GOODBYE TO THE CONTEMPORANEOUS OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT
The General Assembly should amend the Delaware General Corporation Law to eliminate the contemporaneous ownership requirement for derivative actions from section 327. The rule is incoherent and ill-suited to each of the purposes advanced to support it. The rule is also unnecessary, as defendants and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Delaware journal of corporate law 2008-09, Vol.33 (3), p.673 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 673 |
| container_title | The Delaware journal of corporate law |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Laster, J Travis |
| description | The General Assembly should amend the Delaware General Corporation Law to eliminate the contemporaneous ownership requirement for derivative actions from section 327. The rule is incoherent and ill-suited to each of the purposes advanced to support it. The rule is also unnecessary, as defendants and the Delaware courts have ample alternative avenues available for dealing with meritless claims. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_210684818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1609726591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p588-42565ebc6619d3649f0ee4ae23597ec968d5af1e88ebd4051c20ada825f9526d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzU9PwjAYgPHGSOIEv0Pjvcnbv2uPOCtbAiuOEuOJlPXdgRhBJt9fEjw9t-d3RwrulGSllPyeFCCNYk45eCCP43gAgLLkqiBqEcLry6enMdBYe1qFNvrVOnTz1ofthoaP1nebulnTzr9vm86vfBtnZDKkrxGf_jsl8c3HqmbLsGiq-ZKdtLVMCW007ntjuMtX3g2AqBIKqV2JvTM26zRwtBb3WYHmvYCUkxV6cFqYLKfk-bY9nY8_Fxx_d4fj5fx9FXeCg7HKciv_AFfNPFY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210684818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GOODBYE TO THE CONTEMPORANEOUS OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Laster, J Travis</creator><creatorcontrib>Laster, J Travis</creatorcontrib><description>The General Assembly should amend the Delaware General Corporation Law to eliminate the contemporaneous ownership requirement for derivative actions from section 327. The rule is incoherent and ill-suited to each of the purposes advanced to support it. The rule is also unnecessary, as defendants and the Delaware courts have ample alternative avenues available for dealing with meritless claims. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-9490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wilmington: Widener University School of Law</publisher><subject>Amendments ; Fiduciaries ; Ownership ; Requirements ; State court decisions ; State laws</subject><ispartof>The Delaware journal of corporate law, 2008-09, Vol.33 (3), p.673</ispartof><rights>Copyright Widener University School of Law 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laster, J Travis</creatorcontrib><title>GOODBYE TO THE CONTEMPORANEOUS OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT</title><title>The Delaware journal of corporate law</title><description>The General Assembly should amend the Delaware General Corporation Law to eliminate the contemporaneous ownership requirement for derivative actions from section 327. The rule is incoherent and ill-suited to each of the purposes advanced to support it. The rule is also unnecessary, as defendants and the Delaware courts have ample alternative avenues available for dealing with meritless claims. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Amendments</subject><subject>Fiduciaries</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Requirements</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>State laws</subject><issn>0364-9490</issn><issn>1943-7331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotzU9PwjAYgPHGSOIEv0Pjvcnbv2uPOCtbAiuOEuOJlPXdgRhBJt9fEjw9t-d3RwrulGSllPyeFCCNYk45eCCP43gAgLLkqiBqEcLry6enMdBYe1qFNvrVOnTz1ofthoaP1nebulnTzr9vm86vfBtnZDKkrxGf_jsl8c3HqmbLsGiq-ZKdtLVMCW007ntjuMtX3g2AqBIKqV2JvTM26zRwtBb3WYHmvYCUkxV6cFqYLKfk-bY9nY8_Fxx_d4fj5fx9FXeCg7HKciv_AFfNPFY</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Laster, J Travis</creator><general>Widener University School of Law</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>GOODBYE TO THE CONTEMPORANEOUS OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT</title><author>Laster, J Travis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p588-42565ebc6619d3649f0ee4ae23597ec968d5af1e88ebd4051c20ada825f9526d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Amendments</topic><topic>Fiduciaries</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Requirements</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>State laws</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laster, J Travis</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Delaware journal of corporate law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laster, J Travis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GOODBYE TO THE CONTEMPORANEOUS OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT</atitle><jtitle>The Delaware journal of corporate law</jtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>673</spage><pages>673-</pages><issn>0364-9490</issn><eissn>1943-7331</eissn><abstract>The General Assembly should amend the Delaware General Corporation Law to eliminate the contemporaneous ownership requirement for derivative actions from section 327. The rule is incoherent and ill-suited to each of the purposes advanced to support it. The rule is also unnecessary, as defendants and the Delaware courts have ample alternative avenues available for dealing with meritless claims. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Wilmington</cop><pub>Widener University School of Law</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0364-9490 |
| ispartof | The Delaware journal of corporate law, 2008-09, Vol.33 (3), p.673 |
| issn | 0364-9490 1943-7331 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_210684818 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Amendments Fiduciaries Ownership Requirements State court decisions State laws |
| title | GOODBYE TO THE CONTEMPORANEOUS OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A16%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GOODBYE%20TO%20THE%20CONTEMPORANEOUS%20OWNERSHIP%20REQUIREMENT&rft.jtitle=The%20Delaware%20journal%20of%20corporate%20law&rft.au=Laster,%20J%20Travis&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=673&rft.pages=673-&rft.issn=0364-9490&rft.eissn=1943-7331&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1609726591%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210684818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |