Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands

Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Freshwater biology 2018-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1250-1259
Hauptverfasser: Fritz, Kelley A., Whiles, Matt R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1259
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1250
container_title Freshwater biology
container_volume 63
creator Fritz, Kelley A.
Whiles, Matt R.
description Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or emigration of juveniles to adult habitats. We quantified net nutrient fluxes associated with amphibian migrations across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of eight temporary ponds in Illinois, USA. We measured carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) subsidies from terrestrial environments to ponds, in the form of eggs, and the reciprocal subsidies from ponds to terrestrial environments via juvenile emigration. Juvenile emergence biomass did not follow patterns of egg biomass, as not all species bred successfully in each pond, resulting in variability in the magnitude of nutrient fluxes both across ponds and species. The terrestrial environment was not always the recipient system of net nutrient fluxes. Hydroperiod, trophic interactions and species composition explained some dynamics of N and P subsidies. Anthropogenic alterations that affect amphibian communities, such as habitat fragmentation and conversion for agriculture and urbanisation, could have large‐scale impacts on nutrient fluxes and connectivity of temporary pond–forest systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/fwb.13130
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2102653651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2102653651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-380c4473fb38931d39f0789714bfb9edf09143b747c5b6c3f878be6a2e549d8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AaRmBjSHl8SJ2OpKCBVYgExWnZsi1S51U5UuvURkHjDPgmGsHKWf_nO7UPoGsMMh5rbnZphiimcoAmmaRITRvgpmgCwNE6Awzm68H4DAFnCyQSpRd29l6qUzfHwWRtdyt7oqBl6V5qmj2w1fBgfycK1PsR2kH1ZHA9fvXHO-ADJKlLt0GgZeB-1NupN3bVOun20M30lG-0v0ZmVlTdXfzlFr6v7l-VjvH5-eFou1nFBcg4xzaBgjFOraJZTrGlugWc5x0xZlRttIceMKs54kai0oDbjmTKpJCZhuc4KOkU349zOtdshXCc27eCasFIQDCRNgg4cqNuR-n3JGSs6V9bhXoFB_CgUQaH4VRjY-cjuysrs_wfF6u1u7PgGQNF2FQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2102653651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Fritz, Kelley A. ; Whiles, Matt R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Kelley A. ; Whiles, Matt R.</creatorcontrib><description>Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or emigration of juveniles to adult habitats. We quantified net nutrient fluxes associated with amphibian migrations across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of eight temporary ponds in Illinois, USA. We measured carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) subsidies from terrestrial environments to ponds, in the form of eggs, and the reciprocal subsidies from ponds to terrestrial environments via juvenile emigration. Juvenile emergence biomass did not follow patterns of egg biomass, as not all species bred successfully in each pond, resulting in variability in the magnitude of nutrient fluxes both across ponds and species. The terrestrial environment was not always the recipient system of net nutrient fluxes. Hydroperiod, trophic interactions and species composition explained some dynamics of N and P subsidies. Anthropogenic alterations that affect amphibian communities, such as habitat fragmentation and conversion for agriculture and urbanisation, could have large‐scale impacts on nutrient fluxes and connectivity of temporary pond–forest systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal migration ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic reptiles ; Biomass ; Boundaries ; Dynamics ; Eggs ; Emigration ; energy flux ; Fluxes ; Forces (mechanics) ; Gravity ; Habitat fragmentation ; Human influences ; Interactions ; Intermittent lakes ; Juveniles ; migration ; Migrations ; Mineral nutrients ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient dynamics ; Nutrient transport ; Nutrients ; Phosphorus ; Ponds ; resource subsidy ; Small mammals ; Species composition ; stoichiometry ; Subsidies ; Temporary ponds ; temporary pools ; Terrestrial environments ; Trophic relationships ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2018-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1250-1259</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-380c4473fb38931d39f0789714bfb9edf09143b747c5b6c3f878be6a2e549d8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-380c4473fb38931d39f0789714bfb9edf09143b747c5b6c3f878be6a2e549d8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9773-5905</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffwb.13130$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffwb.13130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Kelley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiles, Matt R.</creatorcontrib><title>Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or emigration of juveniles to adult habitats. We quantified net nutrient fluxes associated with amphibian migrations across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of eight temporary ponds in Illinois, USA. We measured carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) subsidies from terrestrial environments to ponds, in the form of eggs, and the reciprocal subsidies from ponds to terrestrial environments via juvenile emigration. Juvenile emergence biomass did not follow patterns of egg biomass, as not all species bred successfully in each pond, resulting in variability in the magnitude of nutrient fluxes both across ponds and species. The terrestrial environment was not always the recipient system of net nutrient fluxes. Hydroperiod, trophic interactions and species composition explained some dynamics of N and P subsidies. Anthropogenic alterations that affect amphibian communities, such as habitat fragmentation and conversion for agriculture and urbanisation, could have large‐scale impacts on nutrient fluxes and connectivity of temporary pond–forest systems.</description><subject>Animal migration</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>energy flux</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forces (mechanics)</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Interactions</subject><subject>Intermittent lakes</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>migration</subject><subject>Migrations</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Nutrient transport</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>resource subsidy</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>stoichiometry</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Temporary ponds</subject><subject>temporary pools</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Trophic relationships</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AaRmBjSHl8SJ2OpKCBVYgExWnZsi1S51U5UuvURkHjDPgmGsHKWf_nO7UPoGsMMh5rbnZphiimcoAmmaRITRvgpmgCwNE6Awzm68H4DAFnCyQSpRd29l6qUzfHwWRtdyt7oqBl6V5qmj2w1fBgfycK1PsR2kH1ZHA9fvXHO-ADJKlLt0GgZeB-1NupN3bVOun20M30lG-0v0ZmVlTdXfzlFr6v7l-VjvH5-eFou1nFBcg4xzaBgjFOraJZTrGlugWc5x0xZlRttIceMKs54kai0oDbjmTKpJCZhuc4KOkU349zOtdshXCc27eCasFIQDCRNgg4cqNuR-n3JGSs6V9bhXoFB_CgUQaH4VRjY-cjuysrs_wfF6u1u7PgGQNF2FQ</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Fritz, Kelley A.</creator><creator>Whiles, Matt R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-5905</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands</title><author>Fritz, Kelley A. ; Whiles, Matt R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-380c4473fb38931d39f0789714bfb9edf09143b747c5b6c3f878be6a2e549d8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal migration</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>energy flux</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forces (mechanics)</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Interactions</topic><topic>Intermittent lakes</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>migration</topic><topic>Migrations</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Nutrient transport</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>resource subsidy</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>stoichiometry</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Temporary ponds</topic><topic>temporary pools</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Trophic relationships</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Kelley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiles, Matt R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fritz, Kelley A.</au><au>Whiles, Matt R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1250</spage><epage>1259</epage><pages>1250-1259</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><abstract>Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or emigration of juveniles to adult habitats. We quantified net nutrient fluxes associated with amphibian migrations across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of eight temporary ponds in Illinois, USA. We measured carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) subsidies from terrestrial environments to ponds, in the form of eggs, and the reciprocal subsidies from ponds to terrestrial environments via juvenile emigration. Juvenile emergence biomass did not follow patterns of egg biomass, as not all species bred successfully in each pond, resulting in variability in the magnitude of nutrient fluxes both across ponds and species. The terrestrial environment was not always the recipient system of net nutrient fluxes. Hydroperiod, trophic interactions and species composition explained some dynamics of N and P subsidies. Anthropogenic alterations that affect amphibian communities, such as habitat fragmentation and conversion for agriculture and urbanisation, could have large‐scale impacts on nutrient fluxes and connectivity of temporary pond–forest systems.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/fwb.13130</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-5905</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-5070
ispartof Freshwater biology, 2018-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1250-1259
issn 0046-5070
1365-2427
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2102653651
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal migration
Anthropogenic factors
Aquatic reptiles
Biomass
Boundaries
Dynamics
Eggs
Emigration
energy flux
Fluxes
Forces (mechanics)
Gravity
Habitat fragmentation
Human influences
Interactions
Intermittent lakes
Juveniles
migration
Migrations
Mineral nutrients
Nitrogen
Nutrient dynamics
Nutrient transport
Nutrients
Phosphorus
Ponds
resource subsidy
Small mammals
Species composition
stoichiometry
Subsidies
Temporary ponds
temporary pools
Terrestrial environments
Trophic relationships
Urbanization
title Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amphibian%E2%80%90mediated%20nutrient%20fluxes%20across%20aquatic%E2%80%93terrestrial%20boundaries%20of%20temporary%20wetlands&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Fritz,%20Kelley%20A.&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1250&rft.epage=1259&rft.pages=1250-1259&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fwb.13130&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2102653651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2102653651&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true