Deficit irrigation: a viable option for sustainable confection sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production in the semi-arid US
With water resources becoming more limited in arid and semi-arid regions, water-saving strategies are needed to reduce agricultural water use. A furrow-irrigated field experiment was conducted during 3 years (2010–2012) in the western US to evaluate the response of confection sunflower to deficit ir...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Irrigation science 2018-11, Vol.36 (6), p.319-328 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 328 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 319 |
| container_title | Irrigation science |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Liu, R. Abdelraouf, E. A. A. Bicego, B. Joshi, V. R. Garcia y Garcia, A. |
| description | With water resources becoming more limited in arid and semi-arid regions, water-saving strategies are needed to reduce agricultural water use. A furrow-irrigated field experiment was conducted during 3 years (2010–2012) in the western US to evaluate the response of confection sunflower to deficit irrigation. Treatments were full irrigation (FI, irrigation as scheduled by farmers), two deficit irrigation strategies (R1, started irrigation when miniature floral heads appeared; and R4, started irrigation when floral heads began to open), and rainfed (CK) as control. Results showed that growth and yield of confection sunflower were significantly affected by treatments. The FI and deficit irrigation treatments (R1 and R4) led to significantly higher leaf area index (LAI), aboveground biomass, head diameter, and yield compared with the CK treatment. Relative to FI, deficit irrigation decreased sunflower LAI, head diameter, and aboveground biomass. Average yield was 6% and 15% less in R1 and R4 treatments, respectively, compared with the FI treatment. There was no significant difference in yield between FI and R1, except during extremely dry years, suggesting that the R1 strategy may maintain yield while reducing one irrigation event. Based on the growth and yield of sunflower, an irrigation for crop establishment and then resuming of irrigation at the R1 stage could be considered as a water-saving strategy for surface-irrigated confection sunflower grown in water-scarce regions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00271-018-0588-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2113981576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2113981576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7fd512621a338643a2dc441a5abfa101849d89cafa12ef8b36ddf06de9f122093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ULtOAzEQtBBIhMAH0FmigcLBa9_DR4fCI0iRKCC15ZztxFFiB_sORMO3c8chUVGtdnZmdncQOgc6AUrL60QpK4FQEITmQpDiAI0g44wAh-oQjSjPGClBiGN0ktKGUigLkY3Q152xrnYNdjG6lWpc8DdY4XenlluDw74HsA0RpzY1yvkfuA7emvpnlFpvt-HDRHw5M1unfLNuE1bet12ZT67wPgbdDlzncbM2OJmdIyo6jRcvp-jIqm0yZ791jBYP96_TGZk_Pz5Nb-ek5lA0pLQ6B1YwUJyLIuOK6TrLQOVqaRV0T2eVFlWtuoYZK5a80NrSQpvKAmO04mN0Mfh257y1JjVyE9rou5WSAfBKQF4WHQsGVh1DStFYuY9up-KnBCr7mOUQs-w2yj5m2WvYoEkd169M_HP-X_QNQkWBLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2113981576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deficit irrigation: a viable option for sustainable confection sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production in the semi-arid US</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Liu, R. ; Abdelraouf, E. A. A. ; Bicego, B. ; Joshi, V. R. ; Garcia y Garcia, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, R. ; Abdelraouf, E. A. A. ; Bicego, B. ; Joshi, V. R. ; Garcia y Garcia, A.</creatorcontrib><description>With water resources becoming more limited in arid and semi-arid regions, water-saving strategies are needed to reduce agricultural water use. A furrow-irrigated field experiment was conducted during 3 years (2010–2012) in the western US to evaluate the response of confection sunflower to deficit irrigation. Treatments were full irrigation (FI, irrigation as scheduled by farmers), two deficit irrigation strategies (R1, started irrigation when miniature floral heads appeared; and R4, started irrigation when floral heads began to open), and rainfed (CK) as control. Results showed that growth and yield of confection sunflower were significantly affected by treatments. The FI and deficit irrigation treatments (R1 and R4) led to significantly higher leaf area index (LAI), aboveground biomass, head diameter, and yield compared with the CK treatment. Relative to FI, deficit irrigation decreased sunflower LAI, head diameter, and aboveground biomass. Average yield was 6% and 15% less in R1 and R4 treatments, respectively, compared with the FI treatment. There was no significant difference in yield between FI and R1, except during extremely dry years, suggesting that the R1 strategy may maintain yield while reducing one irrigation event. Based on the growth and yield of sunflower, an irrigation for crop establishment and then resuming of irrigation at the R1 stage could be considered as a water-saving strategy for surface-irrigated confection sunflower grown in water-scarce regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00271-018-0588-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Aquatic Pollution ; Arid regions ; Arid zones ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climate Change ; Environment ; Furrow irrigation ; Helianthus annuus ; Irrigated farming ; Irrigation ; Leaf area ; Leaf area index ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Semi arid areas ; Semiarid lands ; Sustainable Development ; Waste Water Technology ; Water conservation ; Water Industry/Water Technologies ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water resources ; Water use ; Yields</subject><ispartof>Irrigation science, 2018-11, Vol.36 (6), p.319-328</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Irrigation Science is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7fd512621a338643a2dc441a5abfa101849d89cafa12ef8b36ddf06de9f122093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7fd512621a338643a2dc441a5abfa101849d89cafa12ef8b36ddf06de9f122093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7263-530X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00271-018-0588-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00271-018-0588-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelraouf, E. A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bicego, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, V. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia y Garcia, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Deficit irrigation: a viable option for sustainable confection sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production in the semi-arid US</title><title>Irrigation science</title><addtitle>Irrig Sci</addtitle><description>With water resources becoming more limited in arid and semi-arid regions, water-saving strategies are needed to reduce agricultural water use. A furrow-irrigated field experiment was conducted during 3 years (2010–2012) in the western US to evaluate the response of confection sunflower to deficit irrigation. Treatments were full irrigation (FI, irrigation as scheduled by farmers), two deficit irrigation strategies (R1, started irrigation when miniature floral heads appeared; and R4, started irrigation when floral heads began to open), and rainfed (CK) as control. Results showed that growth and yield of confection sunflower were significantly affected by treatments. The FI and deficit irrigation treatments (R1 and R4) led to significantly higher leaf area index (LAI), aboveground biomass, head diameter, and yield compared with the CK treatment. Relative to FI, deficit irrigation decreased sunflower LAI, head diameter, and aboveground biomass. Average yield was 6% and 15% less in R1 and R4 treatments, respectively, compared with the FI treatment. There was no significant difference in yield between FI and R1, except during extremely dry years, suggesting that the R1 strategy may maintain yield while reducing one irrigation event. Based on the growth and yield of sunflower, an irrigation for crop establishment and then resuming of irrigation at the R1 stage could be considered as a water-saving strategy for surface-irrigated confection sunflower grown in water-scarce regions.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Arid regions</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Furrow irrigation</subject><subject>Helianthus annuus</subject><subject>Irrigated farming</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Leaf area index</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Semi arid areas</subject><subject>Semiarid lands</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Water Industry/Water Technologies</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Yields</subject><issn>0342-7188</issn><issn>1432-1319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ULtOAzEQtBBIhMAH0FmigcLBa9_DR4fCI0iRKCC15ZztxFFiB_sORMO3c8chUVGtdnZmdncQOgc6AUrL60QpK4FQEITmQpDiAI0g44wAh-oQjSjPGClBiGN0ktKGUigLkY3Q152xrnYNdjG6lWpc8DdY4XenlluDw74HsA0RpzY1yvkfuA7emvpnlFpvt-HDRHw5M1unfLNuE1bet12ZT67wPgbdDlzncbM2OJmdIyo6jRcvp-jIqm0yZ791jBYP96_TGZk_Pz5Nb-ek5lA0pLQ6B1YwUJyLIuOK6TrLQOVqaRV0T2eVFlWtuoYZK5a80NrSQpvKAmO04mN0Mfh257y1JjVyE9rou5WSAfBKQF4WHQsGVh1DStFYuY9up-KnBCr7mOUQs-w2yj5m2WvYoEkd169M_HP-X_QNQkWBLA</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Liu, R.</creator><creator>Abdelraouf, E. A. A.</creator><creator>Bicego, B.</creator><creator>Joshi, V. R.</creator><creator>Garcia y Garcia, A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7263-530X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Deficit irrigation: a viable option for sustainable confection sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production in the semi-arid US</title><author>Liu, R. ; Abdelraouf, E. A. A. ; Bicego, B. ; Joshi, V. R. ; Garcia y Garcia, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7fd512621a338643a2dc441a5abfa101849d89cafa12ef8b36ddf06de9f122093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Arid regions</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Furrow irrigation</topic><topic>Helianthus annuus</topic><topic>Irrigated farming</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Leaf area index</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Semi arid areas</topic><topic>Semiarid lands</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Water Industry/Water Technologies</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Yields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelraouf, E. A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bicego, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, V. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia y Garcia, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Irrigation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, R.</au><au>Abdelraouf, E. A. A.</au><au>Bicego, B.</au><au>Joshi, V. R.</au><au>Garcia y Garcia, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deficit irrigation: a viable option for sustainable confection sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production in the semi-arid US</atitle><jtitle>Irrigation science</jtitle><stitle>Irrig Sci</stitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>319-328</pages><issn>0342-7188</issn><eissn>1432-1319</eissn><abstract>With water resources becoming more limited in arid and semi-arid regions, water-saving strategies are needed to reduce agricultural water use. A furrow-irrigated field experiment was conducted during 3 years (2010–2012) in the western US to evaluate the response of confection sunflower to deficit irrigation. Treatments were full irrigation (FI, irrigation as scheduled by farmers), two deficit irrigation strategies (R1, started irrigation when miniature floral heads appeared; and R4, started irrigation when floral heads began to open), and rainfed (CK) as control. Results showed that growth and yield of confection sunflower were significantly affected by treatments. The FI and deficit irrigation treatments (R1 and R4) led to significantly higher leaf area index (LAI), aboveground biomass, head diameter, and yield compared with the CK treatment. Relative to FI, deficit irrigation decreased sunflower LAI, head diameter, and aboveground biomass. Average yield was 6% and 15% less in R1 and R4 treatments, respectively, compared with the FI treatment. There was no significant difference in yield between FI and R1, except during extremely dry years, suggesting that the R1 strategy may maintain yield while reducing one irrigation event. Based on the growth and yield of sunflower, an irrigation for crop establishment and then resuming of irrigation at the R1 stage could be considered as a water-saving strategy for surface-irrigated confection sunflower grown in water-scarce regions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00271-018-0588-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7263-530X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0342-7188 |
| ispartof | Irrigation science, 2018-11, Vol.36 (6), p.319-328 |
| issn | 0342-7188 1432-1319 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2113981576 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agriculture Aquatic Pollution Arid regions Arid zones Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Climate Change Environment Furrow irrigation Helianthus annuus Irrigated farming Irrigation Leaf area Leaf area index Life Sciences Original Paper Semi arid areas Semiarid lands Sustainable Development Waste Water Technology Water conservation Water Industry/Water Technologies Water Management Water Pollution Control Water resources Water use Yields |
| title | Deficit irrigation: a viable option for sustainable confection sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production in the semi-arid US |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A16%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deficit%20irrigation:%20a%20viable%20option%20for%20sustainable%20confection%20sunflower%20(Helianthus%20annuus%20L.)%20production%20in%20the%20semi-arid%20US&rft.jtitle=Irrigation%20science&rft.au=Liu,%20R.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=319-328&rft.issn=0342-7188&rft.eissn=1432-1319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00271-018-0588-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2113981576%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2113981576&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |