction
Mathematical analysis
Original Paper
Sand
Shear strength
Shear stress
Shear tests
Shearing
Soil compaction
Soil resistance
Soil stresses
Ultrasonic testing
title Shear Resistance Characteristics of Soil–Geomembrane Interfaces
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A29%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shear%20Resistance%20Characteristics%20of%20Soil%E2%80%93Geomembrane%20Interfaces&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20geosynthetics%20and%20ground%20engineering&rft.au=Markou,%20I.%20N.&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.artnum=29&rft.issn=2199-9260&rft.eissn=2199-9279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40891-018-0146-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117176710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117176710&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true