A Teleonic Management Framework for Organizations

The hierarchical organization (HO) that has provided the prevailing model for business management for most of this century has been challenged repeatedly during the last 20 to 30 years. Matrix Management (MM), Total Quality Management (TQM), and Business Process Reengineering (BPR) are just three in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Systemic practice and action research 1999-04, Vol.12 (2), p.195
Hauptverfasser: Járos, György G, Dostal, Elisabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 195
container_title Systemic practice and action research
container_volume 12
creator Járos, György G
Dostal, Elisabeth
description The hierarchical organization (HO) that has provided the prevailing model for business management for most of this century has been challenged repeatedly during the last 20 to 30 years. Matrix Management (MM), Total Quality Management (TQM), and Business Process Reengineering (BPR) are just three in the long line of approaches that have been suggested to remedy some of the problems with HO. Although these approaches have showed great promise, they either have been abandoned (MM), are on their way out (TQM), or are experiencing serious problems (BPR) in a large number of organizations that have tried to implement them. Yet many of these organizations have managed to make these approaches work. It is suggested in this paper that the main reasons for the failures do not lie in the models themselves, each of which have considerable merits, but in the absence of an overall theoretical framework, within which the various models could be validated and amalgamated. The authors are of the opinion that teleonics (proposed by Jaros and Cloete, 1987) could serve as the basis for such a framework, which could thus be called the Teleonic Management Framework (TMF). [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1022478114619
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211480029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1750856947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p208t-a24e42f990e85545b9071a8d018b49383da1b81fd33f3d002d051f5de7c668da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1T8tKAzEUDaJgra7dDroevTePSa67oVgVKt1UcFcyTVJa26Rmpgh-vQHdujpncZ6MXSPcIXBx3z4U4FIbRNkgnbARKi1q4qROCweSteT0fs4u-n4LwFETjBi21cLvfIqbVfVqo137vY9DNc12779S_qhCytU8r23cfNthk2J_yc6C3fX-6g_H7G36uJg817P508ukndUHDmaoLZde8kAE3iglVUeg0RoHaDpJwghnsTMYnBBBuLLHgcKgnNerpjHOijG7-c095PR59P2w3KZjjqVyyctFUyxURLf_iVArMKohqcUPWVNQhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211480029</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Teleonic Management Framework for Organizations</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Járos, György G ; Dostal, Elisabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Járos, György G ; Dostal, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><description>The hierarchical organization (HO) that has provided the prevailing model for business management for most of this century has been challenged repeatedly during the last 20 to 30 years. Matrix Management (MM), Total Quality Management (TQM), and Business Process Reengineering (BPR) are just three in the long line of approaches that have been suggested to remedy some of the problems with HO. Although these approaches have showed great promise, they either have been abandoned (MM), are on their way out (TQM), or are experiencing serious problems (BPR) in a large number of organizations that have tried to implement them. Yet many of these organizations have managed to make these approaches work. It is suggested in this paper that the main reasons for the failures do not lie in the models themselves, each of which have considerable merits, but in the absence of an overall theoretical framework, within which the various models could be validated and amalgamated. The authors are of the opinion that teleonics (proposed by Jaros and Cloete, 1987) could serve as the basis for such a framework, which could thus be called the Teleonic Management Framework (TMF). [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-429X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-9295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1022478114619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: New York, NY :Plenum Press,1998</publisher><subject>Business process reengineering ; Management theory ; Organizational behavior ; Quality ; Total quality</subject><ispartof>Systemic practice and action research, 1999-04, Vol.12 (2), p.195</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) 1999 Plenum Publishing Corporation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Járos, György G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dostal, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><title>A Teleonic Management Framework for Organizations</title><title>Systemic practice and action research</title><description>The hierarchical organization (HO) that has provided the prevailing model for business management for most of this century has been challenged repeatedly during the last 20 to 30 years. Matrix Management (MM), Total Quality Management (TQM), and Business Process Reengineering (BPR) are just three in the long line of approaches that have been suggested to remedy some of the problems with HO. Although these approaches have showed great promise, they either have been abandoned (MM), are on their way out (TQM), or are experiencing serious problems (BPR) in a large number of organizations that have tried to implement them. Yet many of these organizations have managed to make these approaches work. It is suggested in this paper that the main reasons for the failures do not lie in the models themselves, each of which have considerable merits, but in the absence of an overall theoretical framework, within which the various models could be validated and amalgamated. The authors are of the opinion that teleonics (proposed by Jaros and Cloete, 1987) could serve as the basis for such a framework, which could thus be called the Teleonic Management Framework (TMF). [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Business process reengineering</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Total quality</subject><issn>1094-429X</issn><issn>1573-9295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1T8tKAzEUDaJgra7dDroevTePSa67oVgVKt1UcFcyTVJa26Rmpgh-vQHdujpncZ6MXSPcIXBx3z4U4FIbRNkgnbARKi1q4qROCweSteT0fs4u-n4LwFETjBi21cLvfIqbVfVqo137vY9DNc12779S_qhCytU8r23cfNthk2J_yc6C3fX-6g_H7G36uJg817P508ukndUHDmaoLZde8kAE3iglVUeg0RoHaDpJwghnsTMYnBBBuLLHgcKgnNerpjHOijG7-c095PR59P2w3KZjjqVyyctFUyxURLf_iVArMKohqcUPWVNQhQ</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>Járos, György G</creator><creator>Dostal, Elisabeth</creator><general>New York, NY :Plenum Press,1998</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SPJJO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>A Teleonic Management Framework for Organizations</title><author>Járos, György G ; Dostal, Elisabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p208t-a24e42f990e85545b9071a8d018b49383da1b81fd33f3d002d051f5de7c668da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Business process reengineering</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Total quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Járos, György G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dostal, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 48</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Systemic practice and action research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Járos, György G</au><au>Dostal, Elisabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Teleonic Management Framework for Organizations</atitle><jtitle>Systemic practice and action research</jtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>195</spage><pages>195-</pages><issn>1094-429X</issn><eissn>1573-9295</eissn><abstract>The hierarchical organization (HO) that has provided the prevailing model for business management for most of this century has been challenged repeatedly during the last 20 to 30 years. Matrix Management (MM), Total Quality Management (TQM), and Business Process Reengineering (BPR) are just three in the long line of approaches that have been suggested to remedy some of the problems with HO. Although these approaches have showed great promise, they either have been abandoned (MM), are on their way out (TQM), or are experiencing serious problems (BPR) in a large number of organizations that have tried to implement them. Yet many of these organizations have managed to make these approaches work. It is suggested in this paper that the main reasons for the failures do not lie in the models themselves, each of which have considerable merits, but in the absence of an overall theoretical framework, within which the various models could be validated and amalgamated. The authors are of the opinion that teleonics (proposed by Jaros and Cloete, 1987) could serve as the basis for such a framework, which could thus be called the Teleonic Management Framework (TMF). [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>New York, NY :Plenum Press,1998</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1022478114619</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-429X
ispartof Systemic practice and action research, 1999-04, Vol.12 (2), p.195
issn 1094-429X
1573-9295
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_211480029
source Periodicals Index Online; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Business process reengineering
Management theory
Organizational behavior
Quality
Total quality
title A Teleonic Management Framework for Organizations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A10%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Teleonic%20Management%20Framework%20for%20Organizations&rft.jtitle=Systemic%20practice%20and%20action%20research&rft.au=J%C3%A1ros,%20Gy%C3%B6rgy%20G&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=195&rft.pages=195-&rft.issn=1094-429X&rft.eissn=1573-9295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1022478114619&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1750856947%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211480029&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true