Debt, Information, and Illiquidity

We analyze the empirical determinants of liquidity in debt markets in light of predictions stemming from debt-based information theories. We conduct a battery of tests confirming predictions of asymmetric information models of bond liquidity, including those that predict a``hockey-stick" relati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NBER Working Paper Series 2018-09, p.25054
Hauptverfasser: Benmelech, Efraim, Bergman, Nittai K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 25054
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Benmelech, Efraim
Bergman, Nittai K
description We analyze the empirical determinants of liquidity in debt markets in light of predictions stemming from debt-based information theories. We conduct a battery of tests confirming predictions of asymmetric information models of bond liquidity, including those that predict a``hockey-stick" relation between bond liquidity and underlying fundamental value. When debt is deep in the money, it becomes informationally insensitive and more liquid. In contrast, when firm value deteriorates towards the left tail, the value of debt becomes informationally sensitive and less liquid. We alleviate endogeneity concerns using exogenous variation in firm value that is plausibly not driven by bond liquidity. Our results shed new empirical light on the determination of liquidity in debt markets.
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w25054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2105077925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w25054</nber_id><sourcerecordid>2105077925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-11c079678257ad331bea0fa17262774175d8c8f684e802f13cfc8ede33ef5aaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90MFLwzAYBfAcFJyb_gGeil7X-SVf03w9ypxaGHjRc0nTBDK6dEtbZP-9hYqnd_nxHjzG7jlsECl__hESZHbFFkAFpaJAdcNu-_4AIIiAL9jjq62HdVIG18WjHnwX1okOTVK2rT-PvvHDZcWunW57e_eXS_b9tvvafqT7z_dy-7JPDYdCppwbUEWuSEilG0ReWw1OcyVyoVTGlWzIkMspswTCcTTOkG0sonVSa4dL9jT3nmJ3Hm0_VIdujGGarAQHCUoVQk4qmZU1XfB9dYr-qOOlmnaIkDhmE3mYSaht_AfzFfgLiidOqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2105077925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Debt, Information, and Illiquidity</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Benmelech, Efraim ; Bergman, Nittai K</creator><creatorcontrib>Benmelech, Efraim ; Bergman, Nittai K</creatorcontrib><description>We analyze the empirical determinants of liquidity in debt markets in light of predictions stemming from debt-based information theories. We conduct a battery of tests confirming predictions of asymmetric information models of bond liquidity, including those that predict a``hockey-stick" relation between bond liquidity and underlying fundamental value. When debt is deep in the money, it becomes informationally insensitive and more liquid. In contrast, when firm value deteriorates towards the left tail, the value of debt becomes informationally sensitive and less liquid. We alleviate endogeneity concerns using exogenous variation in firm value that is plausibly not driven by bond liquidity. Our results shed new empirical light on the determination of liquidity in debt markets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w25054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Asset Pricing ; Corporate Finance ; Default ; Economic Fluctuations and Growth ; Economic models ; Economics ; Information theory ; Monetary Economics</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2018-09, p.25054</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Sep 2018</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-11c079678257ad331bea0fa17262774175d8c8f684e802f13cfc8ede33ef5aaf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benmelech, Efraim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Nittai K</creatorcontrib><title>Debt, Information, and Illiquidity</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>We analyze the empirical determinants of liquidity in debt markets in light of predictions stemming from debt-based information theories. We conduct a battery of tests confirming predictions of asymmetric information models of bond liquidity, including those that predict a``hockey-stick" relation between bond liquidity and underlying fundamental value. When debt is deep in the money, it becomes informationally insensitive and more liquid. In contrast, when firm value deteriorates towards the left tail, the value of debt becomes informationally sensitive and less liquid. We alleviate endogeneity concerns using exogenous variation in firm value that is plausibly not driven by bond liquidity. Our results shed new empirical light on the determination of liquidity in debt markets.</description><subject>Asset Pricing</subject><subject>Corporate Finance</subject><subject>Default</subject><subject>Economic Fluctuations and Growth</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Information theory</subject><subject>Monetary Economics</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo90MFLwzAYBfAcFJyb_gGeil7X-SVf03w9ypxaGHjRc0nTBDK6dEtbZP-9hYqnd_nxHjzG7jlsECl__hESZHbFFkAFpaJAdcNu-_4AIIiAL9jjq62HdVIG18WjHnwX1okOTVK2rT-PvvHDZcWunW57e_eXS_b9tvvafqT7z_dy-7JPDYdCppwbUEWuSEilG0ReWw1OcyVyoVTGlWzIkMspswTCcTTOkG0sonVSa4dL9jT3nmJ3Hm0_VIdujGGarAQHCUoVQk4qmZU1XfB9dYr-qOOlmnaIkDhmE3mYSaht_AfzFfgLiidOqg</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Benmelech, Efraim</creator><creator>Bergman, Nittai K</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Debt, Information, and Illiquidity</title><author>Benmelech, Efraim ; Bergman, Nittai K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-11c079678257ad331bea0fa17262774175d8c8f684e802f13cfc8ede33ef5aaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asset Pricing</topic><topic>Corporate Finance</topic><topic>Default</topic><topic>Economic Fluctuations and Growth</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Information theory</topic><topic>Monetary Economics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benmelech, Efraim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Nittai K</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benmelech, Efraim</au><au>Bergman, Nittai K</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Debt, Information, and Illiquidity</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><spage>25054</spage><pages>25054-</pages><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>We analyze the empirical determinants of liquidity in debt markets in light of predictions stemming from debt-based information theories. We conduct a battery of tests confirming predictions of asymmetric information models of bond liquidity, including those that predict a``hockey-stick" relation between bond liquidity and underlying fundamental value. When debt is deep in the money, it becomes informationally insensitive and more liquid. In contrast, when firm value deteriorates towards the left tail, the value of debt becomes informationally sensitive and less liquid. We alleviate endogeneity concerns using exogenous variation in firm value that is plausibly not driven by bond liquidity. Our results shed new empirical light on the determination of liquidity in debt markets.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, Mass</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w25054</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2018-09, p.25054
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2105077925
source National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Asset Pricing
Corporate Finance
Default
Economic Fluctuations and Growth
Economic models
Economics
Information theory
Monetary Economics
title Debt, Information, and Illiquidity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T02%3A22%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Debt,%20Information,%20and%20Illiquidity&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Benmelech,%20Efraim&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.spage=25054&rft.pages=25054-&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w25054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E2105077925%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2105077925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w25054&rfr_iscdi=true