Consumer empowerment in insurance: Effects on performance risk perceptions in decision making

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to enhance the understanding of consumer empowerment in the relationship between consumers and service providers. It draws on self-efficacy theory to conceptualize consumer empowerment and explain the impact on perceived performance risk in insurance decision maki...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of bank marketing 2018-09, Vol.36 (6), p.1073-1097
Hauptverfasser: Buehler, Pascal, Maas, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1097
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1073
container_title International journal of bank marketing
container_volume 36
creator Buehler, Pascal
Maas, Peter
description PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to enhance the understanding of consumer empowerment in the relationship between consumers and service providers. It draws on self-efficacy theory to conceptualize consumer empowerment and explain the impact on perceived performance risk in insurance decision making.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs data collected from an online survey involving 487 consumers in Switzerland, who recently decided on an insurance service. A structural equation model quantifies both the psychological effects on consumers’ perception of insurance services and behavioral effects on their decision-making process.FindingsPerceived consumer empowerment is conceptualized by perceived self-efficacy and perceived controllability. Both have a significant impact on perceived performance risk, while the former is partially mediated by the preference to delegate the decision to a surrogate. Moreover, customers’ involvement in the purchase process moderates both the direct and indirect effect of perceived self-efficacy on perceived performance risk.Research limitations/implicationsThe results are based on consumers’ perceptions from a single country. Furthermore, consumers’ perceptions were surveyed with a time lag after the decision-making process. To increase rigor, perceptions should be collected during decision making.Practical implicationsResults show that consumer empowerment can be employed as a risk reduction strategy. Consumers with self-efficacy and controllability beliefs perceive significantly less performance risk; however, practitioners should consider that consumers are also motivated to make decisions independently rather than delegating their decisions. Furthermore, consumer empowerment depends on consumer will. For largely indifferent consumers, empowerment does not affect risk or decision delegation preference.Originality/valueThe study is among the few empirical works to examine the effects of consumer empowerment on the consumer-service provider relationship on an individual level. Furthermore, applying consumer empowerment in relationship marketing implies a shift in research focus to the question of how consumers construe decision-making situations rather than objectively measuring the state of consumer relationship.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/IJBM-12-2016-0182
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2102364280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2102364280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-d47a43ba0a5fa167aa0866df03d98af0d8284808ad947ea382542c657061f7833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLsR19F7b55davExMuJG1yG2CcxgHyYt4r-3ZYQDZ_NxDnyMXSLcIIK93bzcv3IkToCaA1o6YgUaZbkqhTlmBZBWnASJU3aW8x4ApCl1wa6qvstTG9I6tEP_E1IbunG96-bkKfmuDufsJPqvHC7-e8U-Hh_eq2e-fXvaVHdbXhOpkTfSeCk-PXgVPWrjPVitmwiiKa2P0Fiy0oL1TSlN8MKSklRrZUBjNFaIFbs-7A6p_55CHt2-n1I3XzpCIKElWZgpPFB16nNOIboh7Vqffh2CW0y4xYRDcosJt5gQf--LTv4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2102364280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consumer empowerment in insurance: Effects on performance risk perceptions in decision making</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Buehler, Pascal ; Maas, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Pascal ; Maas, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to enhance the understanding of consumer empowerment in the relationship between consumers and service providers. It draws on self-efficacy theory to conceptualize consumer empowerment and explain the impact on perceived performance risk in insurance decision making.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs data collected from an online survey involving 487 consumers in Switzerland, who recently decided on an insurance service. A structural equation model quantifies both the psychological effects on consumers’ perception of insurance services and behavioral effects on their decision-making process.FindingsPerceived consumer empowerment is conceptualized by perceived self-efficacy and perceived controllability. Both have a significant impact on perceived performance risk, while the former is partially mediated by the preference to delegate the decision to a surrogate. Moreover, customers’ involvement in the purchase process moderates both the direct and indirect effect of perceived self-efficacy on perceived performance risk.Research limitations/implicationsThe results are based on consumers’ perceptions from a single country. Furthermore, consumers’ perceptions were surveyed with a time lag after the decision-making process. To increase rigor, perceptions should be collected during decision making.Practical implicationsResults show that consumer empowerment can be employed as a risk reduction strategy. Consumers with self-efficacy and controllability beliefs perceive significantly less performance risk; however, practitioners should consider that consumers are also motivated to make decisions independently rather than delegating their decisions. Furthermore, consumer empowerment depends on consumer will. For largely indifferent consumers, empowerment does not affect risk or decision delegation preference.Originality/valueThe study is among the few empirical works to examine the effects of consumer empowerment on the consumer-service provider relationship on an individual level. Furthermore, applying consumer empowerment in relationship marketing implies a shift in research focus to the question of how consumers construe decision-making situations rather than objectively measuring the state of consumer relationship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-2323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJBM-12-2016-0182</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Bank marketing ; Consumer behavior ; Consumer protection ; Consumers ; Decision making ; Digital technology ; Empowerment ; Insurance industry ; Insurance policies ; Perceptions ; Power ; Self image ; Self-efficacy</subject><ispartof>International journal of bank marketing, 2018-09, Vol.36 (6), p.1073-1097</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-d47a43ba0a5fa167aa0866df03d98af0d8284808ad947ea382542c657061f7833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Consumer empowerment in insurance: Effects on performance risk perceptions in decision making</title><title>International journal of bank marketing</title><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to enhance the understanding of consumer empowerment in the relationship between consumers and service providers. It draws on self-efficacy theory to conceptualize consumer empowerment and explain the impact on perceived performance risk in insurance decision making.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs data collected from an online survey involving 487 consumers in Switzerland, who recently decided on an insurance service. A structural equation model quantifies both the psychological effects on consumers’ perception of insurance services and behavioral effects on their decision-making process.FindingsPerceived consumer empowerment is conceptualized by perceived self-efficacy and perceived controllability. Both have a significant impact on perceived performance risk, while the former is partially mediated by the preference to delegate the decision to a surrogate. Moreover, customers’ involvement in the purchase process moderates both the direct and indirect effect of perceived self-efficacy on perceived performance risk.Research limitations/implicationsThe results are based on consumers’ perceptions from a single country. Furthermore, consumers’ perceptions were surveyed with a time lag after the decision-making process. To increase rigor, perceptions should be collected during decision making.Practical implicationsResults show that consumer empowerment can be employed as a risk reduction strategy. Consumers with self-efficacy and controllability beliefs perceive significantly less performance risk; however, practitioners should consider that consumers are also motivated to make decisions independently rather than delegating their decisions. Furthermore, consumer empowerment depends on consumer will. For largely indifferent consumers, empowerment does not affect risk or decision delegation preference.Originality/valueThe study is among the few empirical works to examine the effects of consumer empowerment on the consumer-service provider relationship on an individual level. Furthermore, applying consumer empowerment in relationship marketing implies a shift in research focus to the question of how consumers construe decision-making situations rather than objectively measuring the state of consumer relationship.</description><subject>Bank marketing</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer protection</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Insurance industry</subject><subject>Insurance policies</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Self-efficacy</subject><issn>0265-2323</issn><issn>1758-5937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLsR19F7b55davExMuJG1yG2CcxgHyYt4r-3ZYQDZ_NxDnyMXSLcIIK93bzcv3IkToCaA1o6YgUaZbkqhTlmBZBWnASJU3aW8x4ApCl1wa6qvstTG9I6tEP_E1IbunG96-bkKfmuDufsJPqvHC7-e8U-Hh_eq2e-fXvaVHdbXhOpkTfSeCk-PXgVPWrjPVitmwiiKa2P0Fiy0oL1TSlN8MKSklRrZUBjNFaIFbs-7A6p_55CHt2-n1I3XzpCIKElWZgpPFB16nNOIboh7Vqffh2CW0y4xYRDcosJt5gQf--LTv4</recordid><startdate>20180912</startdate><enddate>20180912</enddate><creator>Buehler, Pascal</creator><creator>Maas, Peter</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180912</creationdate><title>Consumer empowerment in insurance</title><author>Buehler, Pascal ; Maas, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-d47a43ba0a5fa167aa0866df03d98af0d8284808ad947ea382542c657061f7833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bank marketing</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer protection</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Insurance industry</topic><topic>Insurance policies</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Self-efficacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of bank marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buehler, Pascal</au><au>Maas, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consumer empowerment in insurance: Effects on performance risk perceptions in decision making</atitle><jtitle>International journal of bank marketing</jtitle><date>2018-09-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1073</spage><epage>1097</epage><pages>1073-1097</pages><issn>0265-2323</issn><eissn>1758-5937</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to enhance the understanding of consumer empowerment in the relationship between consumers and service providers. It draws on self-efficacy theory to conceptualize consumer empowerment and explain the impact on perceived performance risk in insurance decision making.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs data collected from an online survey involving 487 consumers in Switzerland, who recently decided on an insurance service. A structural equation model quantifies both the psychological effects on consumers’ perception of insurance services and behavioral effects on their decision-making process.FindingsPerceived consumer empowerment is conceptualized by perceived self-efficacy and perceived controllability. Both have a significant impact on perceived performance risk, while the former is partially mediated by the preference to delegate the decision to a surrogate. Moreover, customers’ involvement in the purchase process moderates both the direct and indirect effect of perceived self-efficacy on perceived performance risk.Research limitations/implicationsThe results are based on consumers’ perceptions from a single country. Furthermore, consumers’ perceptions were surveyed with a time lag after the decision-making process. To increase rigor, perceptions should be collected during decision making.Practical implicationsResults show that consumer empowerment can be employed as a risk reduction strategy. Consumers with self-efficacy and controllability beliefs perceive significantly less performance risk; however, practitioners should consider that consumers are also motivated to make decisions independently rather than delegating their decisions. Furthermore, consumer empowerment depends on consumer will. For largely indifferent consumers, empowerment does not affect risk or decision delegation preference.Originality/valueThe study is among the few empirical works to examine the effects of consumer empowerment on the consumer-service provider relationship on an individual level. Furthermore, applying consumer empowerment in relationship marketing implies a shift in research focus to the question of how consumers construe decision-making situations rather than objectively measuring the state of consumer relationship.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJBM-12-2016-0182</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-2323
ispartof International journal of bank marketing, 2018-09, Vol.36 (6), p.1073-1097
issn 0265-2323
1758-5937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2102364280
source Emerald Journals
subjects Bank marketing
Consumer behavior
Consumer protection
Consumers
Decision making
Digital technology
Empowerment
Insurance industry
Insurance policies
Perceptions
Power
Self image
Self-efficacy
title Consumer empowerment in insurance: Effects on performance risk perceptions in decision making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A41%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumer%20empowerment%20in%20insurance:%20Effects%20on%20performance%20risk%20perceptions%20in%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20bank%20marketing&rft.au=Buehler,%20Pascal&rft.date=2018-09-12&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1073&rft.epage=1097&rft.pages=1073-1097&rft.issn=0265-2323&rft.eissn=1758-5937&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJBM-12-2016-0182&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2102364280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2102364280&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true