State Rehabilitation Agencies, Aging with Disability, and Technology: Policy Issues and Implications
Recent federal and state laws have required state rehabilitation programs and Tech Act programs (TAPs) to improve the access of persons with disabilities to assistive technology (AT) and home modifications (HM). A national survey of all 81 state rehabilitation programs, conducted in 1997 and 1998, e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of disability policy studies 2002-03, Vol.12 (4), p.243-252 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 252 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 243 |
container_title | Journal of disability policy studies |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Sheets, Debra J. Liebig, Phoebe S. Campbell, Margaret L. |
description | Recent federal and state laws have required state rehabilitation programs and Tech Act programs (TAPs) to improve the access of persons with disabilities to assistive technology (AT) and home modifications (HM). A national survey of all 81 state rehabilitation programs, conducted in 1997 and 1998, examined the extent to which state rehabilitation agencies provided services to middle age (51 years-64 years) and older (65 years and older) clients, agency staff awareness of the aging of the disability population, and agency capacity to provide access to AT/HM for persons with disabilities who are older. Findings indicated that agencies for the blind or visually impaired (BVIs) served significantly more middle age and older persons, were more aware of aging, and provided greater access to AT/HM than did rehabilitation agencies (RAs). In addition, RAs having TAPs within their agency were more aware of aging, provided more staff training on aging, and collected more data on middle age and older clients than did RAs without TAPs. These results point to the need for more counselor training in the areas of technology and aging, areas in which the TAPs and the network of agencies dealing with aging issues can play a major role. To meet the challenges of an aging population, rehabilitation agencies may also need a mandate that makes independent living a valued outcome in and of itself. Finally, agencies need more AT/HM funding so they can address the growing population of middle age and older persons with disabilities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/104420730201200404 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211181700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_104420730201200404</sage_id><sourcerecordid>111754121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-d93998d6d3c7191d1ebe207dcf97e7ed3fe8e3c8b3cd03588ea652aa1954486e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNPiuWtnkmyTPZbWqlAQtJ6XNJndptTdutki_famrOBB8DRv4Pfmz2PsFuEeUakxgpQclAAOyAEkyDM2wEzoVGrg51FHID0Rl-wqhC0ACIFywOZvnekoeaWNWfudj41v6mRaUW09hVFUvq6SL99tkrkPPXMcJaZ2yYrspm52TXW8Zhel2QW6-alD9r54WM2e0uXL4_NsukwtauhSl4s8127ihFWYo0NaUzzJ2TJXpMiJkjQJq9fCOhCZ1mQmGTcG80xKPSExZHf93H3bfB4odMW2ObR1XFlwRNSo4ltDxnvItk0ILZXFvvUfpj0WCMUprOJvWNE07k3BVPQ79R_HN7uPaF4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211181700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State Rehabilitation Agencies, Aging with Disability, and Technology: Policy Issues and Implications</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Sheets, Debra J. ; Liebig, Phoebe S. ; Campbell, Margaret L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheets, Debra J. ; Liebig, Phoebe S. ; Campbell, Margaret L.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent federal and state laws have required state rehabilitation programs and Tech Act programs (TAPs) to improve the access of persons with disabilities to assistive technology (AT) and home modifications (HM). A national survey of all 81 state rehabilitation programs, conducted in 1997 and 1998, examined the extent to which state rehabilitation agencies provided services to middle age (51 years-64 years) and older (65 years and older) clients, agency staff awareness of the aging of the disability population, and agency capacity to provide access to AT/HM for persons with disabilities who are older. Findings indicated that agencies for the blind or visually impaired (BVIs) served significantly more middle age and older persons, were more aware of aging, and provided greater access to AT/HM than did rehabilitation agencies (RAs). In addition, RAs having TAPs within their agency were more aware of aging, provided more staff training on aging, and collected more data on middle age and older clients than did RAs without TAPs. These results point to the need for more counselor training in the areas of technology and aging, areas in which the TAPs and the network of agencies dealing with aging issues can play a major role. To meet the challenges of an aging population, rehabilitation agencies may also need a mandate that makes independent living a valued outcome in and of itself. Finally, agencies need more AT/HM funding so they can address the growing population of middle age and older persons with disabilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-2073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4802</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/104420730201200404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Adaptive technology ; Aging ; Aging (Individuals) ; Assistive Technology ; Blindness ; Counselor Training ; Disability ; Educational Technology ; Employment ; Funding ; Government agencies ; Handicapped assistance devices ; Independent Living ; Laws ; Middle age ; National Surveys ; Older Adults ; Older people ; Peer Counseling ; People with disabilities ; Population ; Rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation Programs ; State Policy ; State Surveys ; Visual impairment</subject><ispartof>Journal of disability policy studies, 2002-03, Vol.12 (4), p.243-252</ispartof><rights>Copyright PRO-ED Journals Spring 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-d93998d6d3c7191d1ebe207dcf97e7ed3fe8e3c8b3cd03588ea652aa1954486e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/104420730201200404$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104420730201200404$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21802,27849,27907,27908,43604,43605</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheets, Debra J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebig, Phoebe S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Margaret L.</creatorcontrib><title>State Rehabilitation Agencies, Aging with Disability, and Technology: Policy Issues and Implications</title><title>Journal of disability policy studies</title><description>Recent federal and state laws have required state rehabilitation programs and Tech Act programs (TAPs) to improve the access of persons with disabilities to assistive technology (AT) and home modifications (HM). A national survey of all 81 state rehabilitation programs, conducted in 1997 and 1998, examined the extent to which state rehabilitation agencies provided services to middle age (51 years-64 years) and older (65 years and older) clients, agency staff awareness of the aging of the disability population, and agency capacity to provide access to AT/HM for persons with disabilities who are older. Findings indicated that agencies for the blind or visually impaired (BVIs) served significantly more middle age and older persons, were more aware of aging, and provided greater access to AT/HM than did rehabilitation agencies (RAs). In addition, RAs having TAPs within their agency were more aware of aging, provided more staff training on aging, and collected more data on middle age and older clients than did RAs without TAPs. These results point to the need for more counselor training in the areas of technology and aging, areas in which the TAPs and the network of agencies dealing with aging issues can play a major role. To meet the challenges of an aging population, rehabilitation agencies may also need a mandate that makes independent living a valued outcome in and of itself. Finally, agencies need more AT/HM funding so they can address the growing population of middle age and older persons with disabilities.</description><subject>Adaptive technology</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>Blindness</subject><subject>Counselor Training</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Handicapped assistance devices</subject><subject>Independent Living</subject><subject>Laws</subject><subject>Middle age</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Older Adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Peer Counseling</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Programs</subject><subject>State Policy</subject><subject>State Surveys</subject><subject>Visual impairment</subject><issn>1044-2073</issn><issn>1538-4802</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNPiuWtnkmyTPZbWqlAQtJ6XNJndptTdutki_famrOBB8DRv4Pfmz2PsFuEeUakxgpQclAAOyAEkyDM2wEzoVGrg51FHID0Rl-wqhC0ACIFywOZvnekoeaWNWfudj41v6mRaUW09hVFUvq6SL99tkrkPPXMcJaZ2yYrspm52TXW8Zhel2QW6-alD9r54WM2e0uXL4_NsukwtauhSl4s8127ihFWYo0NaUzzJ2TJXpMiJkjQJq9fCOhCZ1mQmGTcG80xKPSExZHf93H3bfB4odMW2ObR1XFlwRNSo4ltDxnvItk0ILZXFvvUfpj0WCMUprOJvWNE07k3BVPQ79R_HN7uPaF4</recordid><startdate>200203</startdate><enddate>200203</enddate><creator>Sheets, Debra J.</creator><creator>Liebig, Phoebe S.</creator><creator>Campbell, Margaret L.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200203</creationdate><title>State Rehabilitation Agencies, Aging with Disability, and Technology</title><author>Sheets, Debra J. ; Liebig, Phoebe S. ; Campbell, Margaret L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-d93998d6d3c7191d1ebe207dcf97e7ed3fe8e3c8b3cd03588ea652aa1954486e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adaptive technology</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>Blindness</topic><topic>Counselor Training</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Handicapped assistance devices</topic><topic>Independent Living</topic><topic>Laws</topic><topic>Middle age</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Older Adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Peer Counseling</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Programs</topic><topic>State Policy</topic><topic>State Surveys</topic><topic>Visual impairment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheets, Debra J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebig, Phoebe S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Margaret L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of disability policy studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheets, Debra J.</au><au>Liebig, Phoebe S.</au><au>Campbell, Margaret L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State Rehabilitation Agencies, Aging with Disability, and Technology: Policy Issues and Implications</atitle><jtitle>Journal of disability policy studies</jtitle><date>2002-03</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>243-252</pages><issn>1044-2073</issn><eissn>1538-4802</eissn><abstract>Recent federal and state laws have required state rehabilitation programs and Tech Act programs (TAPs) to improve the access of persons with disabilities to assistive technology (AT) and home modifications (HM). A national survey of all 81 state rehabilitation programs, conducted in 1997 and 1998, examined the extent to which state rehabilitation agencies provided services to middle age (51 years-64 years) and older (65 years and older) clients, agency staff awareness of the aging of the disability population, and agency capacity to provide access to AT/HM for persons with disabilities who are older. Findings indicated that agencies for the blind or visually impaired (BVIs) served significantly more middle age and older persons, were more aware of aging, and provided greater access to AT/HM than did rehabilitation agencies (RAs). In addition, RAs having TAPs within their agency were more aware of aging, provided more staff training on aging, and collected more data on middle age and older clients than did RAs without TAPs. These results point to the need for more counselor training in the areas of technology and aging, areas in which the TAPs and the network of agencies dealing with aging issues can play a major role. To meet the challenges of an aging population, rehabilitation agencies may also need a mandate that makes independent living a valued outcome in and of itself. Finally, agencies need more AT/HM funding so they can address the growing population of middle age and older persons with disabilities.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/104420730201200404</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1044-2073 |
ispartof | Journal of disability policy studies, 2002-03, Vol.12 (4), p.243-252 |
issn | 1044-2073 1538-4802 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_211181700 |
source | PAIS Index; SAGE Complete; Education Source |
subjects | Adaptive technology Aging Aging (Individuals) Assistive Technology Blindness Counselor Training Disability Educational Technology Employment Funding Government agencies Handicapped assistance devices Independent Living Laws Middle age National Surveys Older Adults Older people Peer Counseling People with disabilities Population Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Programs State Policy State Surveys Visual impairment |
title | State Rehabilitation Agencies, Aging with Disability, and Technology: Policy Issues and Implications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A04%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20Rehabilitation%20Agencies,%20Aging%20with%20Disability,%20and%20Technology:%20Policy%20Issues%20and%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20disability%20policy%20studies&rft.au=Sheets,%20Debra%20J.&rft.date=2002-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=243-252&rft.issn=1044-2073&rft.eissn=1538-4802&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/104420730201200404&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E111754121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211181700&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_104420730201200404&rfr_iscdi=true |