SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE NESTS IN RELATIVELY CONTIGUOUS SAGEBRUSH HABITATS

Degradation of nesting habitat has been proposed as a factor contributing to Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) population declines throughout North America. Delineating suitable nesting habitat across landscapes with relatively contiguous sagebrush cover is difficult but important to i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 2005-11, Vol.107 (4), p.742-752
Hauptverfasser: Holloran, Matthew J, Anderson, Stanley H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 752
container_issue 4
container_start_page 742
container_title The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)
container_volume 107
creator Holloran, Matthew J
Anderson, Stanley H
description Degradation of nesting habitat has been proposed as a factor contributing to Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) population declines throughout North America. Delineating suitable nesting habitat across landscapes with relatively contiguous sagebrush cover is difficult but important to identify areas for protection. We used radio-telemetry to locate Greater Sage-Grouse nests in relatively contiguous sagebrush habitats in Wyoming to investigate the spatial arrangement of nests relative to lek and other nest locations. Nest distributions were spatially related to lek location within 3 and 5 km of a lek, and a 5-km buffer included 64% of the nests. There was no relationship between lek size and lek-to-nest distance, suggesting that accurate population trend evaluation might require lek surveys in addition to lek counts. Closest known lek-to-nest distance was greater for successfully hatched compared to destroyed nests, and closely spaced nests tended to experience lower success and have higher probabilities of both nests experiencing the same fate compared to isolated nests, suggesting that a mechanism of enhanced prey detection occurred at higher nest densities. A low probability that a given individual's consecutive-year nest spacing occurred randomly suggested nesting site-area fidelity. Although a grouped pattern of nests occurred within 5 km of a lek, the proportion of nesting females located farther than 5 km could be important for population viability. Managers should limit strategies that negatively influence nesting habitat regardless of lek locations, and preserve adequate amounts of unaltered nesting habitat within treatment boundaries to maintain nest dispersion and provide sites for philopatric individuals.
doi_str_mv 10.1650/7749.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211269567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4096476</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4096476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-64ad1e023c28ed7498ced9791c60a3f160e41dcbd13c864447feffb9acbf1cb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf-Ah-CiG-dSZqlzWM3sy5QWmlSwQcpbZrChq7abg_-ezMrvvl0uZzvnns4AFxjNMNsjh6CgPIZPgETzP3Qm2PCT8EEIYy8OSXkHFwMwxa5nVAyAa_qKdIySuCjVDqXi0LLLIXZCsa5iLTIoYpi4cV5VigBU6G0gjKFuUjc1bNIXuAyS7WMC6f_oIu8UGu4jhZSR1pdgrO2ehvs1e-cgmIl9HLtJVksl1Hi1T5Ce4_RqsEWEd-Q0DYufmhswwOODUOV32KGLMWNqRvsm5BRSoPWtm3NK1O32NTcn4Lb0fej7z4PdtiX2-7Q79zLkmBMGJ-zwEH3I2T6bhh625Yf_ea96r9KjMpjc-WxuRI78GYEt8O-6_8oijijAXPy3SjXm67b2f9cvgF0vWzo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211269567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE NESTS IN RELATIVELY CONTIGUOUS SAGEBRUSH HABITATS</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Holloran, Matthew J ; Anderson, Stanley H</creator><creatorcontrib>Holloran, Matthew J ; Anderson, Stanley H</creatorcontrib><description>Degradation of nesting habitat has been proposed as a factor contributing to Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) population declines throughout North America. Delineating suitable nesting habitat across landscapes with relatively contiguous sagebrush cover is difficult but important to identify areas for protection. We used radio-telemetry to locate Greater Sage-Grouse nests in relatively contiguous sagebrush habitats in Wyoming to investigate the spatial arrangement of nests relative to lek and other nest locations. Nest distributions were spatially related to lek location within 3 and 5 km of a lek, and a 5-km buffer included 64% of the nests. There was no relationship between lek size and lek-to-nest distance, suggesting that accurate population trend evaluation might require lek surveys in addition to lek counts. Closest known lek-to-nest distance was greater for successfully hatched compared to destroyed nests, and closely spaced nests tended to experience lower success and have higher probabilities of both nests experiencing the same fate compared to isolated nests, suggesting that a mechanism of enhanced prey detection occurred at higher nest densities. A low probability that a given individual's consecutive-year nest spacing occurred randomly suggested nesting site-area fidelity. Although a grouped pattern of nests occurred within 5 km of a lek, the proportion of nesting females located farther than 5 km could be important for population viability. Managers should limit strategies that negatively influence nesting habitat regardless of lek locations, and preserve adequate amounts of unaltered nesting habitat within treatment boundaries to maintain nest dispersion and provide sites for philopatric individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1650/7749.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNDRAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waco: Cooper Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Animal nesting ; Animal populations ; Biotelemetry ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Centrocercus urophasianus ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental protection ; FEATURE ARTICLES ; Female animals ; fidelity ; Grasslands ; Greater Sage-Grouse ; Grouse ; Habitat conservation ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; lek-to-nest distance ; nest distribution ; nest spacing ; Nesting ; Nesting sites ; Nests ; Ornithology ; Population decline ; Ranches ; Spatial distribution ; Wildlife ecology ; Wildlife habitats ; Wyoming</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 2005-11, Vol.107 (4), p.742-752</ispartof><rights>Cooper Ornithological Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 The Cooper Ornithological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Cooper Ornithological Society Nov 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-64ad1e023c28ed7498ced9791c60a3f160e41dcbd13c864447feffb9acbf1cb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-64ad1e023c28ed7498ced9791c60a3f160e41dcbd13c864447feffb9acbf1cb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1650/7749.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4096476$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26957,27903,27904,52342,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holloran, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Stanley H</creatorcontrib><title>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE NESTS IN RELATIVELY CONTIGUOUS SAGEBRUSH HABITATS</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>Degradation of nesting habitat has been proposed as a factor contributing to Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) population declines throughout North America. Delineating suitable nesting habitat across landscapes with relatively contiguous sagebrush cover is difficult but important to identify areas for protection. We used radio-telemetry to locate Greater Sage-Grouse nests in relatively contiguous sagebrush habitats in Wyoming to investigate the spatial arrangement of nests relative to lek and other nest locations. Nest distributions were spatially related to lek location within 3 and 5 km of a lek, and a 5-km buffer included 64% of the nests. There was no relationship between lek size and lek-to-nest distance, suggesting that accurate population trend evaluation might require lek surveys in addition to lek counts. Closest known lek-to-nest distance was greater for successfully hatched compared to destroyed nests, and closely spaced nests tended to experience lower success and have higher probabilities of both nests experiencing the same fate compared to isolated nests, suggesting that a mechanism of enhanced prey detection occurred at higher nest densities. A low probability that a given individual's consecutive-year nest spacing occurred randomly suggested nesting site-area fidelity. Although a grouped pattern of nests occurred within 5 km of a lek, the proportion of nesting females located farther than 5 km could be important for population viability. Managers should limit strategies that negatively influence nesting habitat regardless of lek locations, and preserve adequate amounts of unaltered nesting habitat within treatment boundaries to maintain nest dispersion and provide sites for philopatric individuals.</description><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Biotelemetry</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Centrocercus urophasianus</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>FEATURE ARTICLES</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>fidelity</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Greater Sage-Grouse</subject><subject>Grouse</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>lek-to-nest distance</subject><subject>nest distribution</subject><subject>nest spacing</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Ranches</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Wildlife ecology</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wyoming</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><issn>2732-4621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf-Ah-CiG-dSZqlzWM3sy5QWmlSwQcpbZrChq7abg_-ezMrvvl0uZzvnns4AFxjNMNsjh6CgPIZPgETzP3Qm2PCT8EEIYy8OSXkHFwMwxa5nVAyAa_qKdIySuCjVDqXi0LLLIXZCsa5iLTIoYpi4cV5VigBU6G0gjKFuUjc1bNIXuAyS7WMC6f_oIu8UGu4jhZSR1pdgrO2ehvs1e-cgmIl9HLtJVksl1Hi1T5Ce4_RqsEWEd-Q0DYufmhswwOODUOV32KGLMWNqRvsm5BRSoPWtm3NK1O32NTcn4Lb0fej7z4PdtiX2-7Q79zLkmBMGJ-zwEH3I2T6bhh625Yf_ea96r9KjMpjc-WxuRI78GYEt8O-6_8oijijAXPy3SjXm67b2f9cvgF0vWzo</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Holloran, Matthew J</creator><creator>Anderson, Stanley H</creator><general>Cooper Ornithological Society</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE NESTS IN RELATIVELY CONTIGUOUS SAGEBRUSH HABITATS</title><author>Holloran, Matthew J ; Anderson, Stanley H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-64ad1e023c28ed7498ced9791c60a3f160e41dcbd13c864447feffb9acbf1cb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Biotelemetry</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Centrocercus urophasianus</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>FEATURE ARTICLES</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>fidelity</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Greater Sage-Grouse</topic><topic>Grouse</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>lek-to-nest distance</topic><topic>nest distribution</topic><topic>nest spacing</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Ranches</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Wildlife ecology</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wyoming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holloran, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Stanley H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holloran, Matthew J</au><au>Anderson, Stanley H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE NESTS IN RELATIVELY CONTIGUOUS SAGEBRUSH HABITATS</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>742</spage><epage>752</epage><pages>742-752</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><eissn>2732-4621</eissn><coden>CNDRAB</coden><abstract>Degradation of nesting habitat has been proposed as a factor contributing to Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) population declines throughout North America. Delineating suitable nesting habitat across landscapes with relatively contiguous sagebrush cover is difficult but important to identify areas for protection. We used radio-telemetry to locate Greater Sage-Grouse nests in relatively contiguous sagebrush habitats in Wyoming to investigate the spatial arrangement of nests relative to lek and other nest locations. Nest distributions were spatially related to lek location within 3 and 5 km of a lek, and a 5-km buffer included 64% of the nests. There was no relationship between lek size and lek-to-nest distance, suggesting that accurate population trend evaluation might require lek surveys in addition to lek counts. Closest known lek-to-nest distance was greater for successfully hatched compared to destroyed nests, and closely spaced nests tended to experience lower success and have higher probabilities of both nests experiencing the same fate compared to isolated nests, suggesting that a mechanism of enhanced prey detection occurred at higher nest densities. A low probability that a given individual's consecutive-year nest spacing occurred randomly suggested nesting site-area fidelity. Although a grouped pattern of nests occurred within 5 km of a lek, the proportion of nesting females located farther than 5 km could be important for population viability. Managers should limit strategies that negatively influence nesting habitat regardless of lek locations, and preserve adequate amounts of unaltered nesting habitat within treatment boundaries to maintain nest dispersion and provide sites for philopatric individuals.</abstract><cop>Waco</cop><pub>Cooper Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.1650/7749.1</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-5422
ispartof The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 2005-11, Vol.107 (4), p.742-752
issn 0010-5422
1938-5129
2732-4621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_211269567
source BioOne Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Free E- Journals
subjects Animal nesting
Animal populations
Biotelemetry
Bird nesting
Birds
Centrocercus urophasianus
Environmental degradation
Environmental protection
FEATURE ARTICLES
Female animals
fidelity
Grasslands
Greater Sage-Grouse
Grouse
Habitat conservation
Habitat selection
Habitats
lek-to-nest distance
nest distribution
nest spacing
Nesting
Nesting sites
Nests
Ornithology
Population decline
Ranches
Spatial distribution
Wildlife ecology
Wildlife habitats
Wyoming
title SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE NESTS IN RELATIVELY CONTIGUOUS SAGEBRUSH HABITATS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A07%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SPATIAL%20DISTRIBUTION%20OF%20GREATER%20SAGE-GROUSE%20NESTS%20IN%20RELATIVELY%20CONTIGUOUS%20SAGEBRUSH%20HABITATS&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Holloran,%20Matthew%20J&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=742&rft.epage=752&rft.pages=742-752&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft.coden=CNDRAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1650/7749.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4096476%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211269567&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4096476&rfr_iscdi=true