Enabling the IPBES conceptual framework to work across knowledge boundaries
The IPBES conceptual framework (CF) serves an instrumental value to translate usable knowledge into policy across spatial scales, alongside a normative function to engage diverse knowledge systems, promoting inclusivity and enhancing legitimacy. It has been argued that the CF operates as a boundary...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics law and economics, 2018-12, Vol.18 (6), p.779-799 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 799 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 779 |
| container_title | International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Dunkley, Ria Baker, Susan Constant, Natasha Sanderson-Bellamy, Angelina |
| description | The IPBES conceptual framework (CF) serves an instrumental value to translate usable knowledge into policy across spatial scales, alongside a normative function to engage diverse knowledge systems, promoting inclusivity and enhancing legitimacy. It has been argued that the CF operates as a boundary object, a communication and organisation tool for those working across diverse knowledge systems, designed to help them reach shared goals. The paper focuses on this claim, exploring the three core characteristics of a boundary object: interpretive flexibility, material and organisational structure, and the recognition of dissention. We suggest that too much emphasis is placed within the CF upon interpretive flexibility, whilst meeting information needs and the work requirements of all individuals, groups and communities who use the CF are overlooked. By forcing consensus, the IPBES CF ignores the critical dimensions of a boundary object. We argue that embracing the full characteristics of a boundary object will enable the IPBES to support knowledge coproduction and translation across the knowledge systems, better achieving its goal of providing policy advice. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10784-018-9415-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2110393241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2110393241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-647d7f987ce78ad84d0f7ea879a4b9a682232e8eaaf836148ebec33b24376e7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscTb4L7ZzhKpABRJIwNlykk1pm9rFTlTRpydtkDhxmjnMzK4-hC4ZvWaU6pvEqDaSUGZILllGdkdoxDItCMsycbz3SpNcK3mKzlJaUsoUN3SEnqbeFc3Cz3H7CXj2ejd9w2XwJWzazjW4jm4N2xBXuA34oK6MISW88mHbQDUHXITOVy4uIJ2jk9o1CS5-dYw-7qfvk0fy_PIwm9w-k1LyrCVK6krXudElaOMqIytaa3BG504WuVOGc8HBgHO1EYpJAwWUQhRcCq1Al2KMrobdTQxfHaTWLkMXfX_ScsaoyAWXrE-xIXV4OEJtN3GxdvHbMmr3zOzAzPbM7J6Z3fUdPnRSn_VziH_L_5d-ANk6b5s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2110393241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enabling the IPBES conceptual framework to work across knowledge boundaries</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Dunkley, Ria ; Baker, Susan ; Constant, Natasha ; Sanderson-Bellamy, Angelina</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunkley, Ria ; Baker, Susan ; Constant, Natasha ; Sanderson-Bellamy, Angelina</creatorcontrib><description>The IPBES conceptual framework (CF) serves an instrumental value to translate usable knowledge into policy across spatial scales, alongside a normative function to engage diverse knowledge systems, promoting inclusivity and enhancing legitimacy. It has been argued that the CF operates as a boundary object, a communication and organisation tool for those working across diverse knowledge systems, designed to help them reach shared goals. The paper focuses on this claim, exploring the three core characteristics of a boundary object: interpretive flexibility, material and organisational structure, and the recognition of dissention. We suggest that too much emphasis is placed within the CF upon interpretive flexibility, whilst meeting information needs and the work requirements of all individuals, groups and communities who use the CF are overlooked. By forcing consensus, the IPBES CF ignores the critical dimensions of a boundary object. We argue that embracing the full characteristics of a boundary object will enable the IPBES to support knowledge coproduction and translation across the knowledge systems, better achieving its goal of providing policy advice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1567-9764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10784-018-9415-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Boundaries ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Environmental Management ; Flexibility ; Knowledge ; Legitimacy ; Local knowledge ; Nature Conservation ; Object recognition ; Organizational structure ; Original Paper ; Political Science ; Translation</subject><ispartof>International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics, 2018-12, Vol.18 (6), p.779-799</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved. © 2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-647d7f987ce78ad84d0f7ea879a4b9a682232e8eaaf836148ebec33b24376e7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-647d7f987ce78ad84d0f7ea879a4b9a682232e8eaaf836148ebec33b24376e7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10784-018-9415-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10784-018-9415-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunkley, Ria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constant, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson-Bellamy, Angelina</creatorcontrib><title>Enabling the IPBES conceptual framework to work across knowledge boundaries</title><title>International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics</title><addtitle>Int Environ Agreements</addtitle><description>The IPBES conceptual framework (CF) serves an instrumental value to translate usable knowledge into policy across spatial scales, alongside a normative function to engage diverse knowledge systems, promoting inclusivity and enhancing legitimacy. It has been argued that the CF operates as a boundary object, a communication and organisation tool for those working across diverse knowledge systems, designed to help them reach shared goals. The paper focuses on this claim, exploring the three core characteristics of a boundary object: interpretive flexibility, material and organisational structure, and the recognition of dissention. We suggest that too much emphasis is placed within the CF upon interpretive flexibility, whilst meeting information needs and the work requirements of all individuals, groups and communities who use the CF are overlooked. By forcing consensus, the IPBES CF ignores the critical dimensions of a boundary object. We argue that embracing the full characteristics of a boundary object will enable the IPBES to support knowledge coproduction and translation across the knowledge systems, better achieving its goal of providing policy advice.</description><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Local knowledge</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Translation</subject><issn>1567-9764</issn><issn>1573-1553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscTb4L7ZzhKpABRJIwNlykk1pm9rFTlTRpydtkDhxmjnMzK4-hC4ZvWaU6pvEqDaSUGZILllGdkdoxDItCMsycbz3SpNcK3mKzlJaUsoUN3SEnqbeFc3Cz3H7CXj2ejd9w2XwJWzazjW4jm4N2xBXuA34oK6MISW88mHbQDUHXITOVy4uIJ2jk9o1CS5-dYw-7qfvk0fy_PIwm9w-k1LyrCVK6krXudElaOMqIytaa3BG504WuVOGc8HBgHO1EYpJAwWUQhRcCq1Al2KMrobdTQxfHaTWLkMXfX_ScsaoyAWXrE-xIXV4OEJtN3GxdvHbMmr3zOzAzPbM7J6Z3fUdPnRSn_VziH_L_5d-ANk6b5s</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Dunkley, Ria</creator><creator>Baker, Susan</creator><creator>Constant, Natasha</creator><creator>Sanderson-Bellamy, Angelina</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Enabling the IPBES conceptual framework to work across knowledge boundaries</title><author>Dunkley, Ria ; Baker, Susan ; Constant, Natasha ; Sanderson-Bellamy, Angelina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-647d7f987ce78ad84d0f7ea879a4b9a682232e8eaaf836148ebec33b24376e7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Local knowledge</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Translation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunkley, Ria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constant, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson-Bellamy, Angelina</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunkley, Ria</au><au>Baker, Susan</au><au>Constant, Natasha</au><au>Sanderson-Bellamy, Angelina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enabling the IPBES conceptual framework to work across knowledge boundaries</atitle><jtitle>International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics</jtitle><stitle>Int Environ Agreements</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>779</spage><epage>799</epage><pages>779-799</pages><issn>1567-9764</issn><eissn>1573-1553</eissn><abstract>The IPBES conceptual framework (CF) serves an instrumental value to translate usable knowledge into policy across spatial scales, alongside a normative function to engage diverse knowledge systems, promoting inclusivity and enhancing legitimacy. It has been argued that the CF operates as a boundary object, a communication and organisation tool for those working across diverse knowledge systems, designed to help them reach shared goals. The paper focuses on this claim, exploring the three core characteristics of a boundary object: interpretive flexibility, material and organisational structure, and the recognition of dissention. We suggest that too much emphasis is placed within the CF upon interpretive flexibility, whilst meeting information needs and the work requirements of all individuals, groups and communities who use the CF are overlooked. By forcing consensus, the IPBES CF ignores the critical dimensions of a boundary object. We argue that embracing the full characteristics of a boundary object will enable the IPBES to support knowledge coproduction and translation across the knowledge systems, better achieving its goal of providing policy advice.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10784-018-9415-z</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1567-9764 |
| ispartof | International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics, 2018-12, Vol.18 (6), p.779-799 |
| issn | 1567-9764 1573-1553 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2110393241 |
| source | Political Science Complete; SpringerLink Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Boundaries Earth and Environmental Science Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice Environmental Management Flexibility Knowledge Legitimacy Local knowledge Nature Conservation Object recognition Organizational structure Original Paper Political Science Translation |
| title | Enabling the IPBES conceptual framework to work across knowledge boundaries |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enabling%20the%20IPBES%20conceptual%20framework%20to%20work%20across%20knowledge%20boundaries&rft.jtitle=International%20environmental%20agreements%20:%20politics,%20law%20and%20economics&rft.au=Dunkley,%20Ria&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=779&rft.epage=799&rft.pages=779-799&rft.issn=1567-9764&rft.eissn=1573-1553&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10784-018-9415-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2110393241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2110393241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |