Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in Three European Countries Using 28-Month Overall Survival from Checkmate 067

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) as first line advanced melanoma treatment across 3 European countries. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model, using a three-state partitioned survival structure was devel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2017-10, Vol.20 (9), p.A432
Hauptverfasser: Hirst, A, Paly, VF, Diamantogiannis, F, Guilmet, C, Polanco, S C, Sabater, J, Chirita, O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page A432
container_title Value in health
container_volume 20
creator Hirst, A
Paly, VF
Diamantogiannis, F
Guilmet, C
Polanco, S C
Sabater, J
Chirita, O
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) as first line advanced melanoma treatment across 3 European countries. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model, using a three-state partitioned survival structure was developed.The model utilised the intent-to-treat 28-month progression-free survival data and overall survival data from the CheckMate 067 trial and a network meta-analysis which considers time-varying hazard ratios. The model utilised inputs for Greece, Spain and Portugal.The model considered a 30 year time horizon. Drug acquisition, administration, follow-up, subsequent therapy and adverse event costs were obtained via published unit prices and expert input on resource utilization. Adverse event frequencies were derived from the CheckMate 067 trial and published literature. Utility weights were also estimated from the trial, based on UK tariffs. The key comparators included in the analysis are nivolumab and ipilimumab monotherapy, however an additional comparison with pembrolizumab was considered in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The incremental cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY) ratios (ICUR) were consistent across the three countries. Nivo+ Ipi had an ICUR ranging from €2,488 (Greece - incremental cost €8,110, incremental QALY 3.260) to €7,311 (Spain - incremental cost €23,857, incremental QALY 3.263) compared to ipilimumab and ranging from €21,812 (Portugal - incremental cost €16,090, incremental QALY 0.738) to €28,399 (Spain - incremental cost €27,786, incremental QALY 0.978) compared to nivolumab. The differences in results were shown to be driven by subsequent treatment costs and follow-up costs. When comparing to pembrolizumab, Nivo+Ipi had the greatest QALY and life years and had an ICUR ranging from €12,323 (Greece - incremental cost €31,942, incremental QALY 2.592) and €17,962 (Spain - incremental cost €46,614, incremental QALY 2.595). CONCLUSIONS: Nivo+ Ipi represents a cost-effective option for the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in these 3 European markets.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.197
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2113728877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2113728877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-753ad00cee7945d6ac5166fa381b41d5843dc1f578c5749625158f4dd0882ff23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kc1q3DAURk1JoZO0L9CVIGu7-rEszTKYSROYJIvOrIVGvurIsaWpJDv01fp0tUm7uhfux_m4nKL4SnBFMGm-9VU_66GimIgKy4psxYdiQzity1owdrXseCtLhgn_VFyn1GOMG0b5pvjThpTLnbVgspvBQ0ooWPTs5jBMoz4h51EbxpPzOrvg0ZvLZ_R4cYMb_5_vXVwQe-cBHSLoPILPK-Oum7U30KEnGLQPo17Dh3MEQLsphgvoFT35HB0kdEzO_0RUlk_BLxUvM0Q9DOjHFGe3vIZsDCNqz2BeR50B4UZ8Lj5aPST48m_eFMf73aF9KPcv3x_bu31pSFOLUnCmO4wNgNjWvGu04aRprGaSnGrScVmzzhDLhTRc1NuGcsKlrbsOS0mtpeymuH3nXmL4NUHKqg9T9EulooQwQaUUYknR95SJIaUIVl2iG3X8rQhWqyPVq9WRWh0pLNXiiP0FNvaH6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2113728877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in Three European Countries Using 28-Month Overall Survival from Checkmate 067</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hirst, A ; Paly, VF ; Diamantogiannis, F ; Guilmet, C ; Polanco, S C ; Sabater, J ; Chirita, O</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirst, A ; Paly, VF ; Diamantogiannis, F ; Guilmet, C ; Polanco, S C ; Sabater, J ; Chirita, O</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) as first line advanced melanoma treatment across 3 European countries. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model, using a three-state partitioned survival structure was developed.The model utilised the intent-to-treat 28-month progression-free survival data and overall survival data from the CheckMate 067 trial and a network meta-analysis which considers time-varying hazard ratios. The model utilised inputs for Greece, Spain and Portugal.The model considered a 30 year time horizon. Drug acquisition, administration, follow-up, subsequent therapy and adverse event costs were obtained via published unit prices and expert input on resource utilization. Adverse event frequencies were derived from the CheckMate 067 trial and published literature. Utility weights were also estimated from the trial, based on UK tariffs. The key comparators included in the analysis are nivolumab and ipilimumab monotherapy, however an additional comparison with pembrolizumab was considered in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The incremental cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY) ratios (ICUR) were consistent across the three countries. Nivo+ Ipi had an ICUR ranging from €2,488 (Greece - incremental cost €8,110, incremental QALY 3.260) to €7,311 (Spain - incremental cost €23,857, incremental QALY 3.263) compared to ipilimumab and ranging from €21,812 (Portugal - incremental cost €16,090, incremental QALY 0.738) to €28,399 (Spain - incremental cost €27,786, incremental QALY 0.978) compared to nivolumab. The differences in results were shown to be driven by subsequent treatment costs and follow-up costs. When comparing to pembrolizumab, Nivo+Ipi had the greatest QALY and life years and had an ICUR ranging from €12,323 (Greece - incremental cost €31,942, incremental QALY 2.592) and €17,962 (Spain - incremental cost €46,614, incremental QALY 2.595). CONCLUSIONS: Nivo+ Ipi represents a cost-effective option for the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in these 3 European markets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrenceville: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer therapies ; Cost analysis ; Critical incidents ; Health care expenditures ; Immunotherapy ; Markets ; Medical treatment ; Melanoma ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Pembrolizumab ; Prices ; Quality adjusted life years ; Resource utilization ; Sensitivity analysis ; Skin melanoma ; Survival ; Targeted cancer therapy ; Tariffs</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2017-10, Vol.20 (9), p.A432</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct/Nov 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-753ad00cee7945d6ac5166fa381b41d5843dc1f578c5749625158f4dd0882ff23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,30997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirst, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paly, VF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamantogiannis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilmet, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polanco, S C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabater, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirita, O</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in Three European Countries Using 28-Month Overall Survival from Checkmate 067</title><title>Value in health</title><description>OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) as first line advanced melanoma treatment across 3 European countries. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model, using a three-state partitioned survival structure was developed.The model utilised the intent-to-treat 28-month progression-free survival data and overall survival data from the CheckMate 067 trial and a network meta-analysis which considers time-varying hazard ratios. The model utilised inputs for Greece, Spain and Portugal.The model considered a 30 year time horizon. Drug acquisition, administration, follow-up, subsequent therapy and adverse event costs were obtained via published unit prices and expert input on resource utilization. Adverse event frequencies were derived from the CheckMate 067 trial and published literature. Utility weights were also estimated from the trial, based on UK tariffs. The key comparators included in the analysis are nivolumab and ipilimumab monotherapy, however an additional comparison with pembrolizumab was considered in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The incremental cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY) ratios (ICUR) were consistent across the three countries. Nivo+ Ipi had an ICUR ranging from €2,488 (Greece - incremental cost €8,110, incremental QALY 3.260) to €7,311 (Spain - incremental cost €23,857, incremental QALY 3.263) compared to ipilimumab and ranging from €21,812 (Portugal - incremental cost €16,090, incremental QALY 0.738) to €28,399 (Spain - incremental cost €27,786, incremental QALY 0.978) compared to nivolumab. The differences in results were shown to be driven by subsequent treatment costs and follow-up costs. When comparing to pembrolizumab, Nivo+Ipi had the greatest QALY and life years and had an ICUR ranging from €12,323 (Greece - incremental cost €31,942, incremental QALY 2.592) and €17,962 (Spain - incremental cost €46,614, incremental QALY 2.595). CONCLUSIONS: Nivo+ Ipi represents a cost-effective option for the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in these 3 European markets.</description><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Critical incidents</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Pembrolizumab</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Quality adjusted life years</subject><subject>Resource utilization</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Skin melanoma</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kc1q3DAURk1JoZO0L9CVIGu7-rEszTKYSROYJIvOrIVGvurIsaWpJDv01fp0tUm7uhfux_m4nKL4SnBFMGm-9VU_66GimIgKy4psxYdiQzity1owdrXseCtLhgn_VFyn1GOMG0b5pvjThpTLnbVgspvBQ0ooWPTs5jBMoz4h51EbxpPzOrvg0ZvLZ_R4cYMb_5_vXVwQe-cBHSLoPILPK-Oum7U30KEnGLQPo17Dh3MEQLsphgvoFT35HB0kdEzO_0RUlk_BLxUvM0Q9DOjHFGe3vIZsDCNqz2BeR50B4UZ8Lj5aPST48m_eFMf73aF9KPcv3x_bu31pSFOLUnCmO4wNgNjWvGu04aRprGaSnGrScVmzzhDLhTRc1NuGcsKlrbsOS0mtpeymuH3nXmL4NUHKqg9T9EulooQwQaUUYknR95SJIaUIVl2iG3X8rQhWqyPVq9WRWh0pLNXiiP0FNvaH6g</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Hirst, A</creator><creator>Paly, VF</creator><creator>Diamantogiannis, F</creator><creator>Guilmet, C</creator><creator>Polanco, S C</creator><creator>Sabater, J</creator><creator>Chirita, O</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in Three European Countries Using 28-Month Overall Survival from Checkmate 067</title><author>Hirst, A ; Paly, VF ; Diamantogiannis, F ; Guilmet, C ; Polanco, S C ; Sabater, J ; Chirita, O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-753ad00cee7945d6ac5166fa381b41d5843dc1f578c5749625158f4dd0882ff23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Critical incidents</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Pembrolizumab</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Quality adjusted life years</topic><topic>Resource utilization</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Skin melanoma</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirst, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paly, VF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamantogiannis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilmet, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polanco, S C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabater, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirita, O</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirst, A</au><au>Paly, VF</au><au>Diamantogiannis, F</au><au>Guilmet, C</au><au>Polanco, S C</au><au>Sabater, J</au><au>Chirita, O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in Three European Countries Using 28-Month Overall Survival from Checkmate 067</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>A432</spage><pages>A432-</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) as first line advanced melanoma treatment across 3 European countries. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model, using a three-state partitioned survival structure was developed.The model utilised the intent-to-treat 28-month progression-free survival data and overall survival data from the CheckMate 067 trial and a network meta-analysis which considers time-varying hazard ratios. The model utilised inputs for Greece, Spain and Portugal.The model considered a 30 year time horizon. Drug acquisition, administration, follow-up, subsequent therapy and adverse event costs were obtained via published unit prices and expert input on resource utilization. Adverse event frequencies were derived from the CheckMate 067 trial and published literature. Utility weights were also estimated from the trial, based on UK tariffs. The key comparators included in the analysis are nivolumab and ipilimumab monotherapy, however an additional comparison with pembrolizumab was considered in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The incremental cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY) ratios (ICUR) were consistent across the three countries. Nivo+ Ipi had an ICUR ranging from €2,488 (Greece - incremental cost €8,110, incremental QALY 3.260) to €7,311 (Spain - incremental cost €23,857, incremental QALY 3.263) compared to ipilimumab and ranging from €21,812 (Portugal - incremental cost €16,090, incremental QALY 0.738) to €28,399 (Spain - incremental cost €27,786, incremental QALY 0.978) compared to nivolumab. The differences in results were shown to be driven by subsequent treatment costs and follow-up costs. When comparing to pembrolizumab, Nivo+Ipi had the greatest QALY and life years and had an ICUR ranging from €12,323 (Greece - incremental cost €31,942, incremental QALY 2.592) and €17,962 (Spain - incremental cost €46,614, incremental QALY 2.595). CONCLUSIONS: Nivo+ Ipi represents a cost-effective option for the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in these 3 European markets.</abstract><cop>Lawrenceville</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.197</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2017-10, Vol.20 (9), p.A432
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2113728877
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Cancer therapies
Cost analysis
Critical incidents
Health care expenditures
Immunotherapy
Markets
Medical treatment
Melanoma
Monoclonal antibodies
Pembrolizumab
Prices
Quality adjusted life years
Resource utilization
Sensitivity analysis
Skin melanoma
Survival
Targeted cancer therapy
Tariffs
title Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in Three European Countries Using 28-Month Overall Survival from Checkmate 067
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Effectiveness%20of%20Nivolumab%20in%20Combination%20with%20Ipilimumab%20in%20First-Line%20Treatment%20of%20Advanced%20Melanoma%20in%20Three%20European%20Countries%20Using%2028-Month%20Overall%20Survival%20from%20Checkmate%20067&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Hirst,%20A&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=A432&rft.pages=A432-&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2113728877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2113728877&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true