Comparative NAPLEX Performance of Graduates of US Pharmacy Programs Accredited by ACPE Prior to and Since 1992
Objective. To assess the performance on the standardized licensure examination for graduates from "newly accredited" versus "more established" pharmacy programs. Methods. The performance of graduates from newly accredited programs (those receiving initial full accreditation since...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of pharmaceutical education 2005-01, Vol.69 (1), p.9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | American journal of pharmaceutical education |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Zarembski, Dawn G. Signatur, Diane J. Spunt, Avery L. Wadelin, Jeffrey W. |
description | Objective. To assess the performance on the standardized licensure examination for graduates from "newly accredited" versus "more established" pharmacy programs. Methods. The performance of graduates from newly accredited programs (those receiving initial full accreditation since 1992) was compared with graduates of more established programs (those receiving initial full accreditation prior to 1992). North American Pharmacy Licensing Examination (NAPLEX) data for first-time test takers during the May-August window was compared for the years 2000 through 2003. Results. Small differences in scaled scores and first-time NAPLEX passing rates were found between graduates of newly accredited programs and graduates of more established programs. Conclusion. These results suggest that the accreditation review process for newly accredited programs is appropriately addressing quality education as related to passage of licensure examinations. Analysis of passing rates and scaled scores in the forthcoming years will be necessary to observe if these trends continue. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.5688/aj690109 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211286296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1003492211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-50bc3f37b1038346fd2b757ef5a75d95b3a0a2e14b365f01e69947fcd09b08b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kF1LwzAYhYMoOD_AnxC88qb65rPNZSlzCkMLm-BdSdJEO2wzk07Yv7djenU4nIdz4CB0Q-BeyKJ40BupgIA6QTMiBMskl_kpmgEAzRQX6hxdpLQBIFxwOkNDFfqtjnrsfhx-Kevl_B3XLvoQez1Yh4PHi6jbnR5dOpi3Fa4_9RTaPa5j-Ii6T7i0Nrq2G12LzR6XVT2fsi5EPAashxavukMVUYpeoTOvv5K7_tNLtH6cr6unbPm6eK7KZWap4GMmwFjmWW4IsIJx6VtqcpE7L3QuWiUM06CpI9wwKTwQJ5XiubctKAOFYZfo9li7jeF759LYbMIuDtNiQwmhhaRKTtDdEbIxpBSdb7ax63XcNwSaw5fN_5fsF8w0ZGs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211286296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative NAPLEX Performance of Graduates of US Pharmacy Programs Accredited by ACPE Prior to and Since 1992</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zarembski, Dawn G. ; Signatur, Diane J. ; Spunt, Avery L. ; Wadelin, Jeffrey W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zarembski, Dawn G. ; Signatur, Diane J. ; Spunt, Avery L. ; Wadelin, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To assess the performance on the standardized licensure examination for graduates from "newly accredited" versus "more established" pharmacy programs. Methods. The performance of graduates from newly accredited programs (those receiving initial full accreditation since 1992) was compared with graduates of more established programs (those receiving initial full accreditation prior to 1992). North American Pharmacy Licensing Examination (NAPLEX) data for first-time test takers during the May-August window was compared for the years 2000 through 2003. Results. Small differences in scaled scores and first-time NAPLEX passing rates were found between graduates of newly accredited programs and graduates of more established programs. Conclusion. These results suggest that the accreditation review process for newly accredited programs is appropriately addressing quality education as related to passage of licensure examinations. Analysis of passing rates and scaled scores in the forthcoming years will be necessary to observe if these trends continue. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-6467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5688/aj690109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; Accreditation ; Accreditation (Institutions) ; College graduates ; Colleges & universities ; Comparative Analysis ; Educational Quality ; Error of Measurement ; Graduates ; Item Response Theory ; Licensing ; Licensing Examinations (Professions) ; Performance evaluation ; Pharmaceutical Education ; Pharmacy ; Psychometrics ; Statistical Analysis ; Statistical Distributions ; Tests</subject><ispartof>American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2005-01, Vol.69 (1), p.9</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-50bc3f37b1038346fd2b757ef5a75d95b3a0a2e14b365f01e69947fcd09b08b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-50bc3f37b1038346fd2b757ef5a75d95b3a0a2e14b365f01e69947fcd09b08b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/211286296?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zarembski, Dawn G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signatur, Diane J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spunt, Avery L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadelin, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative NAPLEX Performance of Graduates of US Pharmacy Programs Accredited by ACPE Prior to and Since 1992</title><title>American journal of pharmaceutical education</title><description>Objective. To assess the performance on the standardized licensure examination for graduates from "newly accredited" versus "more established" pharmacy programs. Methods. The performance of graduates from newly accredited programs (those receiving initial full accreditation since 1992) was compared with graduates of more established programs (those receiving initial full accreditation prior to 1992). North American Pharmacy Licensing Examination (NAPLEX) data for first-time test takers during the May-August window was compared for the years 2000 through 2003. Results. Small differences in scaled scores and first-time NAPLEX passing rates were found between graduates of newly accredited programs and graduates of more established programs. Conclusion. These results suggest that the accreditation review process for newly accredited programs is appropriately addressing quality education as related to passage of licensure examinations. Analysis of passing rates and scaled scores in the forthcoming years will be necessary to observe if these trends continue. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</subject><subject>College graduates</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Error of Measurement</subject><subject>Graduates</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>Licensing</subject><subject>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Education</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Statistical Distributions</subject><subject>Tests</subject><issn>0002-9459</issn><issn>1553-6467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kF1LwzAYhYMoOD_AnxC88qb65rPNZSlzCkMLm-BdSdJEO2wzk07Yv7djenU4nIdz4CB0Q-BeyKJ40BupgIA6QTMiBMskl_kpmgEAzRQX6hxdpLQBIFxwOkNDFfqtjnrsfhx-Kevl_B3XLvoQez1Yh4PHi6jbnR5dOpi3Fa4_9RTaPa5j-Ii6T7i0Nrq2G12LzR6XVT2fsi5EPAashxavukMVUYpeoTOvv5K7_tNLtH6cr6unbPm6eK7KZWap4GMmwFjmWW4IsIJx6VtqcpE7L3QuWiUM06CpI9wwKTwQJ5XiubctKAOFYZfo9li7jeF759LYbMIuDtNiQwmhhaRKTtDdEbIxpBSdb7ax63XcNwSaw5fN_5fsF8w0ZGs</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Zarembski, Dawn G.</creator><creator>Signatur, Diane J.</creator><creator>Spunt, Avery L.</creator><creator>Wadelin, Jeffrey W.</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Comparative NAPLEX Performance of Graduates of US Pharmacy Programs Accredited by ACPE Prior to and Since 1992</title><author>Zarembski, Dawn G. ; Signatur, Diane J. ; Spunt, Avery L. ; Wadelin, Jeffrey W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-50bc3f37b1038346fd2b757ef5a75d95b3a0a2e14b365f01e69947fcd09b08b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Accreditation (Institutions)</topic><topic>College graduates</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Error of Measurement</topic><topic>Graduates</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>Licensing</topic><topic>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Education</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Statistical Distributions</topic><topic>Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zarembski, Dawn G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signatur, Diane J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spunt, Avery L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadelin, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>American journal of pharmaceutical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zarembski, Dawn G.</au><au>Signatur, Diane J.</au><au>Spunt, Avery L.</au><au>Wadelin, Jeffrey W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative NAPLEX Performance of Graduates of US Pharmacy Programs Accredited by ACPE Prior to and Since 1992</atitle><jtitle>American journal of pharmaceutical education</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><pages>9-</pages><issn>0002-9459</issn><eissn>1553-6467</eissn><abstract>Objective. To assess the performance on the standardized licensure examination for graduates from "newly accredited" versus "more established" pharmacy programs. Methods. The performance of graduates from newly accredited programs (those receiving initial full accreditation since 1992) was compared with graduates of more established programs (those receiving initial full accreditation prior to 1992). North American Pharmacy Licensing Examination (NAPLEX) data for first-time test takers during the May-August window was compared for the years 2000 through 2003. Results. Small differences in scaled scores and first-time NAPLEX passing rates were found between graduates of newly accredited programs and graduates of more established programs. Conclusion. These results suggest that the accreditation review process for newly accredited programs is appropriately addressing quality education as related to passage of licensure examinations. Analysis of passing rates and scaled scores in the forthcoming years will be necessary to observe if these trends continue. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Alexandria</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.5688/aj690109</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9459 |
ispartof | American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2005-01, Vol.69 (1), p.9 |
issn | 0002-9459 1553-6467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_211286296 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Academic Standards Accreditation Accreditation (Institutions) College graduates Colleges & universities Comparative Analysis Educational Quality Error of Measurement Graduates Item Response Theory Licensing Licensing Examinations (Professions) Performance evaluation Pharmaceutical Education Pharmacy Psychometrics Statistical Analysis Statistical Distributions Tests |
title | Comparative NAPLEX Performance of Graduates of US Pharmacy Programs Accredited by ACPE Prior to and Since 1992 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A46%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20NAPLEX%20Performance%20of%20Graduates%20of%20US%20Pharmacy%20Programs%20Accredited%20by%20ACPE%20Prior%20to%20and%20Since%201992&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20education&rft.au=Zarembski,%20Dawn%20G.&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.pages=9-&rft.issn=0002-9459&rft.eissn=1553-6467&rft_id=info:doi/10.5688/aj690109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1003492211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211286296&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |