Projects, pathogens and incubation periods

Errors can have wide-scale effects in large, complex project organisations. Such errors can typically be traced back to latent conditions, or `pathogens', that tend to reside in a system until they become actual failures – often as a result of some distinct incubation process. A study was under...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of project management 2004-07, Vol.22 (5), p.425-434
Hauptverfasser: Busby, J.S., Hughes, E.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 434
container_issue 5
container_start_page 425
container_title International journal of project management
container_volume 22
creator Busby, J.S.
Hughes, E.J.
description Errors can have wide-scale effects in large, complex project organisations. Such errors can typically be traced back to latent conditions, or `pathogens', that tend to reside in a system until they become actual failures – often as a result of some distinct incubation process. A study was undertaken to identify and categorise the pathogens and incubation processes that lay behind a set of significant errors occurring in large-scale engineering projects. The most common kind of pathogen arose from practices that organisations or individuals had adopted (for example reusing existing design solutions). The next most common kind arose from inherent properties of the task being performed (for example disproportionate and non-linear relationships). As far as incubation processes were concerned, the most common kind was the simple accumulation of probability: because latent conditions were not detected from one project to the next, the cumulative probability of a failure occurring on some project simply increased over time until an error was virtually inevitable. Other kinds of incubation process included organisations becoming increasingly habituated to circumstances that eventually changed, and the natural accumulation of complexity in various systems. These results should help provide a systematic way of assessing how vulnerable a project organisation is to making significant errors.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.09.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_211122338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0263786303001121</els_id><sourcerecordid>669635901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-4ea2e3b54892d65f3c1b818d993548536a1735e910e30793301cfa1f95181cf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BSkexdaZTJs2N2VZ_8CCHvQcsmmqKW5Tk67gtzfL6tnTDMN7b3g_xs4RCgQU133h-jH4jR4KDkAFyAKAH7AZNjXlpaDykM2AC8rrRtAxO4mxB8AaqnrGLp-D762Z4lU26undv9khZnpoMzeY7VpPzg_ZaIPzbTxlR53-iPbsd87Z693yZfGQr57uHxe3q9wQiCkvreaW1lXZSN6KqiOD6wabVkpKt4qExpoqKxEsQS2JAE2nsZMVNmkjmrOLfW4q9bm1cVK934YhvVQcETknapJI7EUm-BiD7dQY3EaHb4WgdlhUr_6wqB0WBVIlLMl4szfaVOHL2aCicXYwtnUhcVCtd_9F_AAbqGzf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211122338</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Projects, pathogens and incubation periods</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Busby, J.S. ; Hughes, E.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Busby, J.S. ; Hughes, E.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Errors can have wide-scale effects in large, complex project organisations. Such errors can typically be traced back to latent conditions, or `pathogens', that tend to reside in a system until they become actual failures – often as a result of some distinct incubation process. A study was undertaken to identify and categorise the pathogens and incubation processes that lay behind a set of significant errors occurring in large-scale engineering projects. The most common kind of pathogen arose from practices that organisations or individuals had adopted (for example reusing existing design solutions). The next most common kind arose from inherent properties of the task being performed (for example disproportionate and non-linear relationships). As far as incubation processes were concerned, the most common kind was the simple accumulation of probability: because latent conditions were not detected from one project to the next, the cumulative probability of a failure occurring on some project simply increased over time until an error was virtually inevitable. Other kinds of incubation process included organisations becoming increasingly habituated to circumstances that eventually changed, and the natural accumulation of complexity in various systems. These results should help provide a systematic way of assessing how vulnerable a project organisation is to making significant errors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-7863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.09.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Error ; Errors ; Failure ; Pathogens ; Processes ; Project management ; Studies ; Systems</subject><ispartof>International journal of project management, 2004-07, Vol.22 (5), p.425-434</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-4ea2e3b54892d65f3c1b818d993548536a1735e910e30793301cfa1f95181cf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-4ea2e3b54892d65f3c1b818d993548536a1735e910e30793301cfa1f95181cf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786303001121$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Busby, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, E.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Projects, pathogens and incubation periods</title><title>International journal of project management</title><description>Errors can have wide-scale effects in large, complex project organisations. Such errors can typically be traced back to latent conditions, or `pathogens', that tend to reside in a system until they become actual failures – often as a result of some distinct incubation process. A study was undertaken to identify and categorise the pathogens and incubation processes that lay behind a set of significant errors occurring in large-scale engineering projects. The most common kind of pathogen arose from practices that organisations or individuals had adopted (for example reusing existing design solutions). The next most common kind arose from inherent properties of the task being performed (for example disproportionate and non-linear relationships). As far as incubation processes were concerned, the most common kind was the simple accumulation of probability: because latent conditions were not detected from one project to the next, the cumulative probability of a failure occurring on some project simply increased over time until an error was virtually inevitable. Other kinds of incubation process included organisations becoming increasingly habituated to circumstances that eventually changed, and the natural accumulation of complexity in various systems. These results should help provide a systematic way of assessing how vulnerable a project organisation is to making significant errors.</description><subject>Error</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systems</subject><issn>0263-7863</issn><issn>1873-4634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BSkexdaZTJs2N2VZ_8CCHvQcsmmqKW5Tk67gtzfL6tnTDMN7b3g_xs4RCgQU133h-jH4jR4KDkAFyAKAH7AZNjXlpaDykM2AC8rrRtAxO4mxB8AaqnrGLp-D762Z4lU26undv9khZnpoMzeY7VpPzg_ZaIPzbTxlR53-iPbsd87Z693yZfGQr57uHxe3q9wQiCkvreaW1lXZSN6KqiOD6wabVkpKt4qExpoqKxEsQS2JAE2nsZMVNmkjmrOLfW4q9bm1cVK934YhvVQcETknapJI7EUm-BiD7dQY3EaHb4WgdlhUr_6wqB0WBVIlLMl4szfaVOHL2aCicXYwtnUhcVCtd_9F_AAbqGzf</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Busby, J.S.</creator><creator>Hughes, E.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>Projects, pathogens and incubation periods</title><author>Busby, J.S. ; Hughes, E.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-4ea2e3b54892d65f3c1b818d993548536a1735e910e30793301cfa1f95181cf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Error</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Busby, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, E.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of project management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Busby, J.S.</au><au>Hughes, E.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Projects, pathogens and incubation periods</atitle><jtitle>International journal of project management</jtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>425-434</pages><issn>0263-7863</issn><eissn>1873-4634</eissn><abstract>Errors can have wide-scale effects in large, complex project organisations. Such errors can typically be traced back to latent conditions, or `pathogens', that tend to reside in a system until they become actual failures – often as a result of some distinct incubation process. A study was undertaken to identify and categorise the pathogens and incubation processes that lay behind a set of significant errors occurring in large-scale engineering projects. The most common kind of pathogen arose from practices that organisations or individuals had adopted (for example reusing existing design solutions). The next most common kind arose from inherent properties of the task being performed (for example disproportionate and non-linear relationships). As far as incubation processes were concerned, the most common kind was the simple accumulation of probability: because latent conditions were not detected from one project to the next, the cumulative probability of a failure occurring on some project simply increased over time until an error was virtually inevitable. Other kinds of incubation process included organisations becoming increasingly habituated to circumstances that eventually changed, and the natural accumulation of complexity in various systems. These results should help provide a systematic way of assessing how vulnerable a project organisation is to making significant errors.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.09.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-7863
ispartof International journal of project management, 2004-07, Vol.22 (5), p.425-434
issn 0263-7863
1873-4634
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_211122338
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Error
Errors
Failure
Pathogens
Processes
Project management
Studies
Systems
title Projects, pathogens and incubation periods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Projects,%20pathogens%20and%20incubation%20periods&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20project%20management&rft.au=Busby,%20J.S.&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=425-434&rft.issn=0263-7863&rft.eissn=1873-4634&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E669635901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211122338&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0263786303001121&rfr_iscdi=true