When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice

•The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies planning and futures studies, 2018-08, Vol.101, p.36-45
1. Verfasser: Bauer, Anja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue
container_start_page 36
container_title Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies
container_volume 101
creator Bauer, Anja
description •The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects and spatial contexts.•Multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice.•Overall, a tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice. With the increasing call for proactive and long-term policy-making, a variety of approaches and instruments of anticipatory policy advice have been devised, implemented and analyzed. However, so far, very little is known about the temporal aspects of such instruments. This article explores the temporal ordering of the future in three prominent instruments of anticipatory policy advice: Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight. Based on 25 cases of SEA, TA, and Foresight processes in Austria, the article first presents the specific time horizons that are applied in the instruments. Time horizons in anticipatory policy advice frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future. In a second step, the article explores and discusses how the chosen time horizons explicitly and implicitly base on varying time scales that are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects, and spatial contexts. Owing to these time scales, multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice. Overall, the article illustrates that the tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2108745641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016328718300028</els_id><sourcerecordid>2108745641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-be05042fb8d6e370d3cc563e16bdf396a183ad130e1b4cb395d04577494e40943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BCHguXXSpGl7WmTxCxa8rHgMaTJ1U3abmrQL---tdO-ehoHnfYd5CLlnkDJg8rFNm3EYA8Y0A1amIFOA7IIsWFnwRPKivCQLmMCEZ2VxTW5ibKeV55AtyPprhx11kQ47pHPNim7x0Pug99QHi8F139R1VHeDM67Xgw8n2vu9Myeq7dEZvCVXjd5HvDvPJfl8ed6u35LNx-v7-mmTGM6LIakRchBZU5dWIi_AcmNyyZHJ2ja8kpqVXFvGAVktTM2r3ILIi0JUAgVUgi_Jw9zbB_8zYhxU68fQTSdVxqAsRC4Fm6h8pkzwMQZsVB_cQYeTYqD-fKlWnX2pP18KpJp8TbnVnMPphaPDoKJx2Bm0LqAZlPXun4Zflyt2DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108745641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Bauer, Anja</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Anja</creatorcontrib><description>•The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects and spatial contexts.•Multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice.•Overall, a tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice. With the increasing call for proactive and long-term policy-making, a variety of approaches and instruments of anticipatory policy advice have been devised, implemented and analyzed. However, so far, very little is known about the temporal aspects of such instruments. This article explores the temporal ordering of the future in three prominent instruments of anticipatory policy advice: Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight. Based on 25 cases of SEA, TA, and Foresight processes in Austria, the article first presents the specific time horizons that are applied in the instruments. Time horizons in anticipatory policy advice frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future. In a second step, the article explores and discusses how the chosen time horizons explicitly and implicitly base on varying time scales that are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects, and spatial contexts. Owing to these time scales, multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice. Overall, the article illustrates that the tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-3287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anticipatory policy advice ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental policy ; Foresight ; Future ; Measures ; Policy making ; Political factors ; Strategic environmental assessment ; Studies ; Sustainable development ; Technological planning ; Technology assessment ; Time ; Time horizons ; Time scales</subject><ispartof>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2018-08, Vol.101, p.36-45</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-be05042fb8d6e370d3cc563e16bdf396a183ad130e1b4cb395d04577494e40943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-be05042fb8d6e370d3cc563e16bdf396a183ad130e1b4cb395d04577494e40943</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2197-1925</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27853,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Anja</creatorcontrib><title>When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice</title><title>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</title><description>•The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects and spatial contexts.•Multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice.•Overall, a tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice. With the increasing call for proactive and long-term policy-making, a variety of approaches and instruments of anticipatory policy advice have been devised, implemented and analyzed. However, so far, very little is known about the temporal aspects of such instruments. This article explores the temporal ordering of the future in three prominent instruments of anticipatory policy advice: Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight. Based on 25 cases of SEA, TA, and Foresight processes in Austria, the article first presents the specific time horizons that are applied in the instruments. Time horizons in anticipatory policy advice frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future. In a second step, the article explores and discusses how the chosen time horizons explicitly and implicitly base on varying time scales that are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects, and spatial contexts. Owing to these time scales, multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice. Overall, the article illustrates that the tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.</description><subject>Anticipatory policy advice</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Foresight</subject><subject>Future</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Strategic environmental assessment</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Technological planning</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Time horizons</subject><subject>Time scales</subject><issn>0016-3287</issn><issn>1873-6378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BCHguXXSpGl7WmTxCxa8rHgMaTJ1U3abmrQL---tdO-ehoHnfYd5CLlnkDJg8rFNm3EYA8Y0A1amIFOA7IIsWFnwRPKivCQLmMCEZ2VxTW5ibKeV55AtyPprhx11kQ47pHPNim7x0Pug99QHi8F139R1VHeDM67Xgw8n2vu9Myeq7dEZvCVXjd5HvDvPJfl8ed6u35LNx-v7-mmTGM6LIakRchBZU5dWIi_AcmNyyZHJ2ja8kpqVXFvGAVktTM2r3ILIi0JUAgVUgi_Jw9zbB_8zYhxU68fQTSdVxqAsRC4Fm6h8pkzwMQZsVB_cQYeTYqD-fKlWnX2pP18KpJp8TbnVnMPphaPDoKJx2Bm0LqAZlPXun4Zflyt2DA</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Bauer, Anja</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-1925</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice</title><author>Bauer, Anja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-be05042fb8d6e370d3cc563e16bdf396a183ad130e1b4cb395d04577494e40943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anticipatory policy advice</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Foresight</topic><topic>Future</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Strategic environmental assessment</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Technological planning</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Time horizons</topic><topic>Time scales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Anja</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauer, Anja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice</atitle><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>36</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>36-45</pages><issn>0016-3287</issn><eissn>1873-6378</eissn><abstract>•The temporal ordering of the future in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight is analyzed.•Time horizons frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future.•Time horizons are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects and spatial contexts.•Multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice.•Overall, a tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice. With the increasing call for proactive and long-term policy-making, a variety of approaches and instruments of anticipatory policy advice have been devised, implemented and analyzed. However, so far, very little is known about the temporal aspects of such instruments. This article explores the temporal ordering of the future in three prominent instruments of anticipatory policy advice: Strategic Environmental Assessment, Technology Assessment and Foresight. Based on 25 cases of SEA, TA, and Foresight processes in Austria, the article first presents the specific time horizons that are applied in the instruments. Time horizons in anticipatory policy advice frequently span around 10–20 years and have an upper limit of 50 years into the future. In a second step, the article explores and discusses how the chosen time horizons explicitly and implicitly base on varying time scales that are related to the subject matter, epistemic considerations, human experiences, political aspects, and spatial contexts. Owing to these time scales, multiple dynamics of limiting and expanding the future in time are to be found in anticipatory policy advice. Overall, the article illustrates that the tendency to shorten time horizons prevails, contradicting the very purpose of instruments of anticipatory policy advice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-1925</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-3287
ispartof Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2018-08, Vol.101, p.36-45
issn 0016-3287
1873-6378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2108745641
source PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Anticipatory policy advice
Environmental assessment
Environmental policy
Foresight
Future
Measures
Policy making
Political factors
Strategic environmental assessment
Studies
Sustainable development
Technological planning
Technology assessment
Time
Time horizons
Time scales
title When is the future? Temporal ordering in anticipatory policy advice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A14%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20is%20the%20future?%20Temporal%20ordering%20in%20anticipatory%20policy%20advice&rft.jtitle=Futures%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20policy,%20planning%20and%20futures%20studies&rft.au=Bauer,%20Anja&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=36-45&rft.issn=0016-3287&rft.eissn=1873-6378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2108745641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108745641&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016328718300028&rfr_iscdi=true