Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls
Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of exercise science 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.1-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | International journal of exercise science |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Sloanhoffer, Hope Harrison, Kathryn McCrory, Jean L. |
description | Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose was to investigate static and dynamic stability in collegiate gymnasts, non-gymnast athletes and non-athlete controls. Data were collected on female university gymnasts (n=10), university athletes in other sports (n=10), and active non-athlete controls (n=10). Static balance was measured using a commercially available six-condition static test and dynamic plantar/dorsiflexion perturbation test. Static stability variables included: mediolateral and anteroposterior COP sway, total COP displacement, average COP velocity, and standard deviation of vertical force. Dynamic perturbation variables included: initial COP sway, total COP sway, and sway velocity. A two factor ANOVA was performed (group x condition) on each variable (a=0.05) in each assessment. Significant differences were found between the groups for mediolateral COP sway (gymnasts |
doi_str_mv | 10.70252/AZSZ4344 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2112649584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2112649584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624-d0f6a4f27a531ee6cf54943e1700bd0c7a10f17a045f33e81e4d143338d0897b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUFFLwzAYDKLgmHvwHwR8Eqwm_dKmeaxzbsLQh-1B9lLSNMGMNp1JJvTfW5yC93LHcdzBIXRNyT0naZY-lLvNjgFjZ2hCBYiEi-z9_J--RLMQ9mQEAOUCJmj1NDjZWYU3Uda2tXHA1uHl0DkZYrjDr71LHmUrndK4jB-tjnp0pWtwqaL90njeu-j7NlyhCyPboGe_PEXb58V2vkrWb8uXeblOVJ6ypCEml8ykXGZAtc6VyZhgoCknpG6I4pISQ7kkLDMAuqCaNZQBQNGQQvAapujmVHvw_edRh1jt-6N342KVUprmTGQFG1O3p5TyfQhem-rgbSf9UFFS_VxV_V0F39XmWZ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2112649584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Sloanhoffer, Hope ; Harrison, Kathryn ; McCrory, Jean L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sloanhoffer, Hope ; Harrison, Kathryn ; McCrory, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><description>Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose was to investigate static and dynamic stability in collegiate gymnasts, non-gymnast athletes and non-athlete controls. Data were collected on female university gymnasts (n=10), university athletes in other sports (n=10), and active non-athlete controls (n=10). Static balance was measured using a commercially available six-condition static test and dynamic plantar/dorsiflexion perturbation test. Static stability variables included: mediolateral and anteroposterior COP sway, total COP displacement, average COP velocity, and standard deviation of vertical force. Dynamic perturbation variables included: initial COP sway, total COP sway, and sway velocity. A two factor ANOVA was performed (group x condition) on each variable (a=0.05) in each assessment. Significant differences were found between the groups for mediolateral COP sway (gymnasts<controls; P=0.049), total COP displacement (controls<non-gymnast athletes, P=0.005), and sway velocity (controls<non-gymnast athletes, P=0.010). In response to dynamic perturbations, gymnasts demonstrated less total sway than controls (P=0.036) and less sway velocity than the non-gymnast athletes (P=0.016). All dependent variables were significantly different between conditions for both static and dynamic tests (P<0.05). Static and dynamic postural control is affected by participation in collegiate sports. In static testing, gymnasts display better mediolateral stability than non-athletes; in dynamic testing, gymnasts display less COP sway and velocity than controls and non-gymnast athletes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-795X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-795X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.70252/AZSZ4344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bowling Green: TopSCHOLAR</publisher><subject>Athletes ; Variables ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>International journal of exercise science, 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.1-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright TopSCHOLAR 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sloanhoffer, Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls</title><title>International journal of exercise science</title><description>Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose was to investigate static and dynamic stability in collegiate gymnasts, non-gymnast athletes and non-athlete controls. Data were collected on female university gymnasts (n=10), university athletes in other sports (n=10), and active non-athlete controls (n=10). Static balance was measured using a commercially available six-condition static test and dynamic plantar/dorsiflexion perturbation test. Static stability variables included: mediolateral and anteroposterior COP sway, total COP displacement, average COP velocity, and standard deviation of vertical force. Dynamic perturbation variables included: initial COP sway, total COP sway, and sway velocity. A two factor ANOVA was performed (group x condition) on each variable (a=0.05) in each assessment. Significant differences were found between the groups for mediolateral COP sway (gymnasts<controls; P=0.049), total COP displacement (controls<non-gymnast athletes, P=0.005), and sway velocity (controls<non-gymnast athletes, P=0.010). In response to dynamic perturbations, gymnasts demonstrated less total sway than controls (P=0.036) and less sway velocity than the non-gymnast athletes (P=0.016). All dependent variables were significantly different between conditions for both static and dynamic tests (P<0.05). Static and dynamic postural control is affected by participation in collegiate sports. In static testing, gymnasts display better mediolateral stability than non-athletes; in dynamic testing, gymnasts display less COP sway and velocity than controls and non-gymnast athletes.</description><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>1939-795X</issn><issn>1939-795X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUFFLwzAYDKLgmHvwHwR8Eqwm_dKmeaxzbsLQh-1B9lLSNMGMNp1JJvTfW5yC93LHcdzBIXRNyT0naZY-lLvNjgFjZ2hCBYiEi-z9_J--RLMQ9mQEAOUCJmj1NDjZWYU3Uda2tXHA1uHl0DkZYrjDr71LHmUrndK4jB-tjnp0pWtwqaL90njeu-j7NlyhCyPboGe_PEXb58V2vkrWb8uXeblOVJ6ypCEml8ykXGZAtc6VyZhgoCknpG6I4pISQ7kkLDMAuqCaNZQBQNGQQvAapujmVHvw_edRh1jt-6N342KVUprmTGQFG1O3p5TyfQhem-rgbSf9UFFS_VxV_V0F39XmWZ8</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Sloanhoffer, Hope</creator><creator>Harrison, Kathryn</creator><creator>McCrory, Jean L.</creator><general>TopSCHOLAR</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls</title><author>Sloanhoffer, Hope ; Harrison, Kathryn ; McCrory, Jean L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c624-d0f6a4f27a531ee6cf54943e1700bd0c7a10f17a045f33e81e4d143338d0897b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sloanhoffer, Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>International journal of exercise science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sloanhoffer, Hope</au><au>Harrison, Kathryn</au><au>McCrory, Jean L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls</atitle><jtitle>International journal of exercise science</jtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>1939-795X</issn><eissn>1939-795X</eissn><abstract>Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose was to investigate static and dynamic stability in collegiate gymnasts, non-gymnast athletes and non-athlete controls. Data were collected on female university gymnasts (n=10), university athletes in other sports (n=10), and active non-athlete controls (n=10). Static balance was measured using a commercially available six-condition static test and dynamic plantar/dorsiflexion perturbation test. Static stability variables included: mediolateral and anteroposterior COP sway, total COP displacement, average COP velocity, and standard deviation of vertical force. Dynamic perturbation variables included: initial COP sway, total COP sway, and sway velocity. A two factor ANOVA was performed (group x condition) on each variable (a=0.05) in each assessment. Significant differences were found between the groups for mediolateral COP sway (gymnasts<controls; P=0.049), total COP displacement (controls<non-gymnast athletes, P=0.005), and sway velocity (controls<non-gymnast athletes, P=0.010). In response to dynamic perturbations, gymnasts demonstrated less total sway than controls (P=0.036) and less sway velocity than the non-gymnast athletes (P=0.016). All dependent variables were significantly different between conditions for both static and dynamic tests (P<0.05). Static and dynamic postural control is affected by participation in collegiate sports. In static testing, gymnasts display better mediolateral stability than non-athletes; in dynamic testing, gymnasts display less COP sway and velocity than controls and non-gymnast athletes.</abstract><cop>Bowling Green</cop><pub>TopSCHOLAR</pub><doi>10.70252/AZSZ4344</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1939-795X |
ispartof | International journal of exercise science, 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.1-12 |
issn | 1939-795X 1939-795X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2112649584 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Athletes Variables Velocity |
title | Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Stability%20in%20Gymnasts,%20Non-Balance%20Athletes,%20and%20Active%20Controls&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20exercise%20science&rft.au=Sloanhoffer,%20Hope&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=1939-795X&rft.eissn=1939-795X&rft_id=info:doi/10.70252/AZSZ4344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2112649584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2112649584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |