Merger Guidelines and the Limits of Our Understanding

The merger guidelines have evolved from a structural standard for determining the legality of mergers to an open-ended evaluation that attempts to predict whether some specific harm to competition is likely. These efforts have been unsuccessful; moreover, mergers generally contribute no positive eco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of industrial organization 2018-11, Vol.53 (3), p.477-506
1. Verfasser: Carstensen, Peter C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 506
container_issue 3
container_start_page 477
container_title Review of industrial organization
container_volume 53
creator Carstensen, Peter C.
description The merger guidelines have evolved from a structural standard for determining the legality of mergers to an open-ended evaluation that attempts to predict whether some specific harm to competition is likely. These efforts have been unsuccessful; moreover, mergers generally contribute no positive economic gain. Blocking mergers that may have little or no adverse effect on competition will not cause significant economic harm; but the failure to interdict mergers that do cause harm imposes significant costs on the economy. Merger enforcement policy should return to the structural method of the 1968 Guidelines as well as impose stricter structural standards.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11151-018-9661-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2108029621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48723010</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48723010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d4357673c215097bda0096f1c77ca25305f55c1c1b76b75887eadb66f95a78c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_wIUw4Dr6XtJ8LaVoFSrdWHAXMplMndLO1GRm4b83ZUR3rt7i3XMvHEKuEe4QQN0nRBRIATU1UiI1J2SCQnGqUMIpmYDWhhqu38_JRUpbgEyJ2YSI1xA3IRaLoanCrmlDKlxbFf1HKJbNvulT0dXFaojFuq1CTH1-Nu3mkpzVbpfC1c-dkvXT49v8mS5Xi5f5w5J6LkRPqxkXSiruGQowqqwcgJE1eqW8Y4KDqIXw6LFUslRCaxVcVUpZG-GU9pJPye3Ye4jd5xBSb7fdENs8aRmCBmYkw5zCMeVjl1IMtT3EZu_il0WwRzt2tGOzHXu0Y01m2MiknG2zgb_m_6CbEdqmvou_KzOtGM9C-TfcQG79</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108029621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Merger Guidelines and the Limits of Our Understanding</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Carstensen, Peter C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carstensen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><description>The merger guidelines have evolved from a structural standard for determining the legality of mergers to an open-ended evaluation that attempts to predict whether some specific harm to competition is likely. These efforts have been unsuccessful; moreover, mergers generally contribute no positive economic gain. Blocking mergers that may have little or no adverse effect on competition will not cause significant economic harm; but the failure to interdict mergers that do cause harm imposes significant costs on the economy. Merger enforcement policy should return to the structural method of the 1968 Guidelines as well as impose stricter structural standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-938X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7160</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11151-018-9661-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers ; Blocking ; Competition ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Enforcement ; Industrial Organization ; Legality ; Mergers ; Microeconomics ; REGULAR PAPERS ; Side effects</subject><ispartof>Review of industrial organization, 2018-11, Vol.53 (3), p.477-506</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Review of Industrial Organization is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d4357673c215097bda0096f1c77ca25305f55c1c1b76b75887eadb66f95a78c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2298-2706</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48723010$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48723010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27849,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carstensen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><title>Merger Guidelines and the Limits of Our Understanding</title><title>Review of industrial organization</title><addtitle>Rev Ind Organ</addtitle><description>The merger guidelines have evolved from a structural standard for determining the legality of mergers to an open-ended evaluation that attempts to predict whether some specific harm to competition is likely. These efforts have been unsuccessful; moreover, mergers generally contribute no positive economic gain. Blocking mergers that may have little or no adverse effect on competition will not cause significant economic harm; but the failure to interdict mergers that do cause harm imposes significant costs on the economy. Merger enforcement policy should return to the structural method of the 1968 Guidelines as well as impose stricter structural standards.</description><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</subject><subject>Blocking</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Legality</subject><subject>Mergers</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>REGULAR PAPERS</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><issn>0889-938X</issn><issn>1573-7160</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_wIUw4Dr6XtJ8LaVoFSrdWHAXMplMndLO1GRm4b83ZUR3rt7i3XMvHEKuEe4QQN0nRBRIATU1UiI1J2SCQnGqUMIpmYDWhhqu38_JRUpbgEyJ2YSI1xA3IRaLoanCrmlDKlxbFf1HKJbNvulT0dXFaojFuq1CTH1-Nu3mkpzVbpfC1c-dkvXT49v8mS5Xi5f5w5J6LkRPqxkXSiruGQowqqwcgJE1eqW8Y4KDqIXw6LFUslRCaxVcVUpZG-GU9pJPye3Ye4jd5xBSb7fdENs8aRmCBmYkw5zCMeVjl1IMtT3EZu_il0WwRzt2tGOzHXu0Y01m2MiknG2zgb_m_6CbEdqmvou_KzOtGM9C-TfcQG79</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Carstensen, Peter C.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-2706</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Merger Guidelines and the Limits of Our Understanding</title><author>Carstensen, Peter C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d4357673c215097bda0096f1c77ca25305f55c1c1b76b75887eadb66f95a78c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</topic><topic>Blocking</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Legality</topic><topic>Mergers</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>REGULAR PAPERS</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carstensen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Review of industrial organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carstensen, Peter C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Merger Guidelines and the Limits of Our Understanding</atitle><jtitle>Review of industrial organization</jtitle><stitle>Rev Ind Organ</stitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>477-506</pages><issn>0889-938X</issn><eissn>1573-7160</eissn><abstract>The merger guidelines have evolved from a structural standard for determining the legality of mergers to an open-ended evaluation that attempts to predict whether some specific harm to competition is likely. These efforts have been unsuccessful; moreover, mergers generally contribute no positive economic gain. Blocking mergers that may have little or no adverse effect on competition will not cause significant economic harm; but the failure to interdict mergers that do cause harm imposes significant costs on the economy. Merger enforcement policy should return to the structural method of the 1968 Guidelines as well as impose stricter structural standards.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11151-018-9661-9</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-2706</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-938X
ispartof Review of industrial organization, 2018-11, Vol.53 (3), p.477-506
issn 0889-938X
1573-7160
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2108029621
source PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acquisitions & mergers
Blocking
Competition
Economics
Economics and Finance
Enforcement
Industrial Organization
Legality
Mergers
Microeconomics
REGULAR PAPERS
Side effects
title Merger Guidelines and the Limits of Our Understanding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A49%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Merger%20Guidelines%20and%20the%20Limits%20of%20Our%20Understanding&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20industrial%20organization&rft.au=Carstensen,%20Peter%20C.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=477-506&rft.issn=0889-938X&rft.eissn=1573-7160&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11151-018-9661-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48723010%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108029621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48723010&rfr_iscdi=true