Comparison of Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Fuzzy Models with Simulation and an Application on Hypertension Data Set

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the classification performances of hierarchical and non-hierarchical fuzzy models built by using different membership functions. Materials and Methods: In this study, normally distributed data sets containing different number of independent variables (p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Meandros medical and dental journal 2018-08, Vol.19 (2), p.138-146
Hauptverfasser: Cantaş, Fulden, Kurt Ömürlü, İmran, Türe, Mevlüt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 146
container_issue 2
container_start_page 138
container_title Meandros medical and dental journal
container_volume 19
creator Cantaş, Fulden
Kurt Ömürlü, İmran
Türe, Mevlüt
description Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the classification performances of hierarchical and non-hierarchical fuzzy models built by using different membership functions. Materials and Methods: In this study, normally distributed data sets containing different number of independent variables (p=3 and p=6) were generated. Besides, the classification performances of hierarchical and non-hierarchical fuzzy models built by using the data set which contained body mass index, fasting blood glucose and triglyceride values of hypertensive (n=206) and control (n=113) people were compared. Results: It was found that there was a significant difference between the fuzzy models (p
doi_str_mv 10.4274/meandros.02996
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ideal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2116957774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2116957774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-14e331237f5a8ac8df005fea51c85c78935464215b429d274ea5a9e432ca29563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkd1LwzAUxYsoOHSvPgd88Kkzn03zOPbhBlMfps8hpinLaJuadOj215tuioMLuTn53RO4J0nuEBxRzOljbVRTeBdGEAuRXSQDjKhIBczI5Vl_nQxD2EIIEc-YINkg-Z64ulXeBtcAV4KFNV55vbFaVSA6ghfXpJtzcb47HPbg2RWmCuDLdhuwtvWuUp2NDv2EasC4basIH6VYi31rfGea0N-nqlNgbbrb5KpUVTDD3_MmeZ_P3iaLdPX6tJyMV6nGmehSRA0hCBNeMpUrnRclhKw0iiGdM81zQRjNKEbsg2JRxE3EJyUMJVgrLFhGbpL7k2_r3efOhE5u3c438UuJEcoE45zTSD2cKFsYVbmmso35B5fT2XglOUei9xudSB23HbwpZettrfxeIij7KORfFPIYBfkBU2p-Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116957774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Fuzzy Models with Simulation and an Application on Hypertension Data Set</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cantaş, Fulden ; Kurt Ömürlü, İmran ; Türe, Mevlüt</creator><contributor>Turan,Yasemin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cantaş, Fulden ; Kurt Ömürlü, İmran ; Türe, Mevlüt ; Turan,Yasemin</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the classification performances of hierarchical and non-hierarchical fuzzy models built by using different membership functions. Materials and Methods: In this study, normally distributed data sets containing different number of independent variables (p=3 and p=6) were generated. Besides, the classification performances of hierarchical and non-hierarchical fuzzy models built by using the data set which contained body mass index, fasting blood glucose and triglyceride values of hypertensive (n=206) and control (n=113) people were compared. Results: It was found that there was a significant difference between the fuzzy models (p&lt;0.001). According to the result of both simulation and hypertension data set application, non-hierarchical fuzzy models were found to have better classification performance than hierarchical fuzzy models according to sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and root mean square criteria. Moreover, when number of independent variables was increased, performances of the models increased too and approached to each other. Conclusion: In fuzzy logic methods, data structure, distributions of the variables and correlation between them, how to divide independent variables into categories and which of the fuzzy logic methods is to choose should be examined by taking an expert support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-9063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-9063</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4274/meandros.02996</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Aydın: Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Body mass index ; Classification ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Economic models ; Engineering research ; Fuzzy logic ; Gene expression ; Hypertension ; International conferences ; Mathematical models ; Neural networks ; Tıp ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Meandros medical and dental journal, 2018-08, Vol.19 (2), p.138-146</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-14e331237f5a8ac8df005fea51c85c78935464215b429d274ea5a9e432ca29563</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-2887-6656</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Turan,Yasemin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cantaş, Fulden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt Ömürlü, İmran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türe, Mevlüt</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Fuzzy Models with Simulation and an Application on Hypertension Data Set</title><title>Meandros medical and dental journal</title><description>Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the classification performances of hierarchical and non-hierarchical fuzzy models built by using different membership functions. Materials and Methods: In this study, normally distributed data sets containing different number of independent variables (p=3 and p=6) were generated. Besides, the classification performances of hierarchical and non-hierarchical fuzzy models built by using the data set which contained body mass index, fasting blood glucose and triglyceride values of hypertensive (n=206) and control (n=113) people were compared. Results: It was found that there was a significant difference between the fuzzy models (p&lt;0.001). According to the result of both simulation and hypertension data set application, non-hierarchical fuzzy models were found to have better classification performance than hierarchical fuzzy models according to sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and root mean square criteria. Moreover, when number of independent variables was increased, performances of the models increased too and approached to each other. Conclusion: In fuzzy logic methods, data structure, distributions of the variables and correlation between them, how to divide independent variables into categories and which of the fuzzy logic methods is to choose should be examined by taking an expert support.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Engineering research</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>International conferences</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Tıp</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2149-9063</issn><issn>2149-9063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkd1LwzAUxYsoOHSvPgd88Kkzn03zOPbhBlMfps8hpinLaJuadOj215tuioMLuTn53RO4J0nuEBxRzOljbVRTeBdGEAuRXSQDjKhIBczI5Vl_nQxD2EIIEc-YINkg-Z64ulXeBtcAV4KFNV55vbFaVSA6ghfXpJtzcb47HPbg2RWmCuDLdhuwtvWuUp2NDv2EasC4basIH6VYi31rfGea0N-nqlNgbbrb5KpUVTDD3_MmeZ_P3iaLdPX6tJyMV6nGmehSRA0hCBNeMpUrnRclhKw0iiGdM81zQRjNKEbsg2JRxE3EJyUMJVgrLFhGbpL7k2_r3efOhE5u3c438UuJEcoE45zTSD2cKFsYVbmmso35B5fT2XglOUei9xudSB23HbwpZettrfxeIij7KORfFPIYBfkBU2p-Qw</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Cantaş, Fulden</creator><creator>Kurt Ömürlü, İmran</creator><creator>Türe, Mevlüt</creator><general>Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi</general><general>Galenos Publishing House</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IEBAR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-6656</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Comparison of Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Fuzzy Models with Simulation and an Application on Hypertension Data Set</title><author>Cantaş, Fulden ; Kurt Ömürlü, İmran ; Türe, Mevlüt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-14e331237f5a8ac8df005fea51c85c78935464215b429d274ea5a9e432ca29563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Engineering research</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>International conferences</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Tıp</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cantaş, Fulden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt Ömürlü, İmran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türe, Mevlüt</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Idealonline online kütüphane - Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Meandros medical and dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cantaş, Fulden</au><au>Kurt Ömürlü, İmran</au><au>Türe, Mevlüt</au><au>Turan,Yasemin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Fuzzy Models with Simulation and an Application on Hypertension Data Set</atitle><jtitle>Meandros medical and dental journal</jtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>138-146</pages><issn>2149-9063</issn><eissn>2149-9063</eissn><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the classification performances of hierarchical and non-hierarchical fuzzy models built by using different membership functions. Materials and Methods: In this study, normally distributed data sets containing different number of independent variables (p=3 and p=6) were generated. Besides, the classification performances of hierarchical and non-hierarchical fuzzy models built by using the data set which contained body mass index, fasting blood glucose and triglyceride values of hypertensive (n=206) and control (n=113) people were compared. Results: It was found that there was a significant difference between the fuzzy models (p&lt;0.001). According to the result of both simulation and hypertension data set application, non-hierarchical fuzzy models were found to have better classification performance than hierarchical fuzzy models according to sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and root mean square criteria. Moreover, when number of independent variables was increased, performances of the models increased too and approached to each other. Conclusion: In fuzzy logic methods, data structure, distributions of the variables and correlation between them, how to divide independent variables into categories and which of the fuzzy logic methods is to choose should be examined by taking an expert support.</abstract><cop>Aydın</cop><pub>Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi</pub><doi>10.4274/meandros.02996</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-6656</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-9063
ispartof Meandros medical and dental journal, 2018-08, Vol.19 (2), p.138-146
issn 2149-9063
2149-9063
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2116957774
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algorithms
Body mass index
Classification
Data processing
Datasets
Economic models
Engineering research
Fuzzy logic
Gene expression
Hypertension
International conferences
Mathematical models
Neural networks
Tıp
Variables
title Comparison of Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Fuzzy Models with Simulation and an Application on Hypertension Data Set
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A30%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ideal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Hierarchical%20and%20Non-hierarchical%20Fuzzy%20Models%20with%20Simulation%20and%20an%20Application%20on%20Hypertension%20Data%20Set&rft.jtitle=Meandros%20medical%20and%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Canta%C5%9F,%20Fulden&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=138-146&rft.issn=2149-9063&rft.eissn=2149-9063&rft_id=info:doi/10.4274/meandros.02996&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ideal%3E2116957774%3C/proquest_ideal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116957774&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true