Evaluation of Chinese projects and comparison with Norwegian projects

Project work in developing and emerging economies is complicated and unpredictable. It would be of great help to equip project managers with an easily applicable tool to assess whether the project is on the right track or not. A Project Evaluation Scheme (PEVS) has earlier been used on Norwegian pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of project management 2002-11, Vol.20 (8), p.601-609
Hauptverfasser: Andersen, Erling S, Dyrhaug, Qinli Xiao, Jessen, Svein Arne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 609
container_issue 8
container_start_page 601
container_title International journal of project management
container_volume 20
creator Andersen, Erling S
Dyrhaug, Qinli Xiao
Jessen, Svein Arne
description Project work in developing and emerging economies is complicated and unpredictable. It would be of great help to equip project managers with an easily applicable tool to assess whether the project is on the right track or not. A Project Evaluation Scheme (PEVS) has earlier been used on Norwegian projects. Data from 89 Chinese projects has been collected using the scheme. This article analyses the Chinese data and compares them to the Norwegian findings. The Chinese projects are scoring higher in all areas investigated, except on informal contacts. Particularly high were goal setting, overall planning and control execution. The Chinese projects achieve their goals and are regarded as a success by all participants. They should improve in project closeout work. The article discusses the reasons for differences between Chinese and Norwegian projects, ranging from differences in perception regarding the questionnaire, to the possibility that Chinese projects in fact are better. The qualities of activity execution are found to be the most important factor in predicting project success. PEVS is proven to be applicable to Chinese projects, yet further customisation is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00011-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211134442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S026378630200011X</els_id><sourcerecordid>228017761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d728b4bcd8b888089ce7e014d481ebc9214bc6a6ac4250e8beaccd42c86feb3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhc6WL05tGZdCVS6gOKLlToLmSSOzalndRkpsV_b9pKt67u4n7nHM4h5JLCLQVa3L0DK3heyoJfA7sBAErz6RHpUVnyXBRcHJPeATklZzHOE1PCoOyR8XitF51unW8yX2ejmWswYrYKfo6mjZlubGb8cqWDiwnZuHaWvfqwwS-nmwN2Tk5qvYh48Xf75PNx_DF6zidvTy-jh0luOPA2tyWTlaiMlZWUEuTQYIlAhRWSYmWGjKZnoQttBBsAygq1MVYwI4saK468T672vin4u8PYqrnvQpMiFaOUciEES9BgD5ngYwxYq1VwSx1-FAW1HUztBlPbNRQwtRtMTZPufq_D1GDtMKhoHDYGrQuppLLe_ePwC5-6c6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211134442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Chinese projects and comparison with Norwegian projects</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Andersen, Erling S ; Dyrhaug, Qinli Xiao ; Jessen, Svein Arne</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Erling S ; Dyrhaug, Qinli Xiao ; Jessen, Svein Arne</creatorcontrib><description>Project work in developing and emerging economies is complicated and unpredictable. It would be of great help to equip project managers with an easily applicable tool to assess whether the project is on the right track or not. A Project Evaluation Scheme (PEVS) has earlier been used on Norwegian projects. Data from 89 Chinese projects has been collected using the scheme. This article analyses the Chinese data and compares them to the Norwegian findings. The Chinese projects are scoring higher in all areas investigated, except on informal contacts. Particularly high were goal setting, overall planning and control execution. The Chinese projects achieve their goals and are regarded as a success by all participants. They should improve in project closeout work. The article discusses the reasons for differences between Chinese and Norwegian projects, ranging from differences in perception regarding the questionnaire, to the possibility that Chinese projects in fact are better. The qualities of activity execution are found to be the most important factor in predicting project success. PEVS is proven to be applicable to Chinese projects, yet further customisation is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-7863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00011-X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Critical success factors ; Health checks ; Implementation ; Managing and leading ; Managing projects ; Project evaluation ; Project management ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of project management, 2002-11, Vol.20 (8), p.601-609</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd and IPMA</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d728b4bcd8b888089ce7e014d481ebc9214bc6a6ac4250e8beaccd42c86feb3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d728b4bcd8b888089ce7e014d481ebc9214bc6a6ac4250e8beaccd42c86feb3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026378630200011X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Erling S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyrhaug, Qinli Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessen, Svein Arne</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Chinese projects and comparison with Norwegian projects</title><title>International journal of project management</title><description>Project work in developing and emerging economies is complicated and unpredictable. It would be of great help to equip project managers with an easily applicable tool to assess whether the project is on the right track or not. A Project Evaluation Scheme (PEVS) has earlier been used on Norwegian projects. Data from 89 Chinese projects has been collected using the scheme. This article analyses the Chinese data and compares them to the Norwegian findings. The Chinese projects are scoring higher in all areas investigated, except on informal contacts. Particularly high were goal setting, overall planning and control execution. The Chinese projects achieve their goals and are regarded as a success by all participants. They should improve in project closeout work. The article discusses the reasons for differences between Chinese and Norwegian projects, ranging from differences in perception regarding the questionnaire, to the possibility that Chinese projects in fact are better. The qualities of activity execution are found to be the most important factor in predicting project success. PEVS is proven to be applicable to Chinese projects, yet further customisation is needed.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Critical success factors</subject><subject>Health checks</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Managing and leading</subject><subject>Managing projects</subject><subject>Project evaluation</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0263-7863</issn><issn>1873-4634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhc6WL05tGZdCVS6gOKLlToLmSSOzalndRkpsV_b9pKt67u4n7nHM4h5JLCLQVa3L0DK3heyoJfA7sBAErz6RHpUVnyXBRcHJPeATklZzHOE1PCoOyR8XitF51unW8yX2ejmWswYrYKfo6mjZlubGb8cqWDiwnZuHaWvfqwwS-nmwN2Tk5qvYh48Xf75PNx_DF6zidvTy-jh0luOPA2tyWTlaiMlZWUEuTQYIlAhRWSYmWGjKZnoQttBBsAygq1MVYwI4saK468T672vin4u8PYqrnvQpMiFaOUciEES9BgD5ngYwxYq1VwSx1-FAW1HUztBlPbNRQwtRtMTZPufq_D1GDtMKhoHDYGrQuppLLe_ePwC5-6c6g</recordid><startdate>200211</startdate><enddate>200211</enddate><creator>Andersen, Erling S</creator><creator>Dyrhaug, Qinli Xiao</creator><creator>Jessen, Svein Arne</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200211</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Chinese projects and comparison with Norwegian projects</title><author>Andersen, Erling S ; Dyrhaug, Qinli Xiao ; Jessen, Svein Arne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d728b4bcd8b888089ce7e014d481ebc9214bc6a6ac4250e8beaccd42c86feb3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Critical success factors</topic><topic>Health checks</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Managing and leading</topic><topic>Managing projects</topic><topic>Project evaluation</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Erling S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyrhaug, Qinli Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessen, Svein Arne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of project management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, Erling S</au><au>Dyrhaug, Qinli Xiao</au><au>Jessen, Svein Arne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Chinese projects and comparison with Norwegian projects</atitle><jtitle>International journal of project management</jtitle><date>2002-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>601</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>601-609</pages><issn>0263-7863</issn><eissn>1873-4634</eissn><abstract>Project work in developing and emerging economies is complicated and unpredictable. It would be of great help to equip project managers with an easily applicable tool to assess whether the project is on the right track or not. A Project Evaluation Scheme (PEVS) has earlier been used on Norwegian projects. Data from 89 Chinese projects has been collected using the scheme. This article analyses the Chinese data and compares them to the Norwegian findings. The Chinese projects are scoring higher in all areas investigated, except on informal contacts. Particularly high were goal setting, overall planning and control execution. The Chinese projects achieve their goals and are regarded as a success by all participants. They should improve in project closeout work. The article discusses the reasons for differences between Chinese and Norwegian projects, ranging from differences in perception regarding the questionnaire, to the possibility that Chinese projects in fact are better. The qualities of activity execution are found to be the most important factor in predicting project success. PEVS is proven to be applicable to Chinese projects, yet further customisation is needed.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00011-X</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-7863
ispartof International journal of project management, 2002-11, Vol.20 (8), p.601-609
issn 0263-7863
1873-4634
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_211134442
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Comparative analysis
Critical success factors
Health checks
Implementation
Managing and leading
Managing projects
Project evaluation
Project management
Studies
title Evaluation of Chinese projects and comparison with Norwegian projects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T14%3A52%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Chinese%20projects%20and%20comparison%20with%20Norwegian%20projects&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20project%20management&rft.au=Andersen,%20Erling%20S&rft.date=2002-11&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=601&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=601-609&rft.issn=0263-7863&rft.eissn=1873-4634&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00011-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E228017761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211134442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S026378630200011X&rfr_iscdi=true