Exposure assessment of 17-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe

An evaluation of measured and predicted concentrations of 17α-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe was conducted to develop expected long-term exposure concentrations for this compound. Measured environmental concentrations (MECs) in surface waters were identified from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2009-12, Vol.28 (12), p.2725-2732
Hauptverfasser: Hannah, Robert, D'Aco, Vincent J, Anderson, Paul D, Buzby, Mary E, Caldwell, Daniel J, Cunningham, Virginia L, Ericson, Jon F, Johnson, Andrew C, Parke, Neil J, Samuelian, John H, Sumpter, John P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2732
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2725
container_title Environmental toxicology and chemistry
container_volume 28
creator Hannah, Robert
D'Aco, Vincent J
Anderson, Paul D
Buzby, Mary E
Caldwell, Daniel J
Cunningham, Virginia L
Ericson, Jon F
Johnson, Andrew C
Parke, Neil J
Samuelian, John H
Sumpter, John P
description An evaluation of measured and predicted concentrations of 17α-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe was conducted to develop expected long-term exposure concentrations for this compound. Measured environmental concentrations (MECs) in surface waters were identified from the literature. Predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) were generated for European and U.S. watersheds using the GREAT-ER and PhATE models, respectively. The majority of MECs are nondetect and generally consistent with model PECs and conservative mass balance calculations. However, the highest MECs are not consistent with concentrations derived from conservative (worst-case) mass balance estimates or model PECs. A review of analytical methods suggests that tandem or high-resolution mass spectrometry methods with extract cleanup result in lower detection limits and lower reported concentrations consistent with model predictions and bounding estimates. Based on model results using PhATE and GREAT-ER, the 90th-percentile low-flow PECs in surface water are approximately 0.2 and 0.3 ng/L for the United States and Europe, respectively. These levels represent conservative estimates of long-term exposure that can be used for risk assessment purposes. Our analysis also indicates that average concentrations are one to two orders of magnitude lower than these 90th-percentile estimates. Higher reported concentrations (e.g., greater than the 99th-percentile PEC of approximately 1 ng/L) could result from methodological problems or unusual environmental circumstances; however, such concentrations are not representative of levels generally found in the environment, warrant special scrutiny, and are not appropriate for use in risk assessments of long-term exposures.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_210354655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1926369351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f515-6ad92d1dc28c8d4976b3fcf2365ac096d9fabbf323e419b1505fc575c180cdd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzktLxDAUBeAgCtbR32BwX8ijeS1lqA8YcDEzO6GkeTgdalKTFPXf22FcXTh8nHMvQIUZI7XkWF6CCgmKakG4vAY3OR8RwlwpVYH39meKeU4O6pxdzp8uFBg9xKJ25TCE39HlkrQd4giHABfptXHwWxeX8gmWg4P7MBRn4bYsaYY6WNjOKU7uFlx5PWZ3939XYPfU7tYv9ebt-XX9uKk9w6zm2ipisTVEGmkbJXhPvfGEcqYNUtwqr_veU0Jdg1WPGWLeMMEMlshYK-gKPJxrpxS_5uXf7hjnFJbFjmBEWcMZW9D9GXkdO_2RhtzttwRhirAgpFGE_gGFI1l6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210354655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exposure assessment of 17-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hannah, Robert ; D'Aco, Vincent J ; Anderson, Paul D ; Buzby, Mary E ; Caldwell, Daniel J ; Cunningham, Virginia L ; Ericson, Jon F ; Johnson, Andrew C ; Parke, Neil J ; Samuelian, John H ; Sumpter, John P</creator><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Robert ; D'Aco, Vincent J ; Anderson, Paul D ; Buzby, Mary E ; Caldwell, Daniel J ; Cunningham, Virginia L ; Ericson, Jon F ; Johnson, Andrew C ; Parke, Neil J ; Samuelian, John H ; Sumpter, John P</creatorcontrib><description>An evaluation of measured and predicted concentrations of 17α-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe was conducted to develop expected long-term exposure concentrations for this compound. Measured environmental concentrations (MECs) in surface waters were identified from the literature. Predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) were generated for European and U.S. watersheds using the GREAT-ER and PhATE models, respectively. The majority of MECs are nondetect and generally consistent with model PECs and conservative mass balance calculations. However, the highest MECs are not consistent with concentrations derived from conservative (worst-case) mass balance estimates or model PECs. A review of analytical methods suggests that tandem or high-resolution mass spectrometry methods with extract cleanup result in lower detection limits and lower reported concentrations consistent with model predictions and bounding estimates. Based on model results using PhATE and GREAT-ER, the 90th-percentile low-flow PECs in surface water are approximately 0.2 and 0.3 ng/L for the United States and Europe, respectively. These levels represent conservative estimates of long-term exposure that can be used for risk assessment purposes. Our analysis also indicates that average concentrations are one to two orders of magnitude lower than these 90th-percentile estimates. Higher reported concentrations (e.g., greater than the 99th-percentile PEC of approximately 1 ng/L) could result from methodological problems or unusual environmental circumstances; however, such concentrations are not representative of levels generally found in the environment, warrant special scrutiny, and are not appropriate for use in risk assessments of long-term exposures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>17-ethinylestradiol ; Aquatic ecology ; contraceptives ; Detection limits ; endocrine-disrupting chemicals ; environmental fate ; Environmental impact ; environmental models ; estimation ; literature reviews ; Low flow ; Mass spectrometry ; Risk assessment ; Surface water ; wastewater ; Water pollution ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2009-12, Vol.28 (12), p.2725-2732</ispartof><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Dec 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Aco, Vincent J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzby, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Virginia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ericson, Jon F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parke, Neil J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelian, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumpter, John P</creatorcontrib><title>Exposure assessment of 17-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><description>An evaluation of measured and predicted concentrations of 17α-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe was conducted to develop expected long-term exposure concentrations for this compound. Measured environmental concentrations (MECs) in surface waters were identified from the literature. Predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) were generated for European and U.S. watersheds using the GREAT-ER and PhATE models, respectively. The majority of MECs are nondetect and generally consistent with model PECs and conservative mass balance calculations. However, the highest MECs are not consistent with concentrations derived from conservative (worst-case) mass balance estimates or model PECs. A review of analytical methods suggests that tandem or high-resolution mass spectrometry methods with extract cleanup result in lower detection limits and lower reported concentrations consistent with model predictions and bounding estimates. Based on model results using PhATE and GREAT-ER, the 90th-percentile low-flow PECs in surface water are approximately 0.2 and 0.3 ng/L for the United States and Europe, respectively. These levels represent conservative estimates of long-term exposure that can be used for risk assessment purposes. Our analysis also indicates that average concentrations are one to two orders of magnitude lower than these 90th-percentile estimates. Higher reported concentrations (e.g., greater than the 99th-percentile PEC of approximately 1 ng/L) could result from methodological problems or unusual environmental circumstances; however, such concentrations are not representative of levels generally found in the environment, warrant special scrutiny, and are not appropriate for use in risk assessments of long-term exposures.</description><subject>17-ethinylestradiol</subject><subject>Aquatic ecology</subject><subject>contraceptives</subject><subject>Detection limits</subject><subject>endocrine-disrupting chemicals</subject><subject>environmental fate</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>environmental models</subject><subject>estimation</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>Low flow</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>wastewater</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotzktLxDAUBeAgCtbR32BwX8ijeS1lqA8YcDEzO6GkeTgdalKTFPXf22FcXTh8nHMvQIUZI7XkWF6CCgmKakG4vAY3OR8RwlwpVYH39meKeU4O6pxdzp8uFBg9xKJ25TCE39HlkrQd4giHABfptXHwWxeX8gmWg4P7MBRn4bYsaYY6WNjOKU7uFlx5PWZ3939XYPfU7tYv9ebt-XX9uKk9w6zm2ipisTVEGmkbJXhPvfGEcqYNUtwqr_veU0Jdg1WPGWLeMMEMlshYK-gKPJxrpxS_5uXf7hjnFJbFjmBEWcMZW9D9GXkdO_2RhtzttwRhirAgpFGE_gGFI1l6</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Hannah, Robert</creator><creator>D'Aco, Vincent J</creator><creator>Anderson, Paul D</creator><creator>Buzby, Mary E</creator><creator>Caldwell, Daniel J</creator><creator>Cunningham, Virginia L</creator><creator>Ericson, Jon F</creator><creator>Johnson, Andrew C</creator><creator>Parke, Neil J</creator><creator>Samuelian, John H</creator><creator>Sumpter, John P</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Exposure assessment of 17-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe</title><author>Hannah, Robert ; D'Aco, Vincent J ; Anderson, Paul D ; Buzby, Mary E ; Caldwell, Daniel J ; Cunningham, Virginia L ; Ericson, Jon F ; Johnson, Andrew C ; Parke, Neil J ; Samuelian, John H ; Sumpter, John P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f515-6ad92d1dc28c8d4976b3fcf2365ac096d9fabbf323e419b1505fc575c180cdd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>17-ethinylestradiol</topic><topic>Aquatic ecology</topic><topic>contraceptives</topic><topic>Detection limits</topic><topic>endocrine-disrupting chemicals</topic><topic>environmental fate</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>environmental models</topic><topic>estimation</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>Low flow</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>wastewater</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Aco, Vincent J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzby, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Virginia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ericson, Jon F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parke, Neil J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelian, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumpter, John P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hannah, Robert</au><au>D'Aco, Vincent J</au><au>Anderson, Paul D</au><au>Buzby, Mary E</au><au>Caldwell, Daniel J</au><au>Cunningham, Virginia L</au><au>Ericson, Jon F</au><au>Johnson, Andrew C</au><au>Parke, Neil J</au><au>Samuelian, John H</au><au>Sumpter, John P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exposure assessment of 17-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2725</spage><epage>2732</epage><pages>2725-2732</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><abstract>An evaluation of measured and predicted concentrations of 17α-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe was conducted to develop expected long-term exposure concentrations for this compound. Measured environmental concentrations (MECs) in surface waters were identified from the literature. Predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) were generated for European and U.S. watersheds using the GREAT-ER and PhATE models, respectively. The majority of MECs are nondetect and generally consistent with model PECs and conservative mass balance calculations. However, the highest MECs are not consistent with concentrations derived from conservative (worst-case) mass balance estimates or model PECs. A review of analytical methods suggests that tandem or high-resolution mass spectrometry methods with extract cleanup result in lower detection limits and lower reported concentrations consistent with model predictions and bounding estimates. Based on model results using PhATE and GREAT-ER, the 90th-percentile low-flow PECs in surface water are approximately 0.2 and 0.3 ng/L for the United States and Europe, respectively. These levels represent conservative estimates of long-term exposure that can be used for risk assessment purposes. Our analysis also indicates that average concentrations are one to two orders of magnitude lower than these 90th-percentile estimates. Higher reported concentrations (e.g., greater than the 99th-percentile PEC of approximately 1 ng/L) could result from methodological problems or unusual environmental circumstances; however, such concentrations are not representative of levels generally found in the environment, warrant special scrutiny, and are not appropriate for use in risk assessments of long-term exposures.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-7268
ispartof Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2009-12, Vol.28 (12), p.2725-2732
issn 0730-7268
1552-8618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_210354655
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 17-ethinylestradiol
Aquatic ecology
contraceptives
Detection limits
endocrine-disrupting chemicals
environmental fate
Environmental impact
environmental models
estimation
literature reviews
Low flow
Mass spectrometry
Risk assessment
Surface water
wastewater
Water pollution
watersheds
title Exposure assessment of 17-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T05%3A42%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exposure%20assessment%20of%2017-ethinylestradiol%20in%20surface%20waters%20of%20the%20United%20States%20and%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Hannah,%20Robert&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2725&rft.epage=2732&rft.pages=2725-2732&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_fao_a%3E1926369351%3C/proquest_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210354655&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true