Individual Differences in Masculine Honor Beliefs Predict Attitudes Toward Aggressive Security Measures, War, and Peace
We hypothesized that individual differences in masculine honor beliefs (MHBs) would predict participants' views of the world and the potential for evil and good among the people in it, as well as their attitudes toward war, peace, and aggressive security policies. Participants' levels of M...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Peace and conflict 2018-02, Vol.24 (1), p.112-116 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 116 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 112 |
| container_title | Peace and conflict |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Saucier, Donald A Webster, Russell J McManus, Jessica L Sonnentag, Tammy L O'Dea, Conor J Strain, Megan L |
| description | We hypothesized that individual differences in masculine honor beliefs (MHBs) would predict participants' views of the world and the potential for evil and good among the people in it, as well as their attitudes toward war, peace, and aggressive security policies. Participants' levels of MHBs were positively associated with their support for war and aggressive security policies (Studies 1 and 2), as well as beliefs in pure evil and perceptions of the world as a competitive jungle (Study 2), and they were negatively associated with their support for peacemaking (Study 2) even after controlling for participants' levels of social desirability, conservatism, and trait aggression (Study 1); sex (Studies 1 and 2); and beliefs in pure evil and pure good (Study 2). We contend that individual differences in MHB are important for understanding how individuals perceive their worlds as places in which the potential and capacity for violence are needed to maintain safety and security. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pac0000303 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2113780459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2013886802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-6e4b6dc1c5508f8ca5d2e7c3e36ded54f14be386ffcb1d98c6ae8481e9d077353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1P3TAMhiO2SeNjN_yCSNwNOuI6bdPLA_sACQQSTLuMchIHBXVtSVLQ-fcLOpO4wzeW7Me2_L6MHYL4BgK709lYUQIF7rBdaLCuul72H9geSETVQ9Phx9IQnaqgh_4z20vpsQzIGmCXvVyOLjwHt5iBfw_eU6TRUuJh5Ncm2WUII_GLaZwiP6MhkE_8NpILNvNVziEvrsD304uJjq8eHiKlFJ6J35FdYsgbfk0mLaV6wv-YeMLN6PgtGUsH7JM3Q6Iv__M--_3zx_35RXV18-vyfHVVGawxVy3Jdess2KYRyitrGldTZ5GwdeQa6UGuCVXrvV2D65VtDSmpgHonug4b3GdH271znJ4WSlk_Tkscy0ld_sdOCdn071ICUKlWibpQX7eUjVNKkbyeY_hr4kaD0K9e6DcvCny8hc1s9Jw21sQc7EBF01g0zq-srqUGDVDjP8Qsicg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2013886802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual Differences in Masculine Honor Beliefs Predict Attitudes Toward Aggressive Security Measures, War, and Peace</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Saucier, Donald A ; Webster, Russell J ; McManus, Jessica L ; Sonnentag, Tammy L ; O'Dea, Conor J ; Strain, Megan L</creator><contributor>Montiel, Cristina Jayme ; Moghaddam, Fathali ; Louis, Winnifred R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Saucier, Donald A ; Webster, Russell J ; McManus, Jessica L ; Sonnentag, Tammy L ; O'Dea, Conor J ; Strain, Megan L ; Montiel, Cristina Jayme ; Moghaddam, Fathali ; Louis, Winnifred R</creatorcontrib><description>We hypothesized that individual differences in masculine honor beliefs (MHBs) would predict participants' views of the world and the potential for evil and good among the people in it, as well as their attitudes toward war, peace, and aggressive security policies. Participants' levels of MHBs were positively associated with their support for war and aggressive security policies (Studies 1 and 2), as well as beliefs in pure evil and perceptions of the world as a competitive jungle (Study 2), and they were negatively associated with their support for peacemaking (Study 2) even after controlling for participants' levels of social desirability, conservatism, and trait aggression (Study 1); sex (Studies 1 and 2); and beliefs in pure evil and pure good (Study 2). We contend that individual differences in MHB are important for understanding how individuals perceive their worlds as places in which the potential and capacity for violence are needed to maintain safety and security.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1919</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433891573</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433891571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pac0000303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springfield: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Aggressive Behavior ; Aggressiveness ; Attitudes ; Belief & doubt ; Conservatism ; Evil ; Female ; Good & evil ; Honor ; Human ; Individual Differences ; Male ; Masculinity ; National Security ; Peace ; Peace studies ; Political Conservatism ; Safety ; Security ; Social Desirability ; Violence ; War</subject><ispartof>Peace and conflict, 2018-02, Vol.24 (1), p.112-116</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-6e4b6dc1c5508f8ca5d2e7c3e36ded54f14be386ffcb1d98c6ae8481e9d077353</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Montiel, Cristina Jayme</contributor><contributor>Moghaddam, Fathali</contributor><contributor>Louis, Winnifred R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Saucier, Donald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Russell J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Jessica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnentag, Tammy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dea, Conor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strain, Megan L</creatorcontrib><title>Individual Differences in Masculine Honor Beliefs Predict Attitudes Toward Aggressive Security Measures, War, and Peace</title><title>Peace and conflict</title><description>We hypothesized that individual differences in masculine honor beliefs (MHBs) would predict participants' views of the world and the potential for evil and good among the people in it, as well as their attitudes toward war, peace, and aggressive security policies. Participants' levels of MHBs were positively associated with their support for war and aggressive security policies (Studies 1 and 2), as well as beliefs in pure evil and perceptions of the world as a competitive jungle (Study 2), and they were negatively associated with their support for peacemaking (Study 2) even after controlling for participants' levels of social desirability, conservatism, and trait aggression (Study 1); sex (Studies 1 and 2); and beliefs in pure evil and pure good (Study 2). We contend that individual differences in MHB are important for understanding how individuals perceive their worlds as places in which the potential and capacity for violence are needed to maintain safety and security.</description><subject>Aggressive Behavior</subject><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Belief & doubt</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Evil</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Good & evil</subject><subject>Honor</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>National Security</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Peace studies</subject><subject>Political Conservatism</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Social Desirability</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>1078-1919</issn><issn>1532-7949</issn><isbn>1433891573</isbn><isbn>9781433891571</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1P3TAMhiO2SeNjN_yCSNwNOuI6bdPLA_sACQQSTLuMchIHBXVtSVLQ-fcLOpO4wzeW7Me2_L6MHYL4BgK709lYUQIF7rBdaLCuul72H9geSETVQ9Phx9IQnaqgh_4z20vpsQzIGmCXvVyOLjwHt5iBfw_eU6TRUuJh5Ncm2WUII_GLaZwiP6MhkE_8NpILNvNVziEvrsD304uJjq8eHiKlFJ6J35FdYsgbfk0mLaV6wv-YeMLN6PgtGUsH7JM3Q6Iv__M--_3zx_35RXV18-vyfHVVGawxVy3Jdess2KYRyitrGldTZ5GwdeQa6UGuCVXrvV2D65VtDSmpgHonug4b3GdH271znJ4WSlk_Tkscy0ld_sdOCdn071ICUKlWibpQX7eUjVNKkbyeY_hr4kaD0K9e6DcvCny8hc1s9Jw21sQc7EBF01g0zq-srqUGDVDjP8Qsicg</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Saucier, Donald A</creator><creator>Webster, Russell J</creator><creator>McManus, Jessica L</creator><creator>Sonnentag, Tammy L</creator><creator>O'Dea, Conor J</creator><creator>Strain, Megan L</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Individual Differences in Masculine Honor Beliefs Predict Attitudes Toward Aggressive Security Measures, War, and Peace</title><author>Saucier, Donald A ; Webster, Russell J ; McManus, Jessica L ; Sonnentag, Tammy L ; O'Dea, Conor J ; Strain, Megan L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-6e4b6dc1c5508f8ca5d2e7c3e36ded54f14be386ffcb1d98c6ae8481e9d077353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aggressive Behavior</topic><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Belief & doubt</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Evil</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Good & evil</topic><topic>Honor</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>National Security</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Peace studies</topic><topic>Political Conservatism</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Social Desirability</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saucier, Donald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Russell J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Jessica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnentag, Tammy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dea, Conor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strain, Megan L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saucier, Donald A</au><au>Webster, Russell J</au><au>McManus, Jessica L</au><au>Sonnentag, Tammy L</au><au>O'Dea, Conor J</au><au>Strain, Megan L</au><au>Montiel, Cristina Jayme</au><au>Moghaddam, Fathali</au><au>Louis, Winnifred R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individual Differences in Masculine Honor Beliefs Predict Attitudes Toward Aggressive Security Measures, War, and Peace</atitle><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>112-116</pages><issn>1078-1919</issn><eissn>1532-7949</eissn><isbn>1433891573</isbn><isbn>9781433891571</isbn><abstract>We hypothesized that individual differences in masculine honor beliefs (MHBs) would predict participants' views of the world and the potential for evil and good among the people in it, as well as their attitudes toward war, peace, and aggressive security policies. Participants' levels of MHBs were positively associated with their support for war and aggressive security policies (Studies 1 and 2), as well as beliefs in pure evil and perceptions of the world as a competitive jungle (Study 2), and they were negatively associated with their support for peacemaking (Study 2) even after controlling for participants' levels of social desirability, conservatism, and trait aggression (Study 1); sex (Studies 1 and 2); and beliefs in pure evil and pure good (Study 2). We contend that individual differences in MHB are important for understanding how individuals perceive their worlds as places in which the potential and capacity for violence are needed to maintain safety and security.</abstract><cop>Springfield</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/pac0000303</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1078-1919 |
| ispartof | Peace and conflict, 2018-02, Vol.24 (1), p.112-116 |
| issn | 1078-1919 1532-7949 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2113780459 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Aggressive Behavior Aggressiveness Attitudes Belief & doubt Conservatism Evil Female Good & evil Honor Human Individual Differences Male Masculinity National Security Peace Peace studies Political Conservatism Safety Security Social Desirability Violence War |
| title | Individual Differences in Masculine Honor Beliefs Predict Attitudes Toward Aggressive Security Measures, War, and Peace |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T06%3A36%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20Differences%20in%20Masculine%20Honor%20Beliefs%20Predict%20Attitudes%20Toward%20Aggressive%20Security%20Measures,%20War,%20and%20Peace&rft.jtitle=Peace%20and%20conflict&rft.au=Saucier,%20Donald%20A&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=112-116&rft.issn=1078-1919&rft.eissn=1532-7949&rft.isbn=1433891573&rft.isbn_list=9781433891571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pac0000303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2013886802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2013886802&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |