Ti6Al4V lightweight lattice structures manufactured by laser powder bed fusion for load-bearing applications

•Visualization of manufactured and compressed LPBF Ti6Al4V lattice structures using microCT scans.•Structural mechanics simulation of lattice structures.•Validation of simulations with physical compression tests.•Both designs found experimentally to fail in the range 190–200 MPa.•Mechanical properti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Optics and laser technology 2018-12, Vol.108, p.521-528
Hauptverfasser: du Plessis, Anton, Yadroitsava, Ina, Yadroitsev, Igor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 528
container_issue
container_start_page 521
container_title Optics and laser technology
container_volume 108
creator du Plessis, Anton
Yadroitsava, Ina
Yadroitsev, Igor
description •Visualization of manufactured and compressed LPBF Ti6Al4V lattice structures using microCT scans.•Structural mechanics simulation of lattice structures.•Validation of simulations with physical compression tests.•Both designs found experimentally to fail in the range 190–200 MPa.•Mechanical properties of designed structures are close to the cortical bone. Additively manufactured (AM) lattice structures allow complex-shaped and custom parts, with superior design that cannot be produced by traditional methods. For medical implants, AM lattice structures are aimed at matching the elastic modulus of bone while providing strength and allowing bone in-growth for long-term stability. In this study, relatively thick struts are investigated in an attempt to match the properties of cortical bone, which is meant for the internal structural integrity of the implant, while a smaller lattice may be used for near-surface parts of an implant. In this work we investigate additively manufactured lattice samples produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) of Ti6Al4V ELI, with samples having approximately 50% regular porosity. In particular, we experimentally compare two designs: diagonal and rhombic. MicroCT-based static loading simulations are used to highlight stress hotspots in the two designs, to highlight possible failure locations. Physical compression testing to initial failure and subsequent microCT highlight the locations of initial failure, which correlate well with the simulation stress hotspots. Both designs show excellent strength (120–140 kN failure load) and effective compressive elastic modulus corresponding well to simulations. Differences between microCT-based simulations of the produced lattices and those of ideal design parameters can be attributed mainly to surface roughness, and slightly thinner manufactured struts of the as-built lattices, with similar trends for the two model designs. These results validate experimentally that both designs are suitable for load-bearing applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2116839455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0030399218307680</els_id><sourcerecordid>2116839455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-36d02f07cdc80a5e7ef3e498e0d5cc5df05c32c39c6ead58e07d7ea21f0771083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLg-vEbDHhunTRN0x4X8QsEL-o1ZJPpmqXb1CRV_PdmXfHqZYZ5894b5hFywaBkwJqrTemnNOiY0JQVsLYEWYKAA7JgreyKStTikCwAOBS866pjchLjBgDqRvAFGZ5dsxzqVzq49Vv6xF2lg07JGaQxhdmkOWCkWz3Ovf4ZLF19ZUrEQCf_aXNbZayfo_Mj7X2gg9e2WKEOblxTPU2DMzrlZTwjR70eIp7_9lPycnvzfH1fPD7dPVwvHwtTQ5cK3lioepDGmha0QIk9x7prEawwRtgehOGV4Z1pUFuRcWkl6opljWTQ8lNyufedgn-fMSa18XMY80lVMda0vKuFyCy5Z5ngYwzYqym4rQ5fioHaRas26i9atYtWgVQ52qxc7pWYn_hwGFQ0DkeD1gU0SVnv_vX4BskKiSU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116839455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ti6Al4V lightweight lattice structures manufactured by laser powder bed fusion for load-bearing applications</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>du Plessis, Anton ; Yadroitsava, Ina ; Yadroitsev, Igor</creator><creatorcontrib>du Plessis, Anton ; Yadroitsava, Ina ; Yadroitsev, Igor</creatorcontrib><description>•Visualization of manufactured and compressed LPBF Ti6Al4V lattice structures using microCT scans.•Structural mechanics simulation of lattice structures.•Validation of simulations with physical compression tests.•Both designs found experimentally to fail in the range 190–200 MPa.•Mechanical properties of designed structures are close to the cortical bone. Additively manufactured (AM) lattice structures allow complex-shaped and custom parts, with superior design that cannot be produced by traditional methods. For medical implants, AM lattice structures are aimed at matching the elastic modulus of bone while providing strength and allowing bone in-growth for long-term stability. In this study, relatively thick struts are investigated in an attempt to match the properties of cortical bone, which is meant for the internal structural integrity of the implant, while a smaller lattice may be used for near-surface parts of an implant. In this work we investigate additively manufactured lattice samples produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) of Ti6Al4V ELI, with samples having approximately 50% regular porosity. In particular, we experimentally compare two designs: diagonal and rhombic. MicroCT-based static loading simulations are used to highlight stress hotspots in the two designs, to highlight possible failure locations. Physical compression testing to initial failure and subsequent microCT highlight the locations of initial failure, which correlate well with the simulation stress hotspots. Both designs show excellent strength (120–140 kN failure load) and effective compressive elastic modulus corresponding well to simulations. Differences between microCT-based simulations of the produced lattices and those of ideal design parameters can be attributed mainly to surface roughness, and slightly thinner manufactured struts of the as-built lattices, with similar trends for the two model designs. These results validate experimentally that both designs are suitable for load-bearing applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-3992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Additive manufacturing ; Compression tests ; Compressive strength ; Computer simulation ; Design parameters ; Failure load ; Laser powder bed fusion ; Lattice structure ; Lattices ; MicroCT ; Modulus of elasticity ; Porosity ; Powder beds ; Simulation ; Structural integrity ; Struts ; Surface roughness ; Surgical implants ; Titanium base alloys</subject><ispartof>Optics and laser technology, 2018-12, Vol.108, p.521-528</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-36d02f07cdc80a5e7ef3e498e0d5cc5df05c32c39c6ead58e07d7ea21f0771083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-36d02f07cdc80a5e7ef3e498e0d5cc5df05c32c39c6ead58e07d7ea21f0771083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4370-8661</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>du Plessis, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadroitsava, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadroitsev, Igor</creatorcontrib><title>Ti6Al4V lightweight lattice structures manufactured by laser powder bed fusion for load-bearing applications</title><title>Optics and laser technology</title><description>•Visualization of manufactured and compressed LPBF Ti6Al4V lattice structures using microCT scans.•Structural mechanics simulation of lattice structures.•Validation of simulations with physical compression tests.•Both designs found experimentally to fail in the range 190–200 MPa.•Mechanical properties of designed structures are close to the cortical bone. Additively manufactured (AM) lattice structures allow complex-shaped and custom parts, with superior design that cannot be produced by traditional methods. For medical implants, AM lattice structures are aimed at matching the elastic modulus of bone while providing strength and allowing bone in-growth for long-term stability. In this study, relatively thick struts are investigated in an attempt to match the properties of cortical bone, which is meant for the internal structural integrity of the implant, while a smaller lattice may be used for near-surface parts of an implant. In this work we investigate additively manufactured lattice samples produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) of Ti6Al4V ELI, with samples having approximately 50% regular porosity. In particular, we experimentally compare two designs: diagonal and rhombic. MicroCT-based static loading simulations are used to highlight stress hotspots in the two designs, to highlight possible failure locations. Physical compression testing to initial failure and subsequent microCT highlight the locations of initial failure, which correlate well with the simulation stress hotspots. Both designs show excellent strength (120–140 kN failure load) and effective compressive elastic modulus corresponding well to simulations. Differences between microCT-based simulations of the produced lattices and those of ideal design parameters can be attributed mainly to surface roughness, and slightly thinner manufactured struts of the as-built lattices, with similar trends for the two model designs. These results validate experimentally that both designs are suitable for load-bearing applications.</description><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Compression tests</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Failure load</subject><subject>Laser powder bed fusion</subject><subject>Lattice structure</subject><subject>Lattices</subject><subject>MicroCT</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Powder beds</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Structural integrity</subject><subject>Struts</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Titanium base alloys</subject><issn>0030-3992</issn><issn>1879-2545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLg-vEbDHhunTRN0x4X8QsEL-o1ZJPpmqXb1CRV_PdmXfHqZYZ5894b5hFywaBkwJqrTemnNOiY0JQVsLYEWYKAA7JgreyKStTikCwAOBS866pjchLjBgDqRvAFGZ5dsxzqVzq49Vv6xF2lg07JGaQxhdmkOWCkWz3Ovf4ZLF19ZUrEQCf_aXNbZayfo_Mj7X2gg9e2WKEOblxTPU2DMzrlZTwjR70eIp7_9lPycnvzfH1fPD7dPVwvHwtTQ5cK3lioepDGmha0QIk9x7prEawwRtgehOGV4Z1pUFuRcWkl6opljWTQ8lNyufedgn-fMSa18XMY80lVMda0vKuFyCy5Z5ngYwzYqym4rQ5fioHaRas26i9atYtWgVQ52qxc7pWYn_hwGFQ0DkeD1gU0SVnv_vX4BskKiSU</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>du Plessis, Anton</creator><creator>Yadroitsava, Ina</creator><creator>Yadroitsev, Igor</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4370-8661</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Ti6Al4V lightweight lattice structures manufactured by laser powder bed fusion for load-bearing applications</title><author>du Plessis, Anton ; Yadroitsava, Ina ; Yadroitsev, Igor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-36d02f07cdc80a5e7ef3e498e0d5cc5df05c32c39c6ead58e07d7ea21f0771083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Compression tests</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Failure load</topic><topic>Laser powder bed fusion</topic><topic>Lattice structure</topic><topic>Lattices</topic><topic>MicroCT</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Powder beds</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Structural integrity</topic><topic>Struts</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Titanium base alloys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>du Plessis, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadroitsava, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadroitsev, Igor</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Optics and laser technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>du Plessis, Anton</au><au>Yadroitsava, Ina</au><au>Yadroitsev, Igor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ti6Al4V lightweight lattice structures manufactured by laser powder bed fusion for load-bearing applications</atitle><jtitle>Optics and laser technology</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>108</volume><spage>521</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>521-528</pages><issn>0030-3992</issn><eissn>1879-2545</eissn><abstract>•Visualization of manufactured and compressed LPBF Ti6Al4V lattice structures using microCT scans.•Structural mechanics simulation of lattice structures.•Validation of simulations with physical compression tests.•Both designs found experimentally to fail in the range 190–200 MPa.•Mechanical properties of designed structures are close to the cortical bone. Additively manufactured (AM) lattice structures allow complex-shaped and custom parts, with superior design that cannot be produced by traditional methods. For medical implants, AM lattice structures are aimed at matching the elastic modulus of bone while providing strength and allowing bone in-growth for long-term stability. In this study, relatively thick struts are investigated in an attempt to match the properties of cortical bone, which is meant for the internal structural integrity of the implant, while a smaller lattice may be used for near-surface parts of an implant. In this work we investigate additively manufactured lattice samples produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) of Ti6Al4V ELI, with samples having approximately 50% regular porosity. In particular, we experimentally compare two designs: diagonal and rhombic. MicroCT-based static loading simulations are used to highlight stress hotspots in the two designs, to highlight possible failure locations. Physical compression testing to initial failure and subsequent microCT highlight the locations of initial failure, which correlate well with the simulation stress hotspots. Both designs show excellent strength (120–140 kN failure load) and effective compressive elastic modulus corresponding well to simulations. Differences between microCT-based simulations of the produced lattices and those of ideal design parameters can be attributed mainly to surface roughness, and slightly thinner manufactured struts of the as-built lattices, with similar trends for the two model designs. These results validate experimentally that both designs are suitable for load-bearing applications.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.050</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4370-8661</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-3992
ispartof Optics and laser technology, 2018-12, Vol.108, p.521-528
issn 0030-3992
1879-2545
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2116839455
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Additive manufacturing
Compression tests
Compressive strength
Computer simulation
Design parameters
Failure load
Laser powder bed fusion
Lattice structure
Lattices
MicroCT
Modulus of elasticity
Porosity
Powder beds
Simulation
Structural integrity
Struts
Surface roughness
Surgical implants
Titanium base alloys
title Ti6Al4V lightweight lattice structures manufactured by laser powder bed fusion for load-bearing applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T16%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ti6Al4V%20lightweight%20lattice%20structures%20manufactured%20by%20laser%20powder%20bed%20fusion%20for%20load-bearing%20applications&rft.jtitle=Optics%20and%20laser%20technology&rft.au=du%20Plessis,%20Anton&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=108&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=521-528&rft.issn=0030-3992&rft.eissn=1879-2545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2116839455%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116839455&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0030399218307680&rfr_iscdi=true