Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands
Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Freshwater biology 2018-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1250-1259 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1259 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1250 |
container_title | Freshwater biology |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Fritz, Kelley A. Whiles, Matt R. |
description | Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or emigration of juveniles to adult habitats.
We quantified net nutrient fluxes associated with amphibian migrations across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of eight temporary ponds in Illinois, USA. We measured carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) subsidies from terrestrial environments to ponds, in the form of eggs, and the reciprocal subsidies from ponds to terrestrial environments via juvenile emigration.
Juvenile emergence biomass did not follow patterns of egg biomass, as not all species bred successfully in each pond, resulting in variability in the magnitude of nutrient fluxes both across ponds and species.
The terrestrial environment was not always the recipient system of net nutrient fluxes. Hydroperiod, trophic interactions and species composition explained some dynamics of N and P subsidies.
Anthropogenic alterations that affect amphibian communities, such as habitat fragmentation and conversion for agriculture and urbanisation, could have large‐scale impacts on nutrient fluxes and connectivity of temporary pond–forest systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/fwb.13130 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2102653651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2102653651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-380c4473fb38931d39f0789714bfb9edf09143b747c5b6c3f878be6a2e549d8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AaRmBjSHl8SJ2OpKCBVYgExWnZsi1S51U5UuvURkHjDPgmGsHKWf_nO7UPoGsMMh5rbnZphiimcoAmmaRITRvgpmgCwNE6Awzm68H4DAFnCyQSpRd29l6qUzfHwWRtdyt7oqBl6V5qmj2w1fBgfycK1PsR2kH1ZHA9fvXHO-ADJKlLt0GgZeB-1NupN3bVOun20M30lG-0v0ZmVlTdXfzlFr6v7l-VjvH5-eFou1nFBcg4xzaBgjFOraJZTrGlugWc5x0xZlRttIceMKs54kai0oDbjmTKpJCZhuc4KOkU349zOtdshXCc27eCasFIQDCRNgg4cqNuR-n3JGSs6V9bhXoFB_CgUQaH4VRjY-cjuysrs_wfF6u1u7PgGQNF2FQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2102653651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Fritz, Kelley A. ; Whiles, Matt R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Kelley A. ; Whiles, Matt R.</creatorcontrib><description>Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or emigration of juveniles to adult habitats.
We quantified net nutrient fluxes associated with amphibian migrations across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of eight temporary ponds in Illinois, USA. We measured carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) subsidies from terrestrial environments to ponds, in the form of eggs, and the reciprocal subsidies from ponds to terrestrial environments via juvenile emigration.
Juvenile emergence biomass did not follow patterns of egg biomass, as not all species bred successfully in each pond, resulting in variability in the magnitude of nutrient fluxes both across ponds and species.
The terrestrial environment was not always the recipient system of net nutrient fluxes. Hydroperiod, trophic interactions and species composition explained some dynamics of N and P subsidies.
Anthropogenic alterations that affect amphibian communities, such as habitat fragmentation and conversion for agriculture and urbanisation, could have large‐scale impacts on nutrient fluxes and connectivity of temporary pond–forest systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal migration ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic reptiles ; Biomass ; Boundaries ; Dynamics ; Eggs ; Emigration ; energy flux ; Fluxes ; Forces (mechanics) ; Gravity ; Habitat fragmentation ; Human influences ; Interactions ; Intermittent lakes ; Juveniles ; migration ; Migrations ; Mineral nutrients ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient dynamics ; Nutrient transport ; Nutrients ; Phosphorus ; Ponds ; resource subsidy ; Small mammals ; Species composition ; stoichiometry ; Subsidies ; Temporary ponds ; temporary pools ; Terrestrial environments ; Trophic relationships ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2018-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1250-1259</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-380c4473fb38931d39f0789714bfb9edf09143b747c5b6c3f878be6a2e549d8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-380c4473fb38931d39f0789714bfb9edf09143b747c5b6c3f878be6a2e549d8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9773-5905</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffwb.13130$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffwb.13130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Kelley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiles, Matt R.</creatorcontrib><title>Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or emigration of juveniles to adult habitats.
We quantified net nutrient fluxes associated with amphibian migrations across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of eight temporary ponds in Illinois, USA. We measured carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) subsidies from terrestrial environments to ponds, in the form of eggs, and the reciprocal subsidies from ponds to terrestrial environments via juvenile emigration.
Juvenile emergence biomass did not follow patterns of egg biomass, as not all species bred successfully in each pond, resulting in variability in the magnitude of nutrient fluxes both across ponds and species.
The terrestrial environment was not always the recipient system of net nutrient fluxes. Hydroperiod, trophic interactions and species composition explained some dynamics of N and P subsidies.
Anthropogenic alterations that affect amphibian communities, such as habitat fragmentation and conversion for agriculture and urbanisation, could have large‐scale impacts on nutrient fluxes and connectivity of temporary pond–forest systems.</description><subject>Animal migration</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>energy flux</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forces (mechanics)</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Interactions</subject><subject>Intermittent lakes</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>migration</subject><subject>Migrations</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Nutrient transport</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>resource subsidy</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>stoichiometry</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Temporary ponds</subject><subject>temporary pools</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Trophic relationships</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AaRmBjSHl8SJ2OpKCBVYgExWnZsi1S51U5UuvURkHjDPgmGsHKWf_nO7UPoGsMMh5rbnZphiimcoAmmaRITRvgpmgCwNE6Awzm68H4DAFnCyQSpRd29l6qUzfHwWRtdyt7oqBl6V5qmj2w1fBgfycK1PsR2kH1ZHA9fvXHO-ADJKlLt0GgZeB-1NupN3bVOun20M30lG-0v0ZmVlTdXfzlFr6v7l-VjvH5-eFou1nFBcg4xzaBgjFOraJZTrGlugWc5x0xZlRttIceMKs54kai0oDbjmTKpJCZhuc4KOkU349zOtdshXCc27eCasFIQDCRNgg4cqNuR-n3JGSs6V9bhXoFB_CgUQaH4VRjY-cjuysrs_wfF6u1u7PgGQNF2FQ</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Fritz, Kelley A.</creator><creator>Whiles, Matt R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-5905</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands</title><author>Fritz, Kelley A. ; Whiles, Matt R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-380c4473fb38931d39f0789714bfb9edf09143b747c5b6c3f878be6a2e549d8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal migration</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>energy flux</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forces (mechanics)</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Interactions</topic><topic>Intermittent lakes</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>migration</topic><topic>Migrations</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Nutrient transport</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>resource subsidy</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>stoichiometry</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Temporary ponds</topic><topic>temporary pools</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Trophic relationships</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Kelley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiles, Matt R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fritz, Kelley A.</au><au>Whiles, Matt R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1250</spage><epage>1259</epage><pages>1250-1259</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><abstract>Resource subsidies of energy and nutrients can be transported via physical forces, such as gravity, wind or water and biotic processes, such as animal migration or emigration. Migratory transport of nutrient subsidies may be associated with reproductive processes, such as the deposition of eggs or emigration of juveniles to adult habitats.
We quantified net nutrient fluxes associated with amphibian migrations across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of eight temporary ponds in Illinois, USA. We measured carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) subsidies from terrestrial environments to ponds, in the form of eggs, and the reciprocal subsidies from ponds to terrestrial environments via juvenile emigration.
Juvenile emergence biomass did not follow patterns of egg biomass, as not all species bred successfully in each pond, resulting in variability in the magnitude of nutrient fluxes both across ponds and species.
The terrestrial environment was not always the recipient system of net nutrient fluxes. Hydroperiod, trophic interactions and species composition explained some dynamics of N and P subsidies.
Anthropogenic alterations that affect amphibian communities, such as habitat fragmentation and conversion for agriculture and urbanisation, could have large‐scale impacts on nutrient fluxes and connectivity of temporary pond–forest systems.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/fwb.13130</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-5905</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-5070 |
ispartof | Freshwater biology, 2018-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1250-1259 |
issn | 0046-5070 1365-2427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2102653651 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal migration Anthropogenic factors Aquatic reptiles Biomass Boundaries Dynamics Eggs Emigration energy flux Fluxes Forces (mechanics) Gravity Habitat fragmentation Human influences Interactions Intermittent lakes Juveniles migration Migrations Mineral nutrients Nitrogen Nutrient dynamics Nutrient transport Nutrients Phosphorus Ponds resource subsidy Small mammals Species composition stoichiometry Subsidies Temporary ponds temporary pools Terrestrial environments Trophic relationships Urbanization |
title | Amphibian‐mediated nutrient fluxes across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries of temporary wetlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amphibian%E2%80%90mediated%20nutrient%20fluxes%20across%20aquatic%E2%80%93terrestrial%20boundaries%20of%20temporary%20wetlands&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Fritz,%20Kelley%20A.&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1250&rft.epage=1259&rft.pages=1250-1259&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fwb.13130&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2102653651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2102653651&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |