Cross-agreement retaliation in the WTO dispute settlement system: an important enforcement mechanism for developing countries?
This article aims at analysing the merits and limits of ‘cross-retaliation’ as a mechanism to induce compliance in WTO dispute settlement, specifically from the perspective of developing countries. The focus is on cross-agreement retaliation, in particular with respect to the Agreement on Trade-Rela...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World trade review 2008-07, Vol.7 (3), p.511-545 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 545 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 511 |
container_title | World trade review |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | SPADANO, LUCAS EDUARDO F. A. |
description | This article aims at analysing the merits and limits of ‘cross-retaliation’ as a mechanism to induce compliance in WTO dispute settlement, specifically from the perspective of developing countries. The focus is on cross-agreement retaliation, in particular with respect to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), as this seems to be the most ‘promising’ area for developing countries. Although there are several legal, economic, and administrative difficulties related to the implementation of a suspension of TRIPS obligations and there is so far no practical experience, this seems to remain an interesting option for developing countries – or at least for the largest ones among them – wishing to obtain greater leverage in the system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1474745608003960 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cambr</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211250121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1474745608003960</cupid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20190821015748</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1604575631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-6d5a31592559ae7fa2e4ed91b4bda567a7d3374c5181684ff85b7d6f533ce0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9L9DAQxou8gr7qB_AWvFczTdK0XkQW_4HgwQWPIdtMu5FtU5Os4MXPbmoVDyJzyPDkN88MT5YdAz0FCvLsEbhMJUpaUcrqku5k-0kSOQNW_fvseT7972X_Q3imtOCUy_3sfeFdCLnuPGKPQyQeo95YHa0biB1IXCN5Wj4QY8O4jUgCxriZyfAWIvbnRCewH52POok4tM43M9Bjs9aDDT1JGjH4ihs32qEjjdsO0VsMF4fZbqs3AY--3oNseX21XNzm9w83d4vL-7zhksa8NEIzEHUhRK1RtrpAjqaGFV8ZLUqppWFM8kZABWXF27YSK2nKVjDWIG3ZQXYy247evWwxRPXstn5IG1UBUAgKBSQIZqiZIvHYqtHbXvs3BVRNIatfIaeZ23nG9zYq3aWUogqofbNWdopikp3vlHF2smEMym-soFDTqkjOQvIqWbGv9bpfeWs6_Dny7wM-AKLdmcU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211250121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-agreement retaliation in the WTO dispute settlement system: an important enforcement mechanism for developing countries?</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>SPADANO, LUCAS EDUARDO F. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>SPADANO, LUCAS EDUARDO F. A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article aims at analysing the merits and limits of ‘cross-retaliation’ as a mechanism to induce compliance in WTO dispute settlement, specifically from the perspective of developing countries. The focus is on cross-agreement retaliation, in particular with respect to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), as this seems to be the most ‘promising’ area for developing countries. Although there are several legal, economic, and administrative difficulties related to the implementation of a suspension of TRIPS obligations and there is so far no practical experience, this seems to remain an interesting option for developing countries – or at least for the largest ones among them – wishing to obtain greater leverage in the system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1474745608003960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994 April 15) ; Agreements ; Compliance ; Developing countries ; Dispute resolution (Law) ; Disputes ; Enforcement ; Industrialized nations ; Intellectual property ; International trade ; LDCs ; Power ; Property rights ; Studies ; World Trade Organization. Appellate Body</subject><ispartof>World trade review, 2008-07, Vol.7 (3), p.511-545</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Lucas Eduardo F. A. Spadano 2008</rights><rights>Copyright © Lucas Eduardo F. A. Spadano 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-6d5a31592559ae7fa2e4ed91b4bda567a7d3374c5181684ff85b7d6f533ce0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-6d5a31592559ae7fa2e4ed91b4bda567a7d3374c5181684ff85b7d6f533ce0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745608003960/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SPADANO, LUCAS EDUARDO F. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-agreement retaliation in the WTO dispute settlement system: an important enforcement mechanism for developing countries?</title><title>World trade review</title><description>This article aims at analysing the merits and limits of ‘cross-retaliation’ as a mechanism to induce compliance in WTO dispute settlement, specifically from the perspective of developing countries. The focus is on cross-agreement retaliation, in particular with respect to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), as this seems to be the most ‘promising’ area for developing countries. Although there are several legal, economic, and administrative difficulties related to the implementation of a suspension of TRIPS obligations and there is so far no practical experience, this seems to remain an interesting option for developing countries – or at least for the largest ones among them – wishing to obtain greater leverage in the system.</description><subject>Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994 April 15)</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Dispute resolution (Law)</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>World Trade Organization. Appellate Body</subject><issn>1474-7456</issn><issn>1475-3138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9L9DAQxou8gr7qB_AWvFczTdK0XkQW_4HgwQWPIdtMu5FtU5Os4MXPbmoVDyJzyPDkN88MT5YdAz0FCvLsEbhMJUpaUcrqku5k-0kSOQNW_fvseT7972X_Q3imtOCUy_3sfeFdCLnuPGKPQyQeo95YHa0biB1IXCN5Wj4QY8O4jUgCxriZyfAWIvbnRCewH52POok4tM43M9Bjs9aDDT1JGjH4ihs32qEjjdsO0VsMF4fZbqs3AY--3oNseX21XNzm9w83d4vL-7zhksa8NEIzEHUhRK1RtrpAjqaGFV8ZLUqppWFM8kZABWXF27YSK2nKVjDWIG3ZQXYy247evWwxRPXstn5IG1UBUAgKBSQIZqiZIvHYqtHbXvs3BVRNIatfIaeZ23nG9zYq3aWUogqofbNWdopikp3vlHF2smEMym-soFDTqkjOQvIqWbGv9bpfeWs6_Dny7wM-AKLdmcU</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>SPADANO, LUCAS EDUARDO F. A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Cross-agreement retaliation in the WTO dispute settlement system: an important enforcement mechanism for developing countries?</title><author>SPADANO, LUCAS EDUARDO F. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-6d5a31592559ae7fa2e4ed91b4bda567a7d3374c5181684ff85b7d6f533ce0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994 April 15)</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Dispute resolution (Law)</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>World Trade Organization. Appellate Body</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SPADANO, LUCAS EDUARDO F. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>World trade review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SPADANO, LUCAS EDUARDO F. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-agreement retaliation in the WTO dispute settlement system: an important enforcement mechanism for developing countries?</atitle><jtitle>World trade review</jtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>511</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>511-545</pages><issn>1474-7456</issn><eissn>1475-3138</eissn><abstract>This article aims at analysing the merits and limits of ‘cross-retaliation’ as a mechanism to induce compliance in WTO dispute settlement, specifically from the perspective of developing countries. The focus is on cross-agreement retaliation, in particular with respect to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), as this seems to be the most ‘promising’ area for developing countries. Although there are several legal, economic, and administrative difficulties related to the implementation of a suspension of TRIPS obligations and there is so far no practical experience, this seems to remain an interesting option for developing countries – or at least for the largest ones among them – wishing to obtain greater leverage in the system.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1474745608003960</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1474-7456 |
ispartof | World trade review, 2008-07, Vol.7 (3), p.511-545 |
issn | 1474-7456 1475-3138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_211250121 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994 April 15) Agreements Compliance Developing countries Dispute resolution (Law) Disputes Enforcement Industrialized nations Intellectual property International trade LDCs Power Property rights Studies World Trade Organization. Appellate Body |
title | Cross-agreement retaliation in the WTO dispute settlement system: an important enforcement mechanism for developing countries? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A55%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cambr&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-agreement%20retaliation%20in%20the%20WTO%20dispute%20settlement%20system:%20an%20important%20enforcement%20mechanism%20for%20developing%20countries?&rft.jtitle=World%20trade%20review&rft.au=SPADANO,%20LUCAS%20EDUARDO%20F.%C2%A0A.&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=511-545&rft.issn=1474-7456&rft.eissn=1475-3138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1474745608003960&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cambr%3E1604575631%3C/proquest_cambr%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211250121&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1474745608003960&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20190821015748&rfr_iscdi=true |