Comparative life cycle assessment of LED lighting products

The use of LED lighting products is growing rapidly. However, there are no in-depth, updated studies that show how to assess and compare these products for eco-design purposes. This research aims to inform eco-design by assessing and comparing the environmental impact of a new LED eco-lighting produ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001) England : 2001), 2018-10, Vol.50 (6), p.801-826
Hauptverfasser: Casamayor, JL, Su, D, Ren, Z
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 826
container_issue 6
container_start_page 801
container_title Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001)
container_volume 50
creator Casamayor, JL
Su, D
Ren, Z
description The use of LED lighting products is growing rapidly. However, there are no in-depth, updated studies that show how to assess and compare these products for eco-design purposes. This research aims to inform eco-design by assessing and comparing the environmental impact of a new LED eco-lighting product with an existing LED lighting product. A cradle to grave life cycle assessment is conducted. The system boundaries include all product life cycle stages, except the maintenance of the luminaires and the manufacturing of the packaging. A novel functional unit is defined for the assessment, which is more suitable for LED lighting products. Six scenarios are considered, including three probable useful lives of the luminaires (1000, 15,000 and 40,000 hours) and two end of life options (domestic bin and recycling centre). The life cycle assessment results reveal that the new eco-lighting product has about 60% less environmental impact than the existing lighting product in all scenarios. The life cycle stages with the biggest impacts are, in decreasing order: (1) use, (2) manufacturing, (3) end of life and (4) transport. Recommendations for the eco-design of LED lighting products are proposed, and the challenges in applying life cycle assessment for eco-design are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1477153517708597
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2104008254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1477153517708597</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2104008254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-4ee3a8a8c30315dfb633185e61f6fc78b6a3a7fb410e0d41bb0a7f2e5d331f483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LxDAQDaLgunr3WPBcnWmSJutN1vUDFrzouaTppHbpbmvSFfbfm9IFQfA0b-Z9DDzGrhFuEZW6Q6EUSi4jBi0X6oTNxlMKC65Pj3jkz9lFCBsA1MD5jN0vu21vvBmab0raxlFiD7alxIRAIWxpNySdS9arx0jWn0Ozq5Ped9XeDuGSnTnTBro6zjn7eFq9L1_S9dvz6_JhnVoBYkgFETfaaMuBo6xcmXOOWlKOLndW6TI33ChXCgSCSmBZQlwzklXUOaH5nN1MufHx157CUGy6vd_Fl0WGIAB0JkVUwaSyvgvBkyt632yNPxQIxdhQ8behaEknSzA1_Yb-q_8BwolkhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2104008254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative life cycle assessment of LED lighting products</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Casamayor, JL ; Su, D ; Ren, Z</creator><creatorcontrib>Casamayor, JL ; Su, D ; Ren, Z</creatorcontrib><description>The use of LED lighting products is growing rapidly. However, there are no in-depth, updated studies that show how to assess and compare these products for eco-design purposes. This research aims to inform eco-design by assessing and comparing the environmental impact of a new LED eco-lighting product with an existing LED lighting product. A cradle to grave life cycle assessment is conducted. The system boundaries include all product life cycle stages, except the maintenance of the luminaires and the manufacturing of the packaging. A novel functional unit is defined for the assessment, which is more suitable for LED lighting products. Six scenarios are considered, including three probable useful lives of the luminaires (1000, 15,000 and 40,000 hours) and two end of life options (domestic bin and recycling centre). The life cycle assessment results reveal that the new eco-lighting product has about 60% less environmental impact than the existing lighting product in all scenarios. The life cycle stages with the biggest impacts are, in decreasing order: (1) use, (2) manufacturing, (3) end of life and (4) transport. Recommendations for the eco-design of LED lighting products are proposed, and the challenges in applying life cycle assessment for eco-design are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-1535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1477153517708597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Environmental impact ; Light emitting diodes ; Lighting</subject><ispartof>Lighting research &amp; technology (London, England : 2001), 2018-10, Vol.50 (6), p.801-826</ispartof><rights>The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-4ee3a8a8c30315dfb633185e61f6fc78b6a3a7fb410e0d41bb0a7f2e5d331f483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-4ee3a8a8c30315dfb633185e61f6fc78b6a3a7fb410e0d41bb0a7f2e5d331f483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477153517708597$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477153517708597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,43612,43613</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casamayor, JL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Z</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative life cycle assessment of LED lighting products</title><title>Lighting research &amp; technology (London, England : 2001)</title><description>The use of LED lighting products is growing rapidly. However, there are no in-depth, updated studies that show how to assess and compare these products for eco-design purposes. This research aims to inform eco-design by assessing and comparing the environmental impact of a new LED eco-lighting product with an existing LED lighting product. A cradle to grave life cycle assessment is conducted. The system boundaries include all product life cycle stages, except the maintenance of the luminaires and the manufacturing of the packaging. A novel functional unit is defined for the assessment, which is more suitable for LED lighting products. Six scenarios are considered, including three probable useful lives of the luminaires (1000, 15,000 and 40,000 hours) and two end of life options (domestic bin and recycling centre). The life cycle assessment results reveal that the new eco-lighting product has about 60% less environmental impact than the existing lighting product in all scenarios. The life cycle stages with the biggest impacts are, in decreasing order: (1) use, (2) manufacturing, (3) end of life and (4) transport. Recommendations for the eco-design of LED lighting products are proposed, and the challenges in applying life cycle assessment for eco-design are discussed.</description><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Light emitting diodes</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><issn>1477-1535</issn><issn>1477-0938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1LxDAQDaLgunr3WPBcnWmSJutN1vUDFrzouaTppHbpbmvSFfbfm9IFQfA0b-Z9DDzGrhFuEZW6Q6EUSi4jBi0X6oTNxlMKC65Pj3jkz9lFCBsA1MD5jN0vu21vvBmab0raxlFiD7alxIRAIWxpNySdS9arx0jWn0Ozq5Ped9XeDuGSnTnTBro6zjn7eFq9L1_S9dvz6_JhnVoBYkgFETfaaMuBo6xcmXOOWlKOLndW6TI33ChXCgSCSmBZQlwzklXUOaH5nN1MufHx157CUGy6vd_Fl0WGIAB0JkVUwaSyvgvBkyt632yNPxQIxdhQ8behaEknSzA1_Yb-q_8BwolkhQ</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Casamayor, JL</creator><creator>Su, D</creator><creator>Ren, Z</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Comparative life cycle assessment of LED lighting products</title><author>Casamayor, JL ; Su, D ; Ren, Z</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-4ee3a8a8c30315dfb633185e61f6fc78b6a3a7fb410e0d41bb0a7f2e5d331f483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Light emitting diodes</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casamayor, JL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Z</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Lighting research &amp; technology (London, England : 2001)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casamayor, JL</au><au>Su, D</au><au>Ren, Z</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative life cycle assessment of LED lighting products</atitle><jtitle>Lighting research &amp; technology (London, England : 2001)</jtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>801</spage><epage>826</epage><pages>801-826</pages><issn>1477-1535</issn><eissn>1477-0938</eissn><abstract>The use of LED lighting products is growing rapidly. However, there are no in-depth, updated studies that show how to assess and compare these products for eco-design purposes. This research aims to inform eco-design by assessing and comparing the environmental impact of a new LED eco-lighting product with an existing LED lighting product. A cradle to grave life cycle assessment is conducted. The system boundaries include all product life cycle stages, except the maintenance of the luminaires and the manufacturing of the packaging. A novel functional unit is defined for the assessment, which is more suitable for LED lighting products. Six scenarios are considered, including three probable useful lives of the luminaires (1000, 15,000 and 40,000 hours) and two end of life options (domestic bin and recycling centre). The life cycle assessment results reveal that the new eco-lighting product has about 60% less environmental impact than the existing lighting product in all scenarios. The life cycle stages with the biggest impacts are, in decreasing order: (1) use, (2) manufacturing, (3) end of life and (4) transport. Recommendations for the eco-design of LED lighting products are proposed, and the challenges in applying life cycle assessment for eco-design are discussed.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1477153517708597</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-1535
ispartof Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001), 2018-10, Vol.50 (6), p.801-826
issn 1477-1535
1477-0938
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2104008254
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Environmental impact
Light emitting diodes
Lighting
title Comparative life cycle assessment of LED lighting products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T04%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20life%20cycle%20assessment%20of%20LED%20lighting%20products&rft.jtitle=Lighting%20research%20&%20technology%20(London,%20England%20:%202001)&rft.au=Casamayor,%20JL&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=801&rft.epage=826&rft.pages=801-826&rft.issn=1477-1535&rft.eissn=1477-0938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1477153517708597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2104008254%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2104008254&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1477153517708597&rfr_iscdi=true