Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls

Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of exercise science 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.1-12
Hauptverfasser: Sloanhoffer, Hope, Harrison, Kathryn, McCrory, Jean L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title International journal of exercise science
container_volume 11
creator Sloanhoffer, Hope
Harrison, Kathryn
McCrory, Jean L.
description Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose was to investigate static and dynamic stability in collegiate gymnasts, non-gymnast athletes and non-athlete controls. Data were collected on female university gymnasts (n=10), university athletes in other sports (n=10), and active non-athlete controls (n=10). Static balance was measured using a commercially available six-condition static test and dynamic plantar/dorsiflexion perturbation test. Static stability variables included: mediolateral and anteroposterior COP sway, total COP displacement, average COP velocity, and standard deviation of vertical force. Dynamic perturbation variables included: initial COP sway, total COP sway, and sway velocity. A two factor ANOVA was performed (group x condition) on each variable (a=0.05) in each assessment. Significant differences were found between the groups for mediolateral COP sway (gymnasts
doi_str_mv 10.70252/AZSZ4344
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2112649584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2112649584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624-d0f6a4f27a531ee6cf54943e1700bd0c7a10f17a045f33e81e4d143338d0897b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUFFLwzAYDKLgmHvwHwR8Eqwm_dKmeaxzbsLQh-1B9lLSNMGMNp1JJvTfW5yC93LHcdzBIXRNyT0naZY-lLvNjgFjZ2hCBYiEi-z9_J--RLMQ9mQEAOUCJmj1NDjZWYU3Uda2tXHA1uHl0DkZYrjDr71LHmUrndK4jB-tjnp0pWtwqaL90njeu-j7NlyhCyPboGe_PEXb58V2vkrWb8uXeblOVJ6ypCEml8ykXGZAtc6VyZhgoCknpG6I4pISQ7kkLDMAuqCaNZQBQNGQQvAapujmVHvw_edRh1jt-6N342KVUprmTGQFG1O3p5TyfQhem-rgbSf9UFFS_VxV_V0F39XmWZ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2112649584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Sloanhoffer, Hope ; Harrison, Kathryn ; McCrory, Jean L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sloanhoffer, Hope ; Harrison, Kathryn ; McCrory, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><description>Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose was to investigate static and dynamic stability in collegiate gymnasts, non-gymnast athletes and non-athlete controls. Data were collected on female university gymnasts (n=10), university athletes in other sports (n=10), and active non-athlete controls (n=10). Static balance was measured using a commercially available six-condition static test and dynamic plantar/dorsiflexion perturbation test. Static stability variables included: mediolateral and anteroposterior COP sway, total COP displacement, average COP velocity, and standard deviation of vertical force. Dynamic perturbation variables included: initial COP sway, total COP sway, and sway velocity. A two factor ANOVA was performed (group x condition) on each variable (a=0.05) in each assessment. Significant differences were found between the groups for mediolateral COP sway (gymnasts&lt;controls; P=0.049), total COP displacement (controls&lt;non-gymnast athletes, P=0.005), and sway velocity (controls&lt;non-gymnast athletes, P=0.010). In response to dynamic perturbations, gymnasts demonstrated less total sway than controls (P=0.036) and less sway velocity than the non-gymnast athletes (P=0.016). All dependent variables were significantly different between conditions for both static and dynamic tests (P&lt;0.05). Static and dynamic postural control is affected by participation in collegiate sports. In static testing, gymnasts display better mediolateral stability than non-athletes; in dynamic testing, gymnasts display less COP sway and velocity than controls and non-gymnast athletes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-795X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-795X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.70252/AZSZ4344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bowling Green: TopSCHOLAR</publisher><subject>Athletes ; Variables ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>International journal of exercise science, 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.1-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright TopSCHOLAR 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sloanhoffer, Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls</title><title>International journal of exercise science</title><description>Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose was to investigate static and dynamic stability in collegiate gymnasts, non-gymnast athletes and non-athlete controls. Data were collected on female university gymnasts (n=10), university athletes in other sports (n=10), and active non-athlete controls (n=10). Static balance was measured using a commercially available six-condition static test and dynamic plantar/dorsiflexion perturbation test. Static stability variables included: mediolateral and anteroposterior COP sway, total COP displacement, average COP velocity, and standard deviation of vertical force. Dynamic perturbation variables included: initial COP sway, total COP sway, and sway velocity. A two factor ANOVA was performed (group x condition) on each variable (a=0.05) in each assessment. Significant differences were found between the groups for mediolateral COP sway (gymnasts&lt;controls; P=0.049), total COP displacement (controls&lt;non-gymnast athletes, P=0.005), and sway velocity (controls&lt;non-gymnast athletes, P=0.010). In response to dynamic perturbations, gymnasts demonstrated less total sway than controls (P=0.036) and less sway velocity than the non-gymnast athletes (P=0.016). All dependent variables were significantly different between conditions for both static and dynamic tests (P&lt;0.05). Static and dynamic postural control is affected by participation in collegiate sports. In static testing, gymnasts display better mediolateral stability than non-athletes; in dynamic testing, gymnasts display less COP sway and velocity than controls and non-gymnast athletes.</description><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>1939-795X</issn><issn>1939-795X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUFFLwzAYDKLgmHvwHwR8Eqwm_dKmeaxzbsLQh-1B9lLSNMGMNp1JJvTfW5yC93LHcdzBIXRNyT0naZY-lLvNjgFjZ2hCBYiEi-z9_J--RLMQ9mQEAOUCJmj1NDjZWYU3Uda2tXHA1uHl0DkZYrjDr71LHmUrndK4jB-tjnp0pWtwqaL90njeu-j7NlyhCyPboGe_PEXb58V2vkrWb8uXeblOVJ6ypCEml8ykXGZAtc6VyZhgoCknpG6I4pISQ7kkLDMAuqCaNZQBQNGQQvAapujmVHvw_edRh1jt-6N342KVUprmTGQFG1O3p5TyfQhem-rgbSf9UFFS_VxV_V0F39XmWZ8</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Sloanhoffer, Hope</creator><creator>Harrison, Kathryn</creator><creator>McCrory, Jean L.</creator><general>TopSCHOLAR</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls</title><author>Sloanhoffer, Hope ; Harrison, Kathryn ; McCrory, Jean L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c624-d0f6a4f27a531ee6cf54943e1700bd0c7a10f17a045f33e81e4d143338d0897b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sloanhoffer, Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>International journal of exercise science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sloanhoffer, Hope</au><au>Harrison, Kathryn</au><au>McCrory, Jean L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls</atitle><jtitle>International journal of exercise science</jtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>1939-795X</issn><eissn>1939-795X</eissn><abstract>Gymnastics by nature is a balance sport requiring both static and dynamic stability. To our knowledge, the center of pressure (COP) movement of collegiate gymnasts has not been compared to other collegiate athletes and healthy controls during static and dynamic postural stability tasks. Our purpose was to investigate static and dynamic stability in collegiate gymnasts, non-gymnast athletes and non-athlete controls. Data were collected on female university gymnasts (n=10), university athletes in other sports (n=10), and active non-athlete controls (n=10). Static balance was measured using a commercially available six-condition static test and dynamic plantar/dorsiflexion perturbation test. Static stability variables included: mediolateral and anteroposterior COP sway, total COP displacement, average COP velocity, and standard deviation of vertical force. Dynamic perturbation variables included: initial COP sway, total COP sway, and sway velocity. A two factor ANOVA was performed (group x condition) on each variable (a=0.05) in each assessment. Significant differences were found between the groups for mediolateral COP sway (gymnasts&lt;controls; P=0.049), total COP displacement (controls&lt;non-gymnast athletes, P=0.005), and sway velocity (controls&lt;non-gymnast athletes, P=0.010). In response to dynamic perturbations, gymnasts demonstrated less total sway than controls (P=0.036) and less sway velocity than the non-gymnast athletes (P=0.016). All dependent variables were significantly different between conditions for both static and dynamic tests (P&lt;0.05). Static and dynamic postural control is affected by participation in collegiate sports. In static testing, gymnasts display better mediolateral stability than non-athletes; in dynamic testing, gymnasts display less COP sway and velocity than controls and non-gymnast athletes.</abstract><cop>Bowling Green</cop><pub>TopSCHOLAR</pub><doi>10.70252/AZSZ4344</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-795X
ispartof International journal of exercise science, 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.1-12
issn 1939-795X
1939-795X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2112649584
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals
subjects Athletes
Variables
Velocity
title Dynamic Stability in Gymnasts, Non-Balance Athletes, and Active Controls
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Stability%20in%20Gymnasts,%20Non-Balance%20Athletes,%20and%20Active%20Controls&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20exercise%20science&rft.au=Sloanhoffer,%20Hope&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=1939-795X&rft.eissn=1939-795X&rft_id=info:doi/10.70252/AZSZ4344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2112649584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2112649584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true