Turbulent boundary layer response to large-scale wavy topographies

Flat-plate turbulent boundary layer adjustment to large-scale 2D and 3D wavy topographies was experimentally studied using high-resolution particle image velocimetry in a refractive-index-matching flume. The flow was characterized at a Reynolds number R e   =   4 × 1 0 4 , based on the channel half...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics of fluids (1994) 2017-06, Vol.29 (6)
Hauptverfasser: Hamed, Ali M., Castillo, Luciano, Chamorro, Leonardo P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Physics of fluids (1994)
container_volume 29
creator Hamed, Ali M.
Castillo, Luciano
Chamorro, Leonardo P.
description Flat-plate turbulent boundary layer adjustment to large-scale 2D and 3D wavy topographies was experimentally studied using high-resolution particle image velocimetry in a refractive-index-matching flume. The flow was characterized at a Reynolds number R e   =   4 × 1 0 4 , based on the channel half height and incoming free-stream velocity. Two ratios of amplitude (a) to incoming boundary layer thickness ( δ 0 ) were considered for each topography ( a ∕ δ 0   =   0.12 and 0.81). The 2D topography is described by a sinusoidal wave in the streamwise direction with an amplitude to wavelength ratio a ∕ λ x   =   0.05 , while the 3D topography is defined with an additional wave superimposed in the spanwise direction. The results show that the spanwise variability of the topography leads to a much milder response in both a ∕ δ 0 ratios. The regions of strong acceleration and deceleration over the crests and troughs of the topography are reduced over the 3D topography due to the alternate flow path around the 3D elements. Furthermore, the boundary layer thickness and integral parameters experienced milder variations over the 3D topography for both a ∕ δ 0 . The Reynolds shear stress shows distinctive evolution with downstream distance. In the 3D case, maximum Reynolds stress similar to those in the developed region is achieved within the first three wavelengths past the topographic change indicating that the dynamics of the downstream evolution is dominated by vertical diffusion and redistribution. This is in contrast with the 2D case with a ∕ δ 0   =   0.12 where the Reynolds stress did not achieve the levels observed in the developed region.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.4989719
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2116103235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2116103235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-3b8a450b305159b942bf5b54af7edfa6b93a94223d22f6566926632e0bc7cdd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI4ufIOCK4WMuTSnzVIHbzDgZlyHJE3HDrWpSav07c3QWbs6h4-Pc_kRuqZkRQnwe7rKZSkLKk_QgpJS4gIATg99QTAAp-foIsY9IYRLBgv0uB2DGVvXDZnxY1fpMGWtnlzIgou976LLBp9I2DkcrW5d9qt_psR6vwu6_2xcvERntW6juzrWJfp4ftquX_Hm_eVt_bDBlkk2YG5KnQtiOBFUSCNzZmphRK7rwlW1BiO5TpDxirEaBEC6DzhzxNjCVlXJl-hmntsH_z26OKi9H0OXVipGKVDCGRfJup0tG3yMwdWqD81XektRog4RKaqOESX3bnajbQY9NL77R_4DVqFlmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116103235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Turbulent boundary layer response to large-scale wavy topographies</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hamed, Ali M. ; Castillo, Luciano ; Chamorro, Leonardo P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamed, Ali M. ; Castillo, Luciano ; Chamorro, Leonardo P.</creatorcontrib><description>Flat-plate turbulent boundary layer adjustment to large-scale 2D and 3D wavy topographies was experimentally studied using high-resolution particle image velocimetry in a refractive-index-matching flume. The flow was characterized at a Reynolds number R e   =   4 × 1 0 4 , based on the channel half height and incoming free-stream velocity. Two ratios of amplitude (a) to incoming boundary layer thickness ( δ 0 ) were considered for each topography ( a ∕ δ 0   =   0.12 and 0.81). The 2D topography is described by a sinusoidal wave in the streamwise direction with an amplitude to wavelength ratio a ∕ λ x   =   0.05 , while the 3D topography is defined with an additional wave superimposed in the spanwise direction. The results show that the spanwise variability of the topography leads to a much milder response in both a ∕ δ 0 ratios. The regions of strong acceleration and deceleration over the crests and troughs of the topography are reduced over the 3D topography due to the alternate flow path around the 3D elements. Furthermore, the boundary layer thickness and integral parameters experienced milder variations over the 3D topography for both a ∕ δ 0 . The Reynolds shear stress shows distinctive evolution with downstream distance. In the 3D case, maximum Reynolds stress similar to those in the developed region is achieved within the first three wavelengths past the topographic change indicating that the dynamics of the downstream evolution is dominated by vertical diffusion and redistribution. This is in contrast with the 2D case with a ∕ δ 0   =   0.12 where the Reynolds stress did not achieve the levels observed in the developed region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-6631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4989719</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHFLE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Amplitudes ; Boundary element method ; Boundary layer ; Boundary layer thickness ; Deceleration ; Evolution ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Image resolution ; Particle image velocimetry ; Reynolds number ; Reynolds stress ; Shear stress ; Three dimensional flow ; Topography ; Turbulent boundary layer ; Two dimensional boundary layer ; Velocity measurement</subject><ispartof>Physics of fluids (1994), 2017-06, Vol.29 (6)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2017 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-3b8a450b305159b942bf5b54af7edfa6b93a94223d22f6566926632e0bc7cdd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-3b8a450b305159b942bf5b54af7edfa6b93a94223d22f6566926632e0bc7cdd83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1373-2409 ; 0000-0002-5199-424X ; 0000-0001-9633-6075</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,794,4512,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamed, Ali M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamorro, Leonardo P.</creatorcontrib><title>Turbulent boundary layer response to large-scale wavy topographies</title><title>Physics of fluids (1994)</title><description>Flat-plate turbulent boundary layer adjustment to large-scale 2D and 3D wavy topographies was experimentally studied using high-resolution particle image velocimetry in a refractive-index-matching flume. The flow was characterized at a Reynolds number R e   =   4 × 1 0 4 , based on the channel half height and incoming free-stream velocity. Two ratios of amplitude (a) to incoming boundary layer thickness ( δ 0 ) were considered for each topography ( a ∕ δ 0   =   0.12 and 0.81). The 2D topography is described by a sinusoidal wave in the streamwise direction with an amplitude to wavelength ratio a ∕ λ x   =   0.05 , while the 3D topography is defined with an additional wave superimposed in the spanwise direction. The results show that the spanwise variability of the topography leads to a much milder response in both a ∕ δ 0 ratios. The regions of strong acceleration and deceleration over the crests and troughs of the topography are reduced over the 3D topography due to the alternate flow path around the 3D elements. Furthermore, the boundary layer thickness and integral parameters experienced milder variations over the 3D topography for both a ∕ δ 0 . The Reynolds shear stress shows distinctive evolution with downstream distance. In the 3D case, maximum Reynolds stress similar to those in the developed region is achieved within the first three wavelengths past the topographic change indicating that the dynamics of the downstream evolution is dominated by vertical diffusion and redistribution. This is in contrast with the 2D case with a ∕ δ 0   =   0.12 where the Reynolds stress did not achieve the levels observed in the developed region.</description><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Boundary element method</subject><subject>Boundary layer</subject><subject>Boundary layer thickness</subject><subject>Deceleration</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Image resolution</subject><subject>Particle image velocimetry</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Reynolds stress</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Three dimensional flow</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Turbulent boundary layer</subject><subject>Two dimensional boundary layer</subject><subject>Velocity measurement</subject><issn>1070-6631</issn><issn>1089-7666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI4ufIOCK4WMuTSnzVIHbzDgZlyHJE3HDrWpSav07c3QWbs6h4-Pc_kRuqZkRQnwe7rKZSkLKk_QgpJS4gIATg99QTAAp-foIsY9IYRLBgv0uB2DGVvXDZnxY1fpMGWtnlzIgou976LLBp9I2DkcrW5d9qt_psR6vwu6_2xcvERntW6juzrWJfp4ftquX_Hm_eVt_bDBlkk2YG5KnQtiOBFUSCNzZmphRK7rwlW1BiO5TpDxirEaBEC6DzhzxNjCVlXJl-hmntsH_z26OKi9H0OXVipGKVDCGRfJup0tG3yMwdWqD81XektRog4RKaqOESX3bnajbQY9NL77R_4DVqFlmA</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Hamed, Ali M.</creator><creator>Castillo, Luciano</creator><creator>Chamorro, Leonardo P.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1373-2409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-424X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9633-6075</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Turbulent boundary layer response to large-scale wavy topographies</title><author>Hamed, Ali M. ; Castillo, Luciano ; Chamorro, Leonardo P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-3b8a450b305159b942bf5b54af7edfa6b93a94223d22f6566926632e0bc7cdd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Boundary element method</topic><topic>Boundary layer</topic><topic>Boundary layer thickness</topic><topic>Deceleration</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Image resolution</topic><topic>Particle image velocimetry</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Reynolds stress</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Three dimensional flow</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Turbulent boundary layer</topic><topic>Two dimensional boundary layer</topic><topic>Velocity measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamed, Ali M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamorro, Leonardo P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamed, Ali M.</au><au>Castillo, Luciano</au><au>Chamorro, Leonardo P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Turbulent boundary layer response to large-scale wavy topographies</atitle><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>1070-6631</issn><eissn>1089-7666</eissn><coden>PHFLE6</coden><abstract>Flat-plate turbulent boundary layer adjustment to large-scale 2D and 3D wavy topographies was experimentally studied using high-resolution particle image velocimetry in a refractive-index-matching flume. The flow was characterized at a Reynolds number R e   =   4 × 1 0 4 , based on the channel half height and incoming free-stream velocity. Two ratios of amplitude (a) to incoming boundary layer thickness ( δ 0 ) were considered for each topography ( a ∕ δ 0   =   0.12 and 0.81). The 2D topography is described by a sinusoidal wave in the streamwise direction with an amplitude to wavelength ratio a ∕ λ x   =   0.05 , while the 3D topography is defined with an additional wave superimposed in the spanwise direction. The results show that the spanwise variability of the topography leads to a much milder response in both a ∕ δ 0 ratios. The regions of strong acceleration and deceleration over the crests and troughs of the topography are reduced over the 3D topography due to the alternate flow path around the 3D elements. Furthermore, the boundary layer thickness and integral parameters experienced milder variations over the 3D topography for both a ∕ δ 0 . The Reynolds shear stress shows distinctive evolution with downstream distance. In the 3D case, maximum Reynolds stress similar to those in the developed region is achieved within the first three wavelengths past the topographic change indicating that the dynamics of the downstream evolution is dominated by vertical diffusion and redistribution. This is in contrast with the 2D case with a ∕ δ 0   =   0.12 where the Reynolds stress did not achieve the levels observed in the developed region.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.4989719</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1373-2409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-424X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9633-6075</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-6631
ispartof Physics of fluids (1994), 2017-06, Vol.29 (6)
issn 1070-6631
1089-7666
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2116103235
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Amplitudes
Boundary element method
Boundary layer
Boundary layer thickness
Deceleration
Evolution
Fluid dynamics
Fluid flow
Image resolution
Particle image velocimetry
Reynolds number
Reynolds stress
Shear stress
Three dimensional flow
Topography
Turbulent boundary layer
Two dimensional boundary layer
Velocity measurement
title Turbulent boundary layer response to large-scale wavy topographies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A33%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Turbulent%20boundary%20layer%20response%20to%20large-scale%20wavy%20topographies&rft.jtitle=Physics%20of%20fluids%20(1994)&rft.au=Hamed,%20Ali%20M.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=1070-6631&rft.eissn=1089-7666&rft.coden=PHFLE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4989719&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2116103235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116103235&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true