When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice
•The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies planning and futures studies, 2018-08, Vol.101, p.36-45 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Bauer, Anja |
description | •The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects and spatial contexts.•Multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice.•Overall, a tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.
With the increasing call for proactive and long-term policy-making, a variety of approaches and instruments of anticipatory policy advice have been devised, implemented and analyzed. However, so far, very little is known about the temporal aspects of such instruments. This article explores the temporal ordering of the future in three prominent instruments of anticipatory policy advice: Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight. Based on 25 cases of SEA, TA, and Foresight processes in Austria, the article first presents the specific time horizons that are applied in the instruments. Time horizons in anticipatory policy advice frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future. In a second step, the article explores and discusses how the chosen time horizons explicitly and implicitly base on varying time scales that are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects, and spatial contexts. Owing to these time scales, multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice. Overall, the article illustrates that the tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2108745641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016328718300028</els_id><sourcerecordid>2108745641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-be05042fb8d6e370d3cc563e16bdf396a183ad130e1b4cb395d04577494e40943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BCHguXXSpGl7WmTxCxa8rHgMaTJ1U3abmrQL---tdO-ehoHnfYd5CLlnkDJg8rFNm3EYA8Y0A1amIFOA7IIsWFnwRPKivCQLmMCEZ2VxTW5ibKeV55AtyPprhx11kQ47pHPNim7x0Pug99QHi8F139R1VHeDM67Xgw8n2vu9Myeq7dEZvCVXjd5HvDvPJfl8ed6u35LNx-v7-mmTGM6LIakRchBZU5dWIi_AcmNyyZHJ2ja8kpqVXFvGAVktTM2r3ILIi0JUAgVUgi_Jw9zbB_8zYhxU68fQTSdVxqAsRC4Fm6h8pkzwMQZsVB_cQYeTYqD-fKlWnX2pP18KpJp8TbnVnMPphaPDoKJx2Bm0LqAZlPXun4Zflyt2DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108745641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Bauer, Anja</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Anja</creatorcontrib><description>•The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects and spatial contexts.•Multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice.•Overall, a tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.
With the increasing call for proactive and long-term policy-making, a variety of approaches and instruments of anticipatory policy advice have been devised, implemented and analyzed. However, so far, very little is known about the temporal aspects of such instruments. This article explores the temporal ordering of the future in three prominent instruments of anticipatory policy advice: Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight. Based on 25 cases of SEA, TA, and Foresight processes in Austria, the article first presents the specific time horizons that are applied in the instruments. Time horizons in anticipatory policy advice frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future. In a second step, the article explores and discusses how the chosen time horizons explicitly and implicitly base on varying time scales that are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects, and spatial contexts. Owing to these time scales, multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice. Overall, the article illustrates that the tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-3287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anticipatory policy advice ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental policy ; Foresight ; Future ; Measures ; Policy making ; Political factors ; Strategic environmental assessment ; Studies ; Sustainable development ; Technological planning ; Technology assessment ; Time ; Time horizons ; Time scales</subject><ispartof>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2018-08, Vol.101, p.36-45</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-be05042fb8d6e370d3cc563e16bdf396a183ad130e1b4cb395d04577494e40943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-be05042fb8d6e370d3cc563e16bdf396a183ad130e1b4cb395d04577494e40943</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2197-1925</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27853,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Anja</creatorcontrib><title>When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice</title><title>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</title><description>•The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects and spatial contexts.•Multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice.•Overall, a tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.
With the increasing call for proactive and long-term policy-making, a variety of approaches and instruments of anticipatory policy advice have been devised, implemented and analyzed. However, so far, very little is known about the temporal aspects of such instruments. This article explores the temporal ordering of the future in three prominent instruments of anticipatory policy advice: Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight. Based on 25 cases of SEA, TA, and Foresight processes in Austria, the article first presents the specific time horizons that are applied in the instruments. Time horizons in anticipatory policy advice frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future. In a second step, the article explores and discusses how the chosen time horizons explicitly and implicitly base on varying time scales that are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects, and spatial contexts. Owing to these time scales, multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice. Overall, the article illustrates that the tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.</description><subject>Anticipatory policy advice</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Foresight</subject><subject>Future</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Strategic environmental assessment</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Technological planning</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Time horizons</subject><subject>Time scales</subject><issn>0016-3287</issn><issn>1873-6378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BCHguXXSpGl7WmTxCxa8rHgMaTJ1U3abmrQL---tdO-ehoHnfYd5CLlnkDJg8rFNm3EYA8Y0A1amIFOA7IIsWFnwRPKivCQLmMCEZ2VxTW5ibKeV55AtyPprhx11kQ47pHPNim7x0Pug99QHi8F139R1VHeDM67Xgw8n2vu9Myeq7dEZvCVXjd5HvDvPJfl8ed6u35LNx-v7-mmTGM6LIakRchBZU5dWIi_AcmNyyZHJ2ja8kpqVXFvGAVktTM2r3ILIi0JUAgVUgi_Jw9zbB_8zYhxU68fQTSdVxqAsRC4Fm6h8pkzwMQZsVB_cQYeTYqD-fKlWnX2pP18KpJp8TbnVnMPphaPDoKJx2Bm0LqAZlPXun4Zflyt2DA</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Bauer, Anja</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-1925</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice</title><author>Bauer, Anja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-be05042fb8d6e370d3cc563e16bdf396a183ad130e1b4cb395d04577494e40943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anticipatory policy advice</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Foresight</topic><topic>Future</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Strategic environmental assessment</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Technological planning</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Time horizons</topic><topic>Time scales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Anja</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauer, Anja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice</atitle><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>36</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>36-45</pages><issn>0016-3287</issn><eissn>1873-6378</eissn><abstract>•The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects and spatial contexts.•Multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice.•Overall, a tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.
With the increasing call for proactive and long-term policy-making, a variety of approaches and instruments of anticipatory policy advice have been devised, implemented and analyzed. However, so far, very little is known about the temporal aspects of such instruments. This article explores the temporal ordering of the future in three prominent instruments of anticipatory policy advice: Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight. Based on 25 cases of SEA, TA, and Foresight processes in Austria, the article first presents the specific time horizons that are applied in the instruments. Time horizons in anticipatory policy advice frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future. In a second step, the article explores and discusses how the chosen time horizons explicitly and implicitly base on varying time scales that are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects, and spatial contexts. Owing to these time scales, multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice. Overall, the article illustrates that the tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-1925</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-3287 |
ispartof | Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2018-08, Vol.101, p.36-45 |
issn | 0016-3287 1873-6378 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2108745641 |
source | PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Anticipatory policy advice Environmental assessment Environmental policy Foresight Future Measures Policy making Political factors Strategic environmental assessment Studies Sustainable development Technological planning Technology assessment Time Time horizons Time scales |
title | When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A14%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20is%20the%20future?%20Temporal%20ordering%20in%20anticipatory%20policy%20advice&rft.jtitle=Futures%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20policy,%20planning%20and%20futures%20studies&rft.au=Bauer,%20Anja&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=36-45&rft.issn=0016-3287&rft.eissn=1873-6378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2108745641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108745641&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016328718300028&rfr_iscdi=true |