Re-Examining the Rationale for Strategic Assessment: An Evaluation of Purpose in Two Systems
Strategic forms of impact assessment have seen increased application around the world since their conception. Expansion has produced considerable variation and this range of tools and processes can create practitioner confusion and blurred boundaries in practice. This research draws on empirical dat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental assessment policy and management 2017-12, Vol.19 (4), p.1750020 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1750020 |
container_title | Journal of environmental assessment policy and management |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Hayes, Samuel J. Barker, Adam Jones, Carys E |
description | Strategic forms of impact assessment have seen increased application around the world since their conception. Expansion has produced considerable variation and this range of tools and processes can create practitioner confusion and blurred boundaries in practice. This research draws on empirical data from England and Scotland to examine different systems to understand how the purposes of strategic assessment are framed and to consider how purposes are translated into practice. Four key purposes of strategic assessment are examined; overcoming EIA shortcomings, strategic thinking, representation of the environment and consideration of sustainability. It is concluded that various scales (international, national, local and individual) influence how strategic assessment purpose is framed. We find that as multiple purposes come together they interact, with regulatory compliance potentially dominating. Strategic assessment is also found to be described as information provider, and excluded or distant from strategic thinking as part of plan formulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1142/S146433321750020X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_world</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2116148819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2116148819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272X-7221d1b44ac9e1436b6912f4f9ddd08f83f6f9c06701b3fd633cc9d750c188573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkF9LwzAUxYMoOHQfwLeAz9XcJE1b38aYf2CgbBP2IJQ0TWakbWbSOfftzZz4sqd74JzfhXMQugJyA8Dp7Ry44IwxCllKCCXLEzSIMktSQdLTqKOd7P1zNAzBVgQKwTjldIDeZjqZfMvWdrZb4f5d45nsretko7FxHs97L3u9sgqPQtAhtLrr7_Cow5Mv2Wx-o9gZ_LLxaxc0th1ebB2e70Kv23CJzoxsgh7-3Qv0ej9ZjB-T6fPD03g0TRTN6DLJKIUaKs6lKjRwJipRADXcFHVdk9zkzAhTKCIyAhUztWBMqaKOXRXkeZqxC3R9-Lv27nOjQ19-uI2PHUJJAQTwPIcipuCQUt6F4LUp19620u9KIOV-x_Jox8iQA7N1vqmDsrG-NVb9o8fID44PdBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116148819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re-Examining the Rationale for Strategic Assessment: An Evaluation of Purpose in Two Systems</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hayes, Samuel J. ; Barker, Adam ; Jones, Carys E</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Samuel J. ; Barker, Adam ; Jones, Carys E</creatorcontrib><description>Strategic forms of impact assessment have seen increased application around the world since their conception. Expansion has produced considerable variation and this range of tools and processes can create practitioner confusion and blurred boundaries in practice. This research draws on empirical data from England and Scotland to examine different systems to understand how the purposes of strategic assessment are framed and to consider how purposes are translated into practice. Four key purposes of strategic assessment are examined; overcoming EIA shortcomings, strategic thinking, representation of the environment and consideration of sustainability. It is concluded that various scales (international, national, local and individual) influence how strategic assessment purpose is framed. We find that as multiple purposes come together they interact, with regulatory compliance potentially dominating. Strategic assessment is also found to be described as information provider, and excluded or distant from strategic thinking as part of plan formulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-3332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-5605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1142/S146433321750020X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Data processing ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, 2017-12, Vol.19 (4), p.1750020</ispartof><rights>2017, World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.</rights><rights>2017. World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272X-7221d1b44ac9e1436b6912f4f9ddd08f83f6f9c06701b3fd633cc9d750c188573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272X-7221d1b44ac9e1436b6912f4f9ddd08f83f6f9c06701b3fd633cc9d750c188573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Samuel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Carys E</creatorcontrib><title>Re-Examining the Rationale for Strategic Assessment: An Evaluation of Purpose in Two Systems</title><title>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management</title><description>Strategic forms of impact assessment have seen increased application around the world since their conception. Expansion has produced considerable variation and this range of tools and processes can create practitioner confusion and blurred boundaries in practice. This research draws on empirical data from England and Scotland to examine different systems to understand how the purposes of strategic assessment are framed and to consider how purposes are translated into practice. Four key purposes of strategic assessment are examined; overcoming EIA shortcomings, strategic thinking, representation of the environment and consideration of sustainability. It is concluded that various scales (international, national, local and individual) influence how strategic assessment purpose is framed. We find that as multiple purposes come together they interact, with regulatory compliance potentially dominating. Strategic assessment is also found to be described as information provider, and excluded or distant from strategic thinking as part of plan formulation.</description><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1464-3332</issn><issn>1757-5605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkF9LwzAUxYMoOHQfwLeAz9XcJE1b38aYf2CgbBP2IJQ0TWakbWbSOfftzZz4sqd74JzfhXMQugJyA8Dp7Ry44IwxCllKCCXLEzSIMktSQdLTqKOd7P1zNAzBVgQKwTjldIDeZjqZfMvWdrZb4f5d45nsretko7FxHs97L3u9sgqPQtAhtLrr7_Cow5Mv2Wx-o9gZ_LLxaxc0th1ebB2e70Kv23CJzoxsgh7-3Qv0ej9ZjB-T6fPD03g0TRTN6DLJKIUaKs6lKjRwJipRADXcFHVdk9zkzAhTKCIyAhUztWBMqaKOXRXkeZqxC3R9-Lv27nOjQ19-uI2PHUJJAQTwPIcipuCQUt6F4LUp19620u9KIOV-x_Jox8iQA7N1vqmDsrG-NVb9o8fID44PdBE</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Hayes, Samuel J.</creator><creator>Barker, Adam</creator><creator>Jones, Carys E</creator><general>World Scientific Publishing Company</general><general>World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Re-Examining the Rationale for Strategic Assessment: An Evaluation of Purpose in Two Systems</title><author>Hayes, Samuel J. ; Barker, Adam ; Jones, Carys E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272X-7221d1b44ac9e1436b6912f4f9ddd08f83f6f9c06701b3fd633cc9d750c188573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Samuel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Carys E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayes, Samuel J.</au><au>Barker, Adam</au><au>Jones, Carys E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re-Examining the Rationale for Strategic Assessment: An Evaluation of Purpose in Two Systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management</jtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1750020</spage><pages>1750020-</pages><issn>1464-3332</issn><eissn>1757-5605</eissn><abstract>Strategic forms of impact assessment have seen increased application around the world since their conception. Expansion has produced considerable variation and this range of tools and processes can create practitioner confusion and blurred boundaries in practice. This research draws on empirical data from England and Scotland to examine different systems to understand how the purposes of strategic assessment are framed and to consider how purposes are translated into practice. Four key purposes of strategic assessment are examined; overcoming EIA shortcomings, strategic thinking, representation of the environment and consideration of sustainability. It is concluded that various scales (international, national, local and individual) influence how strategic assessment purpose is framed. We find that as multiple purposes come together they interact, with regulatory compliance potentially dominating. Strategic assessment is also found to be described as information provider, and excluded or distant from strategic thinking as part of plan formulation.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>World Scientific Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1142/S146433321750020X</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-3332 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, 2017-12, Vol.19 (4), p.1750020 |
issn | 1464-3332 1757-5605 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2116148819 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Data processing Sustainability |
title | Re-Examining the Rationale for Strategic Assessment: An Evaluation of Purpose in Two Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T09%3A32%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_world&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-Examining%20the%20Rationale%20for%20Strategic%20Assessment:%20An%20Evaluation%20of%20Purpose%20in%20Two%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20assessment%20policy%20and%20management&rft.au=Hayes,%20Samuel%20J.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1750020&rft.pages=1750020-&rft.issn=1464-3332&rft.eissn=1757-5605&rft_id=info:doi/10.1142/S146433321750020X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_world%3E2116148819%3C/proquest_world%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116148819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |