Assessment of algorithms for computing moist available potential energy

Atmospheric moist available potential energy (MAPE) has traditionally been defined as the potential energy of a moist atmosphere relative to that of the adiabatically sorted reference state defining a global potential energy minimum. Although the Munkres algorithm can in principle find such a refere...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 2018-07, Vol.144 (714), p.1501-1510
Hauptverfasser: Harris, Bethan L., Tailleux, Rémi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1510
container_issue 714
container_start_page 1501
container_title Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
container_volume 144
creator Harris, Bethan L.
Tailleux, Rémi
description Atmospheric moist available potential energy (MAPE) has traditionally been defined as the potential energy of a moist atmosphere relative to that of the adiabatically sorted reference state defining a global potential energy minimum. Although the Munkres algorithm can in principle find such a reference state exactly, its computational cost has prompted much interest in developing heuristic methods for computing MAPE in practice. Comparisons of the accuracy of such approximate algorithms have so far been limited to a small number of test cases; this work provides an assessment of the performance of the algorithms across a wide range of atmospheric soundings, in two different locations. We determine that the divide‐and‐conquer algorithm is the best suited to practical application, but suffers from the previously unexplored shortcoming that it can produce a reference state with higher potential energy than the actual state, resulting in a negative value of MAPE. Additionally, we show that it is possible to construct an algorithm exploiting a previously derived theoretical expression linking MAPE to Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE). This approach has a similar accuracy to existing approximate sorting algorithms, whilst providing greater insight into the physical source of MAPE. In light of these results, we discuss possible ways to improve on the construction of Available Potential Energy (APE) theory for a moist atmosphere. Moist Available Potential Energy (MAPE) describes the energy available to atmospheric motion by taking the difference between the total potential energies (TPE) of the actual atmospheric state and a reference state. Reference states have previously been computed using sorting algorithms that approximate the reversible adiabatic rearrangement minimizing the TPE. However, we show that these algorithms regularly produce a reference state with even higher TPE than the actual state and therefore alternative approaches not based on sorting parcels are physically preferable.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/qj.3297
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2117028527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2117028527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-c60693cae93aeec0743c8f6a906cc2eb53479a1024aa3c2dbe876204aeacab963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFLw0AQBeBFFKxV_AsLHjxI6mQ3yWaPpWhVCiIoeFsm66QmJNl0N1X6702tV0_v8r0ZeIxdxjCLAcTtpp5JodURm8SJUlGu4P2YTQBkGmkAfcrOQqgBIFVCTdhyHgKF0FI3cFdybNbOV8NnG3jpPLeu7bdD1a1566owcPzCqsGiId67YaxU2HDqyK935-ykxCbQxV9O2dv93eviIVo9Lx8X81VkpRAqshlkWlokLZHIgkqkzcsMNWTWCipSmSiNMYgEUVrxUVCuMgEJElosdCan7Opwt_dus6UwmNptfTe-NCKOFYg8FWpU1wdlvQvBU2l6X7XodyYGs1_JbGqzX2mUNwf5XTW0-4-Zl6df_QPtjGhc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117028527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of algorithms for computing moist available potential energy</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Harris, Bethan L. ; Tailleux, Rémi</creator><creatorcontrib>Harris, Bethan L. ; Tailleux, Rémi</creatorcontrib><description>Atmospheric moist available potential energy (MAPE) has traditionally been defined as the potential energy of a moist atmosphere relative to that of the adiabatically sorted reference state defining a global potential energy minimum. Although the Munkres algorithm can in principle find such a reference state exactly, its computational cost has prompted much interest in developing heuristic methods for computing MAPE in practice. Comparisons of the accuracy of such approximate algorithms have so far been limited to a small number of test cases; this work provides an assessment of the performance of the algorithms across a wide range of atmospheric soundings, in two different locations. We determine that the divide‐and‐conquer algorithm is the best suited to practical application, but suffers from the previously unexplored shortcoming that it can produce a reference state with higher potential energy than the actual state, resulting in a negative value of MAPE. Additionally, we show that it is possible to construct an algorithm exploiting a previously derived theoretical expression linking MAPE to Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE). This approach has a similar accuracy to existing approximate sorting algorithms, whilst providing greater insight into the physical source of MAPE. In light of these results, we discuss possible ways to improve on the construction of Available Potential Energy (APE) theory for a moist atmosphere. Moist Available Potential Energy (MAPE) describes the energy available to atmospheric motion by taking the difference between the total potential energies (TPE) of the actual atmospheric state and a reference state. Reference states have previously been computed using sorting algorithms that approximate the reversible adiabatic rearrangement minimizing the TPE. However, we show that these algorithms regularly produce a reference state with even higher TPE than the actual state and therefore alternative approaches not based on sorting parcels are physically preferable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-9009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-870X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qj.3297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Atmosphere ; Atmospheric sounding ; available potential energy ; Computer applications ; convection ; Convective available potential energy ; Energy ; moist thermodynamics ; Potential energy</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2018-07, Vol.144 (714), p.1501-1510</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of the Royal Meteorological Society.</rights><rights>2018 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-c60693cae93aeec0743c8f6a906cc2eb53479a1024aa3c2dbe876204aeacab963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-c60693cae93aeec0743c8f6a906cc2eb53479a1024aa3c2dbe876204aeacab963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fqj.3297$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fqj.3297$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harris, Bethan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tailleux, Rémi</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of algorithms for computing moist available potential energy</title><title>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</title><description>Atmospheric moist available potential energy (MAPE) has traditionally been defined as the potential energy of a moist atmosphere relative to that of the adiabatically sorted reference state defining a global potential energy minimum. Although the Munkres algorithm can in principle find such a reference state exactly, its computational cost has prompted much interest in developing heuristic methods for computing MAPE in practice. Comparisons of the accuracy of such approximate algorithms have so far been limited to a small number of test cases; this work provides an assessment of the performance of the algorithms across a wide range of atmospheric soundings, in two different locations. We determine that the divide‐and‐conquer algorithm is the best suited to practical application, but suffers from the previously unexplored shortcoming that it can produce a reference state with higher potential energy than the actual state, resulting in a negative value of MAPE. Additionally, we show that it is possible to construct an algorithm exploiting a previously derived theoretical expression linking MAPE to Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE). This approach has a similar accuracy to existing approximate sorting algorithms, whilst providing greater insight into the physical source of MAPE. In light of these results, we discuss possible ways to improve on the construction of Available Potential Energy (APE) theory for a moist atmosphere. Moist Available Potential Energy (MAPE) describes the energy available to atmospheric motion by taking the difference between the total potential energies (TPE) of the actual atmospheric state and a reference state. Reference states have previously been computed using sorting algorithms that approximate the reversible adiabatic rearrangement minimizing the TPE. However, we show that these algorithms regularly produce a reference state with even higher TPE than the actual state and therefore alternative approaches not based on sorting parcels are physically preferable.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheric sounding</subject><subject>available potential energy</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>convection</subject><subject>Convective available potential energy</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>moist thermodynamics</subject><subject>Potential energy</subject><issn>0035-9009</issn><issn>1477-870X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EFLw0AQBeBFFKxV_AsLHjxI6mQ3yWaPpWhVCiIoeFsm66QmJNl0N1X6702tV0_v8r0ZeIxdxjCLAcTtpp5JodURm8SJUlGu4P2YTQBkGmkAfcrOQqgBIFVCTdhyHgKF0FI3cFdybNbOV8NnG3jpPLeu7bdD1a1566owcPzCqsGiId67YaxU2HDqyK935-ykxCbQxV9O2dv93eviIVo9Lx8X81VkpRAqshlkWlokLZHIgkqkzcsMNWTWCipSmSiNMYgEUVrxUVCuMgEJElosdCan7Opwt_dus6UwmNptfTe-NCKOFYg8FWpU1wdlvQvBU2l6X7XodyYGs1_JbGqzX2mUNwf5XTW0-4-Zl6df_QPtjGhc</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Harris, Bethan L.</creator><creator>Tailleux, Rémi</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Assessment of algorithms for computing moist available potential energy</title><author>Harris, Bethan L. ; Tailleux, Rémi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-c60693cae93aeec0743c8f6a906cc2eb53479a1024aa3c2dbe876204aeacab963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheric sounding</topic><topic>available potential energy</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>convection</topic><topic>Convective available potential energy</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>moist thermodynamics</topic><topic>Potential energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harris, Bethan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tailleux, Rémi</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harris, Bethan L.</au><au>Tailleux, Rémi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of algorithms for computing moist available potential energy</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>714</issue><spage>1501</spage><epage>1510</epage><pages>1501-1510</pages><issn>0035-9009</issn><eissn>1477-870X</eissn><abstract>Atmospheric moist available potential energy (MAPE) has traditionally been defined as the potential energy of a moist atmosphere relative to that of the adiabatically sorted reference state defining a global potential energy minimum. Although the Munkres algorithm can in principle find such a reference state exactly, its computational cost has prompted much interest in developing heuristic methods for computing MAPE in practice. Comparisons of the accuracy of such approximate algorithms have so far been limited to a small number of test cases; this work provides an assessment of the performance of the algorithms across a wide range of atmospheric soundings, in two different locations. We determine that the divide‐and‐conquer algorithm is the best suited to practical application, but suffers from the previously unexplored shortcoming that it can produce a reference state with higher potential energy than the actual state, resulting in a negative value of MAPE. Additionally, we show that it is possible to construct an algorithm exploiting a previously derived theoretical expression linking MAPE to Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE). This approach has a similar accuracy to existing approximate sorting algorithms, whilst providing greater insight into the physical source of MAPE. In light of these results, we discuss possible ways to improve on the construction of Available Potential Energy (APE) theory for a moist atmosphere. Moist Available Potential Energy (MAPE) describes the energy available to atmospheric motion by taking the difference between the total potential energies (TPE) of the actual atmospheric state and a reference state. Reference states have previously been computed using sorting algorithms that approximate the reversible adiabatic rearrangement minimizing the TPE. However, we show that these algorithms regularly produce a reference state with even higher TPE than the actual state and therefore alternative approaches not based on sorting parcels are physically preferable.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/qj.3297</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-9009
ispartof Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2018-07, Vol.144 (714), p.1501-1510
issn 0035-9009
1477-870X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2117028527
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Atmosphere
Atmospheric sounding
available potential energy
Computer applications
convection
Convective available potential energy
Energy
moist thermodynamics
Potential energy
title Assessment of algorithms for computing moist available potential energy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20algorithms%20for%20computing%20moist%20available%20potential%20energy&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Meteorological%20Society&rft.au=Harris,%20Bethan%20L.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=714&rft.spage=1501&rft.epage=1510&rft.pages=1501-1510&rft.issn=0035-9009&rft.eissn=1477-870X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qj.3297&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117028527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117028527&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true