The Underpinnings of Workload in Unmanned Vehicle Systems
This paper identifies and characterizes factors that contribute to operator workload in unmanned vehicle systems. Our objective is to provide a basis for developing models of workload for use in design and operation of complex human-machine systems. In 1986, Hart developed a foundational conceptual...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on human-machine systems 2018-10, Vol.48 (5), p.452-467 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 467 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 452 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on human-machine systems |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Hooey, Becky L. Kaber, David B. Adams, Julie A. Fong, Terrence W. Gore, Brian F. |
description | This paper identifies and characterizes factors that contribute to operator workload in unmanned vehicle systems. Our objective is to provide a basis for developing models of workload for use in design and operation of complex human-machine systems. In 1986, Hart developed a foundational conceptual model of workload, which formed the basis for arguably the most widely used workload measurement technique-the NASA Task Load Index. Since that time, however, there have been many advances in models and factor identification as well as workload control measures. Additionally, there is a need to further inventory and describe factors that contribute to human workload in light of technological advances, including automation and autonomy. Thus, we propose a conceptual framework for the workload construct and present a taxonomy of factors that can contribute to operator workload. These factors, referred to as workload drivers, are associated with a variety of system elements including the environment, task, equipment, and operator. In addition, we discuss how workload moderators, such as automation and interface design, can be manipulated in order to influence operator workload. We contend that workload drivers, workload moderators, and the interactions among drivers and moderators all need to be accounted for when building complex human-machine systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/THMS.2017.2759758 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2117166490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8169072</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2117166490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a54c234259b14db2e9fd5733d8053bf985e39fed79d26b9f7e4b46b83abe491a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PAjEQhhujiQT5AcbLJp4X-7ltj4aomGA8AHps2u1UFqGL7XLg37sEdC4zyTzvTPIgdEvwmBCsHxbTt_mYYiLHVAothbpAA0oqVVKGxeXfTDW5RqOc17gvRYUQaoD0YgXFMnpIuybGJn7log3FZ5u-N631RRP75dbGCL74gFVTb6CYH3IH23yDroLdZBid-xAtn58Wk2k5e395nTzOyppq1pVW8JoyToV2hHtHQQcvJGNeYcFc0EoA0wG81J5WTgcJ3PHKKWYdcE0sG6L7091dan_2kDuzbvcp9i8NJUSSquIa9xQ5UXVqc04QzC41W5sOhmBzlGSOksxRkjlL6jN3p0wDAP-8IpXGkrJfKfVh0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117166490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Underpinnings of Workload in Unmanned Vehicle Systems</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Hooey, Becky L. ; Kaber, David B. ; Adams, Julie A. ; Fong, Terrence W. ; Gore, Brian F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hooey, Becky L. ; Kaber, David B. ; Adams, Julie A. ; Fong, Terrence W. ; Gore, Brian F.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper identifies and characterizes factors that contribute to operator workload in unmanned vehicle systems. Our objective is to provide a basis for developing models of workload for use in design and operation of complex human-machine systems. In 1986, Hart developed a foundational conceptual model of workload, which formed the basis for arguably the most widely used workload measurement technique-the NASA Task Load Index. Since that time, however, there have been many advances in models and factor identification as well as workload control measures. Additionally, there is a need to further inventory and describe factors that contribute to human workload in light of technological advances, including automation and autonomy. Thus, we propose a conceptual framework for the workload construct and present a taxonomy of factors that can contribute to operator workload. These factors, referred to as workload drivers, are associated with a variety of system elements including the environment, task, equipment, and operator. In addition, we discuss how workload moderators, such as automation and interface design, can be manipulated in order to influence operator workload. We contend that workload drivers, workload moderators, and the interactions among drivers and moderators all need to be accounted for when building complex human-machine systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-2291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/THMS.2017.2759758</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITHSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Automation ; Autonomy ; cognitive models ; Complex systems ; Load modeling ; Measurement techniques ; Moderators ; remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) ; Taxonomy ; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) ; unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) ; unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) ; Unmanned vehicles ; Workload ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems, 2018-10, Vol.48 (5), p.452-467</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a54c234259b14db2e9fd5733d8053bf985e39fed79d26b9f7e4b46b83abe491a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a54c234259b14db2e9fd5733d8053bf985e39fed79d26b9f7e4b46b83abe491a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7774-728X ; 0000-0002-3922-7806</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8169072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8169072$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hooey, Becky L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaber, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Terrence W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gore, Brian F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Underpinnings of Workload in Unmanned Vehicle Systems</title><title>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems</title><addtitle>THMS</addtitle><description>This paper identifies and characterizes factors that contribute to operator workload in unmanned vehicle systems. Our objective is to provide a basis for developing models of workload for use in design and operation of complex human-machine systems. In 1986, Hart developed a foundational conceptual model of workload, which formed the basis for arguably the most widely used workload measurement technique-the NASA Task Load Index. Since that time, however, there have been many advances in models and factor identification as well as workload control measures. Additionally, there is a need to further inventory and describe factors that contribute to human workload in light of technological advances, including automation and autonomy. Thus, we propose a conceptual framework for the workload construct and present a taxonomy of factors that can contribute to operator workload. These factors, referred to as workload drivers, are associated with a variety of system elements including the environment, task, equipment, and operator. In addition, we discuss how workload moderators, such as automation and interface design, can be manipulated in order to influence operator workload. We contend that workload drivers, workload moderators, and the interactions among drivers and moderators all need to be accounted for when building complex human-machine systems.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>cognitive models</subject><subject>Complex systems</subject><subject>Load modeling</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Moderators</subject><subject>remotely operated vehicles (ROVs)</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)</subject><subject>unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs)</subject><subject>unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs)</subject><subject>Unmanned vehicles</subject><subject>Workload</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>2168-2291</issn><issn>2168-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PAjEQhhujiQT5AcbLJp4X-7ltj4aomGA8AHps2u1UFqGL7XLg37sEdC4zyTzvTPIgdEvwmBCsHxbTt_mYYiLHVAothbpAA0oqVVKGxeXfTDW5RqOc17gvRYUQaoD0YgXFMnpIuybGJn7log3FZ5u-N631RRP75dbGCL74gFVTb6CYH3IH23yDroLdZBid-xAtn58Wk2k5e395nTzOyppq1pVW8JoyToV2hHtHQQcvJGNeYcFc0EoA0wG81J5WTgcJ3PHKKWYdcE0sG6L7091dan_2kDuzbvcp9i8NJUSSquIa9xQ5UXVqc04QzC41W5sOhmBzlGSOksxRkjlL6jN3p0wDAP-8IpXGkrJfKfVh0A</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Hooey, Becky L.</creator><creator>Kaber, David B.</creator><creator>Adams, Julie A.</creator><creator>Fong, Terrence W.</creator><creator>Gore, Brian F.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7774-728X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-7806</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>The Underpinnings of Workload in Unmanned Vehicle Systems</title><author>Hooey, Becky L. ; Kaber, David B. ; Adams, Julie A. ; Fong, Terrence W. ; Gore, Brian F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a54c234259b14db2e9fd5733d8053bf985e39fed79d26b9f7e4b46b83abe491a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>cognitive models</topic><topic>Complex systems</topic><topic>Load modeling</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Moderators</topic><topic>remotely operated vehicles (ROVs)</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)</topic><topic>unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs)</topic><topic>unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs)</topic><topic>Unmanned vehicles</topic><topic>Workload</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hooey, Becky L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaber, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Terrence W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gore, Brian F.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hooey, Becky L.</au><au>Kaber, David B.</au><au>Adams, Julie A.</au><au>Fong, Terrence W.</au><au>Gore, Brian F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Underpinnings of Workload in Unmanned Vehicle Systems</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems</jtitle><stitle>THMS</stitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>452</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>452-467</pages><issn>2168-2291</issn><eissn>2168-2305</eissn><coden>ITHSA6</coden><abstract>This paper identifies and characterizes factors that contribute to operator workload in unmanned vehicle systems. Our objective is to provide a basis for developing models of workload for use in design and operation of complex human-machine systems. In 1986, Hart developed a foundational conceptual model of workload, which formed the basis for arguably the most widely used workload measurement technique-the NASA Task Load Index. Since that time, however, there have been many advances in models and factor identification as well as workload control measures. Additionally, there is a need to further inventory and describe factors that contribute to human workload in light of technological advances, including automation and autonomy. Thus, we propose a conceptual framework for the workload construct and present a taxonomy of factors that can contribute to operator workload. These factors, referred to as workload drivers, are associated with a variety of system elements including the environment, task, equipment, and operator. In addition, we discuss how workload moderators, such as automation and interface design, can be manipulated in order to influence operator workload. We contend that workload drivers, workload moderators, and the interactions among drivers and moderators all need to be accounted for when building complex human-machine systems.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/THMS.2017.2759758</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7774-728X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-7806</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-2291 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on human-machine systems, 2018-10, Vol.48 (5), p.452-467 |
issn | 2168-2291 2168-2305 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2117166490 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Automation Autonomy cognitive models Complex systems Load modeling Measurement techniques Moderators remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) Taxonomy unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) Unmanned vehicles Workload Workloads |
title | The Underpinnings of Workload in Unmanned Vehicle Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A19%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Underpinnings%20of%20Workload%20in%20Unmanned%20Vehicle%20Systems&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20human-machine%20systems&rft.au=Hooey,%20Becky%20L.&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=452&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=452-467&rft.issn=2168-2291&rft.eissn=2168-2305&rft.coden=ITHSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/THMS.2017.2759758&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2117166490%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117166490&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8169072&rfr_iscdi=true |