Impact Analysis of the Law Concerning Freedom of Expression

Libel continues to be a major legal problem for the press, but little empirical research has addressed its impact, particularly on such topics as: 1. source confidentiality, 2. open meetings, 3. open records, 4. privacy, and 5. television in the courtroom. Methodologies for conducting this type of r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communications and the law 1986-08, Vol.8 (4), p.35
1. Verfasser: Hale, F Dennis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 35
container_title Communications and the law
container_volume 8
creator Hale, F Dennis
description Libel continues to be a major legal problem for the press, but little empirical research has addressed its impact, particularly on such topics as: 1. source confidentiality, 2. open meetings, 3. open records, 4. privacy, and 5. television in the courtroom. Methodologies for conducting this type of research include: 1. surveys of media practitioners, 2. surveys of policy implementers and interpreters, 3. measures of litigation levels, 4. unobtrusive and documentary measures, and 5. studies of public opinion. A review of research using such methods shows few studies about speech, suggesting that studies of the impact of First Amendment law should more often look at the broader concept of freedom of expression. Surveys of practitioners and policy implementers have been used most often, but measuring the consequences of media law is especially important. Journalism professionals may prefer to argue for an absolute or preferred position for press rights since impact analysis may show that its cost is outweighed by the benefit to society. However, hard data are preferable to ignorance.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211254600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1023933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2112546003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDQz0rU0sDTmYOAqLs4yMDAwMTc25mSw9swtSEwuUXDMS8ypLM4sVshPUyjJSFXwSSxXcM7PS04tysvMS1dwK0pNTcnPBcm6VhQUpRYXZ-bn8TCwpiXmFKfyQmluBiU31xBnD92CovzC0tTikvis_NIioMHF8UaGhkamJmYGBsZEKQIA5sc1mA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211254600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact Analysis of the Law Concerning Freedom of Expression</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Hale, F Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Hale, F Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Libel continues to be a major legal problem for the press, but little empirical research has addressed its impact, particularly on such topics as: 1. source confidentiality, 2. open meetings, 3. open records, 4. privacy, and 5. television in the courtroom. Methodologies for conducting this type of research include: 1. surveys of media practitioners, 2. surveys of policy implementers and interpreters, 3. measures of litigation levels, 4. unobtrusive and documentary measures, and 5. studies of public opinion. A review of research using such methods shows few studies about speech, suggesting that studies of the impact of First Amendment law should more often look at the broader concept of freedom of expression. Surveys of practitioners and policy implementers have been used most often, but measuring the consequences of media law is especially important. Journalism professionals may prefer to argue for an absolute or preferred position for press rights since impact analysis may show that its cost is outweighed by the benefit to society. However, hard data are preferable to ignorance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-9093</identifier><identifier>CODEN: COMLDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Westport: Fred B. Rothman &amp; Company</publisher><subject>Broadcasting industry ; Freedoms ; Impact analysis ; Impacts ; Journalism ; Law ; Mass communication ; Press ; Publishing industry</subject><ispartof>Communications and the law, 1986-08, Vol.8 (4), p.35</ispartof><rights>Copyright Fred B. Rothman &amp; Company Aug 1986</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hale, F Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Impact Analysis of the Law Concerning Freedom of Expression</title><title>Communications and the law</title><description>Libel continues to be a major legal problem for the press, but little empirical research has addressed its impact, particularly on such topics as: 1. source confidentiality, 2. open meetings, 3. open records, 4. privacy, and 5. television in the courtroom. Methodologies for conducting this type of research include: 1. surveys of media practitioners, 2. surveys of policy implementers and interpreters, 3. measures of litigation levels, 4. unobtrusive and documentary measures, and 5. studies of public opinion. A review of research using such methods shows few studies about speech, suggesting that studies of the impact of First Amendment law should more often look at the broader concept of freedom of expression. Surveys of practitioners and policy implementers have been used most often, but measuring the consequences of media law is especially important. Journalism professionals may prefer to argue for an absolute or preferred position for press rights since impact analysis may show that its cost is outweighed by the benefit to society. However, hard data are preferable to ignorance.</description><subject>Broadcasting industry</subject><subject>Freedoms</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Impacts</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Mass communication</subject><subject>Press</subject><subject>Publishing industry</subject><issn>0162-9093</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDQz0rU0sDTmYOAqLs4yMDAwMTc25mSw9swtSEwuUXDMS8ypLM4sVshPUyjJSFXwSSxXcM7PS04tysvMS1dwK0pNTcnPBcm6VhQUpRYXZ-bn8TCwpiXmFKfyQmluBiU31xBnD92CovzC0tTikvis_NIioMHF8UaGhkamJmYGBsZEKQIA5sc1mA</recordid><startdate>19860801</startdate><enddate>19860801</enddate><creator>Hale, F Dennis</creator><general>Fred B. Rothman &amp; Company</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19860801</creationdate><title>Impact Analysis of the Law Concerning Freedom of Expression</title><author>Hale, F Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2112546003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Broadcasting industry</topic><topic>Freedoms</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Impacts</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Mass communication</topic><topic>Press</topic><topic>Publishing industry</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hale, F Dennis</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Communications and the law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hale, F Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact Analysis of the Law Concerning Freedom of Expression</atitle><jtitle>Communications and the law</jtitle><date>1986-08-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>35</spage><pages>35-</pages><issn>0162-9093</issn><coden>COMLDE</coden><abstract>Libel continues to be a major legal problem for the press, but little empirical research has addressed its impact, particularly on such topics as: 1. source confidentiality, 2. open meetings, 3. open records, 4. privacy, and 5. television in the courtroom. Methodologies for conducting this type of research include: 1. surveys of media practitioners, 2. surveys of policy implementers and interpreters, 3. measures of litigation levels, 4. unobtrusive and documentary measures, and 5. studies of public opinion. A review of research using such methods shows few studies about speech, suggesting that studies of the impact of First Amendment law should more often look at the broader concept of freedom of expression. Surveys of practitioners and policy implementers have been used most often, but measuring the consequences of media law is especially important. Journalism professionals may prefer to argue for an absolute or preferred position for press rights since impact analysis may show that its cost is outweighed by the benefit to society. However, hard data are preferable to ignorance.</abstract><cop>Westport</cop><pub>Fred B. Rothman &amp; Company</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0162-9093
ispartof Communications and the law, 1986-08, Vol.8 (4), p.35
issn 0162-9093
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_211254600
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Broadcasting industry
Freedoms
Impact analysis
Impacts
Journalism
Law
Mass communication
Press
Publishing industry
title Impact Analysis of the Law Concerning Freedom of Expression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T03%3A01%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Law%20Concerning%20Freedom%20of%20Expression&rft.jtitle=Communications%20and%20the%20law&rft.au=Hale,%20F%20Dennis&rft.date=1986-08-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=35&rft.pages=35-&rft.issn=0162-9093&rft.coden=COMLDE&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1023933%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211254600&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true