Experimental investigation of interface stiffness between concrete masonry infill and reinforced concrete frames

•Experimental investigation for interface stiffness of three types of CMU was carried out.•Interface stiffness varied considerably for various CMU types.•Construction practice and use of shear connectors also affected the interface stiffness.•Experimental values of interface stiffness can be used in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering structures 2018-09, Vol.171, p.779-793
Hauptverfasser: Hammoudah, Sawsan M.W., Chaudhary, Muhammad T.A., Essawy, Ahmed Sherif
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 793
container_issue
container_start_page 779
container_title Engineering structures
container_volume 171
creator Hammoudah, Sawsan M.W.
Chaudhary, Muhammad T.A.
Essawy, Ahmed Sherif
description •Experimental investigation for interface stiffness of three types of CMU was carried out.•Interface stiffness varied considerably for various CMU types.•Construction practice and use of shear connectors also affected the interface stiffness.•Experimental values of interface stiffness can be used in FEM simulations. Masonry infilled wall panels are commonly used as internal partitions or external curtain walls within building frames. These infill panels are generally treated as non-structural elements as quantification of their strength and stiffness is varied and difficult. Interface properties between masonry infill and building frame play an important role in the lateral performance of masonry infilled frames. Behavior of masonry infilled frames have been studied since 1960s experimentally as well as analytically. However, studies to determine the properties of the interface between the masonry infill and the building frame elements are very few. In this study, 28 concrete masonry unit (CMU) samples consisting of solid, lightweight and hollow CMU blocks were tested under lateral load to determine the interface stiffness at three different locations (i.e. frame bottom, side and top) of a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame under varying normal load as well as presence or otherwise of steel shear connectors. The experimental data was analyzed and compared to delineate effect of different parameters on interface stiffness. Experimental results showed that the interface stiffness varied widely for the three types of CMU blocks at various interface locations. The use of shear connectors in the top and side interface specimen increased the interface stiffness considerably as compared to the samples without shear connectors. Similarly, normal load increased the interface stiffness of the bottom specimen as compared to the ones without normal load. Interface stiffness determined from these experimental results can be used for accurate modeling and analysis of CMU infilled R/C frames.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2115248298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029617310659</els_id><sourcerecordid>2115248298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-bf117b0201cd91d97cf70c985856b4136a37e14dbd947a47ffee02b4f1a5f1483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWD9-gwued81sspvdYyn1Awpe9Byy2UlJaZOapNX-e1MqevQ0zPDMDO9DyB3QCii0D6sK3TKmsNOpqil0FW0rypozMoFOsFKwmp2TCQUOJa379pJcxbiilNZdRydkO__aYrAbdEmtC-v2GJNdqmS9K7zJg4TBKI1FHhvjMMZiwPSJ6ArtnQ6YsNio6F04ZNjY9bpQbiwC5sYHjeMfZoLaYLwhF0atI97-1Gvy_jh_mz2Xi9enl9l0UWrGWSoHAyAGmgPpsYexF9oIqvuu6Zp24MBaxQQCH4ex50JxYQwirQduQDUGeMeuyf3p7jb4j11OJVd-F1x-KWuApuZd3R8pcaJ08DEGNHKbZahwkEDlUa9cyV-98qhX0lZmvXlzetrEHGJvMcioLbqc2AbM7Ojtvze-ASlyiy4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2115248298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental investigation of interface stiffness between concrete masonry infill and reinforced concrete frames</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Hammoudah, Sawsan M.W. ; Chaudhary, Muhammad T.A. ; Essawy, Ahmed Sherif</creator><creatorcontrib>Hammoudah, Sawsan M.W. ; Chaudhary, Muhammad T.A. ; Essawy, Ahmed Sherif</creatorcontrib><description>•Experimental investigation for interface stiffness of three types of CMU was carried out.•Interface stiffness varied considerably for various CMU types.•Construction practice and use of shear connectors also affected the interface stiffness.•Experimental values of interface stiffness can be used in FEM simulations. Masonry infilled wall panels are commonly used as internal partitions or external curtain walls within building frames. These infill panels are generally treated as non-structural elements as quantification of their strength and stiffness is varied and difficult. Interface properties between masonry infill and building frame play an important role in the lateral performance of masonry infilled frames. Behavior of masonry infilled frames have been studied since 1960s experimentally as well as analytically. However, studies to determine the properties of the interface between the masonry infill and the building frame elements are very few. In this study, 28 concrete masonry unit (CMU) samples consisting of solid, lightweight and hollow CMU blocks were tested under lateral load to determine the interface stiffness at three different locations (i.e. frame bottom, side and top) of a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame under varying normal load as well as presence or otherwise of steel shear connectors. The experimental data was analyzed and compared to delineate effect of different parameters on interface stiffness. Experimental results showed that the interface stiffness varied widely for the three types of CMU blocks at various interface locations. The use of shear connectors in the top and side interface specimen increased the interface stiffness considerably as compared to the samples without shear connectors. Similarly, normal load increased the interface stiffness of the bottom specimen as compared to the ones without normal load. Interface stiffness determined from these experimental results can be used for accurate modeling and analysis of CMU infilled R/C frames.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Building construction ; Building frames ; Concrete masonry ; Connectors ; Curtain walls ; Data processing ; Experimental evaluation ; Infilled frames ; Interface stiffness ; Interfacial properties ; Lateral load ; Lateral loads ; Masonry ; Nonstructural members ; Panels ; R/C frame ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcing steels ; Shear ; Shear connectors ; Steel ; Stiffness ; Structural engineering</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2018-09, Vol.171, p.779-793</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Sep 15, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-bf117b0201cd91d97cf70c985856b4136a37e14dbd947a47ffee02b4f1a5f1483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-bf117b0201cd91d97cf70c985856b4136a37e14dbd947a47ffee02b4f1a5f1483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hammoudah, Sawsan M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhary, Muhammad T.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essawy, Ahmed Sherif</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental investigation of interface stiffness between concrete masonry infill and reinforced concrete frames</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•Experimental investigation for interface stiffness of three types of CMU was carried out.•Interface stiffness varied considerably for various CMU types.•Construction practice and use of shear connectors also affected the interface stiffness.•Experimental values of interface stiffness can be used in FEM simulations. Masonry infilled wall panels are commonly used as internal partitions or external curtain walls within building frames. These infill panels are generally treated as non-structural elements as quantification of their strength and stiffness is varied and difficult. Interface properties between masonry infill and building frame play an important role in the lateral performance of masonry infilled frames. Behavior of masonry infilled frames have been studied since 1960s experimentally as well as analytically. However, studies to determine the properties of the interface between the masonry infill and the building frame elements are very few. In this study, 28 concrete masonry unit (CMU) samples consisting of solid, lightweight and hollow CMU blocks were tested under lateral load to determine the interface stiffness at three different locations (i.e. frame bottom, side and top) of a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame under varying normal load as well as presence or otherwise of steel shear connectors. The experimental data was analyzed and compared to delineate effect of different parameters on interface stiffness. Experimental results showed that the interface stiffness varied widely for the three types of CMU blocks at various interface locations. The use of shear connectors in the top and side interface specimen increased the interface stiffness considerably as compared to the samples without shear connectors. Similarly, normal load increased the interface stiffness of the bottom specimen as compared to the ones without normal load. Interface stiffness determined from these experimental results can be used for accurate modeling and analysis of CMU infilled R/C frames.</description><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Building frames</subject><subject>Concrete masonry</subject><subject>Connectors</subject><subject>Curtain walls</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Experimental evaluation</subject><subject>Infilled frames</subject><subject>Interface stiffness</subject><subject>Interfacial properties</subject><subject>Lateral load</subject><subject>Lateral loads</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Nonstructural members</subject><subject>Panels</subject><subject>R/C frame</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Shear connectors</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Structural engineering</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWD9-gwued81sspvdYyn1Awpe9Byy2UlJaZOapNX-e1MqevQ0zPDMDO9DyB3QCii0D6sK3TKmsNOpqil0FW0rypozMoFOsFKwmp2TCQUOJa379pJcxbiilNZdRydkO__aYrAbdEmtC-v2GJNdqmS9K7zJg4TBKI1FHhvjMMZiwPSJ6ArtnQ6YsNio6F04ZNjY9bpQbiwC5sYHjeMfZoLaYLwhF0atI97-1Gvy_jh_mz2Xi9enl9l0UWrGWSoHAyAGmgPpsYexF9oIqvuu6Zp24MBaxQQCH4ex50JxYQwirQduQDUGeMeuyf3p7jb4j11OJVd-F1x-KWuApuZd3R8pcaJ08DEGNHKbZahwkEDlUa9cyV-98qhX0lZmvXlzetrEHGJvMcioLbqc2AbM7Ojtvze-ASlyiy4</recordid><startdate>20180915</startdate><enddate>20180915</enddate><creator>Hammoudah, Sawsan M.W.</creator><creator>Chaudhary, Muhammad T.A.</creator><creator>Essawy, Ahmed Sherif</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180915</creationdate><title>Experimental investigation of interface stiffness between concrete masonry infill and reinforced concrete frames</title><author>Hammoudah, Sawsan M.W. ; Chaudhary, Muhammad T.A. ; Essawy, Ahmed Sherif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-bf117b0201cd91d97cf70c985856b4136a37e14dbd947a47ffee02b4f1a5f1483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Building frames</topic><topic>Concrete masonry</topic><topic>Connectors</topic><topic>Curtain walls</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Experimental evaluation</topic><topic>Infilled frames</topic><topic>Interface stiffness</topic><topic>Interfacial properties</topic><topic>Lateral load</topic><topic>Lateral loads</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Nonstructural members</topic><topic>Panels</topic><topic>R/C frame</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Shear connectors</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Structural engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hammoudah, Sawsan M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhary, Muhammad T.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essawy, Ahmed Sherif</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hammoudah, Sawsan M.W.</au><au>Chaudhary, Muhammad T.A.</au><au>Essawy, Ahmed Sherif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental investigation of interface stiffness between concrete masonry infill and reinforced concrete frames</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2018-09-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>171</volume><spage>779</spage><epage>793</epage><pages>779-793</pages><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><abstract>•Experimental investigation for interface stiffness of three types of CMU was carried out.•Interface stiffness varied considerably for various CMU types.•Construction practice and use of shear connectors also affected the interface stiffness.•Experimental values of interface stiffness can be used in FEM simulations. Masonry infilled wall panels are commonly used as internal partitions or external curtain walls within building frames. These infill panels are generally treated as non-structural elements as quantification of their strength and stiffness is varied and difficult. Interface properties between masonry infill and building frame play an important role in the lateral performance of masonry infilled frames. Behavior of masonry infilled frames have been studied since 1960s experimentally as well as analytically. However, studies to determine the properties of the interface between the masonry infill and the building frame elements are very few. In this study, 28 concrete masonry unit (CMU) samples consisting of solid, lightweight and hollow CMU blocks were tested under lateral load to determine the interface stiffness at three different locations (i.e. frame bottom, side and top) of a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame under varying normal load as well as presence or otherwise of steel shear connectors. The experimental data was analyzed and compared to delineate effect of different parameters on interface stiffness. Experimental results showed that the interface stiffness varied widely for the three types of CMU blocks at various interface locations. The use of shear connectors in the top and side interface specimen increased the interface stiffness considerably as compared to the samples without shear connectors. Similarly, normal load increased the interface stiffness of the bottom specimen as compared to the ones without normal load. Interface stiffness determined from these experimental results can be used for accurate modeling and analysis of CMU infilled R/C frames.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.035</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0296
ispartof Engineering structures, 2018-09, Vol.171, p.779-793
issn 0141-0296
1873-7323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2115248298
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Building construction
Building frames
Concrete masonry
Connectors
Curtain walls
Data processing
Experimental evaluation
Infilled frames
Interface stiffness
Interfacial properties
Lateral load
Lateral loads
Masonry
Nonstructural members
Panels
R/C frame
Reinforced concrete
Reinforcing steels
Shear
Shear connectors
Steel
Stiffness
Structural engineering
title Experimental investigation of interface stiffness between concrete masonry infill and reinforced concrete frames
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20investigation%20of%20interface%20stiffness%20between%20concrete%20masonry%20infill%20and%20reinforced%20concrete%20frames&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Hammoudah,%20Sawsan%20M.W.&rft.date=2018-09-15&rft.volume=171&rft.spage=779&rft.epage=793&rft.pages=779-793&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2115248298%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2115248298&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029617310659&rfr_iscdi=true