Measuring the Sustainability of Construction Projects throughout Their Lifecycle: A Taiwan Lesson
Researchers have proposed many industrial or national sustainability evaluation indicator systems during the past decade, although there has not yet been a project-level sustainability evaluation system for the evaluation and execution monitoring of the sustainability status for a construction proje...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2018-05, Vol.10 (5), p.1523 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1523 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Yu, Wen-der Cheng, Shao-tsai Ho, Wei-cheng Chang, Yu-hao |
description | Researchers have proposed many industrial or national sustainability evaluation indicator systems during the past decade, although there has not yet been a project-level sustainability evaluation system for the evaluation and execution monitoring of the sustainability status for a construction project. Without such an evaluation system, it will be difficult for the planners to plan the sustainable project objectives, for the contractors to select the sustainable execution alternatives, and for the facility managers to operate sustainable constructed facilities. To meet the abovementioned requirements, this paper presents an effort conducted in Taiwan to propose a Construction Project Sustainability Assessing System (CPSAS) considering three pillars of sustainability: environmental, social, and economic, based on the theoretical backgrounds from the literature and former successful sustainable projects. The proposed CPSAS comprises four levels: Level 1, 3 main pillars; Level 2, 8 categories; Level 3, 19 sub-categories; and Level 4, 31 indicators. Different selections of indicators for application in different project phases are suggested according to the prioritization via questionnaire surveys. A procedure for sustainable project management with the proposed CPSAS is suggested to the project management team. Finally, three green building projects and two civil infrastructure construction projects of Taiwan were tested to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed CPSAS. It is concluded that the proposed CPSAS is useful for construction stakeholders to achieve sustainability more effectively during the execution of a construction project. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su10051523 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2108740444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2108740444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-1a401fd9b41301c4aab9cbdc540d18fd11ad5470769bdd175a965ff709caa2853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWGov_oKAN2H1fTdJt_FWilZhRcF6XrLZpE2pm5oPpP_elQo6l5nDwwwMIZcIN4xJuI0ZAQSKkp2QUQkVFggCTv_lczKJcQuDGEOJ0xFRz0bFHFy_pmlj6FuOSbletW7n0oF6Sxe-jylknZzv6WvwW6NTHNjg83rjc6KrjXGB1s4afdA7c0fndKXcl-ppbWL0_QU5s2oXzeTXx-T94X61eCzql-XTYl4XupQiFag4oO1ky5EBaq5UK3XbacGhw5ntEFUneAXVVLZdh5VQciqsrUBqpcqZYGNydezdB_-ZTUzN1ufQD5NNiTCrOHDOB-r6SOngYwzGNvvgPlQ4NAjNz4vN34vsG8hlZSk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108740444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the Sustainability of Construction Projects throughout Their Lifecycle: A Taiwan Lesson</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Yu, Wen-der ; Cheng, Shao-tsai ; Ho, Wei-cheng ; Chang, Yu-hao</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wen-der ; Cheng, Shao-tsai ; Ho, Wei-cheng ; Chang, Yu-hao</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers have proposed many industrial or national sustainability evaluation indicator systems during the past decade, although there has not yet been a project-level sustainability evaluation system for the evaluation and execution monitoring of the sustainability status for a construction project. Without such an evaluation system, it will be difficult for the planners to plan the sustainable project objectives, for the contractors to select the sustainable execution alternatives, and for the facility managers to operate sustainable constructed facilities. To meet the abovementioned requirements, this paper presents an effort conducted in Taiwan to propose a Construction Project Sustainability Assessing System (CPSAS) considering three pillars of sustainability: environmental, social, and economic, based on the theoretical backgrounds from the literature and former successful sustainable projects. The proposed CPSAS comprises four levels: Level 1, 3 main pillars; Level 2, 8 categories; Level 3, 19 sub-categories; and Level 4, 31 indicators. Different selections of indicators for application in different project phases are suggested according to the prioritization via questionnaire surveys. A procedure for sustainable project management with the proposed CPSAS is suggested to the project management team. Finally, three green building projects and two civil infrastructure construction projects of Taiwan were tested to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed CPSAS. It is concluded that the proposed CPSAS is useful for construction stakeholders to achieve sustainability more effectively during the execution of a construction project.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su10051523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Construction ; Construction industry ; Contractors ; Evaluation ; Feasibility studies ; Green buildings ; Green development ; Indicators ; Project engineering ; Project management ; Sustainability ; Systems analysis</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2018-05, Vol.10 (5), p.1523</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-1a401fd9b41301c4aab9cbdc540d18fd11ad5470769bdd175a965ff709caa2853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-1a401fd9b41301c4aab9cbdc540d18fd11ad5470769bdd175a965ff709caa2853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wen-der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Shao-tsai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Wei-cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Yu-hao</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the Sustainability of Construction Projects throughout Their Lifecycle: A Taiwan Lesson</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Researchers have proposed many industrial or national sustainability evaluation indicator systems during the past decade, although there has not yet been a project-level sustainability evaluation system for the evaluation and execution monitoring of the sustainability status for a construction project. Without such an evaluation system, it will be difficult for the planners to plan the sustainable project objectives, for the contractors to select the sustainable execution alternatives, and for the facility managers to operate sustainable constructed facilities. To meet the abovementioned requirements, this paper presents an effort conducted in Taiwan to propose a Construction Project Sustainability Assessing System (CPSAS) considering three pillars of sustainability: environmental, social, and economic, based on the theoretical backgrounds from the literature and former successful sustainable projects. The proposed CPSAS comprises four levels: Level 1, 3 main pillars; Level 2, 8 categories; Level 3, 19 sub-categories; and Level 4, 31 indicators. Different selections of indicators for application in different project phases are suggested according to the prioritization via questionnaire surveys. A procedure for sustainable project management with the proposed CPSAS is suggested to the project management team. Finally, three green building projects and two civil infrastructure construction projects of Taiwan were tested to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed CPSAS. It is concluded that the proposed CPSAS is useful for construction stakeholders to achieve sustainability more effectively during the execution of a construction project.</description><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Contractors</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Green development</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Project engineering</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWGov_oKAN2H1fTdJt_FWilZhRcF6XrLZpE2pm5oPpP_elQo6l5nDwwwMIZcIN4xJuI0ZAQSKkp2QUQkVFggCTv_lczKJcQuDGEOJ0xFRz0bFHFy_pmlj6FuOSbletW7n0oF6Sxe-jylknZzv6WvwW6NTHNjg83rjc6KrjXGB1s4afdA7c0fndKXcl-ppbWL0_QU5s2oXzeTXx-T94X61eCzql-XTYl4XupQiFag4oO1ky5EBaq5UK3XbacGhw5ntEFUneAXVVLZdh5VQciqsrUBqpcqZYGNydezdB_-ZTUzN1ufQD5NNiTCrOHDOB-r6SOngYwzGNvvgPlQ4NAjNz4vN34vsG8hlZSk</recordid><startdate>20180511</startdate><enddate>20180511</enddate><creator>Yu, Wen-der</creator><creator>Cheng, Shao-tsai</creator><creator>Ho, Wei-cheng</creator><creator>Chang, Yu-hao</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180511</creationdate><title>Measuring the Sustainability of Construction Projects throughout Their Lifecycle: A Taiwan Lesson</title><author>Yu, Wen-der ; Cheng, Shao-tsai ; Ho, Wei-cheng ; Chang, Yu-hao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-1a401fd9b41301c4aab9cbdc540d18fd11ad5470769bdd175a965ff709caa2853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Contractors</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Green development</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Project engineering</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wen-der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Shao-tsai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Wei-cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Yu-hao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Wen-der</au><au>Cheng, Shao-tsai</au><au>Ho, Wei-cheng</au><au>Chang, Yu-hao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the Sustainability of Construction Projects throughout Their Lifecycle: A Taiwan Lesson</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2018-05-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1523</spage><pages>1523-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Researchers have proposed many industrial or national sustainability evaluation indicator systems during the past decade, although there has not yet been a project-level sustainability evaluation system for the evaluation and execution monitoring of the sustainability status for a construction project. Without such an evaluation system, it will be difficult for the planners to plan the sustainable project objectives, for the contractors to select the sustainable execution alternatives, and for the facility managers to operate sustainable constructed facilities. To meet the abovementioned requirements, this paper presents an effort conducted in Taiwan to propose a Construction Project Sustainability Assessing System (CPSAS) considering three pillars of sustainability: environmental, social, and economic, based on the theoretical backgrounds from the literature and former successful sustainable projects. The proposed CPSAS comprises four levels: Level 1, 3 main pillars; Level 2, 8 categories; Level 3, 19 sub-categories; and Level 4, 31 indicators. Different selections of indicators for application in different project phases are suggested according to the prioritization via questionnaire surveys. A procedure for sustainable project management with the proposed CPSAS is suggested to the project management team. Finally, three green building projects and two civil infrastructure construction projects of Taiwan were tested to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed CPSAS. It is concluded that the proposed CPSAS is useful for construction stakeholders to achieve sustainability more effectively during the execution of a construction project.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su10051523</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2018-05, Vol.10 (5), p.1523 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2108740444 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Construction Construction industry Contractors Evaluation Feasibility studies Green buildings Green development Indicators Project engineering Project management Sustainability Systems analysis |
title | Measuring the Sustainability of Construction Projects throughout Their Lifecycle: A Taiwan Lesson |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A23%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20Sustainability%20of%20Construction%20Projects%20throughout%20Their%20Lifecycle:%20A%20Taiwan%20Lesson&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Yu,%20Wen-der&rft.date=2018-05-11&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1523&rft.pages=1523-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su10051523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2108740444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108740444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |