Branding Internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance

In the 2000s, China and Russia emerged as outspoken actors with global ambitions. To communicate their status aspirations, both countries introduced a range of nation-branding institutions and initiatives. Global Internet governance – the design and administration of Internet technology and related...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cultural studies 2018-10, Vol.21 (5), p.594-613
Hauptverfasser: Budnitsky, Stanislav, Jia, Lianrui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 613
container_issue 5
container_start_page 594
container_title European journal of cultural studies
container_volume 21
creator Budnitsky, Stanislav
Jia, Lianrui
description In the 2000s, China and Russia emerged as outspoken actors with global ambitions. To communicate their status aspirations, both countries introduced a range of nation-branding institutions and initiatives. Global Internet governance – the design and administration of Internet technology and related policymaking – is among the domains where China and Russia have asserted their national brands. The Chinese and Russian governments co-advance the brand narrative of ‘Internet sovereignty’ in opposition to perceived technological and governance hegemony of the United States. Given the power that private online intermediaries wield in the political economy of the Internet, national digital media champions, China’s Baidu and Russia’s Yandex, have been integral to their countries’ Internet branding efforts. The article examines how China and Russia have forged a public–private relationship with respective digital media champions in the context of building and branding an Internet sovereignty agenda.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1367549417751151
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2113994584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1367549417751151</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2113994584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-6f7579048639d35423a6bcfdaac1eacf601c301bc81aca1fd760f3b523bc3dd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKt7lwHXo7mTZH7caf0rFASp6yGTuZmmTDM1mQrd-Q6-oU9iSgVBcHUPnO-cC4eQc2CXAHl-BTzLpShF1BJAwgEZgchYwqWEw6ijnez8Y3ISwpIxVggpR2R-65VrrGvp1A3oHQ409O_o0bZu2F7TO9vaQXV0hY1VNKJ0WCCdLKzDgF8fny-bEKxyVG9r9KrrotZ4So6M6gKe_dwxeX24n0-ektnz43RyM0s0Z-WQZCaXeclEkfGy4VKkXGW1No1SGlBpkzGIINS6AKUVmCbPmOG1THmtedOkfEwu9r1r379tMAzVst94F19WKQAvSyELESm2p7TvQ_BoqrW3K-W3FbBqt131d7sYSfaRoFr8Lf2X_wYW_W-n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2113994584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Branding Internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Budnitsky, Stanislav ; Jia, Lianrui</creator><creatorcontrib>Budnitsky, Stanislav ; Jia, Lianrui</creatorcontrib><description>In the 2000s, China and Russia emerged as outspoken actors with global ambitions. To communicate their status aspirations, both countries introduced a range of nation-branding institutions and initiatives. Global Internet governance – the design and administration of Internet technology and related policymaking – is among the domains where China and Russia have asserted their national brands. The Chinese and Russian governments co-advance the brand narrative of ‘Internet sovereignty’ in opposition to perceived technological and governance hegemony of the United States. Given the power that private online intermediaries wield in the political economy of the Internet, national digital media champions, China’s Baidu and Russia’s Yandex, have been integral to their countries’ Internet branding efforts. The article examines how China and Russia have forged a public–private relationship with respective digital media champions in the context of building and branding an Internet sovereignty agenda.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-5494</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1367549417751151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Digital broadcasting ; Digital media ; Governance ; Hegemony ; Internet ; Market strategy ; Mass media ; Policy making ; Political economy ; Public sector private sector relations ; Sovereignty ; Technology</subject><ispartof>European journal of cultural studies, 2018-10, Vol.21 (5), p.594-613</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-6f7579048639d35423a6bcfdaac1eacf601c301bc81aca1fd760f3b523bc3dd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-6f7579048639d35423a6bcfdaac1eacf601c301bc81aca1fd760f3b523bc3dd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1367549417751151$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1367549417751151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27903,27904,33753,43599,43600</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Budnitsky, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Lianrui</creatorcontrib><title>Branding Internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance</title><title>European journal of cultural studies</title><description>In the 2000s, China and Russia emerged as outspoken actors with global ambitions. To communicate their status aspirations, both countries introduced a range of nation-branding institutions and initiatives. Global Internet governance – the design and administration of Internet technology and related policymaking – is among the domains where China and Russia have asserted their national brands. The Chinese and Russian governments co-advance the brand narrative of ‘Internet sovereignty’ in opposition to perceived technological and governance hegemony of the United States. Given the power that private online intermediaries wield in the political economy of the Internet, national digital media champions, China’s Baidu and Russia’s Yandex, have been integral to their countries’ Internet branding efforts. The article examines how China and Russia have forged a public–private relationship with respective digital media champions in the context of building and branding an Internet sovereignty agenda.</description><subject>Digital broadcasting</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Market strategy</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Public sector private sector relations</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1367-5494</issn><issn>1460-3551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKt7lwHXo7mTZH7caf0rFASp6yGTuZmmTDM1mQrd-Q6-oU9iSgVBcHUPnO-cC4eQc2CXAHl-BTzLpShF1BJAwgEZgchYwqWEw6ijnez8Y3ISwpIxVggpR2R-65VrrGvp1A3oHQ409O_o0bZu2F7TO9vaQXV0hY1VNKJ0WCCdLKzDgF8fny-bEKxyVG9r9KrrotZ4So6M6gKe_dwxeX24n0-ektnz43RyM0s0Z-WQZCaXeclEkfGy4VKkXGW1No1SGlBpkzGIINS6AKUVmCbPmOG1THmtedOkfEwu9r1r379tMAzVst94F19WKQAvSyELESm2p7TvQ_BoqrW3K-W3FbBqt131d7sYSfaRoFr8Lf2X_wYW_W-n</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Budnitsky, Stanislav</creator><creator>Jia, Lianrui</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Branding Internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance</title><author>Budnitsky, Stanislav ; Jia, Lianrui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-6f7579048639d35423a6bcfdaac1eacf601c301bc81aca1fd760f3b523bc3dd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Digital broadcasting</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Market strategy</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Public sector private sector relations</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Budnitsky, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Lianrui</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of cultural studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Budnitsky, Stanislav</au><au>Jia, Lianrui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Branding Internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cultural studies</jtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>594</spage><epage>613</epage><pages>594-613</pages><issn>1367-5494</issn><eissn>1460-3551</eissn><abstract>In the 2000s, China and Russia emerged as outspoken actors with global ambitions. To communicate their status aspirations, both countries introduced a range of nation-branding institutions and initiatives. Global Internet governance – the design and administration of Internet technology and related policymaking – is among the domains where China and Russia have asserted their national brands. The Chinese and Russian governments co-advance the brand narrative of ‘Internet sovereignty’ in opposition to perceived technological and governance hegemony of the United States. Given the power that private online intermediaries wield in the political economy of the Internet, national digital media champions, China’s Baidu and Russia’s Yandex, have been integral to their countries’ Internet branding efforts. The article examines how China and Russia have forged a public–private relationship with respective digital media champions in the context of building and branding an Internet sovereignty agenda.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1367549417751151</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1367-5494
ispartof European journal of cultural studies, 2018-10, Vol.21 (5), p.594-613
issn 1367-5494
1460-3551
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2113994584
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Digital broadcasting
Digital media
Governance
Hegemony
Internet
Market strategy
Mass media
Policy making
Political economy
Public sector private sector relations
Sovereignty
Technology
title Branding Internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A29%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Branding%20Internet%20sovereignty:%20Digital%20media%20and%20the%20Chinese%E2%80%93Russian%20cyberalliance&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cultural%20studies&rft.au=Budnitsky,%20Stanislav&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=594&rft.epage=613&rft.pages=594-613&rft.issn=1367-5494&rft.eissn=1460-3551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1367549417751151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2113994584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2113994584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1367549417751151&rfr_iscdi=true