Characterising rural resilience in Aotearoa-New Zealand: a systematic review
The concept of ‘resilience’ has recently gained traction in a range of contexts. Its various interpretations and framings are now used to examine a variety of issues, particularly relating to the human dimensions of global change. This can pose challenges to scholars, practitioners, and policy-maker...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regional environmental change 2019-02, Vol.19 (2), p.543-557 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 557 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | Regional environmental change |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Spector, Sam Cradock-Henry, Nicholas A Beaven, Sarah Orchiston, Caroline |
description | The concept of ‘resilience’ has recently gained traction in a range of contexts. Its various interpretations and framings are now used to examine a variety of issues, particularly relating to the human dimensions of global change. This can pose challenges to scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers seeking to develop focused research programmes, design targeted interventions, and communicate across disciplinary boundaries. The concept of resilience is widely used in Aotearoa-New Zealand, where it informs both government policy and research programmes. Resilience is particularly relevant in this small developed nation, which is heavily reliant on primary production in rural areas and affected by a range of geological and climatic hazards. To understand the range and extent of application of resilience in the rural context, we use systematic review methods to identify, characterise, and synthesise this knowledge base. Currently, research applying the concept of resilience in the rural context is limited in areal extent, largely quantitative in nature, and led by a small number of researchers. There is limited evidence of collaboration. Research has focused on a small number of hazards, failing to capture the diversity of risks and hazards in addition to their impacts. The results of our analysis and methodology offer important insights for meta-analyses of risk and hazard scholarship. The findings provide a baseline to track the future progress and effectiveness of resilience interventions and help inform current and future research priorities targeting persistent vulnerabilities in rural New Zealand and elsewhere. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10113-018-1418-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2117032862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A716399985</galeid><sourcerecordid>A716399985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-52f95d19c5b4f6cbe3fb764592e58a2c31ee4969f1eb3def347942b9647743463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuC562ZTTbZeCvFLyh6URAvIZtOasp2tyZbS_-9KSt6koGZYXifmeQl5BLoBCiV1xEoAMspVDnwlNgRGQFnImeyejv-7VV1Ss5iXFEKUkg6IvPZhwnG9hh89O0yC9tgmixg9I3H1mLm22za9WhCZ_In3GXvaBrTLm4yk8V97HFtem8T8OVxd05OnGkiXvzUMXm9u32ZPeTz5_vH2XSeW1aWfV4WTpULULasuRO2RuZqKXipCiwrU1gGiFwJ5QBrtkDHuFS8qJXgUnLGBRuTq2HvJnSfW4y9XnXb0KaTugCQlBWVKJJqMqiWpkHtW9f16acpFrj2tmvR-TSfShBMKVWVCYABsKGLMaDTm-DXJuw1UH1wWQ8u6-SyPrisWWKKgYlJ2y4x_D3lf-gbQUx-gQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117032862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterising rural resilience in Aotearoa-New Zealand: a systematic review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Spector, Sam ; Cradock-Henry, Nicholas A ; Beaven, Sarah ; Orchiston, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Spector, Sam ; Cradock-Henry, Nicholas A ; Beaven, Sarah ; Orchiston, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of ‘resilience’ has recently gained traction in a range of contexts. Its various interpretations and framings are now used to examine a variety of issues, particularly relating to the human dimensions of global change. This can pose challenges to scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers seeking to develop focused research programmes, design targeted interventions, and communicate across disciplinary boundaries. The concept of resilience is widely used in Aotearoa-New Zealand, where it informs both government policy and research programmes. Resilience is particularly relevant in this small developed nation, which is heavily reliant on primary production in rural areas and affected by a range of geological and climatic hazards. To understand the range and extent of application of resilience in the rural context, we use systematic review methods to identify, characterise, and synthesise this knowledge base. Currently, research applying the concept of resilience in the rural context is limited in areal extent, largely quantitative in nature, and led by a small number of researchers. There is limited evidence of collaboration. Research has focused on a small number of hazards, failing to capture the diversity of risks and hazards in addition to their impacts. The results of our analysis and methodology offer important insights for meta-analyses of risk and hazard scholarship. The findings provide a baseline to track the future progress and effectiveness of resilience interventions and help inform current and future research priorities targeting persistent vulnerabilities in rural New Zealand and elsewhere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-378X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10113-018-1418-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Climate Change ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental hazards ; Geography ; Government policy ; Hazards ; Identification methods ; Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) ; Nature Conservation ; Oceanography ; Original Article ; Primary production ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Resilience ; Rural areas ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Regional environmental change, 2019-02, Vol.19 (2), p.543-557</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Regional Environmental Change is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-52f95d19c5b4f6cbe3fb764592e58a2c31ee4969f1eb3def347942b9647743463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-52f95d19c5b4f6cbe3fb764592e58a2c31ee4969f1eb3def347942b9647743463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10113-018-1418-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10113-018-1418-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spector, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cradock-Henry, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaven, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orchiston, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Characterising rural resilience in Aotearoa-New Zealand: a systematic review</title><title>Regional environmental change</title><addtitle>Reg Environ Change</addtitle><description>The concept of ‘resilience’ has recently gained traction in a range of contexts. Its various interpretations and framings are now used to examine a variety of issues, particularly relating to the human dimensions of global change. This can pose challenges to scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers seeking to develop focused research programmes, design targeted interventions, and communicate across disciplinary boundaries. The concept of resilience is widely used in Aotearoa-New Zealand, where it informs both government policy and research programmes. Resilience is particularly relevant in this small developed nation, which is heavily reliant on primary production in rural areas and affected by a range of geological and climatic hazards. To understand the range and extent of application of resilience in the rural context, we use systematic review methods to identify, characterise, and synthesise this knowledge base. Currently, research applying the concept of resilience in the rural context is limited in areal extent, largely quantitative in nature, and led by a small number of researchers. There is limited evidence of collaboration. Research has focused on a small number of hazards, failing to capture the diversity of risks and hazards in addition to their impacts. The results of our analysis and methodology offer important insights for meta-analyses of risk and hazard scholarship. The findings provide a baseline to track the future progress and effectiveness of resilience interventions and help inform current and future research priorities targeting persistent vulnerabilities in rural New Zealand and elsewhere.</description><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1436-3798</issn><issn>1436-378X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuC562ZTTbZeCvFLyh6URAvIZtOasp2tyZbS_-9KSt6koGZYXifmeQl5BLoBCiV1xEoAMspVDnwlNgRGQFnImeyejv-7VV1Ss5iXFEKUkg6IvPZhwnG9hh89O0yC9tgmixg9I3H1mLm22za9WhCZ_In3GXvaBrTLm4yk8V97HFtem8T8OVxd05OnGkiXvzUMXm9u32ZPeTz5_vH2XSeW1aWfV4WTpULULasuRO2RuZqKXipCiwrU1gGiFwJ5QBrtkDHuFS8qJXgUnLGBRuTq2HvJnSfW4y9XnXb0KaTugCQlBWVKJJqMqiWpkHtW9f16acpFrj2tmvR-TSfShBMKVWVCYABsKGLMaDTm-DXJuw1UH1wWQ8u6-SyPrisWWKKgYlJ2y4x_D3lf-gbQUx-gQ</recordid><startdate>20190219</startdate><enddate>20190219</enddate><creator>Spector, Sam</creator><creator>Cradock-Henry, Nicholas A</creator><creator>Beaven, Sarah</creator><creator>Orchiston, Caroline</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190219</creationdate><title>Characterising rural resilience in Aotearoa-New Zealand: a systematic review</title><author>Spector, Sam ; Cradock-Henry, Nicholas A ; Beaven, Sarah ; Orchiston, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-52f95d19c5b4f6cbe3fb764592e58a2c31ee4969f1eb3def347942b9647743463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spector, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cradock-Henry, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaven, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orchiston, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Regional environmental change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spector, Sam</au><au>Cradock-Henry, Nicholas A</au><au>Beaven, Sarah</au><au>Orchiston, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterising rural resilience in Aotearoa-New Zealand: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Regional environmental change</jtitle><stitle>Reg Environ Change</stitle><date>2019-02-19</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>543-557</pages><issn>1436-3798</issn><eissn>1436-378X</eissn><abstract>The concept of ‘resilience’ has recently gained traction in a range of contexts. Its various interpretations and framings are now used to examine a variety of issues, particularly relating to the human dimensions of global change. This can pose challenges to scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers seeking to develop focused research programmes, design targeted interventions, and communicate across disciplinary boundaries. The concept of resilience is widely used in Aotearoa-New Zealand, where it informs both government policy and research programmes. Resilience is particularly relevant in this small developed nation, which is heavily reliant on primary production in rural areas and affected by a range of geological and climatic hazards. To understand the range and extent of application of resilience in the rural context, we use systematic review methods to identify, characterise, and synthesise this knowledge base. Currently, research applying the concept of resilience in the rural context is limited in areal extent, largely quantitative in nature, and led by a small number of researchers. There is limited evidence of collaboration. Research has focused on a small number of hazards, failing to capture the diversity of risks and hazards in addition to their impacts. The results of our analysis and methodology offer important insights for meta-analyses of risk and hazard scholarship. The findings provide a baseline to track the future progress and effectiveness of resilience interventions and help inform current and future research priorities targeting persistent vulnerabilities in rural New Zealand and elsewhere.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10113-018-1418-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1436-3798 |
ispartof | Regional environmental change, 2019-02, Vol.19 (2), p.543-557 |
issn | 1436-3798 1436-378X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2117032862 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Climate Change Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Earth and Environmental Science Environment Environmental hazards Geography Government policy Hazards Identification methods Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) Nature Conservation Oceanography Original Article Primary production Regional/Spatial Science Resilience Rural areas Systematic review |
title | Characterising rural resilience in Aotearoa-New Zealand: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A31%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterising%20rural%20resilience%20in%20Aotearoa-New%20Zealand:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Regional%20environmental%20change&rft.au=Spector,%20Sam&rft.date=2019-02-19&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=543-557&rft.issn=1436-3798&rft.eissn=1436-378X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10113-018-1418-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA716399985%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117032862&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A716399985&rfr_iscdi=true |