Organizational Stewardship: Examining a New Measure in the Stress and Well-Being Framework
Recently, scholars and practitioners have called for a more systemic approach to workplace well-being, shifting the focus from individual attitudes and behaviours to underlying factors of the work environment as key ingredients in the mitigation of work stress. While leadership has been examined ext...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of behavioural science 2018-07, Vol.50 (3), p.144-155 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 155 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 144 |
container_title | Canadian journal of behavioural science |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Simpkins, Leah Lemyre, Louise |
description | Recently, scholars and practitioners have called for a more systemic approach to workplace well-being, shifting the focus from individual attitudes and behaviours to underlying factors of the work environment as key ingredients in the mitigation of work stress. While leadership has been examined extensively in organisational research as a personal characteristic, stewardship represents a metaphenomenon functioning beyond interpersonal exchanges. Stewardship is proposed as an organisational approach that emphasizes a sense of purpose toward the common good through the sharing of power, resources, and information across networks in working through complex issues. The present study examined the concept of stewardship within the framework of organisational stress and well-being. Using a large sample of 2,314 senior executives from the Canadian public service a questionnaire measure of stewardship was developed and tested using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability estimates. Results indicated that the 5-item scale was reliable, displayed a unitary factor structure and correlated significantly with established job resources, perceived stress, and indicators of well-being. Then, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that stewardship contributed significant incremental variance in the relationship between psychological stress and measures of distress, cynicism, and work engagement. Moreover, hierarchical regression results revealed that stewardship was conceptually distinct from other established job resources (such as job control and social support). Overall, the results supported the notion of stewardship as an important additional systemic organisational resource. Findings have important implications for both researchers and practitioners interested in the well-being and performance of executives.
Récemment, les théoriciens et les praticiens ont demandé une approche plus systématique du bien-être en milieu de travail, en mettant l'accent sur les facteurs sous-jacents au milieu de travail plutôt que sur les attitudes et les comportements individuels comme étant des éléments clés de l'atténuation du stress au travail. Bien que le leadership ait été examiné en profondeur dans la recherche organisationnelle en tant que caractéristique personnelle, la gérance représente un méta-phénomène qui fonctionne au-delà des échanges interpersonnels. La gérance est proposée comme une approche organisationnelle qui met l'acc |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/cbs0000104 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2109280003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2109280003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-b3a646e128fb0667f76124790f7100a9cc371ecb1efbadb0cdcc0f8b07a3205d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90FFLw0AMAOBDFJzTF3_BgW9KNdfrrq1vOjYVpntQUXw50mu6Vbu23nXM-eu9McE38xISvgQSxo4FnAuQ8YXJHPgQEO2wnkjiNAiVSndZzzeTIAJ43WcHzr37Ug0GUY-9Te0M6_Ibu7KpseKPHa3Q5m5etpd89IWLsi7rGUf-QCt-T-iWlnhZ825O3lpyjmOd8xeqquCaNnRscUGrxn4csr0CK0dHv7nPnsejp-FtMJne3A2vJgHKUHZBJlFFikSYFBkoFRexEmEUp1DEAgBTY2QsyGSCigzzDExuDBRJBrGfh0Eu--xku7e1zeeSXKffm6X1xzgdCkjDxB8r_1WgEgVRKBOvTrfK2MY5S4VubblAu9YC9ObD-u_DHp9tMbaoW7c2aLvSVOTM0lqqu43VA9BSiyiSP8nHfMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2068604238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organizational Stewardship: Examining a New Measure in the Stress and Well-Being Framework</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Simpkins, Leah ; Lemyre, Louise</creator><contributor>Kelloway, E. Kevin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Simpkins, Leah ; Lemyre, Louise ; Kelloway, E. Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, scholars and practitioners have called for a more systemic approach to workplace well-being, shifting the focus from individual attitudes and behaviours to underlying factors of the work environment as key ingredients in the mitigation of work stress. While leadership has been examined extensively in organisational research as a personal characteristic, stewardship represents a metaphenomenon functioning beyond interpersonal exchanges. Stewardship is proposed as an organisational approach that emphasizes a sense of purpose toward the common good through the sharing of power, resources, and information across networks in working through complex issues. The present study examined the concept of stewardship within the framework of organisational stress and well-being. Using a large sample of 2,314 senior executives from the Canadian public service a questionnaire measure of stewardship was developed and tested using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability estimates. Results indicated that the 5-item scale was reliable, displayed a unitary factor structure and correlated significantly with established job resources, perceived stress, and indicators of well-being. Then, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that stewardship contributed significant incremental variance in the relationship between psychological stress and measures of distress, cynicism, and work engagement. Moreover, hierarchical regression results revealed that stewardship was conceptually distinct from other established job resources (such as job control and social support). Overall, the results supported the notion of stewardship as an important additional systemic organisational resource. Findings have important implications for both researchers and practitioners interested in the well-being and performance of executives.
Récemment, les théoriciens et les praticiens ont demandé une approche plus systématique du bien-être en milieu de travail, en mettant l'accent sur les facteurs sous-jacents au milieu de travail plutôt que sur les attitudes et les comportements individuels comme étant des éléments clés de l'atténuation du stress au travail. Bien que le leadership ait été examiné en profondeur dans la recherche organisationnelle en tant que caractéristique personnelle, la gérance représente un méta-phénomène qui fonctionne au-delà des échanges interpersonnels. La gérance est proposée comme une approche organisationnelle qui met l'accent sur un sentiment visant le bien commun par le partage du pouvoir, des ressources et de l'information à travers tous les réseaux afin de résoudre des questions complexes. La présente étude a examiné le concept de gérance dans le cadre du stress et du bien-être organisationnel. En utilisant un imposant échantillon de 2 314 cadres supérieurs de la fonction publique canadienne, un questionnaire de mesure de la gérance a été mis au point et testé à l'aide de l'analyse factorielle exploratoire (EFA), de l'analyse factorielle confirmatoire (AFC), et des estimations de fiabilité. Les résultats ont indiqué que l'échelle à 5 items était fiable, présentait une structure factorielle unitaire et une corrélation significative avec les ressources d'emploi établies, le stress perçu et les indicateurs de bien-être. Puis, des analyses de régression hiérarchique ont révélé que la gérance entraînait d'importantes variations supplémentaires dans la relation entre le stress psychologique et les mesures de détresse, de cynisme et d'engagement vis-à-vis le travail. En outre, les résultats de régression hiérarchique ont révélé que la gérance était conceptuellement distincte des autres ressources d'emploi établies (comme le contrôle sur l'emploi et le soutien social). Dans l'ensemble, les résultats appuient l'hypothèse de la gérance comme étant une ressource organisationnelle systématique supplémentaire importante. Les résultats ont d'importantes implications pour les théoriciens et praticiens intéressés au bien-être et au rendement de cadres.
Public Significance Statement
A better understanding of how systemic organisational level processes and dynamics influence the well-being of employees is crucial for the development and success of health promotion initiatives. The results of this study suggest that executives working in organisations that promote the sharing of power, knowledge, and resources with a strong and explicit sense of purpose toward to the common good report lower stress and higher well-being.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-400X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/cbs0000104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Burnout ; Cynicism ; Distress ; Employee Engagement ; Employees ; Executives ; Factor Analysis ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Health promotion ; Human ; Hypotheses ; Male ; Occupational health ; Occupational stress ; Organizational Characteristics ; Personality ; Public sector ; Stress ; Studies ; Test Construction ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Top Level Managers ; Well Being ; Work environment ; Working Conditions</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of behavioural science, 2018-07, Vol.50 (3), p.144-155</ispartof><rights>2018 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Psychological Association Jul 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-b3a646e128fb0667f76124790f7100a9cc371ecb1efbadb0cdcc0f8b07a3205d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Kelloway, E. Kevin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Simpkins, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemyre, Louise</creatorcontrib><title>Organizational Stewardship: Examining a New Measure in the Stress and Well-Being Framework</title><title>Canadian journal of behavioural science</title><description>Recently, scholars and practitioners have called for a more systemic approach to workplace well-being, shifting the focus from individual attitudes and behaviours to underlying factors of the work environment as key ingredients in the mitigation of work stress. While leadership has been examined extensively in organisational research as a personal characteristic, stewardship represents a metaphenomenon functioning beyond interpersonal exchanges. Stewardship is proposed as an organisational approach that emphasizes a sense of purpose toward the common good through the sharing of power, resources, and information across networks in working through complex issues. The present study examined the concept of stewardship within the framework of organisational stress and well-being. Using a large sample of 2,314 senior executives from the Canadian public service a questionnaire measure of stewardship was developed and tested using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability estimates. Results indicated that the 5-item scale was reliable, displayed a unitary factor structure and correlated significantly with established job resources, perceived stress, and indicators of well-being. Then, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that stewardship contributed significant incremental variance in the relationship between psychological stress and measures of distress, cynicism, and work engagement. Moreover, hierarchical regression results revealed that stewardship was conceptually distinct from other established job resources (such as job control and social support). Overall, the results supported the notion of stewardship as an important additional systemic organisational resource. Findings have important implications for both researchers and practitioners interested in the well-being and performance of executives.
Récemment, les théoriciens et les praticiens ont demandé une approche plus systématique du bien-être en milieu de travail, en mettant l'accent sur les facteurs sous-jacents au milieu de travail plutôt que sur les attitudes et les comportements individuels comme étant des éléments clés de l'atténuation du stress au travail. Bien que le leadership ait été examiné en profondeur dans la recherche organisationnelle en tant que caractéristique personnelle, la gérance représente un méta-phénomène qui fonctionne au-delà des échanges interpersonnels. La gérance est proposée comme une approche organisationnelle qui met l'accent sur un sentiment visant le bien commun par le partage du pouvoir, des ressources et de l'information à travers tous les réseaux afin de résoudre des questions complexes. La présente étude a examiné le concept de gérance dans le cadre du stress et du bien-être organisationnel. En utilisant un imposant échantillon de 2 314 cadres supérieurs de la fonction publique canadienne, un questionnaire de mesure de la gérance a été mis au point et testé à l'aide de l'analyse factorielle exploratoire (EFA), de l'analyse factorielle confirmatoire (AFC), et des estimations de fiabilité. Les résultats ont indiqué que l'échelle à 5 items était fiable, présentait une structure factorielle unitaire et une corrélation significative avec les ressources d'emploi établies, le stress perçu et les indicateurs de bien-être. Puis, des analyses de régression hiérarchique ont révélé que la gérance entraînait d'importantes variations supplémentaires dans la relation entre le stress psychologique et les mesures de détresse, de cynisme et d'engagement vis-à-vis le travail. En outre, les résultats de régression hiérarchique ont révélé que la gérance était conceptuellement distincte des autres ressources d'emploi établies (comme le contrôle sur l'emploi et le soutien social). Dans l'ensemble, les résultats appuient l'hypothèse de la gérance comme étant une ressource organisationnelle systématique supplémentaire importante. Les résultats ont d'importantes implications pour les théoriciens et praticiens intéressés au bien-être et au rendement de cadres.
Public Significance Statement
A better understanding of how systemic organisational level processes and dynamics influence the well-being of employees is crucial for the development and success of health promotion initiatives. The results of this study suggest that executives working in organisations that promote the sharing of power, knowledge, and resources with a strong and explicit sense of purpose toward to the common good report lower stress and higher well-being.</description><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Cynicism</subject><subject>Distress</subject><subject>Employee Engagement</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Organizational Characteristics</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Top Level Managers</subject><subject>Well Being</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Working Conditions</subject><issn>0008-400X</issn><issn>1879-2669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90FFLw0AMAOBDFJzTF3_BgW9KNdfrrq1vOjYVpntQUXw50mu6Vbu23nXM-eu9McE38xISvgQSxo4FnAuQ8YXJHPgQEO2wnkjiNAiVSndZzzeTIAJ43WcHzr37Ug0GUY-9Te0M6_Ibu7KpseKPHa3Q5m5etpd89IWLsi7rGUf-QCt-T-iWlnhZ825O3lpyjmOd8xeqquCaNnRscUGrxn4csr0CK0dHv7nPnsejp-FtMJne3A2vJgHKUHZBJlFFikSYFBkoFRexEmEUp1DEAgBTY2QsyGSCigzzDExuDBRJBrGfh0Eu--xku7e1zeeSXKffm6X1xzgdCkjDxB8r_1WgEgVRKBOvTrfK2MY5S4VubblAu9YC9ObD-u_DHp9tMbaoW7c2aLvSVOTM0lqqu43VA9BSiyiSP8nHfMk</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Simpkins, Leah</creator><creator>Lemyre, Louise</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>Canadian Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Organizational Stewardship: Examining a New Measure in the Stress and Well-Being Framework</title><author>Simpkins, Leah ; Lemyre, Louise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-b3a646e128fb0667f76124790f7100a9cc371ecb1efbadb0cdcc0f8b07a3205d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Cynicism</topic><topic>Distress</topic><topic>Employee Engagement</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Organizational Characteristics</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Top Level Managers</topic><topic>Well Being</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Working Conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simpkins, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemyre, Louise</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simpkins, Leah</au><au>Lemyre, Louise</au><au>Kelloway, E. Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organizational Stewardship: Examining a New Measure in the Stress and Well-Being Framework</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>144-155</pages><issn>0008-400X</issn><eissn>1879-2669</eissn><abstract>Recently, scholars and practitioners have called for a more systemic approach to workplace well-being, shifting the focus from individual attitudes and behaviours to underlying factors of the work environment as key ingredients in the mitigation of work stress. While leadership has been examined extensively in organisational research as a personal characteristic, stewardship represents a metaphenomenon functioning beyond interpersonal exchanges. Stewardship is proposed as an organisational approach that emphasizes a sense of purpose toward the common good through the sharing of power, resources, and information across networks in working through complex issues. The present study examined the concept of stewardship within the framework of organisational stress and well-being. Using a large sample of 2,314 senior executives from the Canadian public service a questionnaire measure of stewardship was developed and tested using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability estimates. Results indicated that the 5-item scale was reliable, displayed a unitary factor structure and correlated significantly with established job resources, perceived stress, and indicators of well-being. Then, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that stewardship contributed significant incremental variance in the relationship between psychological stress and measures of distress, cynicism, and work engagement. Moreover, hierarchical regression results revealed that stewardship was conceptually distinct from other established job resources (such as job control and social support). Overall, the results supported the notion of stewardship as an important additional systemic organisational resource. Findings have important implications for both researchers and practitioners interested in the well-being and performance of executives.
Récemment, les théoriciens et les praticiens ont demandé une approche plus systématique du bien-être en milieu de travail, en mettant l'accent sur les facteurs sous-jacents au milieu de travail plutôt que sur les attitudes et les comportements individuels comme étant des éléments clés de l'atténuation du stress au travail. Bien que le leadership ait été examiné en profondeur dans la recherche organisationnelle en tant que caractéristique personnelle, la gérance représente un méta-phénomène qui fonctionne au-delà des échanges interpersonnels. La gérance est proposée comme une approche organisationnelle qui met l'accent sur un sentiment visant le bien commun par le partage du pouvoir, des ressources et de l'information à travers tous les réseaux afin de résoudre des questions complexes. La présente étude a examiné le concept de gérance dans le cadre du stress et du bien-être organisationnel. En utilisant un imposant échantillon de 2 314 cadres supérieurs de la fonction publique canadienne, un questionnaire de mesure de la gérance a été mis au point et testé à l'aide de l'analyse factorielle exploratoire (EFA), de l'analyse factorielle confirmatoire (AFC), et des estimations de fiabilité. Les résultats ont indiqué que l'échelle à 5 items était fiable, présentait une structure factorielle unitaire et une corrélation significative avec les ressources d'emploi établies, le stress perçu et les indicateurs de bien-être. Puis, des analyses de régression hiérarchique ont révélé que la gérance entraînait d'importantes variations supplémentaires dans la relation entre le stress psychologique et les mesures de détresse, de cynisme et d'engagement vis-à-vis le travail. En outre, les résultats de régression hiérarchique ont révélé que la gérance était conceptuellement distincte des autres ressources d'emploi établies (comme le contrôle sur l'emploi et le soutien social). Dans l'ensemble, les résultats appuient l'hypothèse de la gérance comme étant une ressource organisationnelle systématique supplémentaire importante. Les résultats ont d'importantes implications pour les théoriciens et praticiens intéressés au bien-être et au rendement de cadres.
Public Significance Statement
A better understanding of how systemic organisational level processes and dynamics influence the well-being of employees is crucial for the development and success of health promotion initiatives. The results of this study suggest that executives working in organisations that promote the sharing of power, knowledge, and resources with a strong and explicit sense of purpose toward to the common good report lower stress and higher well-being.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/cbs0000104</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-400X |
ispartof | Canadian journal of behavioural science, 2018-07, Vol.50 (3), p.144-155 |
issn | 0008-400X 1879-2669 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2109280003 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Burnout Cynicism Distress Employee Engagement Employees Executives Factor Analysis Factor Structure Female Health promotion Human Hypotheses Male Occupational health Occupational stress Organizational Characteristics Personality Public sector Stress Studies Test Construction Test Reliability Test Validity Top Level Managers Well Being Work environment Working Conditions |
title | Organizational Stewardship: Examining a New Measure in the Stress and Well-Being Framework |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T19%3A25%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organizational%20Stewardship:%20Examining%20a%20New%20Measure%20in%20the%20Stress%20and%20Well-Being%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20behavioural%20science&rft.au=Simpkins,%20Leah&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=144-155&rft.issn=0008-400X&rft.eissn=1879-2669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/cbs0000104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2109280003%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2068604238&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |