A reassessment of the role of the Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985) in accounting education research
This paper reexamines the cautionary theme advanced recently in Stout and Ruble (1991a; 1991b) regarding the use of the LSI-1985 in accounting education research. We focus on evidence relevant to the construct validity of the LSI-1985 and identify a number of psychometric problems with the instrumen...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of accounting education 1994-04, Vol.12 (2), p.89-104 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 104 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 89 |
| container_title | Journal of accounting education |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Stout, David E. Ruble, Thomas L. |
| description | This paper reexamines the cautionary theme advanced recently in Stout and Ruble (1991a; 1991b) regarding the use of the LSI-1985 in accounting education research. We focus on evidence relevant to the construct validity of the LSI-1985 and identify a number of psychometric problems with the instrument. The evidence regarding the measurement properties of the LSI-1985 (in both its standard and scrambled versions) argues for suspension of its use in accounting education research. In short, the LSI-1985 does not provide meaningful measures of the learning style constructs posited by the Experiential Learning Model (ELM). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0748-5751(94)90009-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211237461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0748575194900094</els_id><sourcerecordid>1554103619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-19778eb386fdc4d58c5a94da1c02a084b969bfcdbd761dafc31ee41b92a2b0763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wMOiF3tYzexmk81FkOJHoeCheg7ZZNZuaRNNtoX-e1Or3vSUITzvM8xLyDnQa6DAb6hgdV6JCq4kG0lKqczZARlALcocpOSHZPCLHJOTGBeUgqCcDUh7lwXUMWKMK3R95tusn2MW_BJ_5inq4Dr3ls36bfqduE0CfdhmV9PZJPnrapR1LtPG-LXrdyDatdF9511yx5Q281Ny1OplxLPvd0heH-5fxk_59PlxMr6b5qYQrE8yIWpsypq31jBb1abSklkNhhaa1qyRXDatsY0VHKxuTQmIDBpZ6KKhgpdDcrH3vgf_scbYq4VfB5dWqgKgKAXjkKDLvyCoKga05CATxfaUCT7GgK16D91Kh60Cqna1q12natepkkx91a5Yit3uY5jO3HQYVDQdOoO2C2h6ZX33v-ATPOGIEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554103619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A reassessment of the role of the Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985) in accounting education research</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Stout, David E. ; Ruble, Thomas L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stout, David E. ; Ruble, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reexamines the cautionary theme advanced recently in Stout and Ruble (1991a; 1991b) regarding the use of the LSI-1985 in accounting education research. We focus on evidence relevant to the construct validity of the LSI-1985 and identify a number of psychometric problems with the instrument. The evidence regarding the measurement properties of the LSI-1985 (in both its standard and scrambled versions) argues for suspension of its use in accounting education research. In short, the LSI-1985 does not provide meaningful measures of the learning style constructs posited by the Experiential Learning Model (ELM).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-5751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0748-5751(94)90009-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountants ; Cognitive style ; Education ; Higher education ; Learning ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting education, 1994-04, Vol.12 (2), p.89-104</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Spring 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-19778eb386fdc4d58c5a94da1c02a084b969bfcdbd761dafc31ee41b92a2b0763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-19778eb386fdc4d58c5a94da1c02a084b969bfcdbd761dafc31ee41b92a2b0763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0748575194900094$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27848,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stout, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruble, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><title>A reassessment of the role of the Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985) in accounting education research</title><title>Journal of accounting education</title><description>This paper reexamines the cautionary theme advanced recently in Stout and Ruble (1991a; 1991b) regarding the use of the LSI-1985 in accounting education research. We focus on evidence relevant to the construct validity of the LSI-1985 and identify a number of psychometric problems with the instrument. The evidence regarding the measurement properties of the LSI-1985 (in both its standard and scrambled versions) argues for suspension of its use in accounting education research. In short, the LSI-1985 does not provide meaningful measures of the learning style constructs posited by the Experiential Learning Model (ELM).</description><subject>Accountants</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0748-5751</issn><issn>1873-1996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wMOiF3tYzexmk81FkOJHoeCheg7ZZNZuaRNNtoX-e1Or3vSUITzvM8xLyDnQa6DAb6hgdV6JCq4kG0lKqczZARlALcocpOSHZPCLHJOTGBeUgqCcDUh7lwXUMWKMK3R95tusn2MW_BJ_5inq4Dr3ls36bfqduE0CfdhmV9PZJPnrapR1LtPG-LXrdyDatdF9511yx5Q281Ny1OplxLPvd0heH-5fxk_59PlxMr6b5qYQrE8yIWpsypq31jBb1abSklkNhhaa1qyRXDatsY0VHKxuTQmIDBpZ6KKhgpdDcrH3vgf_scbYq4VfB5dWqgKgKAXjkKDLvyCoKga05CATxfaUCT7GgK16D91Kh60Cqna1q12natepkkx91a5Yit3uY5jO3HQYVDQdOoO2C2h6ZX33v-ATPOGIEw</recordid><startdate>19940401</startdate><enddate>19940401</enddate><creator>Stout, David E.</creator><creator>Ruble, Thomas L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>[Harrisonburg, Va.] :Center for Research in Accounting Education, James Madison University,1983</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SMOQP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940401</creationdate><title>A reassessment of the role of the Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985) in accounting education research</title><author>Stout, David E. ; Ruble, Thomas L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-19778eb386fdc4d58c5a94da1c02a084b969bfcdbd761dafc31ee41b92a2b0763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Accountants</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stout, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruble, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 46</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stout, David E.</au><au>Ruble, Thomas L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A reassessment of the role of the Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985) in accounting education research</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting education</jtitle><date>1994-04-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>89-104</pages><issn>0748-5751</issn><eissn>1873-1996</eissn><abstract>This paper reexamines the cautionary theme advanced recently in Stout and Ruble (1991a; 1991b) regarding the use of the LSI-1985 in accounting education research. We focus on evidence relevant to the construct validity of the LSI-1985 and identify a number of psychometric problems with the instrument. The evidence regarding the measurement properties of the LSI-1985 (in both its standard and scrambled versions) argues for suspension of its use in accounting education research. In short, the LSI-1985 does not provide meaningful measures of the learning style constructs posited by the Experiential Learning Model (ELM).</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0748-5751(94)90009-4</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0748-5751 |
| ispartof | Journal of accounting education, 1994-04, Vol.12 (2), p.89-104 |
| issn | 0748-5751 1873-1996 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_211237461 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Accountants Cognitive style Education Higher education Learning Statistical analysis |
| title | A reassessment of the role of the Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985) in accounting education research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A59%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20reassessment%20of%20the%20role%20of%20the%20Learning%20Style%20Inventory%20(LSI-1985)%20in%20accounting%20education%20research&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20education&rft.au=Stout,%20David%20E.&rft.date=1994-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=89-104&rft.issn=0748-5751&rft.eissn=1873-1996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0748-5751(94)90009-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1554103619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554103619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0748575194900094&rfr_iscdi=true |